To people saying Max Fosh need to come back. It’s a no. He was disrespectful and didn’t seem the understand the games. He didn’t match the boys energy at all. You could see it on their face that there were annoyed at some of the joke.
I really need anyone who shares this energy to take a step back and reflect.
First of all, it’s completely fine if you don’t like guests, or Max. I didn’t enjoy some of the guests either so I get it.
However, what’s not okay is speculating about how SFTH themselves feel about their guests, especially to justify your own feelings towards them, that’s just obnoxious. You don’t know them, you don’t know what they think. “You could see it on their face” no I couldn’t. They were performing, what you saw could have been a part of their performance.
I’d like to remind everyone that SFTH invite the guests themselves, and it’s their job to be good hosts and make their guests feel welcomed. You’re painting them as terrible hosts who don’t know how to be professional and helpful towards someone completely new at improv.
Of course if any of the guests was hateful or crossed the line, they wouldn’t have to tolerate them, but Max surely wasn’t, they wouldn’t have posted his show at all if he had been.
I’d also like to ask everyone to be more hospitable towards guests, because we’re also their hosts in a way, they’re entering our space. You don’t have to like them, you don’t even have to tolerate them, but don’t be rude. SFTH wants to go bigger, which means they need to build connections. Inviting guests is one of the ways to do so. Respect their decisions and their agency.
In short, be nice, be kind, be welcoming. I don’t think that’s too much to ask.
Does anybody remember the survey about subtitles? Well, I’m here to tell you the results! (in a very nonenglishing English)
Before I start, I should mention that I asked a bunch of people from other places and fandoms, but still, around 80% surveyed were from the Shoot From The Hip community. You’re awesome! I’ve received so many sweet words. Thank you so much from me and from the subtitlers too. I sent them all of your words about SFTHs captions ^^
There are two versions of the survey, one of them is in English and the other one is not. I’ve combined the results in an Excel file and made some graphs.
So, as of November 1st the survey had been taken by 176 people. Out of all of them, only 7% said that they don’t use subtitles at all. Also, 23% always turn on subs, and 49% said that they turn up only human-made subtitles.
Out of all people who use subs in different circumstances (161 people to be exact), 81% said that with colour-coding, it is much easier to understand who is speaking. Another 17% said that colour-coding helps only sometimes. Notably, this group includes every colourblind person who took the survey.
As you can see, subtitles, especially when they’re colour-coded, are really in demand. But what about translations?
The survey revealed that only 24% enable subs in their native language when watching a video in their second language and 28% do this only if the subtitles are human-made. It might not look like a lot, especially considering the fact that 34% said that even if the translation is available, they still watch the video w/o it.
[No picture this time, sorry :( ]
Some of you might think that all of the hard work of translators is not worth it, but it’s not true. As long as the translations help someone, for example with learning a language, not getting a joke, when just being too tired to second-languaging or wanting to share a video with your friend, it’s worth it. Have you ever been in a situation, when you really liked a meme and wanted to send it to your friend, but you couldn’t because the meme was in a language your friend doesn’t speak?
And… that’s all. Really interesting results, don’t you think? I was really surprised, especially by the results of the colour-coding question. Fun fact: all of the “no” on this question was NOT from SFTH fandom. Here’s the result of the English survey (around 90-95% are SFTH fans):
140 people. 86% yes, 14% sometimes, 0% no. This is CRAZY.
Yes, there are around 3 SFTH fans who took the other survey, but I don’t know who answered what. In any case, even one or two people vs 140 is just… Wow.
In the end I want to say that unfortunately I will not continue my research. I used the results for my article but I probably will not use them in my thesis. I came to the conclusion that the original survey has a lot of mistakes and the questions were asked incorrectly. Also, it turns out that it’s just too much for me. I tried to chew more than I can and it made me worry much more than I expected. I’m really sorry but so SO grateful. This was surely an experience!
AngelJacob designs!! Their emojis are 🥧✒️ your honor...I'm so obsessed with them
Some thoughts + sketch under the cut!!
Idk if it's hard to tell but I intended on Jacob's hair to be more messy eventho Lord Roland tried to make him as presentable as possible, he still got that wild Fife boy in him <33 His blush is pinkish because I say so
For Angel I made her outfit mint because that's how I see Tom's shirt and because I got it from a fanfic I wrote and I can't get it off my mind,,, Angel's hat has Lilies in it!! White and yellow because they represent freedom and independence just like her!! My girl boss!!
I tried to make their outfit as close to the century (1895) they're in but also cooperate it with TomLuke's appearance :3 I had so much fun drawing them!!
And here's a shitass sketch of them on traditional,,,I'm not so good at traditional okay shhh,,
Stat lovers: I come to you with SFTH mother stats!
People commonly wonder who in SFTH plays the best / the most kids, women, relationships, etc. Well, I was taken in by the slightly less common question: who plays the most and the best mothers?
