Kaya, 27, They/Them & Shi/Hir
Intersex Nonbinary Gaybian AroAce
Fat Autistic Mad Plural Alterhuman
Rowlf is my F/O! đ€ (Non-Sharing)
I block Bigots, Exclusionists, & Tankies
FREE PALESTINE! FREE UKRAINE! đ”đž đșđŠ
Game of Thrones Daily
Three Goblin Art
No title available
ojovivo
Stranger Things

izzy's playlists!
Not today Justin

Discoholic đȘ©
Mike Driver
Peter Solarz
Aqua Utopiaïœæ”·ăźćșă§èšæ¶ă玥ă
Show & Tell
Claire Keane

Kaledo Art
taylor price
sheepfilms
trying on a metaphor

ç„æ„ / Permanent Vacation
Today's Document
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
seen from Austria
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from Malaysia

seen from France

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Philippines

seen from Malaysia
seen from Morocco
seen from United States
seen from Indonesia

seen from Poland
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Denmark
@ghostly-rowlf
Kaya, 27, They/Them & Shi/Hir
Intersex Nonbinary Gaybian AroAce
Fat Autistic Mad Plural Alterhuman
Rowlf is my F/O! đ€ (Non-Sharing)
I block Bigots, Exclusionists, & Tankies
FREE PALESTINE! FREE UKRAINE! đ”đž đșđŠ
Tuatara (Sphenodon punctatus), family Sphenodontidae, order Rhynchocephalia, endemic to New Zealand
Once considered ENDANGERED, they have been upgraded to Least Concern now.
There were once considered to be 2 species of Tuatara, but now there is only one species recognized.
This is not a lizard.
Tuataras can grow to a total length of up to 80Â cm (31Â in).
This is the only member of the reptile group Rhynchocephalia that is still around. All other species went extinct millions of years ago.
Tuataras were eradicated by humans and introduced species from the main islands of New Zealand, and now only occur on small islands near the North Island and far north of the South Island. (*There has been some modest success re-introducing them to the main islands.)
Tuataras are mainly insectivorous.
The oldest known tuatara is around 130 years old!
This is one of my very favorite animals!!!
photograph via: The Toledo Zoo
im gonna be completely for real, saying "a lot of people use the term 'moral ocd' as an excuse for ignoring bad things" is not a good thing to put in your post tagged "#moral ocd"
never let the fact that you were born a girl stop you from being the gayest man alive
they should invent a body that feels normal to be inside of
i NEED people to realise foreshadowing is. in fact. a literary device. and not a Bad Thing. the audience picking up on your hints is a Good Thing. because. it makes the story and itâs conclusion make sense. and some people will not see those but enjoy seeing them on a second read through. red herrings are one thing but if your novel consists of nothing but red herrings itâs not a coherent story itâs just a collection of paragraphs that donât actually plausibly link to one another. you're not fighting with the audience you donât look clever you look like you donât know how basic fiction works. be vulnerable for once in your goddamn life and don't treat writing like a game to be won where the audience losing is a good thing.
Getting to the end of a story and going "THE CLUES WERE THERE THE WHOLE TIME!" is always joyous for me whether or not I picked up on the clues leading up
If I saw the clues and caught the hints then yes! I am clever and me and the author/creator/artist etc were in on it together the whole time!
If I didn't notice the clues or got fooled but can clearly see them in hindsight then "Ha! You won this time storyteller! I am delighted by this game we play!' and then I enjoy putting the pieces together afterwards and enjoying how clever it was. I feel like the creator respects me as an audience
If there is a "twist" that comes with 0 clues or foreshadowing at all I'm annoyed. I'm pissed off. I feel like I'm being condescended to and patronised. It's not clever or interesting and makes me annoyed I ended up caring about characters and plot points that ended up meaningless.
Because it's not that these stories don't have foreshadowing or plot clues. They just abandon it for a "surprising twist"
A story that pays off the clues is letting me into the fun and makes a participant in the story
A story that just gives me a "shock" but no pay off is telling me not to engage or get attached or care. So why would I watch?
OMG! THIS!
Random plot twists that don't connect to anything in the story are not clever. If we don't see it coming because the writer didn't provide any clues, they aren't clever and it's totally unsatisfying (and I will NEVER read this writer again). These clues need not be lit up in neon with a parade of elephants and showgirls. But they need to be present
I'm a writer and am rarely surprised. Often, if I am surprised it's because the writer was a dumbass and included a "twist" that makes no sense (and therefore isn't really a twist, it's just random bullshit). If a writer genuinely surprises me, without being an absolute dumbass, I am FUCKING DELIGHTED! I will tell everyone I know to read the book/see the movie/watch the show.
