Yaoi cocaine saga
Love wins
will byers stan first human second

Discoholic šŖ©
dirt enthusiast
noise dept.
d e v o n
hello vonnie
RMH
Sweet Seals For You, Always
Aqua Utopiaļ½ęµ·ć®åŗć§čØę¶ćē“”ć
taylor price
One Nice Bug Per Day

Andulka
styofa doing anything

if i look back, i am lost
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
NASA

@theartofmadeline
I'd rather be in outer space šø

Kiana Khansmith
Xuebing Du
seen from Germany

seen from Malaysia
seen from Germany

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Hong Kong SAR China

seen from Palestinian Territories
seen from United States

seen from Singapore
seen from Austria

seen from Malaysia

seen from Italy

seen from United States
seen from Tunisia

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from Spain

seen from Italy
@jora-jean
Yaoi cocaine saga
Love wins
This isnt a joke my favorite piece of writing advice that Iāve ever seen is someone that said if you were stuck with a fic and couldnāt figure out why or what was wrong, your problem is actually usually about ten sentences back. Maybe there was something wonky about the tone or the dialogue or you added something that didnāt fit but itās usually ten sentences back. And every single time I get stuck in a fic I count back ten sentences and itās always fucking there
If you write yourself into a corner, back out of the corner.
Japanese legend: you have the face of who you loved most in a past life
THE NEXT AVATAR ABOUT TO LOOK FINE AFFFFFF
Oh, so YOU guys can just see a face and be like āI like that face, Iām gonna make it my faceā and everyoneās just COOL with that. But when I, Koh the Face Stealer,
Pride flags, their meaning, and their history
disclaimer: sorry if i miss any flags!! if i use any of the improper flags, get the history or the meaning wrong please let me know so i can fix it !!!!
the original pride flag
designed by gilbert baker in 1978
pink was sex, red was life, orange was healing, yellow was sunlight, green was nature, turquoise was magic or art, indigo was serenity and violet was spirit
rainbow flag
often used to represent the entire lgbtqa+ community
they got rid of the pink because the fabric wasnāt available
Philadelphiaās pride flag
In 2017 amber hikes, a black queer woman serving as executive director of the city of philadelphiaās office of lgbt affairs led the more pride more colour campaign to design the flag
The black and brown stripes were added to the flag to show inclusivity to black and brown members of the lgbtqa+ community and acknowledged the discrimination they face from both within and outside of the community
progress pride flag
created by daniel quasar in 2018 adding black and brown striped for people of colour and blue pink and white stripes for the trans community
the flag aimed to shift emphasis to marginalized groups that were important in the current climate and to show that forward movement and progress was still left to be made
lesbian flag
emily gwen designed the sunset lesbian flag
the flag was inclusive of butch, trans and non conforming women who were attracted to women
the dark orange is gender non-conformity, the coral orange is independence, the light orange is community, the white is the relationship to womanhood, the pink is serenity and peace, the pastel pink is love and sex, the dark pink is femininity
the earliest lesbian flag was made in 1999 by sean campbell which contained the repurpose of a nazi symbol, an axe to show feminisms, and a violet colour to indicate sapphic desires. another version of the lesbian flag is the lipstick lesbian flag made in 2010 by natalie mccray had colour that meant to represent two lips touching, the flag excluded butch, trans, and gender non conforming women
mlm/nblm/gaylm flags
(i am actually not entirely sure which is the proper flag or who invented them because there is still a lot of discourse and different variations of the flag)
the first flag is for mlm and nblm and has the least amount of controversy behind it so itās probably your safest bet to you but it might not be the most recognizable. from top to bottom the colours represent attraction and beauty, mlm of colour, community and support, acceptance, trans and non binary, peace and warmth, love and romance
the second flag is a gaylm flag which was made by a gaylm trans man, it is the most recognisable flag but it is similar to a flag that has controversy surrounding whether it is a recolour of the lesbian flag (which i as a lesbian donāt mind but others may disagree) which was created by a transphobe. the flag above is for gay men and the colours from top to bottom represent community, healing, joy, gnc nb and trans men, pure love, fortitude, and diversity
bisexual flag
the bisexual flag was designed by michael page in 1988 to increase visibility towards bisexual people
bisexual people are attracted to multiple genders and experience attraction in relation to gender, this can be either romantic or sexual attraction
the pink represents represents attraction to those of the same gender identity, the purple represents attraction to genders, blue represents attraction to those who identify as a different gender
pansexual flag
the pansexual flag was designed in 2010 to differentiate from the bisexual flag
pansexual people are attracted to people regardless of their gender identity, this attraction can be romantic or sexual
pink represents attraction to women, the yellow represents attraction to genderqueer, non binary, agender, androgynous, or anyone who is not within the gender binary, blue represents attraction to men
polysexual flag
the polysexual flag was designed in 2012
