so this asshole pulled the ol' reblog and block, which usually I will simply ignore and go about my day, but this cunt, this utter waste of an internet connection, decided to say that I, an autistic person, was calling them "retarded" above. can you point to where in my post I say the word retarded? this fuck cannot read omfg.
>fucking joe schmuck stuck in line for a gig actually had fuck all power over the venue's policy. it's systemic. it's systems. it's corporat
fuck it, let's break this down bit by bit, so you can waste even more people's time with your complete lack of grey matter.
"you could like, bother to ask instead of accusing and going off the rails like a wildcat in heat."
I literally said "I'm being melodramatic for comedic effect but dear fucking god." right there in my reblog. the "wildcat in heat" aspect was a joke. what wasn't a joke was being tired of people refusing to understand my posts then co-opting them for their bullshit. I linked you to posts explaining this and more of my beliefs.
"people believe that suffering is a good thing. people believe that suffering is deserved, and that anyone who circumvents this is a horrible person. people are supposed to suffer. this is a cultural norm: literally, suffering makes you a better person."
crying and screaming and punching walls. my dude. I explained things to you. take a step back. what puts ideas like that in their heads? what manipulates people into accepting the suffering it bestows upon them? why do you keep individualising systemic issues? oh right it's because the system tells you to.
this is fucking stupid. you're stupid. you see people being told they deserve to suffer, then being made to suffer, and then you go "it's their fault they're suffering. they should fix it themselves."
again, you said "they're voluntarily choosing to suffer". my dude.
"you are engaging in it right now, flinging all kinds of filth here and going off the rails instead of bothering to USE YOUR BRAIN, as you say."
"flinging filth"? the jokes. the jokes I said were jokes. born out of frustration because people keep saying dumb shit on my posts?
also, calling a mentally ill person "off the rails" right before...
"would you like to clarify why you think stupidity, retardation, is a good insult on a post about disability?"
would you like to explain why you said kanye was right? I can't believe you said kanye was right on my post. disgusting. lmao.
this is literally a "when did you stop beating your wife?"
"why you can't control yourself, and feel the need to act like this? why you expect your violence to have a good effect---"
god you're so fucking stu- sorry. I forgot, you think autistic people are stupid. you're so fucking poo poo head.
also, violence is pretty effective. like, dislike it all you want but if you'd been punched in the face every time you looked at my blog you'd be out of my hair by now.
why is insulting you indication that somebody's capacity is at all diminished from its usual level? maybe I just think you're a cunt.
"oh, it's because people believe suffering makes you a better person. violence is good."
violence is great lmao. I love pub fights. you don't seem to know much about me so here's the thing, I've got many posts about it being fucking idiotic to have black and white morality that sees violence as a conversation-ender. sometimes a bitch won't leave you alone in the pub so you slap him. but it's even more idiotic to perceive it like that when you think "learn to read" is violence.
also I've never said suffering makes you better. for example, it is morally wrong by every standard worth its salt that I must suffer through reading your bullshit. I'm doing it because it's fun.
anyway, stop projecting shit on me, especially weird moralising bullshit that I clearly don't think, to suit your dumb narrative.
"why does joe shmuck think he needs to blame the disabled people, instead of realizing that they can't stand in line?"
because they're a visible display of someone getting what he-
"because suffering is good, and if you can't tolerate the suffering, you should not be able to get the thing you want. only the good people who come out of the suffering as morally better deserve to be rewarded. can't get something for nothing, yeah?"
okay there freud let's tone this down like a lot.
"for some weird reason you don't think joe schmuck should have to use his brain?"
"he's not the worst person ever for following exactly what he's told and telling you you're a vile evil miscreant worthy of death?"
jesus fucking christ, now you're putting words in an imaginary man's mouth I can't. I actually don't know how you're this far gone.
"is it that you think he's too stupid to understand any of this? that's incredibly hateful of you to think about literally everyone in the world."
if literally everyone in the world is telling you that you're a vile evil miscreant worthy of death, maybe it's your toxic personality? I can't tell if you genuinely think you're saying something worth hearing but, if you think it is, at least proof read it before you hit send, because errors like that are pretty avoidable. it's a sentence apart, dude. it characterised what joe schmuck thinks as "you're a vile evil miscreant worthy of death" and then followed it up by asserting everyone on earth is joe schmuck. oh my god.