Foreshadowing is the reward for paying attention. It's the story letting you in on the secret like a co-conspirator because you're the clever little audience member who has been picking up on the clues the writer has been setting up.
It even makes watching/reading again more worthwhile because if you didn't notice the foreshadowing the first time you have the joy of being able to notice the things you missed!
disabled people are often in permacrisis
there's never enough money each month. there's always an unexpected illness. new symptoms pop up or old symptoms flare up. meds have to be managed always and refilled constantly and any refill has the opportunity to go wrong. any regular care has the opportunity to go wrong. any mistake can send your health spiralling. it's always "i just need to get through this bad patch" but as soon as one ends another begins. another crisis begins in the middle of the last crisis. managing one thing leaves another thing to be neglected until that becomes a major issue and has to be managed asap and the cycle starts anew over and over and over
via prev
i wanna see more characters with crazy genders and ten sets of pronouns. i want more characters that are several minorities at once no matter if it makes sense or not. i want a genuine miku binder wearing character and a genuine solo poly hijabi, and i want them to be friends. i want characters named Bug and Kai and Fridge and Sock and Microwave. i want nonhuman characters in human fields, and human characters in love with nonhumans. i wanna see characters with several disabilities simply existing. i want characters with clashing interests and fashion styles and hyper-specific jobs. i wanna see characters in polycules, triads, qprs, several at once with different characters. i want characters who are systems with 500+ alters. i want plural characters who are open about it. i want characters who fursuit and wear therian gear and do quads. i want characters who are otherkin. i wanna see a pack of wolf therians and a group of warrior cats feline therians who hang out at the same park. i want a group of characters where everyone has a different shade of skin and different hair color and different fave flavor of monster energy. i wanna see characters that reflect real life !!!!!!!!!!!! i want to see more characters !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Here is an article from NPR about it (May 22, 2026):
Carolina Milanesi, an independent technology analyst, said Google is trying to make its cash cow business â search â richer and more personalized, and it will make shopping easier. But there is a risk that users may have fewer choices about what to click. "Right now it's: I ask a question, I get a bunch of answers and I feel that I'm in control as to which answer I take, or if I'm looking for something, which product I'm going to end up buying. That is going to be less so going forward," she said. Milanesi envisions AI-enabled search and agents proposing products to consumers â perhaps even those they have requested â but with less clarity or choice around where it's coming from. "If you're going to say: 'I want a pair of Jordans, go find them,' you're not necessarily sure what steps have been taken and whether the AI has used a source or a store that was paid for and therefore came up in the search results," she said, "or if AI actually went and did their due diligence and picked the best for me as a customer."
And here's one from Time magazine (May 20, 2026):
While Google already has âAI Mode,â the company will now power the whole search bar through its new Gemini 3.5 Flash model. Instead of the classic list of blue links, Google Search will now also generate a custom page with an AI-generated summary of what youâre searching about, which will then trigger a conversation with AI Mode on the main page, allowing users to ask follow-up questionsâsimilar to the kind of layout you would see when opening ChatGPT.
And a little more from Time's article on how this may affect the websites that we are trying to search for:
When Google first started implementing AI-assisted results, news publishers warned of âcatastrophicâ impacts on the industry, much of which relies on Google search to drive users to their websites. Last year, news websites saw significant traffic declines as chatbots increasingly replaced Google search as the primary way to find sites and ask questions. Small businesses also noted drops in traffic to their sites from Google, which has traditionally delivered customers.  Lily Ray, vice president of SEO strategy & research at Amsive, a digital marketing agency, warned as early as last year that Googleâs planned changes to search are âgoing to have a devastating impact on the Internet.â âIt will severely cut into the main source of revenue for most publishers and it will disincentivize content creators who rely on organic search traffic, which is millions of websites, maybe more,â she told Technology Magazine. Â
