Ribbit!
Today's Document
taylor price
The Stonewall Inn
No title available
YOU ARE THE REASON
noise dept.
EXPECTATIONS
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

#extradirty

pixel skylines
art blog(derogatory)
Game of Thrones Daily
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
h
$LAYYYTER
d e v o n
Claire Keane
official daine visual archive
Mike Driver

Love Begins

seen from Poland
seen from South Africa
seen from Italy
seen from United States
seen from T1

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Germany

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from Ireland
seen from Malaysia
seen from Italy
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Greece

seen from Sweden
seen from China
seen from Austria
@hopekidsdontsee
Ribbit!
Absolute Good
The one Absolute Good thing I have done in my life is that I got my children out of this mind controlling, lying faith called the Jehovah's witnesses.
“Swearing is unattractive” I’m not attractive anyway so fuck off
Yahweh, Adonai, Jehovah? What is God’s Name?
"In Hebrew the name of God is spelled YHWH. Since ancient Hebrew had no written vowels, it is uncertain how the name was pronounced originally, but there are records of the name in Greek, which did have written vowels. These records indicate that in...
Right speech
Right speech calls for a prohibition on any kind of polemic speech or ‘lying, gossiping, speaking harshly or being divisive’. Instead, one should at all times speak in ‘the service of truth and harmony’. (Living Religions) This would be a very difficult precept to uphold in the arena of political speech. It is possible to be factual, but to get everyone to agree even with incontrovertible evidence is impossible.
Currently, the issue of gun control is at the forefront of political discourse. No argument will sway the opposing side, and whichever side wins today, there will be suffering and the arguments will not cease. The left will argue that no one’s Right is worth one child’s life. The fact is that the Second Amendment does not protect the right to shoot children. The Second Amendment only protects the right to bear arms for the promotion of a free state, it does not say free from whom or what. The political right likes to point out that these Rights are inalienable and self-evident. They are not self-evident and the government can suspend them in any circumstance they call extreme. No position or law will mollify everyone. A sobbing mother cannot be swayed by reason. An overly paranoid man cannot be convinced that there are no conspiratorial plots for tyranny.
However, the Founding Fathers did create speech that led to the reasonably harmonious unification of this country. I believe the Founding Fathers thought that the best way to preserve harmony was to ensure the greatest amount of liberty for all. The alternative; forced harmony, would be oxymoronic. In the field of politics, I think the Founding Fathers created the speech that most closely approximates the Buddhist precept of right speech.
When considering the alleviation of suffering, we must ask whose suffering and when does the suffering occur, because all suffering cannot be eliminated. The Founding Fathers were well aware of criminals and they did what could be done to create the system which would punish them, but numerous quotes show that what they truly feared was a return to the suffering of tyranny. Thomas Jefferson said, “No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms. The strongest reason for people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against the tyranny of government.” The Founding Fathers had just overthrown the tyranny of one government and wanted to ensure that the government they had just created did not, and could not, ever devolve into another insufferable tyranny. The suffering that comes with tyranny has been writ large throughout our history books and that suffering was of legendary proportions.
The speech in the Second Amendment has achieved good results, if the prevention of tyranny was its goal. We are still a free people, no country dares to attempt a full invasion, and we will remain free as long as the citizens have the right to bear the arms that approximate the force of a single soldier. The criminals that harm the innocent are quite simply the cost of tyranny prevention.
Heinrich Aldegrever (German, 1502-ca. 1561), Hercules Killing the Dragon, from the series the Labors of Hercules, 1550, engraving on paper
Portland Art Museum
Beware the intellectual gripping of the mind.
Morris goes to some length here to show the dangers and the consequences of this insidious condition. I took the liberty of looking up the antonyms of intellectual. They are nonintellectual, irrational or naive.
Perhaps this was just a poor choice of words and he meant something else, I put my Tinfoil Sombrero back on and tried to ‘Reason From The Scriptures’, the only word that I could come up with, the thing they believe should grip the mind is Faith.
Faith can defeat the contradictory doctrines, the cognitively meaningless, the scandals and the false prophecies. The only other mental state that can accomplish all these things is Willed Ignorance.
Also note that while they no longer outright prohibit college, they place all the guilt on the parents if the child leaves. ‘The Elders try,… You dropped them off’, or my favorite ‘You allowed this’, as if 18 wasn’t the legal age of emancipation. It’s as if they’re saying “So when were in the New System and your adult children are not there , don’t blame us , you’re the reason your child is dead.”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmL-U6-KKJ8
A paper I did for a class.
“A man’s character is his fate.” Plato
Plato thought that everyone’s soul was divided into three portions, appetite, spirit, and reason. The proportions of each of these qualities are fixed. The ratio of each portion would describe your character and determine how you would lead your life. In my own life I find some validity to this belief.
