I need a Michael and/or a squip to live
So I got myself squipped
(Also shout out to my Michael friend in real life, Xinmone I love ya)
noise dept.
art blog(derogatory)

Janaina Medeiros

★
KIROKAZE
Xuebing Du

No title available

@theartofmadeline
🪼
wallacepolsom
tumblr dot com
ojovivo

izzy's playlists!

Discoholic 🪩

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
todays bird
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
we're not kids anymore.

roma★
seen from Canada
seen from United States

seen from Ghana
seen from United Kingdom

seen from India
seen from Germany

seen from Germany

seen from Canada
seen from Philippines
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from Türkiye
seen from Israel

seen from Canada

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from Thailand
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
@harrrrrittebighare
I need a Michael and/or a squip to live
So I got myself squipped
(Also shout out to my Michael friend in real life, Xinmone I love ya)
My next haircut
OAK’S BIO FOR GREAT COMET SAYS “I have done things… other than Hamilton” I’m crying
someone said they needed to see it in print so. proof
it also says “shake and bake”
I LOVE YOUR ARTSTYLE!! hella gnarly
can you draw a bmc character for me? you choose :)
THANKKKKKKK YOUUUUUUUU!!
I’m just putting in Jeremy in this doodle pic!
Chaotic good John Laurens, do you agree?
Nope – he's the archetypal Lawful Good guy.
Devotes his life to a greater ideal, and never questions it.
Obsessed with doing the right thing.
Extremely strict about the moral code that guides all his actions. (Plagued by the anxiety of falling short of it.)
Vocal – and active – against injustices.
Painfully honest and forthright, even when it's a bad idea.
Always acts honourably (or tries to) (and then agonises about it).
Never acts from self-interest; self-sacrifice is the name of the game.
Bonus point: law student.
Doodle on the subway
Forgive me for the shaky strokes
CAN YOU SEE ME?
This is probably DIABOLICAL you're all welcome. Get ready for Hallo freaking Ween
bmc angst what is this 2017? second comic batch- there are some side effects of getting squipped Jeremy fails to mention
even when they’re mad at each other they have NO sense of personal space..
jeremy deliberately sits This close to michael when there was plenty of room to sit at least a little further away .. and during their entire confrontation ESPECIALLY while jeremy is sitting next to him, michael’s hands twitch (almost like he’s going to touch jeremy before he stops himself). when jeremy stands up, he reaches out for him and then pulls his arms back.
michael does the same thing when he’s mad at jeremy for ditching him at the mall and ignoring him, but as soon as he figures out its bc the squip actually worked he gets excited for him and runs up to him, getting in his personal space again.
michael clearly tries distancing himself but he cant help but reach out for jeremy, because thats what they’ve always done (as is depicted in two player game). I really think michael communicates most effectively through his body language, which is something that (in my eyes), is pretty evidently shown the moment he comes on stage.
the people yearn for squips apparently
🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
Inspired by the song →the gypsy bard. I don't know why but I think it really fits:D
sᴘᴀʀᴋs
happy Independence Day y’all
inspired by Prometheus Bound, 1618, Peter Paul Rubens & Frans Snyders
leslie odom jr returns to the role of aaron burr in the UK, july 3rd, 2026
Most written Musicals/Plays on AO3
Source
Note: Podcasts and audio/radio plays were not included, EPIC is considered an album by AO3, not a musical, so it also didn't make the list.
EDIT: Hamlet was incorrectly removed from this ranking, the error is now fixed.
@lamssummer2026 day 25: campfire - adoration - sketchbook
its way too hot out so i drew the guys cooling down at the river while i'm stuck inside studying for exams :,D this is another one i'm gonna redo when i have more time to understand lighting
live footage of me drawing this under cut. my brain is fried.
When you visit an archive to look at historical letters, most of the time you'll find them bound/pasted into letterbooks, or at least unfolded and stored flat in folders. So it was a real treat when I visited the UK National Archives to get a chance to interact with letters in their natural states.
These letters were taken by the British when the ships they were being carried on were captured during the war.
Most individual letters have a seal (unless they were sent under cover of a different letter) and an address:
Here we have one of the few surviving letters from John Laurens to his wife Martha in London, this one from 9 November 1777. This letter wasn't locked (folded in a way that kept it self-sealed).
And here's the full text and all the other pages.
You could also quite clearly see the watermark on the paper. The crown, postillion (post horn) and "LVG" denote Dutch papermaker Lubertus van Gerrevink. This was high-quality laid paper.
The more interested I become in material history, the more insights I start to read from these physical clues. For one, the large expanse of blank paper is so telling. Martha never received this letter, but I can imagine her staring at the empty pages and wondering why nothing more was added. The paper quality and the Julius Caesar seal also tell us something about John's wealth and ideology.
Gladly – thanks for indulging me, @inkafterdark!
The folding looks like a rush-job to me – the two sides pressed in, and then the top and bottom overlapped and sealed. It's not a particularly secure method (as in, it could both tear open accidentally and be opened covertly), but then this isn't a particularly important or secret letter. I suspect that it was sent under cover, probably via Henry (and thus the added protective layer would not require careful folding); however, the archive doesn't include any other Laurens letters as part of this captured ship's papers.
I'm also fascinated by the fact that he's using really fancy paper here; it might just have been what he had to hand, but other letters around that time are written on more ordinary paper (as far as I can see on the scans). I don't think it's hugely significant in the context of this letter, but it does speak to the regional availability of trade goods (or perhaps to the kinds of goods the army was commandeering from the region).
