#Week 3 Reading Response Constructionism & 1:1 Computing
Constructionism means to self- construct the knowledge. In this article, the author, Papert reflects on how he could envision classrooms where students are ‘doing’, instead of just being instructed. It is like the teacher being the facilitator and the students take charge of their own learning. Making meaning and creating is what the author would like to see, as in the example of the art in the classroom; kids were working together creatively. Papert states that constructionist activity-which integrates math with art, and the children make the software- enhances the effectiveness of instruction given by a teacher in the same topic. My feeling is that if teachers are trained to include technology, and are able to integrate with the curriculum, then students will learn so much more.
In the end he sees situated learning is great for making meaning; as in the case of the science and math class. Papert uses the soap sculpture and math to show how learning by making was observed. In my own teaching experiences, I do observe how children learn more when they are given the opportunity to make meaning, by being able to choose the materials, make decisions, work creatively with other peers, and have their own strategies, and learning occurs. The teacher facilitates and allows the students to take charge of their learning: Constructionism.
The One on One Computing Initiatives article was interesting and it discussed the benefits of one on one computing. Many of the schools where I have taught at have computers but unfortunately do not work properly, are outdated, or the school lacks internet service. Another issue the schools face is that they lack computers, tablets, and or lap tops for each student. Children do go to the computer lab once per week, but this is not enough technology exposure for the students.
Researchers have long argued that for technology to make a powerful difference in student learning, students must be able to use computers more than once or twice per week in a lab at school (Penuel, 2006).
If our students are to get ahead and be tech savvy, then there needs to be improvements in our schools. In the article, it talks about children taking devices home and I happen to disagree with this because what happens to the kids that lose them, break them, or if the house holds lack Wi-Fi or internet service. In order for this ‘one on one’ initiative to work, everything needs to be in place: teachers need training, students need training, have working computers / lap tops for students, updated software, and Wi-Fi available. Each student should also have access to a lap top so they are all given the same opportunities.
As a teacher that has been frustrated with the computers in my previous school, it was easier to just teach the class without technology, as the computers never had service and the kids would get bored easily waiting for the connection.
For classrooms using wireless networks, the reliability of the network is frequently an issue and a barrier to widespread use by teachers for instruction (Penuel, 2006).
After reading the first few paragraphs, and watching Negroponte’s video, the idea of one lap top per child seemed great, but as I continued reading, I had a different point of view. Every child deserves to have their own laptop to help them learn, but if their basic needs are not being met, then lap tops are pointless. What good is having a lap top in these developing countries if there are other important things that the money can be used for; like schools, books, clean water, food etc…?
I feel the money should be utilized correctly and if the needs of these children are met, then one on one lap tops can be implemented. The article also states how many of the countries have issues using the lap tops, and the percentages of lap top use keep dropping. According to Mark Warschauer, a Professor of University of California, pointed out that laptop by itself does not completely fill the need of students in under privileged countries (Wikipedia).
In order for children to use laptops such as these, there needs to be teacher training, support for all tech issues, laptop repairs, and be able to connect the laptop work with the classroom curriculum. You just can’t give laptops out and walk away, and expect students to take charge. They need support throughout the use and guidance as to what they are to do.
Many of these countries are wasting money on the laptops, because as one country representative stated from Peru, 40% do not use, and in Alabama 80.3% of the students say they never use the laptops. So all the money wasted can be utilized for better things to include better schools, health instruction, teacher training, good working laptops or computers, updated software, and support for when problems do arise. When things are done correctly, then perhaps these countries can take part in implementing ‘One Laptop per Child’ programs that can teach the children to read; as Negroponte stated in his video.