"nobody can possibly understand you or think about other people because they're being told to think something else? they don't have thoughts and beliefs of their own, they're just drones following "corporations"? there's no overarching system telling people why all this has to be the way it is?"
"it's systemic. it's systems. it's corporations. stop blaming fucking individuals. you sound like the idiots who talk about fucking carbon footprints." literally the first paragraph of my reply dude.
also, nice job displaying your bias against me. when I say "this is systemic" that's me saying "nobody can think for themselves", if I explain one system, capital, that's me saying people are drones following corporations, but you then say immediately that there's systems. again, these are one sentence apart. proof read your shit.
"puritanism and calvinism, the basis of most modern christianity, DO NOT EXIST???"
yeah, I'm sure the concert venue doesn't build more entrances because they think god wants people to wait in line outside, and definitely not because doing so and hiring the staff and security would cost money. you sure cracked this mystery.
"fundyism is not a thing worldwide in any religion whatsoever? MAN that's the world i want to live in"
quick question: does your government have separation of chruch and state? mine doesn't.
"nah, people don't ever think that suffering makes you a better person or that demand you should stop crying before i give you a reason to cry."
this pisses me off because I've talked at length on my blog about being an abuse survivor; you coming and parroting common shit abusers say at random people, while falsely accusing them of saying shit they never said, and generally being a cunt, is not- you know that's not okay, right? like, you know you're a cunt?
"nobody ever in the history of the world has grown up in a culture that normalizes abuse, normalizes suffering, as something to be proud of. nobody one ups each other with how terrible their lives are, how much sleep they haven't gotten! that would be fuckin WEIRD, imagine living like that! braggin about how much you've worked this week? how many meals you had to skip?"
and your decision is to blame the people victimised by that kind of system for having the thoughts it implants in their brains, and for being too immobilised by it to repair it single-handedly.
"how you're too proud to apply for welfare and won't use SNAP because that's for grubby leeches? WILD."
I'm on benefits. I know clarifying the joke apparently doesn't work on you, but this is a play on your blog title being general you btw.
"disabled people aren't ever told that their suffering is for a greater purpose or that they aren't suffering enough to be allowed accommodations. NEVER."
I have talked about the issue of means testing in multiple threads, in fact one I linked you to above was specifically about that.
"i'm not shocked you're so free with insulting people who have trouble reading. is this like a thing with you? disabled people are funny? illiteracy and people who are denied those opportunities are funny?"
you know that I know you're not actually illiterate, right? because of the whole "we're talking by writing and reading" thing? the reason it's a funny insult is because you can't grasp the simple ideas being conveyed to you, and because you're an asshole. and I don't feel guilty about using it as one because I know for sure the illiterate people aren't reading this to be upset by it anyway.
"insulting people is great praxis because comparing them to the unwashed masses shows how pure your blue blood is?"
I'm not draco malfoy, I'm not american, I've never even been to america, and I don't insult people as "praxis", I insult them if they piss me off personally. you're annoying, you're a cunt, you suck. nothing about that is activism, I don't do everything I do with a moralising equation in the back of my mind. sometimes you're actually just being a cunt and somebody will tell you as much. I genuinely don't know why you're trying to imply I'm well off and looking down upon the poor, considering I've linked you to crap about applying for and being on benefits - then again, I can tell you're too lazy to read that, because otherwise you'd know that I don't live in america given details therein.
"are you doing this because you always act like this and call it social commentary or is it because you're not slamming your head hard enough to get back to a clean slate where you can install some praxis that doesn't focus on hatewhoring?"
woah woah woah. I have amnesia. and some people have head injuries. are you making fun of that? good sir. how dare. shocked and, frankly, horrified that you would do this.
again, it's not praxis, it's just that you suck.
"with all due respect i did not think i needed to explain what an "example" is, but if you truly do not understand please ask."
are you making fun of stupid, or as you call them "retarded", people?
"i do think you're just reaching here to say nasty things, because again, making people suffer makes them better."
no, it's because you said dumb shit on my post. I was joking about in my frustration at that. if it made you suffer... that's wild. not my intent, but I can't say I'm disappointed. but was it praxis or was it vindictive? can you get your story straight? for me, it was neither. you annoyed me so I jokingly casually lightly insulted you, I've been consistent about my motive from the start lmao. you making it some weird personal bid to make you a better person or some shit is... kinda creepy? like, idk how to tell you that you are a stranger and I am not personally involved with you or invested in you. you pissed me off with some dumb shit, that's all. I made a few jokes at your expense as a result - that's literally it.
