A Knight of the Seven Kingdoms 1.01
todays bird
$LAYYYTER
KIROKAZE

#extradirty
The Stonewall Inn

bliss lane
TVSTRANGERTHINGS

Discoholic 🪩
occasionally subtle
🩵 avery cochrane 🩵
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
cherry valley forever

pixel skylines
Sweet Seals For You, Always
almost home
Not today Justin
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

titsay
The Bowery Presents

Love Begins

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Switzerland
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Canada

seen from South Korea

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from T1

seen from Malaysia

seen from Estonia
seen from Bangladesh
seen from Venezuela
@johanirae
A Knight of the Seven Kingdoms 1.01
Tumblr Sexyman Contest 2026 Final Round
Senshi (Dungeon Meshi)
Ryland Grace (Project Hail Mary)
Mr. Ant Tenna (Deltarune)
Tenna art by @9Aaaalt29 on twt
i mean.......you know my vote ;)
HOUSE OF THE DRAGON ; S03E04 “Tumbleton”
the ex the muse
one thing i hate about english is your open compound words. what do you mean it's a light switch and not a lightswitch or a water bottle instead of a waterbottle. get real
why won't you let your words frot.
There’s a quality that certain books/movies/TV shows have that leads me to say, “Yeah, I can see people making fanfiction of that.” It’s something to do, I think, with how tight the story is, how much feels open-ended or like it could be elaborated on.
Something like Breaking Bad, for example, has low squiggability (that’s what I’m calling this quality). It’s tightly written, the characters are consistent, there’s little left to interpolate or extrapolate. Obviously, people DO write fanfic of Breaking Bad, but it still has a low squiggability score. Whereas something like Supernatural has a high squiggability score. Fantasy and science fiction often have high squiggability scores. This suggests squiggability could also be related to worldbuilding and potential for people to borrow a premise or setting.
And sometimes you’ll read or watch something and you’ll say, “Ah, low squiggability,” and then you’ll open tumblr and find out that everyone else seem to think its squiggability was very high indeed.
For anyone wondering, the PhD student's name is Myra Cheng.
Here's a link to an article about the study from the Stanford Report: link.
Across three preregistered studies, participants interacting with sycophantic AI became more convinced of their own rightness and less willing to repair relationships. Yet at the same time, participants rated sycophantic AI models as higher quality, more trustworthy, and more desirable for future use, which may explain why this behavior has persisted despite its harmful impacts.
Myra Cheng et al. "Sycophantic AI decreases prosocial intentions and promotes dependence." Science 391, eaec8352 (2026).
Perhaps I’m being dramatic, but it almost feels as though the original phrasing (that I see being reflected quite heavily in the comments) focuses on Cheng’s inspiration from AI-generated breakup texts. The article goes much further than that; Cheng and her team clearly spent time acquiring data and then processing it to tell the story of how AI-dependence is fundamentally shifting how people interact with others. This change in human interactions didn’t happen overnight. We are witnessing a fundamental shift in how we interact with other people and a simultaneous diminishing of how long people will spend on any given task. Focusing in on the more click-worthy problem of breakup texts overlooks the underlying issue that, after being discovered, can actually influence policy change as Cheng discusses
You know how wealthy people turn into stupid arseholes by surrounding themselves with vapid yes-men? ChatGPT is vapid yes-men on tap. Now you, too, can subject yourself to the phenomenon that we've all long known turns people into giant toddlers who are impossible to deal with.
don't drink from the yes-men tap.
HOTD | Their alpha omega instincts are drawn to each other, but it is still a weak bond. If they find another match, it can be broken.
For Hotd2025Bingo prompt “Marriage of Convenience”
Part 1 / Part 2
Text below for easier reading:
Reeve enters the Shinra building and get into the elevator, a SOLDIER following him in. He thinks nothing of it until the SOLDIER holds out the coffee and breakfast bagel he's holding to Reeve and says in a familiar voice,
"You look like shit this morning."
Reeve tenses automatically, but then forces himself to relax with a sigh, taking the offerings from Kunsel.
"Here I thought you were the secretive type," Reeve says.
"I am when I need to be, but you did a hell of a job last night trying to convince Aerith and I otherwise," Kunsel replies. Reeve looks at the coffee. It's his favorite coffee shop, he frequents it on mornings that he has a little extra time. He takes a sip, and it's his usual.
"Are you sure you're not a turk?" Reeve asks. Kunsel snickers.
"Last time I checked, no. Might've been a missed career opportunity, I suppose." Kunsel shrugs.
all the jokes about Daeron chilling in Old Town while the other targtowers were experiencing The Horrors™ in King's Landing meanwhile Daeron was being raised by known Targaryen hater Ormund Hightower experiencing levels of catholic guilt Westeros has never seen again
Crazy to think that seagulls existed before french fries.
Medieval seagull struggling to fly away with an entire purloined potatoe
Aemond Targaryen meets Alys Rivers HOUSE OF THE DRAGON 3.02 — "Queen's Landing"
HOTD | Their alpha omega instincts are drawn to each other, but it is still a weak bond. If they find another match, it can be broken.
For Hotd2025Bingo prompt “Marriage of Convenience”
Part 1 / Part 2
Text below for easier reading:
gwayne fighting for his life day in day out against cristons incessant cynicism 😭😭 gwayne: we have some disciplinary problems in the ranks can u get in on that maybe?? criston: some shakespearean soliloquy. gwayne: CAN WE HAVE ONE NORMAL CONVERSATION CAN WE PLS JUST DEAL WITH THE PROBLEMS AT HAND THIS ONCE NOT THIS EXISTENTIAL BULLSHIT ALL DAY
Gwayne Hightower and his boss who likes to slot in one hour monologues to a half hour staff meeting.
Pre-dance, Daeron is a bit too adventurous and gets blown to Dragonstone by strong winds (Tessarion is too young).
Guest right and all, despite Daemon’s grumblings, he is given safe passage while the storm passes.
Rhaenyra’s kids are happy to discover that they have an uncle who is very nice! And his dragon is so pretty.
Daemon, deeply suspicious of this new Hightower child, sits in on the conversation whenever Daeron is involved. Which is how he discovers how his Targaryenphobic upbringing.
Daemon: Lord Ormund said your blood was WHAT.
Daemon: your father is my brother. The KING.
Daemon: HE SAID THE KING WAS WHAT?!
Oh HELL no.
He might be fine with child murder, but he draws the line at any anti Targaryen sentiments!
… NGL I don’t know how to end this post. On the one hand sure Daemon can just decide - my kid now. But then he’ll walk around telling Daeron he is good, despite his blood being tainted in another way. Same sandwich different filling.
He could send him back KL, which has such a good record with healthy child upbringing /s
Alicent saying Ormund acts fatherly to Daeron and then we cut to Ormund in fact acting how Alicent perceives fathers to act towards Daeron was also so awesome
Had a discussion on twitter about how Alicent doesn't trust Gwayne judgement about Ormund being cruel, largely because Alicent's meter of acceptable levels of cruelty is so skewed because of her own upbringing.
Kingmaking and religious indoctrination is probably a-okay in their books! (Not a dunk on Alicent, just a dunk on how the whole ASOIAF world sucks)
One week until he returns 🥰