“ive been kicked in the balls so i know what period cramps feel like”
I think getting kicked in the balls is worse

Janaina Medeiros
Peter Solarz

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
Today's Document
YOU ARE THE REASON

Product Placement
Cosimo Galluzzi

★

No title available
One Nice Bug Per Day

shark vs the universe
noise dept.
tumblr dot com
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
styofa doing anything
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
No title available
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
occasionally subtle

roma★
seen from United States

seen from Lithuania

seen from Türkiye

seen from United States

seen from Canada
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Belgium

seen from Netherlands
seen from Thailand

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Türkiye

seen from Malaysia
@eucliwoodhellscyte-blog
“ive been kicked in the balls so i know what period cramps feel like”
I think getting kicked in the balls is worse
When feminists support not going to the police over rape, they support rapists going free, they support rapists raping other women, and they support the rape culture they claim to hate so much.
okay except for no. going to the police is such a hard thing to do and sometimes it isn’t the right decision for the victim in terms of helping them recover. you probably are very uneducated on how the justice system handles sexual assault crimes, because if you actually knew anything about this topic- you wouldn’t be judging it the way you are. so stop and think before making stupid posts that will only make many rape survivors feel horrible.
Going to the police is… Hard? You know what else is hard? The healing for the next girl he rapes. So by not going to the police you’re allowing him to take other women. There is no excuse.
And what should go wrong, you fucking idiots? The police is going to shoot you? The police is going to arrest you? The worst thing that could happen is that they dont take it serious, so just try it, its better than not even trying. (not that the police wouldnt take it serious,tho...)
Boycotting all of North Carolina is ridiculous.
First of all, it turns a serious concern into a joke. The concern being predatory men going into women’s restrooms. I get it. Trans people just want to pee, but let’s address the elephant in the room, the bill isn’t talking about trans people who pass, it’s talking about people who look like men. There are men who would abuse and exploit the plights of trans people. That’s the issue and it has to be dealt with. Secondly, it alienates the people in the state who are actually on your side. It doesn’t help you.
Im still on that road "Go to the restroom your actual sex is". Its not that hard and noone can say something like "he was in the womans bathroom, but got a penis". Easy peasy, why making it hard. (not like most people would care if a man comes into woman toilets etc.)
To consider Europe a single being is the worst you could do. Everybody hates everybody. The British hate immigrants, Germans hate Italians, Italians hate the French and other Italians, the French hate everyone else
In conclusion
Eurovision is the battleground on which the old hatreds are rekindled.
Also, this is quite frankly the most accurate post i’ve ever seen in my life.
@darthkawaii42
The sad but extremely accurate truth tbh 😂😂😂
It’s so annoying when Americans treat a whole continent like one big country. “I went to Europe” Really, love? Where’d you go? Barcelona or Barnsley?
balkan. i’m just gonna leave this here…
A lot of Europeans are just natural enemies.
Like Germans and Scots
And Frenchmen and Scots
And Scots and other Scots
Damn those Scots, they ruined Scotland!
Even within the same supposed groups to have emnities. Bavarians vs Baden-Wurttembergers, Scots vs Glaswegians, Arsenal vs Manchester Fucking United.
I think I learned a lot of this watching Snarky, European stand-up because 90% is racist jokes about whatever country the comic has a beef with.
Technically its the English who hate immigrants..the rest of the UK likes them.
Mainly (i imagine) to do with england being much more densely populated than the rest of us.
I dunno, I’ve seen a lot of Germans fulfilling the stereotype lately.
Which stereotype *^*? I like hearing stereotypes about myself <3
This is a problem
Meanwhile men don’t get the right to vote unless they sign paperwork allowing the government to turn them into expendable weapons. And no protection from infant genital mutilation. And no reproductive rights. And in many areas they cannot see justice if they are raped or abused.
But yeah, a short partial list of fictonal characters with happy endings and a long partial list of dead fictional characters is a problem.
