i will always love you, awkward boyfail chuuya 💔🥀
No title available

oozey mess
Misplaced Lens Cap
🩵 avery cochrane 🩵
No title available

No title available
h
Doug Jones
art blog(derogatory)
The Bowery Presents
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
Noah Kahan
Cosimo Galluzzi
Cosmic Funnies

titsay
official daine visual archive

Jar Jar Binks Fan Club

izzy's playlists!
Sweet Seals For You, Always

Kiana Khansmith

seen from Malaysia

seen from South Korea

seen from United States
seen from Colombia
seen from Venezuela
seen from Brazil
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Vietnam

seen from Spain
seen from Russia
seen from Costa Rica

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Kuwait
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Colombia

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from Finland
@gorgeousarrangements
i will always love you, awkward boyfail chuuya 💔🥀
Chuuya saves Kyouka (POV the mafia right after Dazai left and Kyouka joined)
Yosano, Mori, and the equilibrium of the ADA & the PM
In my personal opinion, just because Mori isn't canonically a pedophile doesn't mean the scenes between him & Yosano aren't pretty heavily CSA/sexual trafficking coded, and don't inform the narrative in some way. Mori also heads the port mafia, an organization where we are canonically told Kyouka had to use her "feminine wiles" for (at 14!) And Gin has to dress as a male to be treated with respect.
Now I understand there's a heavy "equilibrium," theme in BSD, the idea that good must coexist with evil, that the port mafia balances the city to the same level the ADA does. This theme is further developed In Beast, especially in Kenji's monologue to Akutagawa. That things get destroyed, but are rebuilt again.
I think I have difficulty accepting the premise of the port mafia as a "necessary evil," especially when it was precisely Mori's treatment of Yosano that led to the split. The using of her body, the exploitation of it, of her ability, to be used again and again on men against her will in this impure, violent way, to the point she sees herself as broken and irredeemable afterwards -- how is that not a CSA metaphor -- and how is that not in extension a metaphor for the entire port mafia, an organization where people, usually recruited as children, are exploited and abused for their bodies and abilities?
I would love if BSD took a turn away from its "necessary evil," yin and yang rhetoric about the PM & the ADA. I think I would much rather see "evil happens, but it's imperative we consistently push against it." I do think that's where BSD as a story goes...we constantly see characters choosing good, choosing who they love despite their circumstances.
So it's weird to me that Natsume, who is presented as a wise and all powerful character and perhaps a thematic voice, is the one who claims the PM is a necessary evil that also brings a certain level of balance to the city, instead of just a cruel fact of life. I wonder if his character is ever going to be brought up again or critiqued?
Especially considering Mori as a character, his twisted senses of responsibility, his choice to go duel Fukuzawa instead of one or the other being killed, his choice to murder the former PM boss because he was too reckless, yet his choice to, at the same time, still indulge in the exploitative and abusive tactics of the mafia...
For me, I see the PM as representative of the evils that will always exist in the world. This is why I think someone like Mori heading it is a curious choice, since he's a combination of "necessary" and "unnecessary" evils as a character, much like Dazai. Wouldn't it have made more sense to have the mafia be headed by someone with that insatiable thirst for violence, to represent the idea of what the mafia really is? (Or perhaps it's a nod to the idea that people performing evil, tend to have some kind of righteous and even loving attitude in their minds while doing it, unable to see flaws in their justifications, which usually have to do with things like loyalty, justice, revenge...)
The ADA is a constant fight against those evils, and Dazai being in the ADA, with his flit-between-the-two history, perfectly captures the necessary evil involved in the fight against it as well.
It never struck me as a situation where "one needs the other to survive..." it struck me as "because evil exists, the fight against it will always persist."
Anyway, this is a long ramble. I just feel very curious with the way the story has been set up so far, and I feel as though some things that have previously been established are likely being set up to be challenged. Anyone have anything to add?
cant stand seeing people take the complexity of atsushis relationship with the headmaster and claim that the author is trying to push that the abusers a good guy. holy oversimplification of an incredibly nuanced topic and portrayal.
atsushi hates the headmaster. he expresses intense anger at him for what he did even in recent chapters but hes also repressing his sadness at his death because that anger is blinding him and its preventing him from being able to complete the grieving process. i think just in general he was struggling to cope with his own emotions at the time. he hated the director and thought that meant he couldnt mourn him. it was much easier to believe the director hated him and that was that but im glad asagiri tackled this topic because it adds so much more humanity to all the characters and is a pretty common aspect of abuse irl.
