•

[aa05150]

photograph by Peter Christopherson

[knifeforsale]

ASSORTED LOOSE BLADES | LISTING

[leboudoirchat]

My Sin by Lanvin (1964)

[rmnstn]

[ripempezardexerox]

Jack Felgate

Fleshism

2016 - 2018, Acrylic on plywood

[aleprouswitch]

Pharmakon at Red Bull Energy Fest, May 2015.

[bisbiseo-deactivated20130915]

[pleatherpleasure]

BOAN // Babylon

[ymutate]

László Moholy-Nagy

K VII, 1922

[scavengedluxury]

Bottle Lane. Nottingham, October 2019.

[m4lema]

[upscaleharem]

francis bacon

[ortut]

Subodh Gupta - Hamlet’s Helmet, 2003 (Polished stainless steel)

[cantcatchmeee]

[sioltach]

dragonfly blades

[philosophybits]

There are three existence-spheres: the esthetic, the ethical, the religious. The metaphysical is abstraction, and there is no human being who exists metaphysically. The metaphysical, the ontological, is, but it does not exist, for when it exists it does so in the esthetic, in the ethical, in the religious, and when it is, it is the abstraction from or a something prior to the esthetic, the ethical, the religious. The esthetic sphere is only a transition sphere, and therefore its highest expression is repentance as a negative action. The esthetic sphere is the sphere of immediacy, the ethical the sphere of requirement (and this requirement is so infinite that the individual always goes bankrupt), the religious the sphere of fulfillment, but, please note, not a fulfillment such as when one fills an alms box or a sack with gold, for repentance has specifically created a boundless space, and as a consequence the religious contradiction: simultaneously to be out on 70,000 fathoms of water and yet be joyful.

Søren Kierkegaard, Stages on Life’s Way

[a-state-of-bliss]

W Magazine June 2006 - Madonna by Steven Klein