The fact that he leaves almost two pages fully blank is the most interesting part to me. The content makes it plain that this is not a love letter, but the format also reinforces this – the convention of the time was for love letters to spill over onto every available scrap and corner of paper, including the cover. Laurens also makes no attempt to update Martha on any news – and he had a lot to choose from, considering his own promotion, Henry's election as president, and all the various battles he'd been involved in just weeks prior. He also doesn't ask after her or his daughter's wellbeing. It seems the only thing Laurens wants to convey in this letter is his prohibition of her coming to America; although the "time allowed" requires him to be "laconic", he nevertheless spends it repeating what he has already communicated to Martha and her father several times prior. And even if he had sent other letters recently, it was still the convention to repeat key pieces of news as the chance of letters miscarrying was very high.
Overall, it just seems strange to me that he would go to the trouble and expense of sending this letter, and not making even a half-hearted attempt to fill up the space. I think he's trying to be kind and reassuring in his phrasing, but the words are undermined by the material reality of the document.
To some degree, we can take Laurens on his word that he was short of time – after all, this is November 1777, halfway between the Battle of Germantown and the Valley Forge encampment, so the aides were all undoubtedly busy. Still, it only takes fifteen or twenty minutes to fill another page with updates, and just a minute or two to fiddle with the most basic kind of letterlocks – so this all reads to me like he didn't put a lot of care into this piece of correspondence. John also wrote a (longer!) conversational letter to Henry that same day, updating him on some military news. So I think this brevity was a result of Laurens lacking interest and having other higher priorities than strictly one of time.
Of course, the additional consideration is that nobody at headquarters knew at the time that Laurens was married, so the haste could have been the result of writing covertly or at night. This explanation does seem to fit all the evidence...
When you visit an archive to look at historical letters, most of the time you'll find them bound/pasted into letterbooks, or at least unfolded and stored flat in folders. So it was a real treat when I visited the UK National Archives to get a chance to interact with letters in their natural states.
These letters were taken by the British when the ships they were being carried on were captured during the war.
Most individual letters have a seal (unless they were sent under cover of a different letter) and an address:
Here we have one of the few surviving letters from John Laurens to his wife Martha in London, this one from 9 November 1777. This letter wasn't locked (folded in a way that kept it self-sealed).
And here's the full text and all the other pages.
You could also quite clearly see the watermark on the paper. The crown, postillion (post horn) and "LVG" denote Dutch papermaker Lubertus van Gerrevink. This was high-quality laid paper.
The more interested I become in material history, the more insights I start to read from these physical clues. For one, the large expanse of blank paper is so telling. Martha never received this letter, but I can imagine her staring at the empty pages and wondering why nothing more was added. The paper quality and the Julius Caesar seal also tell us something about John's wealth and ideology.
Gladly – thanks for indulging me, @inkafterdark!
The folding looks like a rush-job to me – the two sides pressed in, and then the top and bottom overlapped and sealed. It's not a particularly secure method (as in, it could both tear open accidentally and be opened covertly), but then this isn't a particularly important or secret letter. I suspect that it was sent under cover, probably via Henry (and thus the added protective layer would not require careful folding); however, the archive doesn't include any other Laurens letters as part of this captured ship's papers.
I'm also fascinated by the fact that he's using really fancy paper here; it might just have been what he had to hand, but other letters around that time are written on more ordinary paper (as far as I can see on the scans). I don't think it's hugely significant in the context of this letter, but it does speak to the regional availability of trade goods (or perhaps to the kinds of goods the army was commandeering from the region).
The fact that he leaves almost two pages fully blank is the most interesting part to me. The content makes it plain that this is not a love letter, but the format also reinforces this – the convention of the time was for love letters to spill over onto every available scrap and corner of paper, including the cover. Laurens also makes no attempt to update Martha on any news – and he had a lot to choose from, considering his own promotion, Henry's election as president, and all the various battles he'd been involved in just weeks prior. He also doesn't ask after her or his daughter's wellbeing. It seems the only thing Laurens wants to convey in this letter is his prohibition of her coming to America; although the "time allowed" requires him to be "laconic", he nevertheless spends it repeating what he has already communicated to Martha and her father several times prior. And even if he had sent other letters recently, it was still the convention to repeat key pieces of news as the chance of letters miscarrying was very high.
Overall, it just seems strange to me that he would go to the trouble and expense of sending this letter, and not making even a half-hearted attempt to fill up the space. I think he's trying to be kind and reassuring in his phrasing, but the words are undermined by the material reality of the document.
To some degree, we can take Laurens on his word that he was short of time – after all, this is November 1777, halfway between the Battle of Germantown and the Valley Forge encampment, so the aides were all undoubtedly busy. Still, it only takes fifteen or twenty minutes to fill another page with updates, and just a minute or two to fiddle with the most basic kind of letterlocks – so this all reads to me like he didn't put a lot of care into this piece of correspondence. John also wrote a (longer!) conversational letter to Henry that same day, updating him on some military news. So I think this brevity was a result of Laurens lacking interest and having other higher priorities than strictly one of time.
Of course, the additional consideration is that nobody at headquarters knew at the time that Laurens was married, so the haste could have been the result of writing covertly or at night. This explanation does seem to fit all the evidence...
Fascinating! Is it too much to ask for a transcript? I’m struggling to read what he wrote here.
Everyone's favourite @john-laurens has you covered!