Was mentallyexhaustedcatgirl and got banned for ?????
Im honestly not sure
Looking for my moots
Doug Jones
ojovivo
todays bird
Interview Vampire Daily

No title available

blake kathryn

No title available
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
KIROKAZE
YOU ARE THE REASON

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
Color Me Curious

#extradirty

PR's Tumblrdome
RMH
cherry valley forever
h
Fai_Ryy
No title available

@theartofmadeline

seen from Austria
seen from Iraq

seen from Canada
seen from Türkiye
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Norway
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from Russia

seen from Bangladesh

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from T1
seen from Brazil

seen from France
seen from Vietnam

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Iraq
@exhaustedcatgirl
Was mentallyexhaustedcatgirl and got banned for ?????
Im honestly not sure
Looking for my moots
dragon who kisses you with tongue and deletes shinigami eyes from your web browser
“shinigami eyes is bad?” well i encourage you to draw your own conclusions of course but
Completely unsurprising post to be made by a person who consistently refuses to recognise the reactionary basis of the "transandrophobia" movement
Everyone's always very keen to forget that Shinigami Eyes wasn't actually developed to mark transphobes in general but to help aid the online safety of trans women specifically, and shockingly enough yeah you're more likely to get marked red if you explicitly refuse to oppose the trans cohort of Men's Rights Activists.
The above green-marked statements are obviously pithy off-the-cuff remarks expressing such normal women's frustrations as "men are often misogynist" and "women shouldn't give men infinite patience", but of course these things that are perfectly understandable in the mouths of cis feminists become gross insults when said by a transfem, because everything we ever say is taken in the worst possible faith and we're never allowed to be annoyed or angry.
Being annoyed or angry is not an excuse to be incredibly transphobic actually. One trans woman to another, go fuck yourself.
Hey, btw, Libertineangel is fully lying up there. Shinigami Eyes now exists solely to "protect" a specific subset of reactionary trans women and no one else, including any trans woman who even vaguely steps out of line with the "radical transfeminist" movements online.
However, when the project started, it was explicitly and specifically for ALL trans people of ALL gender assignments and gender identities.
Like. I know that person is right about the use case of the extension now, but they are straight up lying about history here. And really recent history. History most of tumblr's user base lived through on tumblr.
This is a ridiculous thing to lie about, frankly.
Source on the extension including nonbinary people and trans men as per their guidelines as far back and 2019 btw
> “mannish features”
> look inside
> literally just common physical traits among women of colour
you can’t separate transmisogyny from racism. the radical feminism movement is so overwhelmingly white because their idea of what a woman is is so thoroughly steeped in white supremacy.
You can’t separate transmisogyny from racism. Very important to remember
It's very interesting the gendered double-edged sword of being believed about pain. People assumed to be cis men are supposed to tough out pain, repress it, tamp it down. You're not allowed to react to pain because it's a weakness. You're not that hurt, and even if you are, you cannot show it. But then people assumed to be cis women are supposedly weaker, so if you react to pain it's a sign that you're reacting to a lower threshold of pain. You're not that hurt, you're just a woman.
And it's wild because men and women both, cis and trans alike, are so convinced that they are the only ones not believed about pain, not allowed to express certain emotions.
When disability is a connected factor, then there is even greater disbelief, backlash, lack of patience. When mental health is a factor, there is an even greater assumption of low tolerance or delusion. When race is a connected factor, then suddenly Black people are meant to have a higher pain tolerance, so they are allowed to suffer more. Self-medication is expected in some areas, and forbidden in others. Access through financial means is a barrier to care.
There's so many layers to the concept of "I'm not allowed to react to my suffering" that are all true, but every time there is someone making gendered arguments of "UNLIKE MY OPPOSITE" I have to call bullshit. Cis men and women do it to each other, they do it to trans people, trans people do it to each other, and to cis people.
Everyone's pain is being ignored, no one's needs are being met, because we are participating in a hierarchical system that tries to imply inherent superiority, and if anything dampens your assumed superiority then you're weak, and if you can do anything to challenge your assumed weakness then you're a threat.
You mean everything to me, TWOC & TFOC!!
(PT: You mean everything to me, TWOC & TFOC!! /end PT)
You're so lovely, Black/African trans women & fems!! 🩷
You're so incredible, Brown trans women & fems!! 🩵
You're so awesome, Indigenous trans women & fems!! 🤍
You're so spectacular, Pacific Islander trans women & fems!! 🩷
You're so amazing, Latino trans women & fems!! 🩵
You're so unique, multiracial trans women & fems!! 🤍
You're so outstanding, East Asian trans women & fems!! 🩷
You're so fantastic, South Asian trans women & fems!! 🩵
You're so admirable, Southeast Asian trans women & fems!! 🤍
You're so brilliant, Central Asian trans women & fems! 🩷
You're so delightful, West Asian/Middle Eastern trans women & fems!! 🩵
You're so marvelous, North Asian trans women & fems!! 🤍
Trans women or color & transfems of color are everything to this world!!! 🩵🩷🤍🩷🩵 Never stop being you!!