when he first comprehends the news atsushi is clearly happy but it also feels a bit like hes playing it up. as if he doesnt exactly know how he should act. he reinforces all hes done to him “he abused me horrifically so of course i should be ecstatic” but it doesnt feel entirely genuine. his real feelings are much more complex than that. tanizaki asks him if he wants to know why the director was here looking for him and atsushi says no, insisting the director mustve been here to hurt him. but the way he responds when he learns of the directos true intentions suggests that he mightve been considering this from the start. after all, the director told him to never hate himself as a child but he either blocked it out or didnt pay much attention to it so he mightve already suspected this.
at this age, he already knew the answers to these questions. as a child he believed he was being punished solely because the director hated him (which the director verbally reinforced) and he continued to tell himself that, trying to ignore the bits that suggested otherwise. he told tanizaki the director was probably there to kill him even though he was told that his punishment was a lesson to help him learn to endure pain so he could survive in this world, even after the director told him to take all his hate out on him and to never hate himself, even after the “poison” didnt kill him.
despite all the realizations, he didnt want to accept it. or couldnt for his own wellbeing. at this point, he remembered the directors words about not hating himself, realized he was being punished for going rampant as the tiger and was being fed nutrients, remembered the directors actions that suggested he wasnt doing what he did out of pure malice yet he still couldnt help but try to deny that the director could ever care about him. by now, atsushi knows that its true but he doesnt want it to be
he was unable to cope with the duality of the directors actions and his own feelings so dazai helped him. he told atsushi that multiple things can be true. the headmaster is despicable, he thought he was doing what was best for atsushi, the directors actions are a huge part of what made atsushi who he is today, atsushi doesnt have to forgive him, the director is unforgivable. he told him that he could still hate the headmaster and that he could cry for him as well. he was validating both atsushis pain/anger AND his grief and it was then that atsushi finally allowed himself to mourn.
its also worth mentioning he said “thats what i think” in regard to the orphanage directors actions keeping atsushi alive and teaching him how to live. at the end of the day, it must be said that this is dazais opinion and dazai is someone who has used similar methods. he gave akutagawa a reason to live regardless of how much trauma and pain it led to. he hurt akutagawa for the sake of keeping him alive. the director wanted atsushi to hate him so he wouldnt hate himself, wanted him to feel as if his entire existence is a burden and hes unworthy to live if he doesnt help others so hed save people just as dazai was degrading so that he could give akutagawa something to chase after, a reason to live, and just as he wanted akutagawa to depend his self worth on dazais approval and fear punishment so that he would listen to dazai and wouldnt become a slave to his own ability and destroy himself.
he did it with good intentions in mind but as he said, it isnt justified. although he can most likely somewhat understand the directors line of thinking because of that. so far it doesnt seem like he regrets what hes done because he believes hes getting the results he wanted (atsushi and akutagawa teaming up). he hasnt been shown to account for the pain he inflicted which i assume would be the case with the director as well. they understand their methods are cruel and horrible but they prioritize doing what they believe they need to do to raise aku/atsu right but i digress
and this wasnt the end of things. atsushi is still angry at the director. he didnt let this prevent him from hating him and he didnt start glorifying his abuser. he was finally able to healthily deal with some of his trauma which he still is dealing with to this day and he isnt portrayed as in the wrong for hating him
it is undeniable that he somewhat feels a bond with the headmaster. he looks to him for guidance and even had to cover that up by imagining dazai in his place. the journey is far from over which is another thing i love. him and akutagawa basically fall on opposite ends of the spectrum. both of them look towards their mentors for guidance but atsushis hate overshadows that while akutagawas admiration overshadows his contempt
in the main universe he has supportive people in his life and dazai is able to help him mourn but he doesnt have that support group in beast so when he learns of the headmasters intentions, he latches onto the idea of someone caring about him and glorifies him. it was a trauma response and including it doesnt mean asagiri is saying that the director was a good man. it is far from uncommon for abuse victims to form a trauma bond with their abusers and akutagawa is even shown doing some form of this in the main series. in beast, rather than helping atsushi mourn, dazai uses this situation to control atsushi and he doesnt get the chance to overcome this. at the end of the series, mori is the one offering to help him mourn and it is implied that he is able to heal eventually by letting go of the headmasters gift and finding something else to validate his existence with.
