Just a reminder that I have a Discord server for fans of the comic! Discussion doesn't necessarily need to be critical - all talk about Gunnerkrigg is welcome. Feel free to join!
Monterey Bay Aquarium
šŖ¼
will byers stan first human second

Andulka
Cosmic Funnies

Love Begins
AnasAbdin
we're not kids anymore.

titsay
Stranger Things
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
Today's Document

Kaledo Art
Claire Keane
almost home
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
I'd rather be in outer space šø
Aqua Utopiaļ½ęµ·ć®åŗć§čØę¶ćē“”ć

PR's Tumblrdome

No title available
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States
seen from Bangladesh

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Sweden

seen from United States
seen from Sweden
seen from United States

seen from Germany

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Singapore

seen from New Zealand

seen from Denmark
@gunnerkriggcritical
Just a reminder that I have a Discord server for fans of the comic! Discussion doesn't necessarily need to be critical - all talk about Gunnerkrigg is welcome. Feel free to join!
Genuinely kill yourself
???
hey. you don't need to reply to this if you don't want to or anything, but i wanted to apologize, specifically, for wielding a recent death as a cudgel to attempt to get you to see my perspective. it wasn't kind. also, i'm not trying to cancel Tom, not trying to get you or anyone else to cancel Tom. i'm frankly kind of uncertain where this talk of cancelling comes from, because i wasn't rallying anyone to do anything --except for 1. asking *you personally* to reconsider whether people who were hurt or not are silly for feeling the way that they feel, and 2. question whether having expectations that a specific queer-friendly creator should know better than to reference harry potter is a reasonable notion or not. we don't agree on this, obviously, but i genuinely believe that as long as JKR is materially benefiting from the existence of Harry Potter, engaging with the franchise normalizes the harm she does to people like you and me. i feel compelled, in a very uncool and unfun way, to point this out to friends, family, and strangers when the opportunity arises. yes, even though it's very popular, and is never going to go away. i understand you don't share this perspective, so this probably comes across as stupid to you, but this is the context of why reacted so strongly. i wasn't accusing you of endorsing anti-trans violence, but i *was* accusing you of not caring about some trans people's feelings, and the way i expressed myself was pretty shitty. it wasn't productive or smart to have attempted to hurt you in order to try to get you to empathize with my own/other people's hurt, even if i didn't realize that's what i was doing at the time. i was lashing out because i personally was hurt and disappointed in Tom, and when i went hunting to see if anyone felt the same way that i did, i was met with your post telling me that my perspective was ridiculous. i hope i've explained myself a bit better, and sorry again for the misaimed vitriol
Thanks, I really appreciate it. I get where youāre coming from and Iām sorry that I made you feel belittled. The whole situation sucks and weāll all be better off when the black mold in JKRās house finishes the job.
I used to find the commentary on here interesting, but I needed to take a huge step back from both this blog and your discord community because of, as others have mentioned, some of the wild and parasocial speculations about Tom and Magnoliaās personal lives and politics. Fwiw, I still have my own critiques of GC. But if itās gotten to the point where you have no desire to keep up with GC, but still keep speculating about the author with 0 evidence, I donāt see what this is for anymore.
Sorry I didnāt publish this earlier, I genuinely somehow missed it. And Iām sorry you feel that way. Youāre not wrong, and I do need to rethink some of the stuff Iāve been posting here. Itās easy to get sucked into gossip, but at the end of the day thatās not what I set up the blog for at all, and it shouldnāt ever be the focus.
āAcknowledging the fact that Harry Potter franchise *exists* and that fiction containing magical schools is often compared to itā = āendorsing transphobia and murderā is one hell of a take.
Yeah lol thatās basically it. Itās a pretty wild train of thought to me. Iāve been skimming the Something Awful thread and this seems to be the prevailing opinion, though? Like, everyone seems to agree Tom is tacitly giving a thumbs-up to JKR by mentioning HP. I really donāt think I could ever be convinced this is true, but itās not a hill worth dying on either. If people are upset, they have a right to feel that way.
I do think accusing Tom of anything more than tone-deafness would be excessive and unfair, though. To me, Tom has earned the benefit of the doubt when it comes to LGBT issues. Heās been nothing but LGBT-friendly in the past, even 20 years ago when it wasnāt necessarily as easy to be.
Man. Still thinking about that reply. Even putting aside how I personally feel at being accused of endorsing anti-trans violence because I said mentioning Harry Potter one time isnāt a huge deal, Iām turning over in my head the concept that people expect me to dogpile and cancel Tom Siddell because he made a very brief and straightforward āGunnerkrigg used to get compared to Harry Potter all the timeā joke. I mean. I have problems with the comic and Tom, but Iām not even gonna pretend I care about this issue. Because itās literally not an issue. Come on.