I think I have always had a high degree of reason and spirit. I think that this eventually came to the forefront of my personality in spite of an irrational indoctrination. I was raised to be a minister in the Jehovah’s Witness religion. I was taught to only believe as fact whatever the Bible or the Watchtower Society told me, regardless of what anyone else said was scientific fact. For instance, carbon dating is a lie along with any evidence that might point to evolution.
In addition I was also taught the scripture “As far as it depends on you be peaceable with all men.” In practice that meant that if I got in a fight during my childhood, I clearly did not do enough to be peaceable. When you are taught from infancy to ‘turn the other cheek’ the idea of fighting back is quickly drummed out of you. This will eventually turn you into an appeasing coward. After I left the religion my true nature came to the forefront, I now have to make a conscious effort to keep my spirit in check. I think I have always had an aggressive spirit; it was an irrational indoctrination that prevented me from defending myself.
As a child in school I excelled in nearly any subject. However in eleventh grade I determined that there was no point in learning more since it was frowned on to go on to higher education. This was because the End was near and college was a ‘cesspool of liberalism and low morals.’
Shortly before turning twenty one, I was promoted to a position of leadership within the congregation. I was disillusioned with this promotion because, supposedly this promotion was divinely inspired through the prayers of the Elders. I knew that, while I knew all the doctrines, I did not have an ounce of faith and I was regularly sinning. Eventually I drifted away due to my lack of faith. It took years of introspective thought to shed the ‘group think’ mentality. Now I can see glaring examples of irrationality in the Bible and in the Jehovah’s Witness religion.
In spite of my being indoctrinated from infancy to believe in the irrational, this capacity for reason eventually pushed me to seek out reason.
I just watched a video with Anthony Morris of the jw’s governing body ranting about how dangerous a college education is, and how jw parents need to keep their children from going to college:
at 0:58, he says:
…with schools of “higher education”, in many of their curriculums, and if...
This was something that bothered me even back when I was a good jw. The watchtower explains that the date 1914 C.E. is calculated by adding 2,520 years to 607 B.C.E. Bear with me, this is a bit confusing, but I’ll try to simplify their explanation as much as possible. The watchtower explains...
Who am I?
I am subjective and relative, I seek objective reason. I believe I am currently, mostly, self-directed. I am still crawling out from under a determinist ‘train wreck’ of a past.
I am relentlessly bitter and angry; I don’t always know who I am angry with. I was raised a Jehovah’s Witness, sometimes I am angry over how I was brought up, and sometimes I am angry at myself because I didn’t see through it at a much younger age. If you are a Witness and you leave, you must leave some of your identity behind. To be anything and have it stripped away is to have your self-identity taken away. To have your mind molded and twisted, by a faction that you did not choose, for the express purpose of making a malleable and sheep like servant, is the equivalent of falling into the hands of the Comprachicos. (Hugo)
Because of the aforementioned concern, preserving identity, I believe it is a mistake to call myself, and make part of my identity, anything that can’t be objectively proven. For example if I say, “I’m an atheist’” then it becomes part of my self-identity. I am much more likely to defend even the most tenuous position, if I’ve made a part of myself. If instead I take the position that I believe that the Problem of Evil seems to be impossible to solve, and that, by extension, a theistic God seems improbable, I can still learn opposing viewpoints without threatening my own identity.
I am not trusting; I don’t, can’t, and probably should not trust myself, I am fallible. My therapist says that I didn’t form trusting relationships at critical points in my life and that has led to my obsessive-compulsive disorder; there is no way to tell how long I will have to deal with O.C.D.
I am a victim of physical and emotional abuse. I hated my father, I became my father. When I finally stopped behaving like him, my hate for him gradually diminished and died. One of my few great prides in life is that I think it may have ended the cycle of abuse. It is incredibly sad, and also shameful, that one of my few great prides in life is that I stopped beating my daughters in wild fits of rage, and have finally developed the kind of self-control that virtually any adult human should have.
I think that covers most of the determined factors.
In the present I am immensely concerned about Ethics, in spite of having very low empathy for anyone outside of the circle of people I actually care about. My being ethical and having very little concern for others is not contradictory, I am ethical for me.
I have very little interest in remaining married, but I work hard to keep the marriage together for the benefits it gives my children. Ultimately I know my position as Dad is transitory and relative. There will come the day that they no longer need me and I will change from Daddy to the man who fathered me.
In the future I am considering some type of withdrawal. I would like to pursue more personal study.
Ultimately the past cannot be changed. That which is ‘Now’ is so short that it becomes the past before you can really conceive it. The emotions we feel in the present are largely the result of sensorial input, which are notoriously unreliable, or are influenced by the past.
The future is intent and as such is not objective reality. After eliminating all that is subjective or temporally relative, I have no idea who I am.
I frequently feel that I have been deprived of who I could have been. I feel as if my motto should be “There but for the curse of God go I”.