I feel like these meme format was made for us 😂
styofa doing anything
hello vonnie
ojovivo
dirt enthusiast

★

shark vs the universe
Three Goblin Art

if i look back, i am lost

pixel skylines

⁂
RMH
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ

Love Begins
Peter Solarz
d e v o n

No title available

#extradirty

JVL
we're not kids anymore.
No title available

seen from Malaysia

seen from Canada

seen from Türkiye
seen from Germany

seen from Vietnam
seen from United States

seen from Switzerland

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from India

seen from Singapore
seen from South Africa

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from Singapore
@exjwexplains
I feel like these meme format was made for us 😂
“From house to house, from door to door, the good news we will share..” 😷😷
#even if this isnt 100% accurate people in the notes dont seem to realize translating was done by a human with human intentions and morals#the reason why i dont take the Bible for gospel is because we have no idea what the original text was meant to say#every single translation has been chosen by someone to fit their narrative#i dont put tons of weight on a thousand plus year old book and thousand plus year old rules (via @markwatnae)
Literally though, why would you hide this in the tags, it’s absolutely a brilliant take and what people should do.
I was curious to know if this wasn’t just a Tweet making basesless claims, but apparently an openly gay Christian by the name of Ed Oxford has been researching this issue for years. Here’s some interesting bits from an article [link] about this tweet.
YOU HAVE BEEN PART OF A RESEARCH TEAM THAT IS SEEKING TO UNDERSTAND HOW THE DECISION WAS MADE TO PUT THE WORD HOMOSEXUAL IN THE BIBLE. IS THAT TRUE?
Ed: Yes. It first showed up in the RSV translation. So before figuring out why they decided to use that word in the RSV translation (which is outlined in my upcoming book with Kathy Baldock, Forging a Sacred Weapon: How the Bible Became Anti-Gay) I wanted to see how other cultures and translations treated the same verses when they were translated during the Reformation 500 years ago. So I started collecting old Bibles in French, German, Irish, Gaelic, Czechoslovakian, Polish… you name it. Now I’ve got most European major languages that I’ve collected over time. Anyway, I had a German friend come back to town and I asked if he could help me with some passages in one of my German Bibles from the 1800s. So we went to Leviticus 18:22 and he’s translating it for me word for word. In the English where it says “Man shall not lie with man, for it is an abomination,” the German version says “Man shall not lie with young boys as he does with women, for it is an abomination.” I said, “What?! Are you sure?” He said, “Yes!” Then we went to Leviticus 20:13— same thing, “Young boys.” So we went to 1 Corinthians to see how they translated arsenokoitai (original greek word) and instead of homosexuals it said, “Boy molesters will not inherit the kingdom of God.”
I then grabbed my facsimile copy of Martin Luther’s original German translation from 1534. My friend is reading through it for me and he says, “Ed, this says the same thing!” They use the word knabenschander. Knaben is boy, schander is molester. This word “boy molesters” carried through the next several centuries of German Bible translations. Knabenschander is also in 1 Timothy 1:10. So the interesting thing is, I asked if they ever changed the word arsenokoitai to homosexual in modern translations. So my friend found it and told me, “The first time homosexual appears in a German translation is 1983.” To me that was a little suspect because of what was happening in culture in the 1970s. Also because the Germans were the ones who created the word homosexual in 1862, they had all the history, research, and understanding to change it if they saw fit; however, they did not change it until 1983. If anyone was going to put the word in the Bible, the Germans should have been the first to do it!
Like many ancient texts, Leviticus was created gradually over a long period and includes the words of more than one writer. […] An earlier edition of Leviticus, then, may have been silent on the matter of sex between men.
[..] there is good evidence that an earlier version of the laws in Leviticus 18 permitted sex between men. In addition to having the prohibition against same-sex relations added to it, the earlier text, I believe, was revised in an attempt to obscure any implication that same-sex relations had once been permissible.
The key to understanding this editorial decision is the concept of “the exception proves the rule.” [..]
Now, apply this principle to Leviticus 18: A law declaring that homosexual incest is prohibited could reasonably be taken to indicate that non-incestuous homosexual intercourse is permitted.
TL;DR: The word “homosexual” wasn’t added to the Bible until the RVS translation in the 1983, which was funded by Americans. Older translations in other languages such as German specifically use the word “knabenschander” which directly translates to “boy molester.”