I think itās cruel to assume I broadly donāt care about trans rights just from this post! Iāll qualify this by saying it doesnāt necessarily follow that I therefore must be right about everything, but I do think itās worth noting that I am trans myself and invoking a brutally murdered trans girl to āgotchaā me is more than a little insensitive. All I said is itās unrealistic to expect everyone ever to never again mention the franchise even in passing in a neutral light, and I donāt think Iām going to back down from that very reasonable and measured statement, lol.
Iāll be open and honest: when it comes to the concept that we must accuse everyone who even acknowledges the existence of Harry Potter of implicitly endorsing everything JKR has ever saidāand even of endorsing the murder of trans people, as youāve done hereāI think itās super sanctimonious and, yes, silly!Ā And I especially donāt think this approach is at all helpful to trans people or to the fight against terfs in any way whatsoever, to be honest. All I can say is youāre welcome to unfollow or block me if you feel this way. Sorry.
There's a mention of Harry Potter in the latest page (Monday 20th, May) and it's really making me side-eye the author. Is Tom really not up-to-date with JKR's terf reputation?? I know some people aren't, and he left Britain before she went so full mask off plausible deniability no longer covered her, but I thought either he or Magnolia would know by now???
He and Magnolia seem very online. No way he doesn't know.
That being said, I feel like people have been saying Gunnerkrigg is just Harry Potter as a comic for like the past 20 years, so I don't really have a problem with this page?? It's poking fun at the comic being compared to another work, not endorsing anything about it. JKR sucks, but "let's never mention this insanely popular franchise ever again and cancel anyone who makes reference to its existence" is, to me, a super unrealistic and silly way to approach this situation.
God I wish I was interested in Gunnerkrigg still. But I check back in on the main page every now and then and I'm just... not. I don't care about anything that's happening, I don't find it interesting or fun or weird or charming, it's just all so nothing. Why is Parley skinny now. Have they been giving Parley Ozempic. Do I care to find out. Not really
lol did you see magnolias hourlies today where she shows tom "despairing about his work"
I have now. OOF.
Yeah, itās on Bluesky:
I think the biggest problem with Tony is that the comic is obsessed with the "twist" that's he's not an unfeeling monster. In "the Tree" he comes off as unreasonably mean for the sake of cheap drama. He ends up backpedaling most of the demands made in that chapter so it feels pointless. It feels manufactured to make the reader dislike him. I think he could have just been introverted and struggling with his wife's death;I don't need 5 chapters about discovering he's capable of human emotion.
Exactly.
lol did you see magnolias hourlies today where she shows tom "despairing about his work"
I have now. OOF.
About to do some reading through Tom's AMA from today to see if there's any interesting nuggets in there. Will report back
Really not that much of note. He talks a lot about his creative process, but not very in-depth. All pretty vague. He's adamant that he still enjoys working on the comic and has never fallen out of love with drawing and writing it, which I honestly am never going to believe no matter how many times he says it. He also says Annie is his favourite character and he finds her the most interesting, which sticks in my damn craw given the comic's treatment of her for the past *checks notes* over ten years. Other than that, not much stuck out to me.
Annie spent years as a punching bag, and now is a strange combo of punching bag and one-note side character who never does anything of note and who is never the subject of character study or examination. The idea that she's still Tom's favourite to this day is kind of laughable, but if that's how he sees it, that's how he sees it, I guess. She'll always be my favourite, anyway.
About to do some reading through Tom's AMA from today to see if there's any interesting nuggets in there. Will report back
Just found out tom siddell supports uk maga (reform). Makes sense why the comic has gone downhill in the last couple years :/
Any evidence/receipts on this? I donāt want to believe this without seeing him outright say it. (I also donāt know much about UK politics, but I can do some research to educate myself if it turns out this is accurate.)
I haven't looked at a page of Gunnerkrigg in months, maybe even over a year at this point, I'm not sure, so whenever I get updates about what's going on in it, it feels like I'm receiving letters from my family member on the front lines of a crazy war on a different continent. You could tell me whatever and I would just have to believe it. Tony and Omega are engaged to have a summer wedding? Sure, I'll believe it. Every character in the comic got together in a big circle to point at and mock Annie for everything she's done wrong ever in a weird humiliation ritual that lasted 30 pages? Sounds legit. Boxbot nuked the Court with actual nuclear bombs and now absolutely everyone is straight up dead? Why the fuck not at this point.
there's been a lot of unbeliveable events in gkc over the years but the idea that tony of all people would want to keep one of omega's earrings as a KEEPSAKE is literally. my suspension of disbelief has evaporated. he knew her for all of five minutes. i simply do not believe this.
Tony what š Are we genuinely supposed to believe Tony and Omega were like. In love with each other or something. Is that a relationship the comic was legitimately trying to build up. Okay! I guess!