I want my protagonist to die with a dramatical ending
You know, we’d be okay with that too. But not when the characters story lines are practically nonexistent and unoriginal, and not when 80% of them don’t live. Even if all LGBTQ women characters had amazing and original storylines, an 80% death rate would still be pretty boring and lame.
Thats why you shouldnt ask for representation characters, cz they obviously end like that. Characters need alot of creativity, if thats none of the authores idea, he cant make a decent character. Write yourself one, because like that all characters end this way.
I don’t really understand your argument tbh. Why do those characters have to end like that? The writer can do whatever they want, but if they handle LGBTQ representation poorly, or really any representation poorly, they’re going to have to face the consequences of it. Especially when they write most of the other characters creatively. Changing widespread representation isn’t really as simple as “just write your own character”, unfortunately. If it were, we would have done so by now.
I think you missunderstood, I read all the time complains about not having any lgbtq characters in the movie,book, etc. and that you want representation. If a author sees that and thinks “Damn, my [thing] wont sell if I dont have any character like that” it will become a character like that. Because it was a character that wasnt originally meant to be and the authores creativity is not needed that much(you tell him hes not allowed to do that and this with the character), so he cant make a proper character or doesnt even want to, since its just for representation.
If I say “draw whatever you want, but only 3 colours”, what does it do? Right, it limits your creativity.
Okay, I see what you’re saying. But representation isn’t just having that character for the sake of having diversity, you know? When we ask for LGBTQ characters, we’re asking for characters that are just as well rounded and well written as the other characters, but that happen to be part of the LGBTQ community. If a writer can’t write a character that happens to not be the same sexual orientation or gender as they are, then I would venture to say that they probably shouldn’t be a writer. Authors and writers should start having diverse characters that ARE meant to be there, you know? That’s the whole point of this.
I know, I know. Writers should be able to do that and they know the fans want well made characters. But if youre forcing something onto someone, it will never be as good as something he decided on his own. I think they should try to make more of these chars, but I dont think they should if they dont want to.
This is a problem
Meanwhile men don’t get the right to vote unless they sign paperwork allowing the government to turn them into expendable weapons. And no protection from infant genital mutilation. And no reproductive rights. And in many areas they cannot see justice if they are raped or abused.
But yeah, a short partial list of fictonal characters with happy endings and a long partial list of dead fictional characters is a problem.
I want my protagonist to die with a dramatical ending
You know, we’d be okay with that too. But not when the characters story lines are practically nonexistent and unoriginal, and not when 80% of them don’t live. Even if all LGBTQ women characters had amazing and original storylines, an 80% death rate would still be pretty boring and lame.
Thats why you shouldnt ask for representation characters, cz they obviously end like that. Characters need alot of creativity, if thats none of the authores idea, he cant make a decent character. Write yourself one, because like that all characters end this way.
I don’t really understand your argument tbh. Why do those characters have to end like that? The writer can do whatever they want, but if they handle LGBTQ representation poorly, or really any representation poorly, they’re going to have to face the consequences of it. Especially when they write most of the other characters creatively. Changing widespread representation isn’t really as simple as “just write your own character”, unfortunately. If it were, we would have done so by now.
I think you missunderstood, I read all the time complains about not having any lgbtq characters in the movie,book, etc. and that you want representation. If a author sees that and thinks "Damn, my [thing] wont sell if I dont have any character like that" it will become a character like that. Because it was a character that wasnt originally meant to be and the authores creativity is not needed that much(you tell him hes not allowed to do that and this with the character), so he cant make a proper character or doesnt even want to, since its just for representation.
