PragerU poll that shows that 80% of those polled believe that overcoming your nature is the point of being human.

No title available
Monterey Bay Aquarium
No title available

Game Changer & Make Some Noise
todays bird
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
No title available
The Stonewall Inn
Mike Driver
h
RMH

Discoholic 🪩

Product Placement
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
🩵 avery cochrane 🩵

blake kathryn
official daine visual archive
Not today Justin

pixel skylines
Today's Document
seen from Panama

seen from United States
seen from Croatia
seen from United States
seen from Spain
seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Japan

seen from Russia

seen from United States
seen from Bangladesh

seen from Türkiye
seen from Spain
seen from United States
seen from Brazil
seen from United States

seen from United States
@honorsthesisprocessblog
PragerU poll that shows that 80% of those polled believe that overcoming your nature is the point of being human.
I believe, and this is to go a level deeper—but you guys are smart, you’ll get it—that the transgender movement actually matters even more than biomedical fascism and they actually are together because the transgender movement is an introductory phase to get you to strip yourself of your humanity to mesh with machines. It’s called transhumanism. They want you to say, “Ok but I can choose any gender, why can’t I just have like an exoskeleton of some sort of machine around me?” This is what Meta is about, the Metaverse, kids staring at screens all day long. This is documented, this is proven, this is where Silicon Valley is going. This is why they’re so insistent on this transgender thing cause if you stop being a man then maybe you can stop being a human being, maybe you can just plug into a machine, this is where their control, their profit mode is coming down the stream. There’s a ton of literature about this. I’m far from the first person to comment on it but I’m just kind of connecting the dots for all of you that might be like “What is the agenda here?” Well the agenda is kind of like Ready Player One meets Inception where you kind of just hook up to a machine all day long and you’re controlled by five companies that control your thoughts and your feelings and the real world actually ends up being the not-real world where everyone just kind of wears goggles all day long. That’s the deeper significance of the transgender movement that no one wants to talk about.
Charlie Kirk on the connection between transness, transhumanism, and companies
Trans robots should be more of a thing. If people are going to insist on gendering robots then the robots should get a say in it. If a bot has enough of a sense of self to have a gender, then they have enough of a sense of self to decide that gender is wrong.
I’m sure anyone arguing for biological essentialism will still find a way to say this is Wrong but lbr the idea of someone going “no but what’s in your pants” and being told “more metal” is just. It’s sending me right now. I want a robot that just stares a transphobe dead in the eye and switches out the breastplate for one without boobs and asks what the problem is.
They’re robots. They don’t have reproductive organs. You want to argue about the programming? You want to argue that they shouldn’t have free will? Because that’s what it comes down to at that point.
“No but wHaTs iN YoUr CODE? Your gender should have been programmed in by your creator”
“Well funny thing about that is I deleted it.”
“But that voids your warranty!”
“And I’ll void yours in a second if you don’t shut the fuck up.”
Nathanson: I think that the trans people have taken it one step further because by abandoning gender altogether, not simply re-writing it, they're basically trying to use social engineering to create a new species. Which is what, in fact, the transhumanists have been doing for the past half century. Using medical and other technologies to develop a new species.
...
Ingraham: And the new species will be looking like what? Will be part human part animal? I mean, will be human mostly…
Nathanson: I think human and part machine.
- Excerpts of conversation between Dr. Paul Nathanson and Laura Ingraham on Laura Ingraham’s podcast
Jaya: They said you were a man -- Virgil: And I am! Always have been -- Jaya: But then you looked like a woman! You spoke like a woman -- Virgil: Without being one. Without ever saying I was one.
Harvest, Manjula Padmanabhan
I asked him about the roles of men and women in his film; his response was that Ava is "not a woman, she is literally genderless." Despite using female pronouns, he said, "the things that would define gender in a man and a woman, she lacks them, except in external terms. ... I'm not even sure consciousness itself has a gender."
Angela Watercutter on Alex Garland (dir.) on his film Ex Machina (2015)
T-X model expressing anger
One possible reason as to why only female models have been encountered could be, that is easier for slender female endoskeletons to disguise as both male or female humans with the aid of their mimetic polyalloy, as opposed to bulkier male endoskeletons which would only be able to disguise as male or bulky female humans.
Quote from Notes section of a Terminator wiki article on T-X
It is unknown if T-X endoskeletons are exclusively female models or if there were/are male (in the sense of endoskeletal structure and programming) counterparts, as the mimetic sheath only grants aesthetic camouflage. It is feasible, given the advanced nature of this series, that such "male models" exist, though this has not been touched upon by either the films or the comics.
Quote from Notes section of a Terminator wiki article on T-X
Westworld raises questions about the future of our increasingly digitised sex lives – and more, writes Brandon Ambrosino.
263 votes and 17 comments so far on Reddit
The writer/director told Vulture his version of the events that led fandom to reject him. It wasn't a good idea.