I think people (myself included in some cases) in this fandom are really too willing to say something that they've fully imagined would be narratively dissatisfying. it's like idk. I think it depends
maybe it's just an extension of that "why would I imagine a game I like is going to be bad" thing I talked about awhile ago, but it genuinely is starting to bug me how many posts I see that dismiss a vague idea because it "wouldn't work narratively" (even when I agree). it's just like.. well idk maybe it could. maybe the narrative isn't going the way you think it is based on the half of the story you've seen. maybe it would use that idea in a completely different way than you're imagining and it would rule. maybe the writing would rise to support the idea instead of getting shoved to the side in the way you're imagining.
and that's definitely not to say that there aren't some things that would genuinely be unsatisfying, no matter how they're written. it's just that I think what a lot of people are grasping for in these posts is something more like "I wouldn't like (this specific scenario I've imagined for) it"