If I say "draw whatever you want, but only 3 colours", what does it do? Right, it limits your creativity.
This is a problem
Meanwhile men don’t get the right to vote unless they sign paperwork allowing the government to turn them into expendable weapons. And no protection from infant genital mutilation. And no reproductive rights. And in many areas they cannot see justice if they are raped or abused.
But yeah, a short partial list of fictonal characters with happy endings and a long partial list of dead fictional characters is a problem.
I want my protagonist to die with a dramatical ending
You know, we’d be okay with that too. But not when the characters story lines are practically nonexistent and unoriginal, and not when 80% of them don’t live. Even if all LGBTQ women characters had amazing and original storylines, an 80% death rate would still be pretty boring and lame.
Thats why you shouldnt ask for representation characters, cz they obviously end like that. Characters need alot of creativity, if thats none of the authores idea, he cant make a decent character. Write yourself one, because like that all characters end this way.
when you are waiting for your crush to respond
but you haven’t gotten a reply in 4 days
and you think “what if i’ll never get a reply?”
when you haven’t gotten a reply in 5 days and it makes you mad
and after 6 days you are like
On the seventh day of waiting, my true love sent to me
STILL NO FUCKING EMAIL
Eight days a week
I wait for your mail
Eight days a week
Is enough for me to realize you don’t care
after 9 days, your hope for a reply is just like
TEN FUCKING DAYS HOW DARE YOU
WAITING FOR 11 FUCKING DAYS
After 12 days, your life is just one big mess
14 DAYS AND I FEEL SAD AND
On day 15, you get nice mails from everyone except from the one you love
Everyone seems to be in love and you’re just sitting around waiting for a mail for 18 days and trying to stay positive
25 days and i’m checking my mails knowing there won’t be a reply
Who hurt you :c
This is a problem
Meanwhile men don’t get the right to vote unless they sign paperwork allowing the government to turn them into expendable weapons. And no protection from infant genital mutilation. And no reproductive rights. And in many areas they cannot see justice if they are raped or abused.
But yeah, a short partial list of fictonal characters with happy endings and a long partial list of dead fictional characters is a problem.
I want my protagonist to die with a dramatical ending
Source:
http://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/entscheidungen/rk19990322_2bvr039899.html
*Thank you to a coworker for the translation.
We were asked to reblog this.
Well, its like that one with rape, woman cant rape in the law, but if they rape its not legal, its just not named rape
I mean seriously this is the internet and people are upset about a joke?
Did you forget this is the internet
Mind you, if you’re that fragile, never go onto reddit or 4chan because if that’s upsetting you’ll get ptsd
There’s a difference between a dead baby joke and laughing at the death of a real child.
There’s a difference between a rape joke and laughing at someone getting raped.
I bet you’d flip your shit if sjws laughed at the death of someone because they were “problematic.”
Which… they have. Many times. Like a black man who supported the confederate flag.
And with comedians who made offensive jokes and died.
Have you ever thought that maybe, the issue isn’t that people are “offended by jokes,” but are instead disgusted by the fact that you’re laughing at someone’s death?
So anyways like I’ve said multiple times no one laughed at the death of the girl everyone laughed at the joke about her “letting it go alright” and that’s all I’m reblogging about this anymore. ^_^
I hope you understand.
That’s still “joking” about a real person’s deaths and it’s not funny at all.
Her wearing Frozen pants had nothing to do with anything AND the OP iirc is a blog that posts shot like that all the time.
I mean really OP, you trying to use the “Just a joke” justification really falls flat when… there was no joke. What was the joke there? Frozen was almost entirely irrelevant to the whole thing aside from the clothing the kid was wearing; that’s… dumb. It’s dumb and distasteful.
Oh im sorry, so ehm jokes about jews are not funny and neither jokes, because jews really got killed? They wouldnt be funny it it didnt happen. Thats the point of black humor, making fun of such things, just because you got one to a specific situation it doesnt mean it cant be a joke.
