grimm posting

listen carefully; if we ever become separated, it is imperative that you make your way to the friendly arm inn. grimm, they/them

[fellator]

this fetish stuff is getting out of hand what the fuck is word play

[rylandgraces]

[the most low energy you have ever seen me] we’re about to go crazy mode

[prokopetz]

Predictions for Dungeons & Dragons under Hasbro's management in the coming years:

Uma Musume style horsegirls introduced to the Forgotten Realms; setting's lore revised so that they've always been there.

Advancement rules now stipulate per-session XP bonus based on lifetime D&D Beyond purchase history.

Compendium of exclusive feat trees for specific gender and sexual identities. Bisexuality receives no feats of its own, being mechanically implemented as "half gay"; the resulting synergies are disgusting.

Editorial error in revised Dungeon Master's Guide accidentally refers to Dungeon Masters as Hasbro's employees.

"Noble savage" coding of barbarian class walked back, refocused on European folkloric touchstones such as the Ulster Cycle; all barbarian characters become Irish stereotypes.

AI-based DM service trained exclusively on work of Ed Greenwood launched; withdrawn a week later citing "guiderail issues".

Expanded discussion of navigating player expectations frames "not showing up at all" as a valid playstyle.

Dragon-blooded sorcerer subclass revised to state that one of the character's ancestors was "very good friends" with a dragon.

[suscept]

no one wants to enter into obsessive codependent friendships with me anymore. everyone just has jobs now

[sol-aranea]

So I sent an ask to @meanbossart asking how DU Drow would react to someone crocheting him something. Expanding on that, I think Zephyr would be good at making one size of a sweater, and struggle to change sizes (like me), and she uses Drow as a mannequin. The ones that don’t fit him go to the others in the party. Astarion has three.

[cottoncandylesbo]

the excitable hog

[othellho]

Ingram, John Henry, Flora Symbolica: The language and sentiment of flowers, (London: 1869).

[ocularshingles]

Free PDF at the Biodiversity Heritage Library

[mikkeneko]

#i was sceptical for a minute cause these illustrations don't match the plants in every case#(rounded dandelion leaves serrated willow leaves same leaves on crocus and aloe etc)#but these are the section headers NOT illustrations/representations of individual flowers#anyways. found a link. gorgeous book.

[peachyblkdemonslayer]

"Born of the Broken" by Michael Aguw

[charl0ttan]

somehow palpatine returned was so crazy that nobody even talks about the Spy killing a whole lot of people anyway. or thats a question for another time. not to mention snoke. or the fact that the films truly ruin the payoff of the defeat of the empire in original films but that was never something any sequel films could have worked around at all

[charl0ttan]

i think once a thing has been around long enough for. two generations to know it. three for sure. they can only make new versions of the thing using the capital labor of those who grew up with the thing and its fandom already being pre-established institutions. they arent making something in the spirit of the original- theyre only making another thing like that one for other fans to watch. and especially for a franchise like star wars that doesnt need to prove itself, new films can only serve this amazing cynical purpose.

[cavegirlpoems]

early magic card: Dawn Hawk late-stage magic card: Hubert Farnsworth, Brilliant Inventor (tm)

early yugioh card: Cabbage Warrior late-stage yugioh card: Twilight Memnosinner Exhuvia

early pokemon card: Diglet late-stage pokemon card: Diglet ZZZ+

[bonesbeetle]

compilation of my all-time favorite tweets

[contemptible-scoundrel]

ADVENTURE IS CALLING...

DO YOU PICK UP THA PHONE

[aenslem]

Katey Sagal as Kureha in ONE PIECE (2023–) 2.06 Nami Deerest

[stillnaomi]

"the cruelty is the point"

*looks inside*

it's material interests and the dominant ideology that emerges from them shaping actions

[dogpuppy]

[queeranarchism]

Let me settle the 'is it fetishism and is it bad?' debate once and for all:

Being attracted to any kind of body is normal. Fat bodies. Trans bodies. Disabled bodies. All normal. Being extra attracted to a specific kind of body is normal too. Totally normal to have a type.

Not unlearning the societal stigma attached to those kinds of bodies, the people who inhabit those bodies, and the people who fuck them, to the point where you do any of the following:

Only want to date/fuck the person in secret.

Reduce the person to the feature that you desire and ignore the rest of who they are as a person.

Expect the person to be a walking porn fantasy instead of a real person with their own sexual preferences and boundaries.

Would no longer love the person if the stigmatized aspect of their body changed.

Consider yourself superior to the person, think the person should be 'grateful' that you love their body, etc.

See the person as a temporary adventure while planning to eventually settle down with someone whose body isn't stigmatized.

Is bad and harmful and you shouldn't be dating anyone until you've worked on your shit, because this makes you a very terrible partner. This doesn't mean you are a bad person with bad-fetishist-desires who can only desire people badly, it means you need to unlearn societal stigma so you can be a better partner to the people you desire.

Thank you for coming to me ted talk.

[grimm-lynn]

pregnancy test ad i keep getting with a model who looks EXACTLY like my psychosexual high school best friend/ crush/ first heartbreak