there is this funny thing on here where sexual attraction to children is defined to an absurdly high standard that requires explicitly legally barred material as proof of its existence from the same group of women who call people transmisogynists for saying things like "I should be able to talk about racists even if they are trans." we talk about no other action like this. the bar for being considered as someone expressing sexual attraction to children is, bizarrely, sky high. why?
when I see a white boy with a /k/ and /r9k/ addiction reading The Turner Diaries and Camp of the Saints and sharing excerpts, my thought process is not "oh well, he hasn't gone ahead and told a Jewish person to die to their face, who's to know if he's an antisemite!" my thought is that there's a racist antisemitic boy in racist antisemitic groups reading racist antisemitic literature.
when I see a white queer with an allergy to personal growth and responsibility because they're Queer they can't be an Oppressor who speaks up on racism only to go "you can't talk about us being racist we'll get killed, why would you want to talk about racism anyway nobody benefits from being told about someone being racist", my thought process is not "phew, she hasn't called me a slur or sent Libs of Tiktok my address, she couldn't be racist!" my thought is that there's a racist queer in racist circles sharing racist beliefs that protect racists.
when I see a white transfem with a fetish for little girls sharing art depicting little girls in sexual positions and being molested, writing detailed fantasies about wanting to rape little girls or be a little girl who is raped, and sharing that criticism of said material or fetishes is somehow transmisogynistic and antifemonist, my thought process is not "phew, she hasn't had any Discord grooming allegations and hasn't posted CSEM on her public blog, she can't be a pedophile!" my thought is that there's a pedophile transfem in pedophilic circles sharing pedophilic beliefs that protect pedophiles.
this is also why they're so big on talking about Harm as a quantifiable thing that they, of course, are the sole arbiters of. the Harm of not being able to talk about someone being racist or tell people publicly that someone is racist is, to them, near zero, because they do not give a fuck about racism and how it affects its victims. the "youthlib" (read: pro-youth sexual liberation for their own sexual interests) ones on here believe fetishised abuse of children also has a Harm factor of near zero because for all they falsely profess to care about children more than any other, they do not care about the feelings of the group they are fetishising. they do not care about the digital abuse of children or how it affects its victims, and they do not care that their behaviour aligns itself with those who abuse children in real life and digitally because they do not care about children.
a racist to these people is only someone who is screaming racial slurs directly at you - they choose the definition. all other racist behaviour is incidental and easy to sweep under the rug. a pedophile to these people is someone who, contrary to the "sexually attracted to children" definition, is actively sexually abusing children and sharing CSEM - they choose the definition. all other pedophilic behaviour is incidental and easy to sweep under the rug.
if someone went "despite all the talk about 'racists' on Tumblr there is ZERO EVIDENCE of anyone going up to someone and calling them a nigger" because that's their bar for racism, what would you think of them and their beliefs? what would it say about them?
