Moonstone
I’ve mentioned before that I thought detective books ought to be longer than a simple short story, such as how Sir Arthur Conan Doyle wrote some of Sherlock Holmes’ adventures. I imagined that a great detective story would require many more pages to allow the story a chance of developing fully. Compared to one of Doyle’s short stories, I was certain a full-length detective novel would similarly provide the necessary enjoyment and intrigue that goes along with the genre, but that those feelings would be even more powerful because of the extra detail that a longer story allows. I had all this in mind when I began reading The Moonstone by Wilkie Collins. With over four hundred pages, one which quotes T. S. Eliot declaring it to be the best and longest detective novel, I started off with great expectations.
The story is told by a handful of characters as they recollect their memories involving the disappearance of the famous moonstone diamond. The first half of the book is told from the perspective of Gabriel Betteredge, a most loyal house-steward. His narration drew me into the story; I was deeply entertained by his odd, yet witty character. I also enjoyed this section because, compared to the last half of the book, it actually felt like a detective story. The missing moonstone was investigated by Sergeant Cuff, a detective well-known for solving incredible mysteries, who was convinced that the diamond was never actually stolen. He claimed that Rachel, the owner, wanted to make it appear as if it were stolen so that she could discreetly sell it in order to pay off some of her debt. Betteredge’s narrative ended with Rachel fleeing from her home after Cuff declared her suspected guilt.
At this point it seemed to me as though the story was ending, yet there still remained the last half of the book. The novel could have, and in my unwarranted opinion should have, ended after Betteredge concluded his narration. Maybe I just didn’t have enough patience to wait for the big reveal, but I found that the novel was actually quite hindered by its length. Perhaps I got too used to the short adventures of Sherlock Holmes, but The Moonstone just seemed needlessly long. Furthermore, I also want to note that I was gravely disappointed in the ending. The reveal of the mystery didn’t sit right with me; it seemed to lack the usual resolve and excitement that detective stories bring forth. Mainly, the fact that the character who actually stole the diamond wasn’t even aware they did it, really got on my nerves.