And yes, there’s pics:
The worst thing is when I accidentally start talking abut my trauma to people I don’t wanna talk about it with and then I can’t fucking stop but I’m also completely emotionally detached from it so I’m just spewing out my issues with no emotion except an absolute feeling of terror because I Do Not want to be talking about this but I Can Not stop talking.
Usually the next reply is: “But, but, but… that’s the Old Testament!”
And what do you think the New Testament is based on, half-wit? It was your Jesus, who allegedly said: “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. I tell you the truth, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished. (NIV, Matthew 5:17–18)
Gonna post this quickly before the meme dies
If you Google, “Are Jehovah’s Witnesses a cult?” you will likely come across this article published by Jehovah’s Witnesses on their website, jw.org. This article is meant to disprove claims that Jehovah’s Witnesses are a cult using two common ideas the average person has about what cults are and how they function. The problem with this is, the reasoning used by this organization against the idea that they are a cult can easily be disproved by their own website.
The first being the claim that although most would consider cults a “new or unorthodox religion” Jehovah’s Witnesses are actually a modern incarnation of the Christian congregation in the first century, which is outlined by most of the New Testament. This is simply not true.
A simple quote from their website, from an article entitled “Who Was the Founder of Jehovah’s Witnesses?”:
“The modern-day organization of Jehovah’s Witnesses began at the end of the 19th century.”
Their second point in disproving that they are a cult is to make the claim that they have no human leader on earth and by proxy, follow only the direction of Christ. This can also be easily combated by the fact that while Jehovah’s Witnesses do claim to try and follow the ideas of Jesus as laid out in the New Testament, their true allegiance is to their Governing Body. As described by their website, the Governing Body is “a small group of mature Christians who provide direction for Jehovah’s Witnesses worldwide.”
In other words, the Governing Body of Jehovah’s Witnesses is a small group of men who control the organization and give out doctrinal direction to it’s over 8 million members. The Governing Body has complete and total control over most aspects of Jehovah’s Witnesses lives, from what they can wear, who they can become friends with, who they can marry, where they can live, and so on. Additionally, the Governing Body of Jehovah’s Witnesses abuses it’s power to the point of expecting full devotion and obedience from individual Jehovah’s Witnesses, even if what they are directing them to do does not seem “practical from a human standpoint”.
So, are Jehovah’s Witnesses a cult?
Regardless of whether you believe they are or are not a cult, the fact that their argument for why they are not is so flimsy and easily combated should a reason for concern.
https://www.jw.org/en/jehovahs-witnesses/faq/are-jehovahs-witnesses-a-cult/#?insight[search_id]=d0d2fbfe-c5d0-411a-ac6d-fecb13c0e261&insight[search_result_index]=0
https://www.jw.org/en/jehovahs-witnesses/faq/founder/
https://www.jw.org/en/jehovahs-witnesses/faq/governing-body/
https://www.jw.org/en/publications/books/jehovahs-will/jehovahs-witnesses-governing-body/#?insight[search_id]=61512ee3-a3e7-4477-9a64-84ba12b85660&insight[search_result_index]=7
The best part of being disowned by your family is that you don't have your distant relatives asking how your mom is doing on a status you posted about binge drinking the night before on Facebook.
I had resigned myself to marrying a man and being quietly miserable for the rest of my life, but once you take the first steps towards being true to yourself... It's amazing. I'm glad you were able to realize your marriage wasn't what you wanted.
thank you. I’m still going through great difficulty with this transition in my life. I really appreciate you reaching out like this and taking the time out of your day to give me support. <3
I feel like being raised as a JW is kinda like being grounded every single day of your life.
*jaws theme plays as the memorial approaches*
Just a personal bit here- again. Did the heteronormative culture in the Watchtower sway any of you to be in relationships you weren’t 100% comfortable in?
Because that’s the boat I’m in. I was/am bi (or pan? idk I’m still on a road of self-discovery) and was just like “well at least I kind of like guys too...” and ignored and suppressed all my girl crushes.
Here I am, almost married 6 years to a man and I’m still not even comfortable with him. I truly don’t think I would have married him or any man if I had been able to be my true self.
Yes we are on the road to splitting up, now. But I’m so upset I wasted my youth and 8 years of my life with someone that I couldn’t give my 100% to. He didn’t deserve that, and neither did I.