a polysexual person is attracted to multiple but not all genders
pink represents attraction to women, green represents attraction to non-binary and gender nonconforming people and the blue represents attraction to men
part 2: gender identity
trans flag
designed by monica helms, a transgender woman, in 1999
the light blue stripes are meant to be representative of the colour associated with baby boys, the light pink stripes are the colour associated with baby girls and the wipe stripe is for those who are intersex, transitioning, neutral or undefined gender
non-binary flag
the non-binary flag was designed in 2014 by Kyle Rowan and was created to not replace the genderqueer flag to go along side it and be more representative of non-binary people
non binary people have a gender identity that does not fit within the traditional male/female binary
the yellow represents genders outside or without reference to the binary, white represents people with many or all genders purple represents gender identities that fall somewhere in between male/female or a mix of them and black represents people who are without gender
genderqueer flag
the genderqueer flag was designed in 2011 by marilyn roxie to create visibility for the genderqueer community and related identities
the flag originally represented non-binary and genderqueer people but overtime it became more synonymous with genderqueer people and identities leading to the creation of the non-binary flag in 2014
genderqueer convers a range of identities of people whose gender does not fit within the male/female binary
lavender is a mix of blue and pink representing androgyny and people who identified as a mixture of men and women, white represents agender people, green represents the inverse of lavender to represent people who identity outside or without reference to the gender binary
genderfluid flag
the genderfluid flag was created in 2013 by jj pools to represent peoples whoās gender identity or expression fluctuates or is fluid at different times or circumstances, gender fluid people may also have experience multiple gender expressions, identities, or pronouns
the gender fluid community is very diverse and some people within it may also identify as non-binary, trans, or multi gender
pink represents femininity, white represents lack of gender, purple represents a combination of masculinity and femininity, black represents all genders and blue represents masculinity
agender flag
the agender flag was designed in 2014 by salem x
agender is a gender identity in which individuals live without gender, people are genderlesss of lack gender or can be gender neutral meaning they identify as neither a man woman or anyone else within the gender spectrum
the black and white stripes represent a lack of gender, the green stripes represents a non binary gender because it is the inverse of purple which represents both masculinity and femininity in the genderfluid flag
demiboy flag
the demiboy flag was designed in 2015
a person who identifies as a demiboy identifies as partially but not fully a man, they may identify as another gender in addition to being partially a boy and can have a combination or lack of gender
people who identify as a demiboy may feel little connection with masculine and manhood
the colours are assumed to represent partial connection in the gray areas, blue is masculinity and white is agender or non binary
demigirl flag
the demigirl flag was designed in 2015
a person who identifies as a demigirl identifies as partially but not fully a woman, they may identify as another gender in addition to being partially a woman and can have a combination or lack of gender
people who identify as a demigirl may feel little connection with femininity
the colours are assumed to represent partial connection in the gray areas, pink is femininity and white is agender or non binary
neutrios flag
the neutrios flag was designed in 2014 by a group of non-binary people from brazil
neutrios individuals have a neutral or null gender where a person feels neither male, female, or anything in between while still having an experience of gender identity that is neither male or female
the white represents being neural, unidentified or questioning, the green represents the inverse of lavender which is a mix of blue and pink showing there is no male or female and black is for being agender of genderless
two spirit flag
there are multiple different versions of this flag, the symbol is often placed above the trans and non-binary flags as well
two spirit is an umbrella term for queer native american indigenous groups. a person may have both a masculine or feminine spirit or have one of many third genders or mixed genders found in indigenous groups.
It may also encompass same-sex attraction and gender variance that in western culture may be described as gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender, non binary etc. Two spirit people may hold a gender identity out side of the masculine or feminine binary
According to tradition, the two spirit identity was a result of supernatural intervention in dreams and visions
the two feathers represent masculine and feminine identities, the circle represents the unification of masculine and feminine identities into a separate gender
intersex flag
the intersex flag was designed in 2013 by morgan carpenter as a way to have a commonly understood flag and symbol
an intersex person is someone who was porn with physical sex characteristics that donāt fit the traditional definitions for male or female bodies
the purple and yellow represent gender neutrality and the circle represents the wholeness and completeness and the intersex peoples potentiality