mori expresses he disagrees with dazai and his method of using atsushis trauma to control him as well as the directors cruel methods, insisting he lets him help him overcome his trauma from the headmaster and he is presented as a positive force in atsushis life who is there to help him heal. if asagiri was trying to insist that the director was a good guy, atsushis singular positive influence wouldnt be disapproving of his methods and preventing atsushi from leaving until he can discard of his gift. and he wouldnt continue allowing main universe atsushi to hate him right after dazai explained why he did what he did let alone in the recent chapters
this was longer than i expected it to be so i hope my thought process is coherent and i didnt screw anything up. im always too chicken to post the long stuff but maybe thisll make it out
If anyone is interested I have a couple pics on @kafkaskoala on ao3. This one is finished. The chapters are sort of short bc im bedridden, but this fic borrows from Yozo in NLH and takes the premise Dazai went through csa as a child before joining the PM. His memories return, and Chuuya is the one who shows up for him. This eventually leads to dating :)
This isn't super close to canon or super in character, but it's just a slight twist of canon interpretation.
https://archiveofourown.org/works/65060020/chapters/167297782
Plot theory/predictions after latest BSD chapter
Ok guys I'm just spitballing here. I'm like almost definitely wrong. But here is my theory for where the plot is going.
So as of right now we have Ueda apologizing, admitting to have crafted TWO swords -- one that manipulates space time and one that manipulates life force. We know where ame no gozen, the space time one, is now, with Fyodor. But we don't know about who has the life force sword.
Apparently Ueda is being kept alive for the purpose the second sword is serving -- I believe this sword has the ability to bring people back to life. And is perhaps important to the government to keep certain powerful people alive.
I personally believe two things. ONE: Dazai knows this sword exists. He doesn't know the details, but he knows this sword exists, because this sword has been *used to ressurect him before.* I think he's almost certainly SUCCEEDED at suicide before. It's hard to believe he never has, but bc his ability is powerful and precious, someone keeps forcing him back to life by slashing him once with this sword. Hence all his bandages -- they're covering up his resurrections.
TWO: I sort of think Ueda is lying about feeling remorse. I sort of think it would make sense for Ueda to be a foil to Atsushi -- used for their ability and deeply bitter about that, and in turn deciding to get rid of ability users. Atsushi has his claws up because he's almost certainly intending to free Ueda from their chains, and when he does, Ueda will reveal themselves to be an accomplice in Fyodor's plan. I'm not sure how things will go about from here, but i suppose they'll fight in the fifth dimension? If that's possible?
Thirdly, I think of this fifth dimension as "soul storage," for the life force sword. Once the sword is used on a dead body, the souls are ejected from this fifth dimensional space and placed back in the body. So i assume there is potential for everyone dead to come to life again if that sword is found.
I wonder if how this is going to end up going is Akutagawa & Atsushi are going to be battling Fyodor & Ueda. The parallel storyline is hopefully that Sigma aquires the information about the second sword and wakes up, & the merseult trio works together to retrieve it.
Now, is this a good direction for BSD to go? I kind of think that depends. I hope the ethics of using such a sword is at least deeply examined, bc so much of this series investigates coping with life, loss, and death, and I dont want that to be reversed by a magical sword.
Keep in mind my understanding of the whole political/dimensions/vampricism plot is honestly kind of shaky. Really not super sure what all happened there LOL. But this is just a fun theory.
Rant about Dazai & Akutagawa's relationship
I think sometimes I think about the way Dazai views Aku and I just get upset by how little empathy he has for him, how much he naturalizes the traits Aku has and literally goads it out of him, terrorizes him for it just because Dazai himself is ashamed of who he is and takes it out on Aku to feel a shred of moral superiority.
To explain, Dazai's closest relationships are with people who value life in some way, even in the port mafia. His relationship to Oda is as close as it is because he's someone who has literally given up killing and forced himself to see the value in human life. Ango is of a similar vein, someone who painstakingly writes down the lives and families of all the port mafia members and victims who die, even if it's not in his job description. Even Chuuya falls into this to some extent -- when he does kill, he kills out of a force of love and loyalty, and it doesn't bring him any joy to do it. He regards it as the work he does for those he loves. Dazai, on the other hand, doesn't really feel anything about killing, he struggles to value human life, and even to do things out of love, (or at least he feels deeply that this is the case for him) but at the same time this reality pains him. Dazai WANTS to value human life and despises himself for not being able to. That's why he sort of has to take on the identity of Oda to be able to move on - her doesn't believe this human capability is present in himself.
