Otherkin: Fucked Up Beyond All Reason

An archive of the worst of the worst of the very very worst, with occasional witty banter and even more occasional serious commentary. Dedicated to those who have Watched, and seen that Something is not right. To those who have asked WTF are you doing, and those who have called Bullshit. And to DLF. Pessimum genus inimicorum laudantes.

[fubarotherkin]

Obvious Post is Obvious

Apparently, people are a lot denser than I thought. Here’s what should be obvious if you’re reading this blog.

There are a lot of stupid people in the otherkin community. 

Some of them may legitimately be otherkin, just confused.

Others are not otherkin and have just latched onto the idea.

The stupid people spread a ton of misinformation.

This blog is an archive of the worst of that misinformation.

If you agree with the screenshots, rather than the commentary in the tags, you are part of the problem.

P-Shifting is not real. Neither is growing wings, becoming a mermaid, or thrice-plagued AWTOK.

If you are making posts about any of these things, you are playing make-believe. Or you’re outright delusional.

[unnxturxl]

Do...you know what shifting a hard body part would be like? Like horns, claws, etc. I've heard it would hurt...but any more than the rest of the shift?

Hmm. Shifters can’t just grow those body parts from nowhere, so two things would have to happen: Bone would have to rip out of skin, or nails/teeth would have to change and elongate. Either way, it sounds pretty terrible. Whether it would hurt worse or not would just be a matter of preference.

[fubarotherkin]

[unnxturxl]

What happens if someone transformed into, say, a mouse? How small could they possibly become?

That’s a good question, and I honestly don’t know. Some people argue that it’s impossible to become such a small animal, given that humans are much larger. Some use the argument that the supernatural doesn’t follow the rules of science, so they can shift into tiny animals.

[fubarotherkin]

[unnxturxl]

What is growing teeth like? How does it feel? Do you know how it happens?

When you change, your teeth technically don’t grow. They elongate, but the rest of the teeth was already in your gums.

It hurts a lot. It’s actually probably one of my least favorite parts. Since things are leaving your gums partially, blood just comes out, and it’s not fun to taste. It kinda feels like pulling a tooth, only more unnatural.

[fubarotherkin]

[zaturnz-barz-deactivated2017071]

I think in looking back, the majority of “real” children have always been disgusting to me, and my want I’d never act on was mainly based around anime like characters, which is possibly why referring to little girls as lolis stuck so easily with me. So the way I am, seeing things as a video game or anime, fantasies always had animated designs, but since I think like that all the time I never really noticed, even while noting how gross and deformed most children actually seem in this plane of reality.

Now that I’m not a lolicon anymore, real children still disgust me, but now lolicon has this extremely unpleasant association with real children who are repulsive to me, and so the false idea people have of “me=lolicon” disgusts me for that reason. If not for the association, I’d be neutral towards lolicon, but now it makes me a little sick if I ever see it. 

I should clarify that I still don’t believe being a lolicon or pedophile is inherently bad unless acted on. The source of my discomfort is something that grosses me out, personally.

[fubarotherkin]

[kitkatpurrpurr]

I’m officially neutral on social justice. I detest it. And I think it has good workings.

Don’t you dare get me involved in social justice. I will drive you into the ground.

[fubarotherkin]

tumblr social justice : social justice :: buzz lightyear : buzz aldrin

[unanimously-a-sucker]

Since I am on a bit of an internet detective kick right now, I figured I would check something else out.

I’ve mentioned a few times that I think Draven is a liar, and now I can prove it.

If you remember, last year they claimed they were going to give up visiting hateblogs for a month, and FUBARO pretty quickly caught them trawling through the hateblog-specific “mango pizza” tag, and clicking through to their blog. They first posted a screenshot from statcounter, which Draven claimed was photoshopped, before following it up with links to another IP tracking service and screen-capture videos.

Draven continues to claim that all of these things were faked in an attempt to make them look bad. Now, while it is possible to spoof IP addresses and fake videos, that is complicated, time consuming and (not to insult FUBARO) slightly out of the league of your average tumblr blogger.

I’m going to focus on the claim of photoshopping, a comparably much simpler task. Now, it is totally possible that FUBARO fabricated that screenshot like Draven repeatedly claimed, so I thought I would go and check it out using the excellent fotoforensics tool. Now, this gets a little complicated, but bear with me here.

