Welcome to If Cats Could Do Math (@evilmathsuggestions) an offshoot of @dodecalemma.
Open now for evil math suggestion submissions and pics of cats doing math
Note: submissions be accepted only if they are valid mathematically and not explicit!
ᓚᘏᗢ
Misplaced Lens Cap
sheepfilms

roma★

★
h
One Nice Bug Per Day

Kaledo Art

oozey mess

pixel skylines
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

ellievsbear
Xuebing Du

izzy's playlists!

⁂
Stranger Things
hello vonnie

Andulka
No title available

No title available

No title available
seen from Ukraine

seen from Australia
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Ukraine

seen from France
seen from Canada
seen from Peru

seen from United States

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Russia

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United Kingdom

seen from T1
seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from United States
@evilmathsuggestions
Welcome to If Cats Could Do Math (@evilmathsuggestions) an offshoot of @dodecalemma.
Open now for evil math suggestion submissions and pics of cats doing math
Note: submissions be accepted only if they are valid mathematically and not explicit!
ᓚᘏᗢ
Let R^3 be a vector space over the field of integers modulo 2.
Relate your problem to a common board game.
Create a board game that relates to your problem.
Create a trading card game that requires solving an open problem to play optimally
Did you hear they're calling fields which don't have non-separable irreducible polynomials "perfect"? Unbelievable. I mean, it's the bare minimum. The bar is on the ground.
Use the word perfect to describe fields which have non-separable irreducible polynomials in conversation.
I’d like to note that, when pushed, he didn’t change the indexing letter, no. He just wrote √-1.
Pick one element out of each member of a collection of non-empty sets.
Some would argue that this belongs on @evilmathsuggestions
Let ε > 0 be a real number.
Let "ε>0" be a real number. As in the whole thing is any (even negative) real number
@evilmathsuggestions
8! Least favorite notation you’ve ever seen
Einstein Summation Convention. I maintain that if you need to add a phrase to the effect of ''where we're using ESC", it is not good notation.
Thanks for the ask!
Ah, well there's an easy solution to that: always assume ESC by default and explicitly note when you're not using it. Then it's the lack of ESC which is bad :3
That's the general approach taken in Lee but the fact you have to distinguish either case is a negative because good notation shouldn't be ambiguous.
Don't get me wrong, having tonnes of indices can get super messy and I appreciate the need for a notation but I don't believe it's necessarily the best solution
“always assume ESC by default and explicitly note when you're not using it”
now if you thought "group" is an unhelpful and nondescriptive name for a mathematical concept. just remember that the broader category of mathematical concepts that groups belong to is called, a "category". so it could always be worse
Honestly I enjoy very much the terminology of category theory. If I could only make one change to the whole field it would be to rename categories to monoids, and call what is currently a monoid simply a mon, to strengthen the analogy of groups versus groupoids.
Or as ncatlab suggests, call categories monoidoids.
I'm not sure what monoidoidoid should be, maybe something with operads?
Is this conjecture true?
yes
no
what
EINSTEIN NOTATION MY BELOTHED
Are you bored out of your mind?
Looking for something fun to do?
1. Walk up to your local statistician or statistics department.
2. Loudly and proudly declare: "Everything has a 50% chance of happening. It either happens, or it doesn't".
3. Hope your local statistician(s) do not jog and/or are not athletic whatsoever.
4. Find someone doing this and retort "everything either has a 100% or 0% chance of happening, you just don't have enough information yet to say which". Hope you have the lung capacity for an animated debate while fleeing your local statistician(s) together.