part 3: ace
asexual flag
the asexual flag was designed in 2010
asexuality is the lack of sexual attraction to any gender and the flag is representative of all individuals under the asexual spectrum who feel different levels of sexual attraction
the black is asexuality, the grey is grey-asexuality and demi-sexuality, the white is non asexual partners and allies and the purple is community
aromantic flag
the aromantic flag was designed in 2014 after mutiple revisions
a person who is aromantic does not experience romantic attraction or experiences it in an unconventional way
the dark green represents aromantacism, the light green is the aromantic spectrum, the white represents platonic and aesthetic attraction, grey represents grey-aromantic and demi-aromantic people and black
remember asexuality and aromanticism is a spectrum that can range from no attraction at all to rare or low intensity of sexual attraction
demisexual and demiromantic flags
these flags were created in 2012 and have the same colours as the asexual and aromantic flag
demisexual and demiromantic people is apart of the ace spectrum and they do not experience sexual or romantic attraction until they have formed a deep emotional connection with someone, which can be romantic or platonic or some other form
greysexual and greyromantic flags
there is multiple different renditions of the greysexual flag, the earliest was made in 2014 and was symbolic of someone who feels limited sexual or romantic attraction but not none
greysexual and greyromantic people are on the ace spectrum but may feel infrequency or very limited sexual or romantic attraction, they may also experience sexual or romantic attraction that is only specific to certain circumstances
they may feel uncertain about whether they feel attraction or have attraction that only ambiguously there, they also may feel alienated from romantic or sexual attraction
i canāt talk shit about the pirates of the caribbean films as if elizabeth swann becoming pirate king didnāt hand my entire ass to me and make me the gay i am today
these 2 looks basically defined my sexuality and iām not afraid to admit it
things pirates of the caribbean got right:
1. will and elizabethās love story
2. elizabeth becoming pirate king
3. avoiding sexualizing elizabeth or the other female pirate characters in the first 3 films by allowing them to wear period-accurate pirate outfits that arenāt tailored to be revealing and impractical forĀ āsex appealā just because theyāre women
4. hans zimmerās entire score but especially the iconic āheās a pirateā main theme
5. When the movie came out, morally-gray characters like Jack were actually not really a thing yet in pop culture, and itās not Piratesā fault that there are a ton of stupid shitty copycats out there.
6. I run a corseting panel at cons and literally use Elizabethās lace-up scene as a video clip of what historical corseting was actually like, because the only thing they got wrong in this scene is that tightlacing wouldnāt be a thing for about another 200 years (and you couldnāt tightlace with the corset style Elizabeth is wearing anyway). Itās one of the most accurate corseting scenes Iāve ever seen.
7. Willās hat.
8. That scene with all the pirates on the gallows where that little boy starts singing Hoist the Colours? Yeah, thatās fucking legendary. The rest of AWE was kind of a trash fire, but that scene gave me goosebumps.
9. Thereās this great shot in the first one where they really drive home the class differences inherent in this time period by having the governor talking about progress and civilization to Elizabeth in their carriage, and then they cut to a shot outside the carriage where a beggar gets splashed by mud from the wheel. Itās a perfect way to underline that everything is not, in fact, a nice little upper-class fairytale, and to give some weight to Willās storyline, because he has a lot more in common with that beggar than with the governor.
10. For its time, the CGI was fucking amazing.
11. And letās not forget the work of the makeup department, which had to actually invent new ways of putting on makeup for this movie.
12. The governorās death scene. Holy shit.
13. They could have gone with a Jack/Will/Elizabeth love triangle, but they didnāt. There are some hints Jack is in love (or at least in lust) with Elizabeth, but he recognizes that she loves Will, and thatās that.
14. Youāve got to admit that wedding was unique.
15. The introduction of fantasy elements to historical fiction outside of Tolkein-esque fantasy, and how it contributed to and expanded the Fantasy Media boom weāre still enjoying today.
1. They had a woman of colour play a goddess.
2. They had a woman pirate right in the first film, when the tradition is to only show male ones (hell, the PotC ride at Disney had a wench auction scene until recently). And it was a female pirate of colour at that!
3. Elizabeth may not have known how to fight in the first film, but she wasnāt helpless either. Her first instinct was to fight, but she also had the brains to recognize when it was best to hide instead. Plus when given the chance she stabbed Barbosa that one time.
4. Elizabethās lack of fighting ability was not simply because she was a woman, it was clear it was due to her societal circumstances, since we saw other women of different socioeconomic backgrounds being able to fight (and when given the opportunity to learn Elizabeth took to fighting like a duck on water).
5. The Hoist the Colours scene where we see pirates of multiple ethnicities and their varying flags, reminding us that pirates came in all shapes and sizes and werenāt just white men.
