x | running out of time
KIROKAZE
No title available
Xuebing Du
Cosmic Funnies

祝日 / Permanent Vacation
Today's Document

@theartofmadeline

No title available
wallacepolsom
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
No title available

ellievsbear

tannertan36

titsay

Origami Around
Peter Solarz
Game of Thrones Daily
d e v o n
seen from Philippines

seen from Hungary
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States

seen from Türkiye
seen from Australia

seen from Denmark

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
@fuckyeaholdcameras
x | running out of time
via
1927 Kodak Petite Cameras. From Art Deco 1920, FB.
Wow, apparently the bellows were also colored to match the housing, and they came with accessories like matching compacts.
found what they look like with the bellows open!!
credit u/deepsky_wonders on reddit
The Woman Behind the Camera of your fave bettie page pinups and more! Bunny Yeager, a visionary, artist, and also a pinup herself!
[Bunny Yeager in Black Lace with Her Rolleiflex Camera, 1955 Silver gelatin print Image Dimensions: 9 1/2 x 6 3/4 inches Framed Dimensions: 16 1/2 x 14 1/2 inches Courtesy of Bunny Yeager Archive and Gavlak Photo credit: Jeff McLane]
Ricoh "FF-1s" 1980
35mm Film Camera
...
-L.F.
Inside of a Zeiss Ikon shutter
-L.F.
I’d really like to work on creating a new header and pfp for this blog.
And in recent news, I’ve begun creating a spreadsheet for my camera collection which I will share here when it’s done :)
I’ve had this blog for a really long time. And I want it to continue to grow with me.
Keystone Bel Air K-41 8mm (1956) / x
i have an ancient box camera from the late 40s. takes 120 film. Absolutely unfair good images out of this thing.
This is the 1940s equivalent of a disposable Kodak, it’s terrible but because modern film stock is so fucking good it just rips absolute ass. No I don’t have any pictures they’re scanning shut up.
the shutter speed is "yes" and the aperture is "sure, why not"
it turns out when you have a negative that's 60x70 mm that you don't really need the world's best glass
Beeg Pitchoor
this just isn't fair. this is like a toddler walking into a chess tournament and beating a high schooler
#JESUS THAT DYNAMIC RANGE!!!!
Fun fact: This is all on expired lomography metropolis. if it were in-date film it'd look even better. I dont have any in-date metropolis in 120 but i have a roll of it in 35mm that i'm gonna load up once i've finished my current roll of Kodak ColorPlus 200 (cheap color film that looks better than it should)
Here's Catlabs X Film 100 in 35 though, which is kinda similar in terms of range
Kodak Six-16 (1932-1936) / x
Picked up this Kodak Folding Cartridge Premo from 1913 today! Officially the oldest camera I own.