boring take from real 21st century idiots: bdsm is bad because it's basically torture
interesting take from a fictional 14th century monk: torture is bad because it's basically sex
Shoutout to the nun who had other nuns tie her up and pour hot wax on her as she confessed her sins
I'm sure that's true, but something tells me googling "nun tied up by other nuns" "hot wax" "confessing sins" will likely get what you might call rather un-academic results
Genuinely what the fuck does this even mean. I’m at a loss for words at this point. Just. What?
Probably this, which is most of the boys on this site tbh
There is literally no explanation of this image that isn't transphobic as FUCK.
Either the message is that being a trans man is something white people impose on global southern and/or from-muslim-communities children, implying that these children cannot organically just be trans and that being trans is a white thing
or
the message is that white trans allies forcing other trans people to acknowledge the existence of trans people from global southern and/or from muslim communites is wrong and inherently nefarious.
Either way this is extremely transphobic and racist.
The message is pretty simple, which is that cissexuals often point to people who can’t transition as being the same as themselves, someone who just doesn’t want to
Oh you're transmed. Given the depiction of the '13 year old hijabi', im still assuming theres some latent racism involved but I guess slightly less blatant.
Still transphobic and racist.
"these researchers published a paper on something that literally any of us could have told you 🙄" ok well my supervisors wont let me write something in my thesis unless I can back it up with a citation so maybe it's a good thing that they're amplifying your voice to the scientific community in a way that prevents people from writing off your experiences as annecdotal evidence
they did the research in the first place because they believed you and wanted to tell people about it. they are not our enemies.
people always go "Instead of spending all that time on a study they could have just listened to us when we said these thing happen"
they did listen, that's how studies work, they asked people about their experiences and put all the data together in a nice package that can be cited
i cant believe that there's still gamergate STANK on games that women enjoy. NASTY misogyny residue. stardew valley is in fact a video game. animal crossing is also a video game. so are otome games and dating sims and twee little cozy games. sometimes a bitch doesnt wanna play bloodborne that shit's hard
guys who mainly play 2k and fortnite will still be like oh youre not a real gamer for having 1000 hours in stardew. mother fucker you're larping as a basketball player
Fighting robot girl, yes being sexy is very necessary to defeat your target
remember to recheck your size
GOUGAR CLAIMS COOL ROCK
God forbid women do anything
She had a good time, too
hes trying to ignore it
I've seen visual novels unexpectedly swerve into famously beginner-hostile genres like top-down shoot-'em-ups, and I've seen precision puzzle platformers swerve into visual novels, but I've never seen a visual novel swerve into a precision puzzle platformer, which feels like a conspicuous omission. Like, you thought you were going to do some light reading, maybe see some titty? Fuck you – do this Kaizo Mario thing or no titties for you.
it's always "you gnawed off your own leg to escape like an animal caught in a trap" and never "why didn't anyone try to help you out of the trap" or "why weren't you provided with any other resources to escape the trap with except for your own teeth"
❗
Still dancing with this new art style for Zitra, and I must say I really enjoy how she handles it!
Don't know why it just slapped me in the face but you know how people say "Well my feminist/gender theory framework says xyz, so you must be lying!!" when someone mentions their own lived experience which contradicts that?
You see it a lot with people saying "Masculinity is always rewarded" and people expected to be feminine saying "Well, no, actually, no it's not" and then they get hit with "Well MY theory says otherwise!!"
The thing that slapped me in the face is the word theory. Theory is, essentially, a term that means "This is what I think to be the case, based on the data I have available/observations I have made". Theories are meant to be tested, though. Theories are not infallible truths. Theories are just a step towards looking for either support or contradiction for your theory.
You can absolutely have the theory "Masculinity is always rewarded, regardless of gender", but when more and more data is collected that proves that, actually, masculinity is not always rewarded, and there are several hidden variables you have to keep in mind when collecting your data...
Well, then, in science, you would have to readjust your theory or throw it out entirely. You would have to keep testing it, and changing it, to fit what your findings actually show.
The issue with people saying "My feminist theory states that all masculinity is rewarded, so it is" is that this is just piss poor scientific/academic methodology. You are cherry-picking and purposefully skewing your data to fit your hypothesis, you are ignoring the data that contradicts your theory, you are, essentially, poisoning your data pool or purposefully altering it to affirm your theory in a way where it guarantees you will always be proven right.
In an academic setting, this would get you laughed out of the fucking room. In an academic setting, this type of behavior has gotten countless people laughed out of the room and blacklisted for flagrant tampering of results.
And I think it just goes to show that, once again, any flavor of radical feminism truly does rot the brain and prevent any actual critical thinking and intellectual conceptions to be made.