("The best" is of course hard to quantify, so I focused on role size as an indicator of screentime / contribution to the plot of a longform.)
The quick stats: As of Oct 28, 2025, there are 39 mothers and 4 grandmothers (for a total of 43) across the 63 publicly available longforms. Of these, Tom plays 16, AJ 11, Luke 10, and Sam 6.
Tom also tends towards the largest/most developed roles for mothers, so you could argue that he most consistently plays quality mother characters. (Although AJ was the only one to play a mother who was the lead/protagonist, in The Lollipop Lady's Revenge!)
And I have charts! (Both the mothers and grandmothers are included in the "mother" numbers for these.)
*weighted by contribution to the plot (role size) using multipliers
Details of how I calculated this under the cut!
So, to get these charts, I first listed every mother role I could find across the plays. I did this in Excel, but here they are copied to a google sheet, if you'd like to see/fact check the list, or otherwise play with the data:
I sorted them by SFTH member, and determined the role size for each mother by this criteria: how many scenes are they in, how much screentime is that, and how important is their character to the plot?
For a few of these I had trouble picking between med/large, but when it was pretty borderline by the numbers, I went with "does this feel like a side character or one of the main cast"? (Because you also have to keep in mind that the longforms started out around 20 minutes long, and are now usually more like 30-35 mins long, so trying to determine how big a role is by # of scenes or screentime alone isn't actually consistent. 5 minutes of a 15 min longform would be nothing like 5 minutes of a 50 minute longform. So although side character vs main cast isn't objective, it was still a valuable metric because it brings more consistency across different-length longforms.)
I picked multipliers for each role size based on vibes - basically, how many points does each type of role deserve for its contribution to a longform? This is of course pretty arbitrary, but I felt like it was fair to keep a medium role bang in the middle, with "tiny" roles hardly being worth anything and a protagonist mother being an outlier in the other direction with a ton of points.
Then, it was time to make my graphs. I organized my data in this little table:
And then proceeded to make graphs in Excel based on that data.
One thing you may notice is that the raw and the weighted totals I made with my multipliers don't look at all comparable. I wanted to be able to compare them against each other in a chart, so I further processed the "weighted" totals by finding the average multiplier received by each actor (their Weighted Total / Total), and then dividing it by 4, the "default" multiplier, since it's smack in the middle of my 1-7 points per role system. (This creates the same effect as if my "tiny" multiplier had been 0.25, "medium" had been 1, etc, but that way has uglier numbers so whatever, I'm happy with how I did it.)
So, someone who on average plays medium sized roles (Sam) would have a new multiplier of exactly 1, someone who tends to play larger roles (Tom and Luke) would have a larger multiplier to boost their score, and someone who plays smaller roles (AJ) would have a multiplier under 1 to reduce their score. Then that new multiplier is applied to their raw total. This creates much more balanced data:
I then compared this in the Weighted Roles bar graph you see above.
I like that this data shows that although Luke and AJ have a different number of mother roles and a different spread of role sizes, if you average it out, they have pretty much the same size contribution to the SFTH mother ecosystem! (Same weighted score of 10.25)
I'm Fiery and I'm one of the translators for SFTH.
Right now I'm writing a thesis/dissertation about subtitles and subtitling and I need your help! I want to find out how often people use subtitles, so I made a Google form for this.
The results of the survey will be added to my thesis/dissertation as a proof of the importance of subtitling and captioning. Also, I'm planning to use some of the results for a small academic article.
If you want to fill it out, here is the link:
This survey is anonymous. Your responses will be used for a thesis/dissertation and may be published in an academic article. Your completion
The only restriction: you should be at least 18 y.o. (if you are younger, ask your parents to fill it out instead. Or just do what you want, I can't check your age anyway...)
Don't worry, I'll post the results of the research on Tumblr or on SFTHcord when I get enough responses.
If you’re active in the fandom, you may have seen the Shoot From The Hip Wiki site with this squiddy patterned logo and the little egg flannel icon around. It’s the Shoot From The Hip Wiki on Wiki.gg!
I started this project one summer's day back in 2024, after seeing that the fandom needs a place to look for information about our wonderful plays and beloved characters.
More than a year has passed but I still haven’t really shared or talked about it. Every time someone finds it, shares it, or makes edits to it, I’m still a bit surprised, and also a bit scared, but in a positive way.
I think now is the time for the Wiki to be seen, and to be built stronger.
If you’re interested in editing the Wiki, please go and create an account on the Wiki, and join our Headquarters.
You’re cordially invited!
I hope the Wiki has been helpful to you. But if you haven’t seen it before, welcome to the Wiki 🥰
kaledo-art
stormborns
tangentwithtanner
kianamaiart
baratheonpilled
origamiaround
pixelskylines