The first thing I looked at was the metadata, obviously. There are 2 values in it which I was interested in: Date Created and Date Modified. Obviously, if the two are different, it means the original image has been opened in an image editor and altered in some way. Here are those values for the statcounter image:

Datecreate 2013-11-22T09:46:49-05:00

Datemodify 2013-11-22T09:46:49-05:00

As you can see, they are exactly the same, which means the image has not been opened, edited and resaved.

The next thing I looked at was Error Level Analysis (ELA). What this does is identify areas in an image with different compression rates, which can be indicative of things being added in after the original was created (since the pixels of the original image would be re-compressed when the edited version was saved, while the added material would not). The thing to look out for in ELA is lighter colors or, ideally, patches of white, as these indicate a lower compression level and therefore suggest those areas are not original to the image. Here are the results (the top image is the original which I pulled from FUBARO’s blog and uploaded, while the bottom is the result of the ELA):

As you can see, there is no difference between any parts of the image which would presumably be original (the section at the top with Draven’s details) and the parts allegedly altered (the section at the bottom with the dates and times of the visits). This suggests that the image has not been tampered with, and that information has not been added to it.

And since I, too, don’t get accused of fabricating evidence, here is the direct link to the fotoforensics page containing the ELA and metadata information so you can check it for yourself.

Draven is a liar. Proven by science.

[fubarotherkin]

[fubarotherkin]

Will you ever return?

[fubarotherkin]

[fubarotherkin]

http://silvercreekwolfpack.webs.com/rank-law

[fubarotherkin]

[fubarotherkin]

Obvious proof that "Red Maned Therian Myrg" is a cult, not to mention that this kid is still loyal to the group even though they don't want him or care for him anymore.

[fubarotherkin]

[fubarotherkin]

life hint: when an artist asks you to credit their work which you do not have permission to use, you do it :)

[skellabones-deactivated20140206]

Otherkin vs Gender Identity

I know that it’s probably been said a thousand times before, but the new plant/animal/object pronouns are very problematic and hurtful to the trans community.

Before I begin, I’d like to state that even though I greatly dislike the new pronoun system, if a person told me that they wanted to be called by a certain pronoun, I’d call them by it. I don’t want people to feel bad about their pronoun choices, but at the same time I hope you realize the damage that is being done. Additionally, I believe that being otherkin is valid, however it has NOTHING TO DO WITH GENDER.*****

Life is hard enough as-is for non-binary people. People STILL don’t consider nb to be a valid identity. How does this affect me? My boyfriend (he prefers I call him my boyfriend) is genderfluid, and every time I explain that to someone they bitch and whine about it, while at the same time I can tell the same person I’m a transman and they’re 100% okay with it because they see it as valid.

The problem with the new pronouns is based off expectations. When I say I’m male, people expect I have a certain anatomical makeup. Because I don’t yet, I have been verbally abused, discriminated against, and generally harassed. Trans women have the same exact problems, and sometimes it’s even worse because of transmisogany and sexism.

When you use plants, animals, or objects for your pronouns, nobody is going to give you a hard time for looking a certain way. Nobody is going to tell you that you can’t use a certain bathroom. Nobody is going to beat you up.

And before you say I’m an idiot because saying that the new pronoun system is nb erasure, let me explain a thing about being non-binary. As ironic as it seems, in order for nb to exist, there must first be a binary to base it off of. Those binaries are male and female. When a person says that they identify as agender, that means they don’t identify as male or female. When a person says that they identify as genderfluid, that means that they identify as male sometimes, and female sometimes. See the pattern? Saying you identify as a plant/animal/object has nothing to do with gender at all. If people identified as animals, then there wouldn’t even be an issue. But saying that identity is the same as a gender identity is wrong, because gender is a social construct based on sexual attributes, and your actual being is different then your gender.

Alternately, animals are gendered too.

And before I get some sort of message saying “you hate furries!” or “you just don’t understand”! Let me explain a few things.

One: I don’t hate furries. I occasionally draw furry porn on e621. I started there because it seemed like a safe outlet where I could express my sexuality and physical appearance safely and comfortably. I also know that not everyone who identifies as a furry draws nsfw things, and that not everyone who draws anthro art is a furry.

Two: I understand that some of this has NOTHING to do with furries, however it appears that the person who started this is a furry.

