"oooo i'd draw that but i can't draw"
brother get this through your head
NOBODY can draw
we are literally
ALL
BULLSHITTING
One Nice Bug Per Day

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣

Love Begins

No title available
Sweet Seals For You, Always
🪼
hello vonnie

Kiana Khansmith
Three Goblin Art
we're not kids anymore.
AnasAbdin
Mike Driver
Cosimo Galluzzi

⁂

blake kathryn

JVL

Discoholic 🪩

祝日 / Permanent Vacation

Kaledo Art
todays bird

seen from Australia

seen from Türkiye
seen from Canada
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye

seen from United States

seen from Colombia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Bolivia
seen from Bolivia
seen from Bolivia
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
@deyesofsoul
"oooo i'd draw that but i can't draw"
brother get this through your head
NOBODY can draw
we are literally
ALL
BULLSHITTING
How I want the rest of my life to feel
Too warm for snow
New illustration for Harugo No Mayu print collection!
フクロウ パラダイス・・・
写真参考に背景ワンドロ練習
写真模写ワンドロ2
背景練習
FF7RE Aerith
HAO
There’s a protest going on against AI art over on artstation, so I feel like now is the time for me to make a statement on this issue!
I wholeheartedly support the ongoing protest against AI art. Why? Because my artwork is included in the datasets used to train these image generators without my consent. I get zero compensation for the use of my art, even though these image generators cost money to use, and are a commercial product.
Musicians are not being treated the same way. Stability has a music generator that only uses royalty free music in their dataset. Their words: “Because diffusion models are prone to memorization and overfitting, releasing a model trained on copyrighted data could potentially result in legal issues.” Why is the work of visual artists being treated differently?
Many have compared image generators to human artists seeking out inspiration. Those two are not the same. My art is literally being fed into these generators through the datasets, and spat back out of a program that has no inherent sense of what is respectful to artists. As long as my art is literally integrated into the system used to create the images, it is commercial use of my art without my consent.
Until there is an ethically sourced database that compensates artists for the use of their images, I am against AI art. I also think platforms should do everything they can to prevent scraping of their content for these databases.
Artists, speak out against this predatory practice! Our art should not be exploited without our consent, and we deserve to be compensated when our art is exploited for commercial use.
Grasp
Inspired by the Pillars of Creation star cluster
Haku ら臆仮
So tired...
But i gotta keep going...
Days like this make me feel like im truly lost and just aimlessly wandering...
Everyone says just keep going but I feel like im not going anywhere...
So tired...
Breeze | Wish