Btw it was a joke, noone said it wasnt distastefull or something(black humor, you idiots), but it was a joke, probably, because neither you nor I are able to tell that. Because how you interpret things, is none of the business of the one saying it. If you interpret it wrong = your fault.
I haven’t posted in awhile so
Happy Easter 🐇
u my pal
gay threesomes can be fun…
How about u don’t suggest to somebody that you don’t know that they have sex with you @satanic-anti-feminist
it’s a joke, dood
How about you realize that I know that and it’s still just as harmful
Example: bullies saying its “just a joke” Men making sexist jokes saying its “just a joke” You making sexual comments about someone’s selfie saying its “just a joke”
but how is it harmful?
the first and second one is because it’s hurtful towards the person.
but how is what i said harmful? explain to me.
‘You’re attractive so all I have to say about your looks is suggestive to that we have sex’
you still haven’t explained.
i wonder what it feels like being a prude.
‘All that matters about how you look is your sexual worth’
someone posts a selfie - i appreciate their looks.
also, i never said that’s all they’re worth.
stop twisting what i said and saying what you interpreted the “hidden meaning” of it to be and say what is harmful with what i actually said.
He doesnt get what a joke is, I guess. He thinks you mean that unironically
If it was ironically xP
“Feminists are taking over Ghostbusters!”, men say. “They’re ruining our childhood!”
Meanwhile little girls everywhere can no longer safely Google My Little Pony.
Shots fired
Idc about ghostbusters, I just heard it sucks.
Meanwhile fans of mlp helped making google search safe for Kids, while feminists whine that google search is unsafe, instead of helping.
And he was the inspiration for Zorro who became the inspiration for Batman.
#women invented all your favorite genres
Actually, the first person to ever have their name associated with an original written work was Enheduanna, a Sumerian princess and priestess born in 2285 BC.
In other words, the FIRST AUTHOR IN HUMAN HISTORY was a woman.
#just thought you should know
I’d also like to add that the story often considered to be the ‘world’s first modern novel’, The Tale of Genji (源氏物語), was written by a Japanese noblewoman in the 11th century.
And Frankenstein, written by 19 year old Mary Shelley, is often labeled as the first true science fiction story because the idea of the creature was based on/inspired by the experiments performed by Luigi Galvani.
Source: Double majored in English Literature and Japanese History.
I dont get it why you need to do it like this, all youre saying in my ears is: "Woman invented this and that and everything else was invented by men." I wouldnt be surprised if woman invented more than men
I’m sorry to anyone in the LGBTQ+ community in Mississippi
I had to look up what this was about, but omg. I’m terribly sorry everyone. Please stay safe!
Just when you think there is progress, someone has to take 500 steps backwards.
What happened??
Mississippi passed an anti-lgbt law, so now anyone can refuse service to lgbtq+ individuals out of ‘religious freedom’
“Under HB 1523, religion could be used by individuals or organizations to justify discrimination against LGBT people, single mothers, unwed couples, and others. Tax-payer funded faith-based organizations could: refuse to recognize the marriages of same-sex couples for provision of critical services including emergency shelter; deny children in need of loving homes placement with LGBT families including the child’s own family member; and refuse to sell or rent a for-profit home to an LGBT person – even if the organization receives government funding. As introduced, HB 1523 would also give foster families the freedom to subject an LGBTQ child to the dangerous practice of “conversion therapy” or shame a pregnant unwed girl without fear of government intervention or license suspension. It would even allow individuals to refuse to carry out the terms of a state contract for the provision of counseling services to all eligible individuals, including veterans, based on the counselor’s beliefs about LGBT people or single mothers.“
more info here
They
legalized torture
of children
if they might be gay
Brb burning down the government. For religious reasons of course, so it’s totally fine.
“Tax-payer funded faith-based organizations” hey the Constitution called, something about a separation of church and state, they seemed to think it was kind of important?
There shouldn’t ever be a “tax-payer funded faith-based organization”. Fuck Mississippi.
