Elon Musk isn't a sociopath, Trump isn't a narcissist, Jeff Bezos isn't a psycho, they are terrible racist bigoted assholes
"They could be" not the point, the point is that people are equating these disorders to 'evil dickhead' and that's ableist
No title available
h
Show & Tell
Peter Solarz
Xuebing Du

titsay

ellievsbear
Cosimo Galluzzi
Sweet Seals For You, Always

Product Placement

oozey mess
sheepfilms
dirt enthusiast

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
YOU ARE THE REASON
d e v o n

Andulka
Sade Olutola
Misplaced Lens Cap
Not today Justin

seen from Canada
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from Argentina

seen from United States

seen from Singapore

seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Israel
seen from Germany

seen from Germany
seen from Chile

seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from United States
@exipunk
Elon Musk isn't a sociopath, Trump isn't a narcissist, Jeff Bezos isn't a psycho, they are terrible racist bigoted assholes
"They could be" not the point, the point is that people are equating these disorders to 'evil dickhead' and that's ableist
The real issue with sysmeds and their “sources” is that they’re working backwards trying to find justifications of their version of the truth. Instead of looking at the evidence as it is, they’re coming at the subject with their own preconceived notion of “the truth” and desperately scrambling for anything that even tangentially agrees with them. That’s why most of their sources are biased, or taken out of context. Instead of looking at studies about how systems and plurality work, they’re specifically looking for sources that validate their beliefs that plurality isn’t a spectrum and does not have a non-disorder conterpart - even if those sources are poorly researched or just flat out biased and not peer reviewed. They don’t care how poor their “sources” are, they just want validation for their claims that they can throw at anyone who disagrees. That way they can keep living in their comfortable lie, and claim that anyone who disagrees with them is just a “denier of science/the truth”. Despite their sources all being, essentially a hot pile of biased garbage.
Profiction/proshipping, at its core, is a combination of three ideas:
Ship and let ship (your ships don't harm me and vice-versa) and YKINMK (your kink is not my kink, and that's okay; my kink stories don't harm you and vice-versa)
Harassment over fiction is not acceptable
Censorship of fiction is not acceptable either
That's it.
the concepts "fiction is fiction, its not hurting anyone" & "when consumed by the wrong people, content romanticizing dangerous concepts can be harmful" & "you are responsible for your own consumption" can and need to be able to coexist