$LAYYYTER
Cosmic Funnies

Product Placement

#extradirty
Show & Tell
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"

Kiana Khansmith

祝日 / Permanent Vacation

Janaina Medeiros
No title available
NASA
No title available
ojovivo

blake kathryn
dirt enthusiast
Stranger Things

pixel skylines
Sweet Seals For You, Always

Love Begins
styofa doing anything
seen from United States

seen from Thailand
seen from Puerto Rico

seen from Singapore
seen from United States

seen from Türkiye
seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from Canada

seen from Austria

seen from Canada
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from United States
@georgeodowd
You can’t scare me, I learned how to play “Hot Cross Buns” on the recorder in elementary school.
GET THE SHIRT HERE
As someone who played the recorder to a near-professional level, I would absolutely wear this shirt (mostly) unironically.
still not over god calling aziraphale’s love for crowley “silly” btw. messy, sure, fine, but silly? let’s maybe not use that word to describe queer love
double feature of the fucking millenium i think
Seeing the trailer for Leviticus on the big screen yesterday was amazing, and queer horror is my favourite thing ever, but I'm not even sure I have the capacity for more queer tragedy at this point, so we'll see. I am very excited about Girls Like Girls, though. I've had the song stuck in my head for a week now.
i hate pointless side plots and i hate wasted villains and i hate ignoring the emotional core of the story and i hate human au’s and i hate when characters we love are replaced with different people who we’re still supposed to care about and i hate fated soulmates and i hate they will find each other in every universe and i hate making decisions on behalf of everyone in the universe and i hate endings that reject the message of free will and carving your own path against the systems that seek to restrict you that was built up throughout the story while pretending to embrace it and i hate martyrdom and i hate self sacrifice for the greater good and i hate not being able to live to see the future you helped create when you deserve it and i hate the idea that you can’t live a happy or worthwhile life in a world with oppressive systems and you should just give up
"i hate the idea that you can’t live a happy or worthwhile life in a world with oppressive systems and you should just give up"
all of the above, but most especially this, in a story with queer protagonists and a queer fanbase
Pride Steve 2019 Redraw – [Etsy]
Literally rubbing salt in the wound
i'm sure queer people will love seeing cishets throwing slurs at a gay character and not letting him say the word gay and being forced to come out and not letting the lesbian character say she's a lesbian and making her break up with her girlfriend in the epilogue for no reason and giving them zero build up and not even showing their lips while kissing when they never did that for straight couples in the show.. and they never let Robin say girlfriend btw
WTF. I literally just spat my food on the keyboard. They had the GALL to put this abomination in the pride collection? Um, last I checked the dipshit bros were not LGBTQ+ creators....
I'm seriously seething right now.
Stranger things was merely a symptom of a much larger problem. As someone whose entire existence is informed by storytelling as an art form and foundation of being human, this is rapidly turning into my worst nightmare.
Happy Pride to Vanyel Ashkevron, the first openly gay protagonist in a mainstream fantasy book series!
(The Last Herald Mage series by Mercedes Lackey.)
happy pride month to these two <3
* these three
people joke when they say gay ships keep fandoms alive but it really is true. stranger things left the collective public consciousness months ago and byler is still thriving
Imagine saying this to the Robin Hobb who published her first book while financially struggling as a waitress and post lady with 4 children to take care of alone because her husband was an offshore fisherman in Alaska
The same goes for audiobooks!!! Yes, they are expensive to produce (for good reason). The price tag is often a stumbling block for indie authors. But I promise you there are so many professional narrators out there who will gladly help you build a crowdfunding campaign, or who will work with you on flexible payments. There is absolutely no reason and no excuse for using AI in audiobooks.
I am so upset at the ending of good omens that I genuienly haven't been able to stop angry ranting about it in this blog. I already wrote two pretty extensive different posts about why GO3 sucks and I still feel like I haven't scratched the surface enough.
So I'm gonna list even more grievances I had with this ending, and how it will never work for me, and why many viewers are torn about it.
1. The entire point of the character of Jesus and what he represents, and why the way his arc was handled leaves a dangerous and grim message.
I loved Jesus in the series, I thought he was extremely tender-hearted, confused, torn and most impostantly he is so incredibly human. When I was watching the series, I assumed that his character was meant to represent the importance of unity and why humanity works.
When Jesus gains conciousness again, he immediately asks for his friends, his mother, he asks for the connections he made during his human days that mattered the most to him. He choose to reach for his people over destiny or power.
