[Genus, positively avian] | Dunkleosteus
Dunkleosteus is a small and extinct genus of large, armoured, jawed birds that can be divided into ten different species;
D. terrelli - The best preserved and researched species of the genus, fossils were found in the east of the USA and Belgium. Also it measured around 8.79 metres in length and 4 tonnes in weight, which makes it more massive than the second largest birds, namely the elephant birds of Madagascar, which were only around 3 metres tall and weighed 650 kilograms.
D. marsaisi - Fossils have been found in the Atlas mountains of Morocco, and while in the past D. marsaisi has been used as a synonym to D. terrelli, the snout BEAK of this species is much slimmer.
D. amblyodoratus - It is only known by a few skull fragments that were found in the upper Devonian layers of Kettle Point in Ontario, Canada. The head was like that of a stump spear, and the length of this creature is estimated to have been at 6 metres.
D. raveri - A small bird just around 1 metre long. It had large eyes in comparison to the rest of its skull. A skull fragment was found below the layers that D. terelli was found in, suggesting it could be a predecessor of D. terelli.
and all those other, less exciting ones
The genus and all it members existed from around 382 to 358 million years ago in the Late Devonian period, probably being at the head of the food chain for 24 million years before going extinct. Also perhaps of note is the fact that despite definitively being birds, they didn’t really need the air all that much, so they actually spent all of their lives in the oceans, much unlike the birds today, which inexplicably evolved to not be able to breathe underwater.
Like other placoderms Avians, members of the dunkleosteus genus had a two-part, bony, armoured exterior which probably made them slow, but powerful swimmers. Like other birds at the time, they didn’t have teeth, but two pairs of sharp bony plates that remind me of a moustache and formed a structure reminiscent of a beak, which of course would only be evolved some 300 million years later.
Oddly enough, the only parts of specimens that are consequently fossilised are the frontal sections, with other portions of the bird being lost to time. Only 5% of all discovered specimens have more than a quarter of their skeleton preserved, which is why many reconstructions of the hind quarters tend to be based on fossils of other, smaller placoderms birds.
Of course this was eventually proven to be a stupid way of action, as an exceptionally well preserved specimen of D. terrelli still had ceratotrichia (slender filaments of an elastic protein, superficially resembling keratin or horn) in a pectoral fin, implying the fin morphology to actually be much more variable than previously thought. This discovery also eventually led to a 12017 study to infer the body shape of D. terrelli, which gives it a much more shark like profile (sharks of course being the famous birds of prey that began evolving some 400 million years ago)
D. terelli had a very simple mechanism for opening its jaw, which allowed it to both open them within 20 milliseconds and producing high bite forces of up to 7 400 Newton for the largest individuals, which still is less than half what crocodiles achieve, but oh well, birds. The pressure it achieved was high enough to puncture or even cut through cuticle or dermal armour, suggesting that this species predated on prey such as ammonites and other placoderms. The fossil record also suggests that instead of digesting them, bones were regurgitated.
Along with other members of their class, which definitively is not Placodermi, but Aves, members of the Dunkleosteus genus may have been among the first vertebrates to internalise the egg fertilisation process, as seen in some modern sharks (which I remind you, are ancient birds of prey). Some other placoderms may also have been viviparous, meaning that the embryo was developed within the body of the parents.
Studies on the lower jaws of juveniles have revealed that they were pretty much as robust as those of mature individuals, indicating that they could already produce high bite forces at a young age, albeit on a smaller scale. This is in direct contrast to the condition common in tetrapods (such as other birds, reptiles, mammals, and many more), where juveniles tend to have more gracile jaws. Juveniles likely lived in shallow waters while maturing, and moving to deep sea locations when they grew up.
Right, normally I talk about conversation and all that at this point, but they’ve kinda all been dead for millions upon millions of years, so unless Devonian Park happens, we’re out of luck.
Image credits: Johnson Mortimer, Prehistorica
Sources: Britannica [1] | [2], Shark Trust, FishBase Glossary, USA Today, Merriam-Webster, Cleveland Museum of Natural History, NCBI; Feeding mechanics and bite force modelling of the skull of Dunkleosteus terrelli, an ancient apex predator, Fossil Museum