noai.duckduckgo.com blocks all AI content in search results automatically
in Finland, it is illegal to kill a bear when itâs hibernating. If you ask a hunter why that is, a number of them will tell you itâs wrong simply because it is the law, and they donât make a distinction between what is right, and what is legal. Most people like that are perfectly normal, decent and respectable people, just like the rest of us.
 But if you ask people who think about things, the answer is vague. Killing a hibernating bear would just feel⊠impolite? You canât fucking shoot a man when heâs sleeping, thatâs just fucking rude. Itâs just not the right thing to do.
 Long before hunting laws were established in Finland, you couldnât kill a sleeping bear, and what commands you is something older than law: tradition. Even at a time when hunting was a matter of life and death, and a bear fighting for its life is mainly a matter of death, you just didnât kill a hibernating bear, you have to wake it up first. Hunters risked their lives, the lives of their brothers and everyone in the hunting party, who were friends, family and men that they loved, to give the bear a fighting chance.
 In the modern time, the hunting season of bears is in the summer, for the warmest summer months. There are many reasons for why they are allowed to tread safely in autumn and to sleep in peace through the cold months, almost all of which are rational and scientific, and do not touch the old traditions.
 Old faith says a living thing has many souls - henki, luonto, itse. Plants only have one - the one that wills them to grow. Animals have two, both the spark of life and nature that enables them to act. A human being also has the third, one that makes them a person, personality, itse, literally âselfâ. But the soul that travels in your dreams is not the soul that defines a human - animals have that one as well. When your dog runs in her sleep, her soul is elsewhere, where a dog is needed.
 Oneâs waking soul is elsewhere when they sleep and dream. A bearâs soul is somewhere else when they are hibernating - there are two words for âhibernationâ in finnish, one of which is talviuni, âwinter sleepâ, and that is the one that bears have - and if you kill a sleeping bear, their soul is not in the body, it is still out there, and it can find you, and as a revenge for killing its body, Ghost Bear will kill your entire fucking family.
A small addition: bears, as omnivorous mammals who sometimes walk on two legs, were also considered about one measly step removed from humans â enough like us to be kind of kin.
And as much as you wouldnât stab your fellow human in their sleep, you wouldnât stick a spear into a sleeping bear. And in case the bear hunt was successful, youâd hold a (drink-laden) wake for the bear to see its spirit off into the afterlife just as youâd do for a deceased human.
Also I have a very vague recollection of a myth about Finns (loosely defined) being descended from a bear ancestor, and how the wake celebration for a bear might include a symbolic wedding of the bear spirit to a young girl. More folkloric-minded people with actual references, please do weigh in on this!
Hellebores (Lenten Roses) under a UV light.
the problem is that a lot of people think that the evil of eugenics is "playing with forces of nature man was not meant to meddle with" and not the whole cohercion and killing and mutilation of people
i genuinely can't fucking deal with the larger internet anymore holy shit what the fuck are you people TALKING about. i am at my limit with this stupid bullshit. who the fuck cares if a man is hired to draw medical diagrams for young girls jesus christ we're pearl clutching about medical illustrations now? next you're gonna tell me male pediatricians shouldn't advise parents on their kids' vulva issues? male surgeons shouldn't be in the room when performing a procedure where a woman's breasts or vulva might be exposed? male researchers shouldn't conduct gynecological medical research? sure. better for men to live in ignorance and NEVER ally themselves with us to expand access to sexual education and reproductive healthcare i fucking guess. Twenty thousand likes. i hate it here KILL ME
Is that person transmasc or are they just on T? Is that person transfem or are they just on E? Is that person transfem or were they just assigned male at birth? Is that person transmasc or were they just assigned female at birth?
Is that person actually transmasc or transfem or are you just gendering hormones and body parts? Is that person actually transfem or transmasc or are you just equating agab with gender alignment?
Is that person actually transfem or transmasc or are you forgetting that unaligned and alternatively aligned enben exist?
Donât mind me just thinking about the hole in the middle of the United States where Chipping sparrows refuse to fuck
Official ornithology post