(deth2FLAME)

titsay
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
we're not kids anymore.
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
trying on a metaphor
Sade Olutola

No title available

PR's Tumblrdome
untitled

JVL
Show & Tell
hello vonnie
almost home
sheepfilms
official daine visual archive
YOU ARE THE REASON

Discoholic 🪩

#extradirty
The Bowery Presents
Jules of Nature
seen from United States

seen from Germany

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from TĂĽrkiye
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States

seen from Spain
seen from United States

seen from Netherlands
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Singapore
seen from Kazakhstan
seen from France
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
@deth2flame-blog
(deth2FLAME)
what's your reason to exist youtube: https://youtu.be/NqvrhCtL4sw - LYRICS - i feel so fucking lonely and in constant tentation to choose the fucking drugs, to go back to frustration to end this dam
the story of a metal band that never came to be. LINK IN BIO, PLEASE SHARE ❤ POR FAVOR COMPARTAN EN REDES 🙌 #trap #metal #trapmusic #metalhead #hiphop #sad #emo #emorap #posthardcore #metalcore #djent #altrock #alternativerock #raprock #rapmetal #rock #rap #deth2flame #PRISMATIC
a story of a metal band that never came to be download by clicking on more youtube link: https://youtu.be/zAIkTZX5gig guitars by Dario Meza, my bro
a story of a metal band that never came to be.
a thank you to the most important person in my life youtube: https://youtu.be/LsS5hTXErPg - LYRICS - if i could find a way to tell you exactly how i feel about you to me you're everything everything
- a thank you to the most important person in my life -
youtube:Â youtu.be/LsS5hTXErPg
one of those songs you always wanna dedicate download by clicking on more youtube link: https://youtu.be/q5M2oIRUgQI - LYRICS - and i'd give up forever to touch you cuz i know that you feel me someho
Hypocrisy is the homage which vice pays to virtue.
François de La Rochefoucauld (via azspot)
Libertarianism: Freedom is neither in the right nor the left, but the center.
For some strange reason, I always find that most of the critiques that libertarian thinkers come up with are always directed at the left. Maybe it's just what I've seen or maybe I still have a bit of a left-wing bias from my socialist libertarian days. At first glance, it would make sense that freedom thinkers would criticise the left more as it's a lot easier to pick on and it shows anti-liberty principles in a much more obvious light than the right does. However, I'd say conservatism is just as freedom-hating as most leftist positions. How can this be, however, when the more "modern" right-wing movements are all about freedom (mostly economic), small government and all that blab? That what they'll tell you, at least, but they aren't.
I don't know a single right-winger who advocates for pro-choice ideas within the realm of abortion or recreational and medical drug use (not only cannabis, but all drugs), the abolition of civil marriage, real secularism, downsizing of military, abolition of border/immigration laws (it threatens free trade), anti-traditionalism (there's traditions which are just fucking stupid), and many more core ideas of libertarianism. Why is it then that people believe the GOP's blabbing of freedom and reduced government? They clearly want to control what people do, specially from a social standpoint. They say freedom, but there are "ifs" which shouldn't be there because they threaten that same principle of freedom that they're putting forward. From this I'd say it's reasonable to presume that a high amount of libertarians in modern times have acquired a right-wing bias. And that's completely okay, they have all the right to do so. They just shouldn't say that they're in favor of true liberty, because they're not.
Of course, this doesn't mean that the left-wing is all good, as it's also anti-liberty on really obvious stuff like gun control, economics, high taxation, "free" health care, "free" education, social welfare, and more. I'm not saying that we should stop criticizing the left as there's many things that threaten liberty in that regard, but the right is not any better. Within the traditional political spectrum (you know, that one that makes no sense whatsoever), libertarianism and other related ideologies are right in the center, therefore the criticism should go both ways.
american politics in a nutshell
Public Service Announcement
There is no justifiable reason why any individual person should have a million dollars, let alone any more.
Also, your boss is not your friend, they’re your enemy. Your boss is not your teammate, they’re your opponent. As a low-wage worker, it is your position to try to make as much money as you can, while putting in as little additional work as possible; whereas it is your boss’s position - as an exploitative capitalist - to get as much work out of you as possible for the lowest amount of money they can give you.
Tl;dr - Don’t buddy up to your rich boss. They do not have your best interests at heart, or even in mind.
keep bringing that social justice bullshit down everyone’s throats, maybe if you say this shit enough times smart people will actually start believing it
why can’t someone have more than a million dollars, but the state is entitled to have and take as much money from people as it wants?
how the fuck is your boss your enemy? exploitative capitalist? you know not all people pay their workers minimum wage and treat them like shit, right? you know that worker unions exist in order to prevent that shit from happening, right?
stop generalizing human relations within the workplace to justify your marxist desire for social justice, get some real arguments.
A libertarian is someone who believes that their body and their mind belong to themselves, and that what you choose to do with those is up to you, not up to anyone, and certainly not up to a government.
John McAfee (via nocturnals-anonymous)
“Morality was the great antidote against practical and theoretical nihilism.”
—F. Nietzsche, The Will to Power, §4 (excerpt).
A grasp on what depression is and why it’s a thing