Despite being Jesus, he's portrayed less as a divine figure and more as someone trying to navigate overwhelming circumstances while clinging to the people he loves.
He ultimately wanders through Earth and continues to be defined by his desire for connection. That's why his arc initially felt so powerful to me. It seemed to be building toward the idea that humanity's greatest strength is its ability to form meaningful relationships with one another.
Love. That's one of the most consistent theme on the show. Time and time again, the story emphasizes that the connections we form with others are what give our lives meaning. Characters endure unimaginable hardships because of the people they care about. They find reasons to keep going because someone matters to them.
Because of that, I assumed his arc was leading toward a reaffirmation of one of the show's central messages: that love is what allows humanity to survive, to heal, and to move forward.
I didn't expect his arc to not feel rushed in a 90 minute run, but what we got was worse in my opinion. It wasn't just rushed, it was ultimately a plotline that just dissolved into this wierd, tragic excuse of a plot.
Jesus as well as humanity, gets erased à la infinity war thanos snap. Before he dies he tragically says how he never got a chance to give it a go.
This just...sucks!! What even is the point of having the representaion of love and unity just dissaper into particles hopelessly? what message does that leave the viewers? Why did we even follow his plotline if ultimately it led us to absolutely nothing?
2. Crowley's choice in the end is ultimately framed as selfless when in reality it not only selifsh, but cowardly.
Crowley's character has always been about taking a clear stance. He defies the systems that were built and rebels by choosing his own moral compass over blind obedience.
What makes Crowley compelling is that he acts. He questions. He pushes back. He sees injustice and refuses to quietly participate in it. Even when he's afraid (and he often is) he still makes choices. He still stands his ground.
That's why his "wish" frustrates me so much.
Crowley's choice is framed as selfless because he is willing to sacrifice himself. He is willing to give up his own existence if it means creating a world free from Heaven and Hell because apparently thats the only way free will can actually exist.
The problem is that he isn't only sacrificing himself. He is also sacrificing Aziraphale. The decision is not solely his to make, yet the narrative imposes that he has to take it upon himself anyway.
Also, What about Beelzebub and Gabriel who literally carved a live out for themselves outside of heaven or hell?
Or Adam who quite literally rejects the role assigned to him because he choose his own friends and family? He rewrote the universe in season one because he refused to destory it, he wanted to fix it.
Then there's Maggie and Nina whom whose entire role in Season 2 revolves around the idea that relationships only work when people are allowed to make their own choices, free from outside interference?
The series repeatedly celebrates autonomy, self-determination, and choosing the people you love over the institutions that claim ownership of your life.
That's what makes Crowley's decision to reboot the universe in the name of "free will" so hollow.
In a strange way, his choice mirrors the very institutions Crowley spent the story opposing. Heaven and Hell repeatedly make enormous decisions for others because they believe they know what is best. They impose their vision of the future on countless people without consent.
That is what makes the choice feel cowardly to me as well. Rather than confronting the broken systems and finding a way to change them while preserving the people he loves, he chooses a solution that removes the problem by wiping the slate clean entirely.
A universe without Heaven and Hell may sound liberating, but if achieving it requires erasing the very individuals whose lives give that universe meaning, then the solution begins to undermine the values the story spent so much time celebrating.
Also it's a choice that the he would never make. This is the same Crowley who, when the world was on the verge of ending, didn't choose a grand ideological solution. He wanted to run away with Aziraphale.
Crowley's priorities have always been remarkably consistent. No matter how much he complains, no matter how cynical he pretends to be, when everything falls apart his first instinct is to protect the people he loves and stay close to them. Which is why he dislikes Armageddon in the first place, he loves the world he's in, he just doesn't like the people in power who control it.
This is also the same Crowley who, the last time we saw him, kissed Aziraphale in a desperate attempt to get him to stay. He was begging for Aziraphale to choose a life with him.
That's why the reboot decision feels so disconnected from the character we've been following.
You're asking me to believe that a Crowley who couldn't bear the thought of being separated from Aziraphale would willingly choose a future where both of them cease to exist entirely?
if there is one thing Crowley has consistently chosen throughout the entire story, it is Aziraphale.
3. What the hell even was the point of the Metatron's character then?
Season 2 literally builds up this character in a way that suggests he is going to be one of the most important antagonistic forces in the story.
His presence is unsettling from the moment he appears. The way he manipulates conversations, the way he isolates Aziraphale from Crowley, the way other characters react to him, this all creates the impression that there is something deeply wrong beneath his calm and polite exterior.