"it's why hateful content drives engagement so much more and why you chose to focus on hate yourself here instead of actual substance."
no, I linked to substance. bags and bags of substance. I said you suck because you suck.
"being upset at an example is like complaining that i'm "going off topic" when i use a metaphor to explain a point."
it's amazing. I'm communicating with an illiterate person via writing. they said it couldn't be done.
"i truly did think everyone would be familiar with the concept of glorifying suffering, i guess that's my bad for overestimating the company here."
you also suck at insults. and it's funny because you spent so long up there condemning the very implications you proceed to make. was that projection all along? you're ableist? like, I was joking when I said that you thought autistic people were stupid, but you actually do. and you're actually trying to call me autistic here, which I am. like, was that why you jumped on my post in the first place? to annoy autisic people? maybe this is why everyone hates you.
"failing familiarity, i did at least believe people would have the common courtesy to ASK instead of going off on batshit asshole rants of accusation."
pot, this is kettle. at least mine was a joke.
"you're behaving exactly like fanatic christian preachers, seeing demons everywhere and frothing at the mouth like people did to that "couch guy" who was surprise visited by his girlfriend and still gets harassed to this day by strangers."
me? seeing demons? I said a venue wasn't building more ways in because of money. you said everyone in the queue wants you to suffer and glorifies suffering and chooses to keep the queue as a thing so that they can suffer and wants you to suffer with them. which, of those two options, is really seeing demons?
"has it occurred to you that you treat people the exact same way that you complain about in your op?"
no, because I don't lmao. you're just reaching to pretend that some stranger online insulting you in response to you being a dick (in that characterising everyone how you did and blaming people for their own suffering and talking to me how you did are all peak dick behaviours) is the same as that dickish caricature you wrongly described others as. you projecting that onto me, after I dare tell you that projecting it onto others is also incorrect and cruel, neither surprises me nor makes me at all inclined to believe your absurdity. I talked about improving the system. I want to improve the system. I am not the system. nowhere on my post did I say we should hold it over individual people's heads that they're ultimately flawed or snide or whatever - it's YOU who believes that shit, it's you who twists any flaw or pain or rude action into this absurd freudian nonsense about people wanting to suffer and inflict suffering (which you believe because you massively stretch the fact that the system coerces people into glorifying and seeing virtue in the suffering it inflicts), and now you see that demon everywhere. it just shows that I was right, you didn't understand my post and you refuse to actually think deeper than "bad people". a mentally and physically disabled person telling you that you weren't characterising their post correctly, and making a few jokes that they said were jokes along the way, gets called ableist because you say autistic people are stupid with zero self-awareness and then project that onto me, in an attempt to frame me maliciously and discredit me, and so it doesn't surprise me that you squash me into your absurd worldview even when it so clearly doesn't fit. the reach here relies on assuming that I said what I said with a desire to make you suffer - an allegation that should obviously be incorrect if you were capable of thinking in anything but the demonisation of individual people. or even, simply, capable of reading.
"worse, really, based on all this, and it's clearly not a fluke from your proud links up there. just, ew. my mistake assuming you were a better person than you clearly are. i imagine you'll be glad to have thoroughly corrected my view of you."
you didn't read the links then. most were perfectly amicable. one was somebody also not understanding what you refuse to think critically about, and arguing with me. one was a long thing about why means testing is dangerous. but I suppose it's easier to not read and/or to lie about the content therein, huh?
but here you are again, moralising. the goodness of a person is determined by how politely they engage on tumblr. their value is mathematical and found by how nice they are to you. obscene.
I'm a cunt. I'm kind, but I'm not nice. I fight, I drink, I curse, and I insult pricks like you, because I'm human. you're a wokescold. a tone-policing obsessed asshole, who views the world as baddies doing battle with goodies, and the issues therein are the result simply of the baddies, and all trapped within the system who haven't kissed your boots are the baddies. I was right about you.
pixelskylines
vaporwave
stormborns
areudirty
janainaart
ellievsbear
kaledo-art