Three: I completely understand not wanting to be human. I get that. When I was little, I used to wish I wasn’t ALL the time. I understand someone saying “but on the inside I’m a wolf”. Okay. That’s fine. Just don’t make it about gender. Because saying you wish you were an animal has nothing to do with gender. At all.

The new pronouns would be less of a big deal if it wasn’t for cis people. I literally wouldn’t give a crap at all if you wanted to be called an animal/plant/object as your pronoun, but because it’s hard enough to be taken seriously when I say something as simple as “I identify as male”, there’s no way in HELL cis people are gonna take the new system seriously. Hell, they can’t even wrap their minds around BINARY trans people! They often don’t even think being non-binary is valid. There are TRANS people who don’t think being non-binary is valid! Trying to make new pronouns that actually have NOTHING to do with gender at all makes it even EASIER for cis people to say shit like “You don’t identify as male or female? What’s next, you’re gonna tell me you’re a plant or something like those other freaks?” and treat us like shit because they have more leverage now.

Then people started using the new pronouns because they though they were “cute”

Nononononono. No. N O

A pronoun is not an accessory. It’s not a fashion statement. It is something I have fought for, and something I could easily be killed for. Nobody is gonna kill you because you think you’re a rabbit. Who cares? It’s not like that affects what bathroom or changing room you use, or how people are gonna treat you when you enter it. It changes nothing and makes the rest of us seem like idiots for trying so hard. Gender is NOT something that’s taken lightly in our society, unfortunately.

****In writing this, my goal was NOT to say something like “everyone who uses the new pronouns are scum” or “I want then to die” because that is so far from my goal I could ship it a package and it wouldn’t arrive until a year later. What I wanted to outline is WHY these new pronouns are problematic and how they cause issues that could easily be avoided if they didn’t exist. I wanted to do it in a way that is (hopefully) readable and not aimed at telling people they’re wrong. I just want to educated people about why trans people feel the way they do about all this, and why it’s damaging. Please, at least consider what you’re doing when you start using these.

[fubarotherkin]

People who have no concept of copyright infringement

Here are some handy dandy things about copyright infringement, to start us off.

Artistic infringement results when a person, who is not the copyright holder, uses the art work of another. This unauthorized use can include, but is not limited to, sell, distribution, manipulation, marketing, or producing. Additionally, this form of permissionless use can involve the whole or part of a copyright protected work.

- (source)

In Lee Wilson’s The Advertising Law Guide, in the chapter “Copyright Infringement and How to Avoid It,” he writes:

“The circumstantial evidence test for copyright infringement by unauthorized copying has three parts: 1. Did the accused infringer have ‘access’ to the work that is said to have been infringed so that copying was possible? 2. Is the defendant actually guilty of ‘copying’ part of the plaintiff’s protectable expression from the plaintiff’s work? 3. Is the accused work ‘substantially similar’ to the work the plaintiff says was copied.”

Let me try an clarify that a bit: If you find a piece of art or photo and use it without the creator’s permission, then it is “yes” to all three and you are infringing.

If you take a photo and trace it to do an illustration, then it is “yes” to all three and you are infringing.

- (source)

Some examples of copyright infringement (this is only a partial listing) can include:

Placing someone else's photograph or creative work online without proper permission.

Using a creative work commercially without permission.

Adapting someone else's creative work found in one medium to another medium, such as making a book into a movie or a photograph into a painting.

Modifying or editing a creative work without proper permission.

- (

source

)

Now that we're all properly informed on what art copyright infringement is, let us delve right into some excuses this one particular person has for how her BLATANT plagiarism is actually TOTES LEGAL LOL. Mind you this is all one person.

"Don't even dare accusing the page of theft. This is an original shitty drawing by me. "

"So with the information I've acquired. This is not art theft because it has been modified from the original picture and I in fact own this copy."

"I own it it looks nothing like the original. Your people can call copyright all they want. It isn't illegal."

You all excited to see the image of concern?

Here's the original (WITH ITS SOURCE):

(source)

And here is the copy that apparently looks nothing like the original and isn't a copy at ALL.

Here, I'll source that too. (source)

--

She has plenty of other pieces of artwork, many of which are also stolen drawings she claims are her own. And she can't keep getting away with it. Not anymore.

The source on these is this page: (source)

Those are all I could find quickly.

I am done with her blatantly ignoring the goddamn law, so I want this to go out for people to see.

[fubarotherkin]

Where do you find all these perfect reaction gifs?