
Kiana Khansmith
Game of Thrones Daily

izzy's playlists!

pixel skylines
NASA

blake kathryn
todays bird

★
Misplaced Lens Cap
Cosimo Galluzzi
trying on a metaphor

tannertan36
Sweet Seals For You, Always

No title available

JVL
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
Show & Tell
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
will byers stan first human second

No title available

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Malaysia
seen from T1
seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from Netherlands
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia

seen from Thailand
seen from Germany

seen from United States

seen from Japan

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Malaysia

seen from France
seen from United States
seen from France
seen from United States
@goddam-unicorn
Angel manta ray (what if fish was bird??)
Wow the whole gang is here!
Es hora de desprenderse de todo lo que te hace mal.
Desprenderte de las ganas de ver a alguien que no te quiere.
Desprenderte de lo miserable que te consideras.
Desprenderte de todo lo malo.
de las lágrimas.
de las tristezas.
de los engaños.
de las mentiras.
Desprenderte del color obscuro del cielo.
Desprenderte de las noches tristes.
Desprenderte de lo que crees merecer y comenzar a aferrarte a lo que mereces.
- adathk666
Anyone ever pissed at Snape because he literally had the students buy shitty potions textbooks?
Like literally the same book he used when he was at hogwarts
The same book he spent time correcting so that it actually worked
That’s the book he had his students buy, and then he didn’t give them the corrections.
That alone makes him an unforgivable character because he liked to watch children fail.
That’s the book he had his students buy, and then he didn’t give them the corrections.
On the contrary, canon rather suggests that Snape did teach the kids the revised instructions.
Snape clearly instructed the class verbally:
Prisoner of Azkaban:
Didn’t you hear me say, quite clearly, that only one cat spleen was needed? Didn’t I state plainly that a dash of leech juice would suffice?
Snape doesn’t instruct them to use the textbook; he puts the instructions on the board:
Order of the Phoenix:
“The ingredients and method” — Snape flicked his wand — “are on the blackboard”
and, in another lesson:
Determined not to give Snape an excuse to fail him this lesson, Harry read and reread every line of the instructions on the blackboard
Additionally, Order of the Phoenix gives us some other clues.
“And I must tell you that Professor Snape absolutely refuses to take students who get anything other than ‘Outstanding’ in their O.W.L.s,”
So McGonagall knows that Snape only takes Outstandings, which means it’s been an ongoing decision - it’s not new for Harry’s year. And why would Snape get away with only taking the best?
Well:
“Moronic though some of this class undoubtedly are, I expect you to scrape an ‘Acceptable’ in your O.W.L., or suffer my … displeasure.”
He expects everyone - even Neville, Crabbe and Goyle to gain an A. That’s his absolute baseline. He doesn’t anticipate anyone getting a P, T or D - which is a huge ask, expecting his class to attain the three top grades, without any one of them getting one of the three bottom grades.
“I advise all of you to concentrate your efforts upon maintaining the high-pass level I have come to expect from my O.W.L. students”
Yet evidently, he’s been succeeding.
So doesn’t that rather suggest that he’s teaching them from his own knowledge rather than the textbook? Is it really plausible that every student would succeed, and not a single one would fail, if he was only teaching from the textbook?
After all, Umbridge says:
“Well, the class seems fairly advanced for their level,”
And the real litmus test?
Well, in Half Blood Prince,Slughorn doesn’t write on the blackboard at all. Not once. Instead, he points the kids at their books:
“Scales out, everyone, and potion kits, and don’t forget your copies of Advanced Potion-Making… .”
So let’s look at Hermione and Harry. Hermione’s potions are perfect under Snape. She can follow instructions to the letter, and she always creates a flawless potion. She enters Slughorn’s class, continues to follow the instructions from the textbook, and she flails.
In contrast, Harry was continually distracted in Snape’s lessons - usually because of their joint animosity. Harry was less inclined to concentrate, and Snape made it impossible for him to relax - and for the most part, Harry was preoccupied with other events (e.g. Triwizard Tournament). Despite all of this, Harry still gains an Exceeds Expectations at OWL.
Under Slughorn, Harry finally follows the Prince’s instructions to the letter (he can follow Snape’s instructions, as long as he doesn’t realise Snape’s at the helm), and he creates flawless potions. Although he doesn’t have the innate talent that we see displayed by Snape throughout the his textbook corrections (although I’d argue that Harry has so much on his plate, he has no time to invest in becoming a prodigy), Harry is skilled enough to successfully follow all of the Prince’s methods and techniques, and turn out excellent potions.
Overall, this suggests that neither Hermione or Harry is capable of seeing instinctively what’s required; both only succeed when they’ve got the notes before them and follow them to the letter. Snape, by contrast, was an instinctive Potions maker - it appears Slughorn is teaching in the same way he always did, and we know he taught Snape - so it seems likely that Snape’s flair wasn’t taught to him.
It all rather indicates that Snape was teaching the kids his revised methods. It’s plausibly less apparent during the early years that we see him teaching, because presumably, the easy potions do not require intense modification.