The entire tragedy of the finale hinges on the Metatron's intervention. He is the catalyst for Aziraphale's decision, the reason Crowley and Aziraphale separate. He is also arguably the single most important character in the climax outside of Crowley and Aziraphale themselves.
Which is why I'm left wondering what the point of all that buildup was.
Season 2 encourages the audience to pay attention to him. It practically begs us to analyze his motives. Fans spent years discussing whether he threatened Aziraphale, whether he was lying, what his true goals were, and what role he would play in the final conflict.
Instead, the Metatron quite literally gets killed in the first 15 minutes or so. We don't even get him as anything remotely close to a fully realized antagonist. That's what makes the decision so baffling to me.
The framing around him suggested that he represented something larger: the corruption of Heaven, the abuse of authority, the systems that manipulate people while presenting themselves as benevolent.
If that's what he was meant to symbolize, then why remove him almost immediately??? that literally prevents the story from fully engaging with those ideas.
It would be one thing if his death served as the beginning of a larger conflict. Sometimes a villain dies early because they are merely the face of a deeper problem. But if the narrative never properly explores that deeper problem either, then the Metatron's storyline starts to feel strangely hollow.
Looking back, it raises the question of why the audience was encouraged to fear him in the first place.
Why dedicate so much time to establishing his manipulation of Aziraphale?
Why make him the architect of one of the most emotionally devastating moments in the series?
Why position him as the looming threat over the future for Earth?
If the answer is simply for him to die before any of those threads are meaningfully explored, then the character ends up feeling less like an antagonist and more like a narrative device used to force the separation in Season 2. And for a figure who carried so much thematic and emotional weight, that's an incredibly unsatisfying payoff.
4. The archangel Michael being the plottwist antagonist
This was not only predictable, but just hollow to me.
A plot twist works when it either recontextualizes what came before or reveals something meaningful about the characters involved. Michael becoming the true antagonist doesn't really accomplish either of those things.
Michael wanted to destory the world, including their own coworkers who Michael had some sort of likness towards. Michael does this because they are tired and just...I don't know actually?? a comical crash out??
Like, I get it, we only have 90 minutes, but more reason to either build up the Metatron as the actual antagonist who we were already exploring last season, or atleast make Michael's motives make sense??? They really just erased existance for the fun of it I guess.
5. Aziraphale's mistreatment and mischarectarization
As someone who adores Aziraphale, this makes me so mad. We got like, the fanon version of his character instead of the fleshed out angel we know and love.
Mrs. Sandwich verbally berates him, calling him a taker and that he is the reason whickber street is the way it is now. And like, I think if we view this from Crowley's perspective then sure.
From Crowley's point of view, Aziraphale left. He chose Heaven. He chose an institution that has repeatedly hurt both of them. Crowley is heartbroken, and the people around him are witnessing the aftermath of that heartbreak.
However, Aziraphale went to heaven in hopes because of Crowley and he was also trying to avoid the second coming from happening. I am frustrated with how much Aziraphale is put down for this choice and tries to give the viewers no air to feel actual sympathy as to why he choose to leave.
But anyways, a specific scene that to me felt out of character was when Aziraphale finds Crowley extremely broken and sulking on the floor, and Aziraphale begs him to get up. Ultimately Crowley pushes him away and the angel leaves.
That's not the lovingly stubborn angel I know.
One of Aziraphale's defining traits throughout the entire series is persistence. When he loves someone, he doesn't give up on them easily. This is the angel who spent centuries arguing with Crowley. The angel who repeatedly sought him out even when they disagreed. The angel who continued believing there was good in people, in humanity, and even in Crowley when others would have walked away.
So when he finds the person he loves completely devastated and clearly not thinking rationally, it feels bizarre that he gives up so quickly. I'm not saying he should have magically fixed the situation. Crowley is allowed to be angry. He's allowed to reject him.
But Aziraphale's response to rejection has historically never been, "Well, I tried once." This is the same character who spent six thousand years maintaining a relationship that Heaven and Hell both disapproved of.
Yet now, in arguably the most important moment of their relationship, he seems strangely passive. Their reunion was an absolute let down.
I will give Michael Sheen credit where it's due. His performance is one of the few reasons the scene carries any emotional weight at all.
His voice cracks when he talks about Crowley. The look on his face communicates heartbreak, regret, fear, and love all at once. Even when the script isn't giving him much, you can tell exactly what Aziraphale is feeling.
