read rentry before int⠀⠀.ᐟ.ᐟ

@theartofmadeline
Not today Justin

if i look back, i am lost
🩵 avery cochrane 🩵
No title available
wallacepolsom
trying on a metaphor
No title available
Peter Solarz

blake kathryn

Love Begins

tannertan36
Three Goblin Art
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open

titsay
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
we're not kids anymore.

⁂

Discoholic 🪩
Claire Keane

seen from United States

seen from Canada
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Brazil
seen from United States

seen from Mexico

seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from Australia
seen from Japan
seen from United States
seen from Germany

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from Canada
seen from China

seen from T1
@fussybunbro
read rentry before int⠀⠀.ᐟ.ᐟ
I am literally fucking BEGGING you all to also acknowledge the racism behind the terms "non-man" and "non-woman" and how they're used in queer definitions.
Black and Indigenous queer people have literally been talking about this since the definition was COINED but there's literally NO acknowledgement of this when pointing out why "non-men loving non-men" and "non-women loving non-women" are shitty fucking definitions to force on a whole community.
"Nonman" and "nonwoman" are terms that have been historically used to describe the degendering of black people in society. And words can obviously be used to mean different things- we don't have to stop using these terms altogether. But forcing these terms on a whole community of queer people is really fucking antiblack.
Not to mention that it blatantly degenders a lot of 2S lesbians and gays as well. It basically tells them that they can't be 2S and as a lesbian or gay at the same time, because then they would be "contradictory." I seriously hope I don't have to explain how racist it is to exclude a large portion of Two-Spirit people from your queer label because they don't fit into your neat little white gender binary.
Like these definitions aren't bad to use for yourself personally- but stop forcing them on all lesbians/gays. And if you're advocating for why these shouldn't be used as the most prominent definition, PLEASE acknowledge the racism aspect of it.
trans men and trans women are not opposites bc men and women period are not opposites. man and woman are not two sides of the same coin they are two drops of water in the great gender ocean
This is a false equivalency.
The term for somebody who is transfem and who is oppressed for being transfem—is transfem. Intersex people are intersex. Transfem people are transfem. Perisex people are not intersex. Non-transfem people are not transfem.
TMA/TME is more closely equivalent to if I said IA/IE (intersexism applicable/intersexism exempt).
The reason TMA/TME is problematic is because it fails to acknowledge that non-transfem people can be impacted my transmisogyny—the same way perisex transfems can be impacted by intersexism. And also because it completely ignores the existence of the oppression transmascs experience, categorising them in with their oppressors. The TMA/TME binary is problematic because it collapses complex interplays of oppression into one binary system.
If you want a word for somebody who is transfem and impacted by transfem oppression in the way somebody who is transfem would be? The term is transfem.
“Transfems really are the only people who can’t have terms for their own oppression” I have a question. How do you feel about the term “transandrophobia?” How would you feel about the terms “TAA” and “TAE” (transandrophobia applicable and transandrophobia exempt)? If you’re okay with those terms, I’ll eat my words (somehwhat, it’s still weird, but at least you’re okay with it across the board). If you’re not—why? Do you think trans men don’t experience specific oppression? Is your issue just with who coined it? How do you feel about the term transemasculinisation? Anti-transmasculinity? Please consider why you think it’s okay to restrict the language transmascs use to describe their oppression.
Further, why not make it TMNA/TMNE (transmisogynoir applicable and transmisogynoir exempt)? Black trans women absolutely face the highest rates of assault (assuming black trans men aren’t being erased in the statistics, which is a big assumption). If you’re talking about systems of oppression… why not consider the most impactful axes? Why only consider the axis of man/woman? Consider what this says about the proximity of your theory to radical feminism.
Reminder that you don't have to call yourself AMAB or AFAB. You don't have to say "I'm AFAB nonbinary." Saying "I'm nonbinary" is enough. You don't need to identify with what you were assigned as by some doctor however many years ago. Mentioning your ASAB is scarcely relevant to most conversations, even those about medical transitioning.
Nonbinary is enough, you don't have to supplement it with a binary system of any kind. It doesn't matter how many people want to know your "transition direction." It doesn't matter how many people want to know what your genitals are (which wouldn't be alluded to by your assigned sex anyway). It doesn't matter how many people what to binarise you. It doesn't matter how many binary people you confuse. No one needs to binarise you. Nonbinary. Is. Enough.
i love it when people are like "i hate white people" and the person in question is jewish.
Im not dead I promise
Is “other half” an another term for boyfriend?
🦁☀️
i should be allowed to murder the skinny bitches that buy plus sized clothes from thrift stores and cut and sew them into skinny people clothes. do you fucking KNOW how hard it is to find good plus size clothes as a fat person???? stop stealing what little we got
画一下
i keep forgetting he has no eyebrows
man whatever. happy easter. say hi to jc for me
she should have been in elementary school reading charlotte's web
Testament goes grocery shopping