This is going to be something mostly different from what I usually write on here, as it's not really about politics but about philosophy and maybe a bit of psychology (although please take into account that this is all personal thought and none of it is based on actual scientific research on the human mind). However, politics and philosophy are deeply related topics and they both have one objective in common: to figure out how to live better. While politics sees this from a point of view based on the masses and how individuals interact and form a society with each other, with common benefit as the goal, philosophy makes points about individual thought and how can one interact best with themselves. This topic also relates these two schools of thought behind an even bigger premise: people are unhappy. You can't deny this. Depression, anxiety, sadness, these are all things that are reported by people now more than ever before. People now, more than ever, are willing to admit that they hate themselves. And this is where I have a strong sense of what's wrong in our way of organization as a society, of how we view ourselves as individuals and how we view others.
I have strong motives to believe that depression, angst, anxiety, and general sadness are all caused by a common factor: the unability of most individuals to come into terms with their own demons. Let me clarify: everyone has problems. No matter how much money you have or how much faith you have in whatever religion you glorify, you can still fall down the pit of despair every once in a while. And many people never find the way out, even when they have absolutely all the means to. And this is the reason: fear. People fear to look inside themselves, because most of the time what we hold within ourselves is a gigantic mess of terrible, unpleasant thoughts, generated by all the problems and stress we accumulate everyday and by the horrible, pessimistic notion that society has placed in our heads: that we're replaceable. That no matter what we do, there's always someone else who can do it better than us. It's this way that we start to devaluate ourselves inside our own heads, to think we have nothing to offer to this world, as if we owed something to it (which we don't).
We start to develop an ego, a character formed inside our minds and we convince ourselves that we are this character because we don't want to accept who we really are. And the worst part is that we want people to acknowledge this character, and to even support it wholeheartedly, because if they don't they might be able to see the real person lying within, that real person that we hate. The ego starts to grow, and depending on what kind of situation we're in, we either become highly selfish or highly self-denying to the point where we don't care about ourselves anymore. We start to live for others and for the way they think about us. We wish for them to reinforce our ego in a desperate attempt to convince ourselves that we are that character. And this is how social inhibition is born inside an individual. We start to care so much about what others think that we lose track of what we think, and we suppress our inner thoughts more and more by the passing day. We fall under self-pity, we want compassion and sympathy instead of the truth, because the truth scares us. And like this we start to develop stuff like depression, anxiety and personality disorders, just for the fact that our ego prevents us from facing our own demons. For instance, people who cut themselves do it because they desperately need social acceptance. It's all a product of self-pity. And most of the time they won't realize it, as it's all mostly subconscious. Most people usually don't realize this, but "feeling bad" is an incredibly comfortable position to be in. It takes no effort to be sad. Granted, it doesn't feel good, but it's a lot easier than actually doing something for your own happiness. And this is understandable, as fighting for the sake of bringing yourself happiness is hard and needs to be constant, as your problems and demons will never stop existing. You'll never completely get rid of them, no matter how much you distract yourself from them.
This process is almost universal. You'd have to be some sort of hermit to not fall under this collective social conditioning that's been going on throughout history in general. And the worst part is that no one is at fault, really. How could someone in particular be at fault of something we've all contributed to in some way? But the thing is: we can break the circle. We can teach people that feeling sad is okay and we've succeeded at this as seeking mental help isn't taboo anymore, but we've forgotten something very important. Teaching people to accept their weaknesses and to turn them into strong points. Teaching people that living for yourself isn't wrong or selfish, in fact it's quite the opposite. It is selfish to live for others and to wish for them to reinforce your ego. It's selfish to use others as a means to feel better yourself. However, when you learn that the ego is something that will always be there and that it's healthy to keep it as long as you don't let it do damage within your own interactions with yourself and with the rest of people, that's the moment when you start to live in peace. When you stop caring so much about what others think about you. When you realize that when you dislike something, it's either because of envy or because they remind you of yourself. When you see that your opinions aren't part of yourself but are rather a sort of box that you bring with yourself everywhere you go. When you see that being friends or falling in love isn't about always being with the person in question, but being able to distance yourself from them and have nothing change between you. Keep in mind, this is not something that happens from one day to the other. This is a process that often takes a lifetime to complete. You can always learn more about yourself, and that's the key to this enigma: knowing yourself and acknowledging yourself fully, and not trying to suppress who you really are.
I have a personal philosophy that's gotten me through many situations in life, and I'd like to share it with you. It's based on a phrase from a visual novel/anime titled "Little Busters!", and it goes as following.
"To live is to lose."