I can see the love on Aziraphale's face. I can hear it in his voice. I absolutely believe that Michael Sheen's Aziraphale loves Crowley.
The problem is that Michael Sheen is acting emotions that the writing doesn't fully support.
6. The completely useless Bentley sideplot
First of all, I think taking Crowely's ability for miracles was a dumb plot device to allow some stupid gangsters take his Bentley.
It feels less like a meaningful conflict and more like a mechanism to keep Crowley occupied until the plot needs Aziraphale and Crowley to interact again.
Anyways, yes Aziraphale helps Crowley get the Bentley back and that's kind of the "truce" between them instead of like,, I don't know maybe an emotionally charge conversation? Crowley and Aziraphale's relationship has always been carried by dialogue.
If the Bentley storyline absolutely had to exist, then at least make it emotionally relevant. Make the Bentley represent something. Make Crowley's attachment to it part of a larger conversation about loss, identity, or the life he built with Aziraphale.
It feels like the writers wanted a reconciliation without having to write the difficult conversation that reconciliation actually requires.
Instead, the Bentley subplot ends up feeling like a distraction from the conversation the audience was actually waiting for. If you're going to dedicate screen time to a side quest in the middle of a story that already has limited runtime, that side quest should accomplish something beyond moving pieces around the board.
7. The lack of intimacy in Aziraphale's and Crowley's relationship this season was genuienly such a strange thing.
I feel like Good Omens always was good at writing such intimately sweet and precious moments between these two. And I feel like here, this season ultimately fails to deliver that.
Again, David and Michael translate their love through their performance amazingly. The problem is the script doesn't seem nearly as interested in those moments as previous seasons were.
I have already complained about not getting any sort of kiss (when, again, they had literally already crossed that line in Season 2). But I think what makes it worse is what happens with the alternate versions of Crowley and Aziraphale.
We get a camera pan of their hands with wedding rings. The narrative goes out of its way to communicate that these versions of them are together.
Because the original Crowley and Aziraphale never got that.
The versions we spent years following.
The versions who shared six thousand years of history.
The versions who suffered, grew, changed, argued, reconciled, and fell in love.
Instead, the story presents alternate versions who have not lived through the same experiences and then gives them the visual shorthand of a happy ending.
They aren't the people whose relationship formed the emotional heart of the series.
So while I understand what the scene is trying to communicate, it doesn't land as a reward for me.
It lands as a reminder that the characters who actually earned that future never got to experience it. And that's why the moment feels strangely hollow. It's not that I needed a wedding. It's not even that I specifically needed a kiss.
It's that after Season 2 already made their romantic feelings explicit, the finale seems reluctant to give the original Crowley and Aziraphale even the smallest moment of mutual romantic fulfillment, while simultaneously making sure the audience notices the wedding rings on their replacements.
The result felt less like a payoff and more like a workaround. A way of acknowledging the romance without fully allowing the characters we've spent years loving to actually live it.
....And there's sooooo much more but i'll never shut up so i'll end my list here (if you want to add on to my list, be my guest, theres so much to say about this awful ending to such a beloved series!!)
Ultimately, I feel for the creatives who did care for this show yet had their hands tied when it came to this god awful ending. I feel for both Michael Sheen and David Tennant who put their heart and souls into these characters just for this to be the resolution. The cast and crew who worked tirelessly on this show and had to watch it crumble this way, I can't imagine how it feels.
But most importantly, I feel for the us, the viewers, whom connected with this show and followed it for years. The LGBTQ+ fans who for once, wanted a romance story that was promised ended right. For the queer love in the story to have been as loud as it had been in the past 2 seasons instead of just dancing around it.
After all these years, queer audiences are not asking for special treatment.
We're asking for the same thing every audience asks for: for the stories we invest our hearts in to follow through on the promises they make.
starting off pride month with one of the best coming out scenes in television history 💕
remember when ST was actually a decent show and wrote one of the best coming out scenes in recent TV history?
...remember when it completely erased all of that by having the worst ending and the most insulting coming out scene in TV history?
i will always grieve what this show was and what it could have been before the real talent left the writers room.
can I just say something cause I'm still really fucking angry.