All this to say, I think this leads us to the reason why Dazai hates Aku so much, and its that Aku actually craves killing. We see this originally when Dazai picks him up, and he's yearning to kill the people who killed his orphan friends. Aku actually *wants* to kill, out of rage, not out of a sense of duty or curiousity, which is what sets him apart from Chuuya or Dazai. This essentially disgusts Dazai, largely because of his deep seated issues with himself and his own struggles around valuing human life. If someone well adjusted ran into Aku, they'd understand that his anger, his rage, is a trauma response to the life he lived where people were just openly willing to kill him and the other kids on the street just for existing. A life where people didn't care if he starved. From where was Aku to learn about care for others and their lives, if he'd never witnessed it being directed towards his own? You could argue every character went through neglect, but everyone reacts to it in different ways. This was Aku's reaction, and he didn't deserve Dazai to lash out at him in the way he did, trying to force the rage out of him in a haze of projected self disgust.
Granted, I understand Dazai was a child here, and this was how he was coping with his twisted feelings of self hate, by trying to punish the murderous feelings that he saw in someone else, trying to get a sense of self goodness out of that. But even in Beast AU where he is now an adult, the way he gets Aku to lash out by threatening to execute Gin? And that's how he gets across this lesson that Aku has this "inherent" killing nature? Of course this didn't end up hurting anybody but I don't love how Dazai naturalizes this tendency in Aku, insists this is "how he is." In beast, it sort of looks like Dazai is doing "all the right things." I think it passes by people that committing suicide at the end, though it was for the book, reveals that even then, Dazai was not doing things in an entirely stable way. I sort of instead read Beast as "Dazai's fantasy existence," which still comes from his disturbed mind.
I honestly really really hope for some character development around Dazai and Akutagawa's relationship, and tbh i do think we are getting there. In order for their relationship to shift or heal, we also need Dazai's relationship to himself to shift and heal; for him to understand his range of emotions are just as human as anyone else's, that there isn't something deeply, inherently wrong with him -- that his principle of valuing life is enough, even if he struggles with having all the "right" emotions behind it because of his past, his disposition, whatever. I do think being chronically suicidal towards ones own life causes Dazai to struggle to see the value in lives altogether, and that isn't through a fault of his own. We are watching him pull away from this throughout the BSD narrative, and I hope he can soon begin to understand and forgive Aku's rage. See that all of us approach life in different ways, and love in different ways, and that we are all looking for a path of doing right by each other. Especially Aku, who is following Atsushi's lead, and already starting to see the light.
BSD rhetorical analysis ramblings part 1: Selflessness gives life meaning & saves us from ourselves...but:
I really wanted to do a bit of ramblings on some rhetorical analysis about BSD & some themes I've seen displayed bc Asagiri has laid them out beautifully, but I feel they need to be teased out. I'm doing this pretty much entirely for myself so it's not gonna be in a formal essay style, mostly just ramblings.
I want to start with the concept of "selflessness" as it's the crux of many of the poems & short stories that make up the ADA and, in addition, Selflessness is the quality that is tested for when entering the ADA. you have to prove you're willing to give up your life for good, for the sake of others. I always thought that an interesting test with interesting implications morally.
To start off with the most clear testament to Selflessness that I've read so far is in Kenji Miyazawas "be not defeated by the rain" here is a line from it:
“Count yourself last in everything. Put others before you.
Watch well and listen closely. Hold the learned lessons dear.”
Very clearly written, almost like a guidebook, the poem goes on encouraging the reader to help those who are sick, to nurse the old, to break up arguments, essentially to devote themselves to goodness. At the end of the poem the poem itself turns inwards, we realize the author is talking about himself, to direct himself to be a good man. This poem was written in his dying days, and ends with the line, "that is the man I strive to be." (I find this interesting because we can even say the poem was written in a selfless form -- directed externally, as a guide, instead of focusing on the writer's obvious but only implied regrets)
Moving on theres some interesting insight into the nature of selflessness in Chuuya Nakahara's poem "Voice of Life," here are selected lines from it:
“If happiness is like this, like the limits of unselfishness…if so, this world where one cannot live without eating, is unfair…”
