☕🖤the lattay hottay🖤☕

[Main for arcanesupern0va] nova. she/her. bisexual af. demi. 34. resident lobster lover. 💞💋🦞💋💞 respectfully thirsty. discord mom. i used to be a starkid blog. now its just whatever i throw on here

[joeycupcakerichter]

Ready to settle for a sloppy sad-bang in a cheap hotel room.

[funstyle]

*cools ur dashboard down*

[faemorrigan]

im realizing very fast that people do not in fact know that sometimes things in stories suck on purpose and it sucking is the point

[faemorrigan]

"this story is misogynistic!!"

>looks inside

>about the pressures of societal misogyny and how its bad

[talesandfluff]

“What kind of woman am I?”

[joeycupcakerichter]

😊Just😊thinkin😊bout😊them😊

[joeycupcakerichter]

My goal in this life is to be as annoying as possible about Ted Spankoffski

[joeycupcakerichter]

fucking CharTed, my beloved, I love seeing people fighting for your honor. i have spent too long in the midst of Spankoffski bro tumblr, i have missed the CharTed takes. God, I love them so fucking muchhhhhhhh 😭😭😭

my pathetic fucking dumpster fire of a man, i love thinking about you. <3

[karvevapen]

Breaking news: resident jerk actually cares about someone

[trixiartz]

hey melissa!!!!

[spin-the-wheel-polls]

Poof! You’re a mermaid now. Spin to get a type of mermaid! How we feeling about this?

You have been turned into this type of mermaid!!

What do you think?

I love it!!

it's alright

Ew

EW

oh cool I didn't know this type existed!!

Result/other

Voting ended onJul 12

(I do not know much about mermaids, forgive me if I made any mistakes. Do not drown me.)

[justineportraits]

Vicente Romero Redondo     2010-11

[suigintou]

hey boss can you show me where the forklift's self-destruct is so i can keep it from falling into the hands of enemy warehouse crews?

[meowingatthesea]

[segamascott]

[sreegs]

gonna start making snopes-style responses to urban legends about tumblr

[sreegs]

"this how we lost post editing and it was still worth it"

❌ False

The John Green Cock Monologue, while one of the most egregious examples of post editing, was not why the ability to edit posts was taken away. This feature was removed because scammers would edit posts with huge note counts to try to make their scams look legit.

[sreegs]

"those are his hooves, bitch."

✅ True

Those are his hooves, bitch.

[acidgirl]

this line delivery has lived in my head for 10 years

[acidgirl]

Just One Guy, Just One Spider-Man… -OR Woman?!? We don’t Know; ….forsure.

[dalniente]

it is honestly amazing how much of writing and editing is just. logistics. like... do i use a name here or a pronoun? if i move this dialogue tag to the middle of this line and break it in half, does the end of the line hit harder that way? what if i move the tag to the front? what if i remove it entirely? ...wait, whose point of view am i in; can i reasonably say this character is appalled, or must i say they look or seem or sound appalled? is this a deliberate action or a step-removed one; is her hand closing on his shoulder, or is she closing her hand on his shoulder? environment environment environment, we need to break all this dialogue up with some narration, the scene is coming untethered. what! are! they doing! with! the rest of their bodies that are not hands! fuck fuck fuck FUCK i forgot we covered this two chapters ago and now i either need to cut this whole chunk or find a reason to reprise the conversation from earlier. name or pronoun? name or pronoun? name or pronoun? move this clause around in this sentence? oh i'll add this phrase-- nope, never mind, past!me added the same phrase two lines down. okay, if i add too much environmental narration it's going to take away from this bit, but not enough and it won't feel grounded. what if i move this to its own line? where the FUCK are their hands?

[angelumcaedis]

couldn’t not preserve this tag @spottedenchants

[writingdose]

I am once again begging people to realize that AI checker doesn’t work. it’s never worked. it’s notoriously known to have flagged human-made works as AI and AI-generated works as human-made. and by feeding it people’s works, you are feeding more works to AI, because apparently the machine itself is AI.

the only thing AI checker does is harm genuine artists and people in general too.

[periwinklepromise]

I am once again begging people to critically analyze stuff even when that stuff supports your opinions.

It's easy to laugh about an AI not knowing Frankenstein, but let's look at the rest of the "AI checker" photo, okay? I don't think it's checking AI in the sense of punishing someone for using it. The button at the end reads, "Humanize text." The fine print below the button reads, "Make your text human with undetectable AI" (I edited out the title capitalization, sue me).

This "100% AI GPT" finding is practically an advertisement. The website was made by people trying to sell you something. Specifically, they are trying to sell you a special, magical tool that will let you use AI but not get caught. The target audience for this magical tool consists of people who are already using AI to write shit but who do not want to get caught; rather than just writing the stuff themselves, they are turning to a second AI to "humanize" the AI-generated text so that they can use AI without getting caught. By artificially inflating the % to scary levels - "Oh no," the AI user might think, "my teacher will be able to tell I used AI on this essay if it scores a 100%!" - the seller of the magical tool creates a strong need for their magical tool. "Yes," the seller says, "It's very scary that it scored a 100, but it's okay, I can help you, just pay me money and I'll get that 100 down below <idk, some threshold like 20? 10?>."

The target audience for this magical tool does not include anyone the Isi Breen tweet assumes. I seriously doubt that teachers are using "humanize AI" products for their own students to help the kids not get caught next time, because teachers don't normally teach kids how to get better at cheating. I seriously doubt that employers are using "humanize AI" products to, what, help prospective employees improve their materials for their next job application??

There are absolutely massive flaws in "AI checkers" for academic integrity purposes, and I am sure similar flaws exist in HR spaces. I totally agree that AI and AI checkers are harmful and ineffective, but the above ~Free AI Text Humanizer~ flagging Frankenstein isn't great evidence.

[3lectro-heart]

Literally

[tighxkitty]

Trust in it!