EDIT: FORMATTING Ok this law breaks the 14th amendment section 1: All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Essentially this law is refusing people the right to property (I’m counting adoption as property here, as well as refusing business). But my second note is has anyone read this law to its completion? Because I have. And let me tell you, it’s terrifying. This law revolves around section 2 in that the following are the moral/religious beliefs and convictions that people are allowed to refuse service to (i fixed these so that it’s easier to read): A) Marriage is or should be recognized as a man and a woman. B) Sexual relations are reserved for a man and a woman C) Male and female refers to a person’s sex as decided by anatomy and gender at birth. Sections 3 refers to actions allowed by this law. They are (shortened of course): 1A) people are allowed to perform (yaay) or refuse to perform (not yaay) a marriage, as well as refuse to serve people goods that will be used in a marriage as long as one of the 3 things in sec. 2 are met. 1b) employers are allowed to refuse, terminate, or discipline an employee of the employee if the employee meets the things in sec 2. 1c) Homeowners are allowed to refuse the sale of property to people pertaining to section 2. 2) Adoption facilities are allowed to refuse service based on sec 2 3) /*This one is a bit hard to understand. I don’t know how to paraphrase it, but it is Mississippi HB 1523 Section 3 subsection 3.*/ 4) A person is allowed to refuse treatments, counseling, or gender reassignment that is offered to them as long as it pertains to sec 2. They can also refuse psychological, counseling, or fertility services. 5) People are allowed to refuse service to people if their goods are going to be used in weddings that don’t follow sec 2. /* both part a and b of this go into detail on businesses. Basically everything you would use in a wedding. */ 6) Employers are allowed to create sex-specific standards concerning dress, restrooms, spas, baths, locker rooms, or anywhere else like that /* eg intimate */ 7a) Employees in a workplace are allowed to speak out in agreement with sec 2. 7b) Outside of the workplace, it is the employee’s freedom to speak as they like. 8a&b) Anybody from the state with the power to perform marriages are allowed to deny marriages based on sec 2. Section 4-7 is what you aren’t allowed to do, and what you can recieve grievances for. I’d list it, but it mostly has to do with taxes. Section 8 subsection 3 /* the only subsection I found interesting */ States that this law supercedes all other laws passed in Mississippi. Section 9 explains terms used Section 10 States that this law does not break the Mississippi religious freedom act (Section 11-61-1). Section 11 says that the law will be applied, with force on July 1st 2016. That is the bill in its fullest. I will tag a few people who I think should see this @thesocialjusticecourier @takashi0 @angryinkeddrunk
@on-little-cat-feet @varithoughts @slagartehfox
Maybe I’m missing something, but isn’t this all kinds of unconstitutional? Should the feds be coming down on the state goverment like the (excuse the irony) the wrath of God on this shit?
Well, as far as I know can you in germany refuse to sell anyone lol. Its your freedom to who you sell etc., it would just make the public view of your shop or whatever bad, if you refuse to sell to gay people etc.
To consider Europe a single being is the worst you could do. Everybody hates everybody. The British hate immigrants, Germans hate Italians, Italians hate the French and other Italians, the French hate everyone else
In conclusion
Eurovision is the battleground on which the old hatreds are rekindled.
Also, this is quite frankly the most accurate post i’ve ever seen in my life.
@darthkawaii42
The sad but extremely accurate truth tbh 😂😂😂
It’s so annoying when Americans treat a whole continent like one big country. “I went to Europe” Really, love? Where’d you go? Barcelona or Barnsley?
balkan. i’m just gonna leave this here…
A lot of Europeans are just natural enemies.
Like Germans and Scots
And Frenchmen and Scots
And Scots and other Scots
Damn those Scots, they ruined Scotland!
Even within the same supposed groups to have emnities. Bavarians vs Baden-Wurttembergers, Scots vs Glaswegians, Arsenal vs Manchester Fucking United.
I think I learned a lot of this watching Snarky, European stand-up because 90% is racist jokes about whatever country the comic has a beef with.
Actually all germans hate france, thats only natural, its in our history xP Oh and we love everyone else, they give us alot of money xD
EVERYONE WHO REBLOGS THIS BY APRIL 15, 2016 WILL GET A DRAWING BASED ON THEIR BLOG!!!
I’m probably digging myself a deep hole. And I love it. I will do it. no joke. it has 3 exclamation marks. That’s how you know I’m serious.
rip you and your 15169 drawings
Your free time is over xD