Food waste reduction efforts often intersect with justice, equity, diversity and inclusion issues. As public-private partnerships
work to reduce food waste, it is important that transitions are equitable and inclusive for both consumers and change agents
alike. Research into this area is limited; therefore this box does not aim to explore all the inequalities that people may face
in reducing food waste globally. A recent publication by U.S.-based nonprofit ReFED is helping to shape the discussion and
informs this piece (Herd, Costantino and Leslie 2023).
Change agents
Frontline workers in all sectors of the food system are frequently responsible for implementing food waste reduction interventions, yet they often face systemic inequalities. These inequalities include poor or unsafe working conditions, receiving low wages for long or unsociable working hours, limited benefits and lack of opportunities for progression. Due to working conditions that prioritize efficiency or maximum output, those on the frontline are often unable, or unmotivated, to implement best practices to mitigate food waste generation. This can be exacerbated for women, as a significant proportion of roles within the food system are held by women, both
formally and informally and their working conditions tend to be worse than those experienced by men. Improving working conditions, working with employees to develop solutions based on their first-hand experience, and rewarding positive action may empower and enable frontline workers to deliver food waste reductions. Regarding executive and leadership roles, there is evidence that start-ups and nonprofits with leaders from marginalized groups receive less investment and grant funding. Excluding ideas and innovation from proportion s of the population is likely to exclude impactful solutions. Further, only investing in non-marginalized groups risks developing and implementing interventions that only resonate with a proportion of the population.
Consumers
Food donation is an important near-term fix for food waste, as it allows surplus food that would have become waste to be redistributed to people, oftentimes to those who are food insecure (although food sharing models exist that make surpluses available to all, often purchased at a discounted price). Often, donated items are those that are at risk of becoming waste in the short term, i.e. products with short remaining shelf lives, so may not always be appropriate to the recipient. For instance, food may not be dietarily, culturally or religiously appropriate. There is evidence that a significant proportion of people with disabilities use food banks or food assistance, therefore those with disabilities are more likely to suffer the lack of dignity that is associated with freedom of choice. These challenges can be redressed by service design: solutions such as social supermarkets, often set up like a traditional food retail outlet allowing those in need to choose items from shelves for a heavily discounted price, rather than receiving a predetermined food parcel, are common practice in some countries. Social supermarkets can also afford dignity through reserved time slots by appointment. This would allow marginalized groups, such as senior citizens who are an overrepresented population among food donation recipients, to have priority. As with other food assistance programmes, social supermarkets utilize surplus items that would have become waste. This model gives consumers choice and can in turn lead to reductions in household food waste. Another consideration should be location, to avoid food banks or other food assistance programmes being placed in inaccessible locations, with limited public transport links.
Significant proportions of food waste occur at the household level (estimated as 60 per cent in 2022) across all income levels. Ensuring that lower-income households in particular have the food management skills to use up all their food could help them stretch their budgets. Consumer education interventions must be designed to be inclusive for all, considering cultural appropriateness, language and accessibility of information. In mixed-gender households, women are more frequently responsible for food management. Efforts to reduce household food waste are likely to increase the domestic workload for women, resulting in feelings of guilt when food is wasted. Therefore, when designing household food waste interventions there should be consideration not to exacerbate gender
inequalities.