As for why he had them purchase the textbook? Perhaps it was the only one available. Interestingly, the textbook that you’re complaining about is the NEWT level textbook - is that the reason why Snape requires an Outstanding grade at OWL, because he knows the textbook is shoddy, and will require great skill on the part of the student to make sense of it?
The thing about knitting is it’s much harder to fear the existential futility of all your actions while you’re doing it.
Like ok, sure, sometimes it’s hard to believe you’ve made any positive impact on the world. But it’s pretty easy to believe you’ve made a sock. Look at it. There it is. Put it on, now your foot’s warm.
Checkmate, nihilism.
This is a powerful positive message..
I’m literally reading a book right now (Burnout by Emily and Amelia Nagoski) that says this is scientifically sound.
There have been studies done on rats and dogs where they develop learned helplessness in the animals by giving them impossible tasks. Eventually the animals stop trying, even when the task stops being impossible. (I.e. put a rat in a maze with cheese it can’t get to until it develops learned helplessness, then put the cheese somewhere it can get to it and it won’t even try.) But once they show the animals they CAN do something - i.e. physically moving the rat to the cheese - the learned helplessness goes away.
No one can move you to your cheese for you, but the book says DOING something - which they define as “anything that isn’t nothing” can help. Make a food. Work in the garden. Clean a thing. Do a favor for a friend. Call your elected officials.
Knit a sock.
If you feel overwhelmed by existential despair, do something. It doesn’t have to be big. It just has to be anything that isn’t nothing.
Why is it that march always brings me the absolute mist banger posts…
You can see why we named her Dervish
My chest hurts from laughing omfg
@nagunkgunk
tell me something nice, hit me with those positive vibess
the earliest recorded named cat lived over 3000 years ago in egypt and was called ‘nedjem’ which means sweetie
the pet cat of prince thutmose was called ‘tai miuwette’ which means ‘little mewer’
in medieval england so many cats were given the name ‘gilbert’ that the word ‘gyb’ came to mean ‘pet cat’
Classical get modernized !
- by Lothlenan (Andrea Tamme)
Después de todo… gracias.
Porque conocerte no sólo fue un gusto, sino tambien muchas enseñanzas de las cuales me he tenido que sostener muy fuerte para no volver a caer por tí. Sí, por tí, porque conociste de mí todo lo que me hacía sentir sensible ante cualquier cosa, te miraba a los ojos y me sentía tan cómodo pensando en que podías haber sido tú quien está vez se sí se quedará, pero no fuiste una excepción sino igual al resto como siempre me ha pasado. Gracias por tu tiempo, porque a pesar de que ahora duele, en ese momento todo se había borrado dentro de mí: las tristezas no parecían eso y esa persona simplemente ya se había borrado de mi. Gracias por tus abrazos, porque juro se sentían eternos, y más cuando sabías que no nos volveríamos a ver. Gracias por aparecer, no importa el poco que estuviste, no sabes el gran impacto que dejaste… Fue por algo que te conocí, y ese algo tal vez sea el que lea esto, porque estoy seguro de que jamás te llegará a ti. Gracias por tus lindos deseos al irte, sabías que tenías en tus brazos a una persona que le gustaba escribir y que por sentimientos ahora te está escribiendo justamente esto.
Gracias aunque en el fondo me duelas.
- Oxidado, diciembre 2018.
no puedo seguir si no sé ni a dónde voy
I Died In 2010 and Was Replaced By Someone With Absolutely No Motivation and Complete Emotional Unavailability, a conspiracy thread
~Sunflower
The most beautiful traveler. 🌎🐈
Muchas personas deben de entender que casi el 90% de las personas poseen tristeza y a veces esta te arrebata tus mas grandes pasiones y solo te quedas viendo como se van porque no te complace rescatarlas, es ahí donde hemos tocado fondo.
Poeta Inestable
im going to have a stroke
Instead try… Person A: You know… the thing Person B: The “thing”? Person A: Yeah, the thing with the little-! *mutters under their breath* Como es que se llama esa mierda… THE FISHING ROD
As someone with multiple bilingual friends where English is not the first language, may I present to you a list of actual incidents I have witnessed:
Forgot a word in Spanish, while speaking Spanish to me, but remembered it in English. Became weirdly quiet as they seemed to lose their entire sense of identity.
Used a literal translation of a Russian idiomatic expression while speaking English. He actually does this quite regularly, because he somehow genuinely forgets which idioms belong to which language. It usually takes a minute of everyone staring at him in confused silence before he says “….Ah….. that must be a Russian one then….”
Had to count backwards for something. Could not count backwards in English. Counted backwards in French under her breath until she got to the number she needed, and then translated it into English.
Meant to inform her (French) parents that bread in America is baked with a lot of preservatives. Her brain was still halfway in English Mode so she used the word “préservatifes.” Ended up shocking her parents with the knowledge that apparently, bread in America is full of condoms.
Defined a slang term for me……. with another slang term. In the same language. Which I do not speak.
Was talking to both me and his mother in English when his mother had to revert to Russian to ask him a question about a word. He said “I don’t know” and turned to me and asked “Is there an English equivalent for Нумизматический?” and it took him a solid minute to realize there was no way I would be able to answer that. Meanwhile his mom quietly chuckled behind his back.
Said an expression in English but with Spanish grammar, which turned “How stressful!” into “What stressing!”
Bilingual characters are great but if you’re going to use a linguistic blunder, you have to really understand what they actually blunder over. And it’s usually 10x funnier than “Ooops it’s hard to switch back.”