I always said that if Stranger Things didn't make byler canon it would be a massive flop, and some people (at least around me), even though they were byler shippers, thought that was too far, but I genuinely don't think they could have even made that shit good without making byler canon. It's like what people were saying with conformitygate, 'if they do it but byler doesn't happen, I don't want it'. Byler was such a strong narrative force in the show. To subvert the conformist ending they would've had to make byler canon. To make the ending good in the first place they would need to be true to the show, and how could they be true to the show while forgetting all these laws they had set up with byler?
By ignoring byler like they did, they had to ignore the laws of writing. The laws that they set for themselves when writing it in earlier seasons, especially season 4, because that painting was the point of no return. You can't introduce something like that and never address it. It's just unfinished business that doesn't make any sense because you never resolved it.
And they can't resolve it with a rejection, because I think they knew how stupid that would've been, or maybe they didn't care and wanted to break our hearts, but I digress. If they did some slow burn rejection thing, that would have been a very strange and genuinely anticlimactic writing choice. They would have had to actually explain the painting and make it undeniable for the viewers. They would've had to acknowledge that how Will spoke in the van is how he feels about Mike, and what is that if not love? Pure love, the way they wrote it. The way they acted and directed it, scrutinising it for hours and telling Finn 'it'll pay off.'
If I had done all that, just to end it in rejection, I would be embarrassed of myself.
So they didn't do a rejection, they acted like it was never real in the first place. The coward approach, even more embarrassing In my opinion, but at least all the casual watchers will forget there was ever a painting in the first place.
My point is, no matter what they did with byler, without making it canon, there were always going to be cracks in the dam.
It could be one of the reasons they nerfed Henry And Patty, because the parallels were too obvious. Mike and Will were meant to be their foils, I will die on this hill. Where things ended in tragedy for them, Will and Mike's story was going to be different, because Will was possesed, but he wouldn't lose to the mindflayer like Henry did, right? Mike would have pulled through, not because of a speech from his best friend, but because it was what was in his heart.
In the end, they literally just annihilated all of that. Henry was actually just an evil sycopath with no feelings, who wanted to do everything he did, going against canon lore that they created/approved of with the First Shadow. Patty wasn't even introduced, which should have happened in a good ending for Stranger Things, but they already had a cast of like 80 people by then. They couldn't have forgotten fucking Murray because we all know how important he is.
I don't know what the stance on this is, but I genuinely believe that Stranger things was going to have it's good ending, and something happened behind the scenes that ruined it. I'm not glazing the Duffers, I hate them. I'm saying that Stranger Things was written for misfits at some point. I didn't make that up. There were genuinely beautiful moments in that show and for all it's flaws, it's relationships were what held it all together. I don't really know how it all works, and I guess we'll never get answers, but what the Duffers wrote did not take two years. That took six months at least. It was the definition of rushed. And I know the Duffers never cared about their representation, you can tell by the way that they talk about it, but someone did. Someone laid byler into the groundwork. Someone wrote down those laws and said, 'hey, this is how it works. Don't fuck it up.'
And they did, catastrophically.
It screams cowardice.
In order to nuke byler, they also had to do a last minute save for mileven, cue Jane carrying all the weight.
There were rules for mileven, too. And they broke all of them, too. They wrote again and again about how little Mike and Jane didn't understand eachother. They bored us with fights instead of giving those two something to stand on. In order for Mike to have his big saviour moment for Jane, he needed Will. You can't be told what comes from your heart. Only you can decide that. But Will decided it for Mike, and the show went along with it. Making it difficult to understand how Mike's feelings for Jane worked or whether he even had them.
They wrote Jane's season 4 arc in support of an ending where byler was endgame, and when they backed out, they had to throw her under the bus. Literally get rid of her. Suddenly, Mike always understood her and mileven was all that mattered and all that she was in those mere four years she was out of the lab. Barely able to speak when she had her first kiss with someone she thought of as family. Crying because Mike wasn't loving her right, and gaining her final strength in season 4 not because Mike said something from the heart, but because Will did.
Can't you see? All of this was leading to their endgame.
Its a fucking joke.
The Party at NYC Pride 92! 🌈☀️
Happy Pride Month Byler nation! 💙💛
I know we didn’t get the ending we deserved but let’s celebrate queer love and joy anyway!
Plus, the show is over, we can decide for ourselves what Will and Mike get up to in the 90’s…
Also, do I think all those characters are all queer? Well, maybe, I don’t know… But some are and I’m sure they would support each other and go to Pride all together!
(The poses for the Party’s photo is copied from a photo of the Heartstopper cast at Pride 🙂↕️)