I thought this a beautiful line...happiness as the limits of unselfishness. We see in this poem Nakahara argues happiness comes when we are unselfish, when we put others needs before our own. Thr next line takes this even further, with the phrase "cannot live without eating," we are reminded of the human form, suggesting that to live for others is to escape the entrapment of the human form, to transcend human constraints. Interestingly it also triggers the societal connotations around "man has to eat to live," which is essentially that man has to be self serving, look into his own interests. "Man has to eat" is a phrase often used to excuse greed, selfishness, often immoral decisions. Here Nakahara perhaps also rues such a society, but points out the distinct happiness achieved in rejecting these, also manmade, constraints. Theres a bit of absurdity pointed out here too in the "unfair--" We are trapped in a paradigm where we must to some degree self serve to keep living, both in a literal and societal way -- yet our happiness comes from transcending that, from serving others. Interesting that this is in Nakahara's poetry -- says a lot about his character aswell.
In Akutagawa's short story Rashomon, which i will not be quoting but describing, we also see a struggle with the morality of selflessness. But most notably we see it in Flawless, which is Oda's short story, where a man gives out all his money to his friends constantly and is very self sacrificing and sees the best in people, but is very naive and disorganized, and has a wife who continually tries to see the best in him despite his failings. The story is like a wall of frustrations and complaints, but ends on a very interesting and jarring note when his wife asks why he refuses to consistently fill his time card:
“It’s not like I’ll turn into some big deal if I do every tiny thing, will I? He glared at me with an uncharacteristically frightening expression. Ever since then, I’ve spent my days wondering if he goes out of his way to take on enough work that he can lie down as soon as he gets home and fall fast asleep.”
This seemed a strange way to end the story at first. At most it is a story that exhibits the optimism of humanity, the innate hopefulness and innocence of us that can be taken advantage of, so this ending seemed different from the theme. However, i think it links in an interesting way. If we understand "falling asleep" to follow the connotations around the idiom "how do you sleep at night?" Perhaps we can understand this as a commentary on guilt; and not "turning into a big deal" as perhaps a commentary on human futility. After all, there is no end goal to life -- so what is there? What is the reason for this? When put into the context of a man who is essentially giving his money -- ergo his body, his livelihood -- away for free, we may be able to read the last sentence as self efacing being an act of assuaging the guilt inherent to existence.
From here there is an almost direct link to No Longer Human, where the main character, Yozo, repeatedly comments on the guilt and shame he feels around the sheer act of existence, as if he were born with it. In a couple lines from Nakahara's poems as well, we get these words:
“I am seeking something, always seeking something…”
“Since it's inexplicable, indescribable, I believe my life is worth living.”
Though he does not explicitly comment on guilt, he does comment on an emptiness we are constantly trying to fill, and therefore live for -- guilt, a sense of purpose, a hole inside -- these are all connected. How do we excuse ourselves to keep living? We see in these iterations of literature that selflessness is something we reach for as we die, something we reach for for happiness, something we reach for to save ourselves from the futility of life, something we use to fill the hole of purpose, of guilt, of want inside us. We feel the need to give ourselves away. This is not a lesson or a "should," but a fact of life -- we devote ourselves to something or other. We are all part sacrifice.
“‘Humans live to save themselves. They will understand this before they die.’
-Oda's last words, Dark Era LN.
But Asagiri brings with this recognition of the ubiquity of selflessness a warning: in Yosano. In Yosano Akiko's poem, Thou Shalt Not Die, she writes of how her brother has been sent off to war to die for the country, and how horrible an act of violence and self sacrifice this is. But how common it is as well, how it's even seen as patriotic, to sacrifice onself for a king who doesn't even fight. This is Yosano's story as well, as a character -- someone who was used, sacrificed, for the sake of war.
To me this reads as a warning. We all have emptiness, so we all give ourselves away. This is a fact of life, so it's crucial to be aware and intimate with one's emptiness, and aware of where its being filled. What are you giving yourself to?
We see again & again, both quietly, by Dazai, and out loud, by Atsushi and Akutagawa, the question "why should I live?" Behind this question is "what am I living for?"
Are you living for your friends? For honor? For approval? For guilt, for shame? For justice? For witness? What is the shape of your debt? Who are you paying it to?
Is it saving you?
‧͙⁺˚*・༓☾ 𝑓𝑢𝑙𝑙 𝑚𝑜𝑜𝑛𝑠 2024 ☽༓・*˚⁺‧͙
To The Substitute Art Teacher - Jordan Bolton
A walk in the woods fixes many things
"My dear, here we must run as fast as we can, just to stay in place. And if you wish to go anywhere you must run twice as fast as that."
-Lewis Carroll, Alice in Wonderland
Memories of bygone summer days
I'm participating in Nucleus Portland's annual postcard show this year again! Here are the 3 postcards I'm sending. You will be able to buy the original paintings at Nucleus house in Portland then online starting from Nov 3rd.
AND THE SHOW OPENED YESTERDAY!
The seaside painting has already sold, thanks to however bought it! ;_; <3 You can still get the others two here : The house The Beach
UPDATE : the house has sold too omg ;_; You can still buy the beach one here
Cherry red aesthetic
— Warsan Shire (via lunamonchtuna)
らんらんバス
I’ve been eating plums under the sun and fruit trees every time I get sad