Elon Musk isn't a sociopath, Trump isn't a narcissist, Jeff Bezos isn't a psycho, they are terrible racist bigoted assholes
"They could be" not the point, the point is that people are equating these disorders to 'evil dickhead' and that's ableist
noise dept.
Keni

No title available
wallacepolsom
cherry valley forever
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ

tannertan36

Kiana Khansmith

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
official daine visual archive

Product Placement
will byers stan first human second

pixel skylines
Jules of Nature

if i look back, i am lost
ojovivo

JVL
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her

bliss lane

Andulka

seen from United States

seen from Canada

seen from Malaysia
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Brazil
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Russia
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States

seen from Türkiye
seen from Poland
seen from Venezuela
seen from Maldives

seen from Indonesia
@exipunk
Elon Musk isn't a sociopath, Trump isn't a narcissist, Jeff Bezos isn't a psycho, they are terrible racist bigoted assholes
"They could be" not the point, the point is that people are equating these disorders to 'evil dickhead' and that's ableist
The real issue with sysmeds and their “sources” is that they’re working backwards trying to find justifications of their version of the truth. Instead of looking at the evidence as it is, they’re coming at the subject with their own preconceived notion of “the truth” and desperately scrambling for anything that even tangentially agrees with them. That’s why most of their sources are biased, or taken out of context. Instead of looking at studies about how systems and plurality work, they’re specifically looking for sources that validate their beliefs that plurality isn’t a spectrum and does not have a non-disorder conterpart - even if those sources are poorly researched or just flat out biased and not peer reviewed. They don’t care how poor their “sources” are, they just want validation for their claims that they can throw at anyone who disagrees. That way they can keep living in their comfortable lie, and claim that anyone who disagrees with them is just a “denier of science/the truth”. Despite their sources all being, essentially a hot pile of biased garbage.
Profiction/proshipping, at its core, is a combination of three ideas:
Ship and let ship (your ships don't harm me and vice-versa) and YKINMK (your kink is not my kink, and that's okay; my kink stories don't harm you and vice-versa)
Harassment over fiction is not acceptable
Censorship of fiction is not acceptable either
That's it.
the concepts "fiction is fiction, its not hurting anyone" & "when consumed by the wrong people, content romanticizing dangerous concepts can be harmful" & "you are responsible for your own consumption" can and need to be able to coexist