This sentence, as depressing and Schopenhauerian as it sounds, is absolutely true. No matter what it is we're talking about, everything you have in life is temporary and you will eventually lose it. This means happiness isn't within not losing anything, but withing finding the way to accept loss and move on. To accept that you will eventually die and that whatever you do in life doesn't really matter too much, but that this doesn't mean that you shouldn't live your life to it's fullest. In fact, quite the contrary. It means that you can do whatever you want, not even the sky is the limit. So don't feel guilty for "wasting your time", because no time spent on what you enjoy is really wasted. Always take the red pill, as the truth will never be hurtful if you don’t let it hurt you. Live, my friends, and always remember: the only thing we have to fear is fear itself.
Capitalism is best, but not good enough.
Every once in a while (maybe a little more often than I should) I go about reading through YouTube comments on videos about politics and end up finding the craziest shit in there. Some of it is kind of sane, most of it is utter blabbing by people who clearly have formed a doctrine around their preferred political ideology. And let me tell you: making a dogma out of any type of ideology or personal philosophy is the worst obstacle one can put in front of themselves within their own development as a thinker. This is the reason why my vision on politics changes so much so fast, because I don't try to change things to suit my way of thinking, but change my way of thinking to suit reality (or what I can perceive as reality, really). This indoctrination of ideology happens often with a term that gets thrown around a lot within modern political thinking: capitalism.
Capitalism is, by definition, an economic system with many branches based on private property and competition as the main mechanisms that stimulate a market economy. Within the so called "free world", capitalism is the system that dominates by far, and for good reason. It allows for competition to serve as an incentive for individuals to become entrepreneurs and generate exchange of goods and services, which is good for the economy of a country and helps (almost) everybody in the long run. Business owners must deliver quality products that people want to buy or else their business falls. People "vote" with their money on which businesses they think are good or not so good. It's also possible to reduce monopolies and achieve absolute equality of opportunity for all businesses by implementing capitalism that operates in a free market, as in free from statist principles or any type of government regulation. This allows for new ideas to flourish into existence and for enterprise to be a solid part of daily human interactions. It helps reduce greediness to a minimum... or does it?
Let me stop on that last point for a second and bring up Marx real quick. A large portion of his theory was based on exploitation of labor. He believed that in order to stop business owners from exploiting their workers, private property should be abolished and the workers themselves should own the means of production, generating more fairness within the workplace. I'm no Marxist by any stretch of the imagination, but what he witnessed in order to arrive to this conclusion wasn't a crazy invention inside his head. Exploitation of labor is completely real, and not just during the industrial revolution. We have workers earning jack shit today. And this is the point that brings me to my main criticism of capitalism. What mechanisms does it have to stop enterprise owners from exploiting their workers?
Let's put ourselves in a situation. Let's say worker A is in, I don't know, the construction business. He becomes employed by a company, and starts earning much less than what he actually needs in order to survive in a capitalist society. He also works a lot more than he should. Clearly, something must be wrong, maybe this company has a greedy leader. Under most cases, worker A would either reduce his expenses in order to live with the salary he's receiving in this company, or would look for a job somewhere else, and that would be the end of it. Sadly, it's rarely that easy. What happens if he goes somewhere else to look for better working conditions, but he finds more of the same bad treatment? What happens when the whole system of companies is colluded in order for there to be no decent place for worker A to work in? And here's the big issue, this actually happens. People work and work and earn barely enough to get through the month, and then when they try to find a better job they end up getting more of the same crap. Why? Wasn't capitalism supposed to be a meritocracy, where hard work pays off? Wasn't capitalism supposed to be a system where your individual capabilities are more important than anything else?
Look. I think free market capitalism is a great economic system, it has many advantages over any other system of this nature and it could work wonderfully, but the problem I've mentioned here is real and it only shows that capitalism needs to be modified in order to benefit the working class. And that's where my confusion arises. What mechanisms could the free market operate under that would allow for more fair conditions for workers without taking away all the advantages that it has thanks to the lack of government intervention? This is where I don't know where to go. I'm no political mastermind, I'm just really passionate about this stuff. And the issue at hand here is that I haven't found an answer to this question that keeps me satisfied. Whenever I start researching about capitalism and it's complicated relationship with exploitation of labor, most people supporting capitalism just ignore the topic altogether and people who are anti-capitalist use this to their advantage, but what good is an argument if no one is paying attention? Am I just missing something really obvious? Well, maybe there is no answer. Maybe it's true that nothing, specially something as vast and more or less relative as economics can be perfect. Maybe capitalism is doomed to be the exploitist system forever, or maybe I'm just not smart enough to figure out what the answer to this enigma is. Maybe the solution is already there and I’m just unable to grasp it yet. Who knows.
Making a video about live Donald Trump supporters being idiots is irrelevant bullshit.
Making a video about live Bernie Sanders supporters being idiots is irrelevant bullshit.
There is no more biased way to misrepresent a politician’s support base than selecting a few out of a crowd and showing their idiocy.