6. One of the Pirate Lords being yet ANOTHER woman of colour. She may not have had much of a speaking role if memory serves, but even her presence is already a big deal.
7. The pirates accepting their King is a woman without much fuss.
Pirates is amazing I will not here a bad word
Davy Jones CGI is legendary and a ton better than some of the stuff done today š
Iām pretty sure that female Chinese pirate was a nod to a real, documented female pirate king who was Chinese and had a whole fleet of ships at her disposal but I canāt remember her name rn
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ching_Shih
My favorite part about the Bretheren Court voting wasnāt that they were against Elizabeth for becoming King as a woman and newcomer. They were pissed at Jack for being a chaotic neutral who broke the decades long tradition of an egotistical stalemate by voting for someone besides himself.
Also, the deleted scenes from Black Pearl and At Worldās End that divulge more of Jackās troubled past, like how he was branded as a pirate by the East Indian Trading Company because he stole a ship full of slaves and freed them.
āPeople arenāt cargo, mate.ā
Love these movies.
Link
At least he didn't get expelled.
So, so many works Iāve read could be vastly improved with tightening and shaving of superfluous words. Wordiness is an easy stumbling block, as weāre used to how we talk. Weāre used to how others (long ago) wrote. But times change, my friend, and so do expectations of the writer. We donāt get paid by the word in fiction. So show your smarts and say as much as you can with as much power as you can in as few words as possible.
Here are a few things you can cut without reserve to help shorten your story right now. And as you catch yourself using these words in your next draft, hit that backspace before you finish the sentence! Itās okay if you already have. You can go delete them now. No one will ever know.
Moment/Second/Minute
Itās so tempting. I am guilty of using this word like fertilizer in my first drafts. But most of the time, these words arenāt needed at all. They add nothing.
He sat down for a moment, sipping his coffee. vs. He sat down and sipped at his coffee.
But he only did it for a moment, you say!
He sat down for a moment, sipping his coffee. When the door opened a second later, he shot to his feet. vs. He sat down and sipped his coffee. The door opened, and before he could swallow his first sip, he shot to his feet.
I know, this is about making your writing more concise and my ārightā example has more words than the first example. But whatās the difference? The words used in the second sentence are more tangible. They give a visual that āa second laterā and āfor a momentā donāt. And you could leave that part out, of course, if youāre really going for trimming word count. It doesnāt paint quite the same image, but āThe door opened and he shot to his feet.ā is a perfectly good sentence.
Suddenly/All of a sudden
Youāve heard this one, before, surely. These words are usedā¦when? When youāre trying to portray suddenness. Surprise, perhaps. So why are you adding in extra words to slow down the pace?
She flipped on the TV and reclined in her chair. All of sudden, the TV flashed a bright light and the power went out. vs. She flipped on the TV and reclined in her chair. The TV flashed once before the lights went dark. The power was out.
That sense of immediacy is felt when stuff just happens. So let it happen. If itās rhythm youāre worried about, then find more useful words to create the rhythm. Notice that I didnāt just cut āAll of a suddenā out of the sentence and leave it. I reworded it a bit to make it stronger.
Finally
It can be a useful word, but more often than not, itās just taking up space.
Really/Very
Justā¦delete them.
To alter a Mark Twain quote:
āSubstitute ā[fucking]ā every time youāre inclined to write āvery;ā your editor will delete it and the writing will be just as it should be.ā
But seriously, if youāre saying, āShe was breathing very hard.ā You could just cut the āveryā and say, āShe was breathing hard.ā Or, even better, āShe was panting.ā Or, EVEN BETTER: āShe panted.ā
Himself/herself/myself/themselves
Reflexive nouns have a specific purpose, though they can still often be avoided. They fall into the category of āuse only when itās confusing otherwise.ā
Correct: He looked at himself in the mirror. Better: He looked in the mirror.
Incorrect: She gave them to Andrew and myself before leaving. Correct: She gave them to Andrew and me before leaving.
Technically correct I guess: I havenāt eaten lunch myself. (Intensive pronoun; aka waste of words) Better: I havenāt eaten lunch.
Intensive pronouns add emphasis, but that emphasis is negligible and often negated by the power of tightening your narrative.
That
You can likely cut 60% of your āthat"s and your story will be unaffected. Sometimes, you do need to add a āthatā here and there for clarification, but not always. And sometimes itās just plain incorrect.
The jacket was the coolest one that heād ever owned. vs. The jacket was the coolest one heād ever owned.
In other cases, you might do well to substitute āthatā with āwhich.ā Though, if youāre doing this, make sure you do it properly. That change can often alter the meaning of your sentence. That can be for the better, though.
The vandalism that read āBad Wolfā made Rose nervous. vs. The vandalism, which read āBad Wolf,ā made Rose nervous.
Do you see the difference? In the first sentence, the words are what make Rose nervous. In the second, the vandalism itself makes Rose nervous, and it happens to say āBad Wolf.ā In this case, if youāve watched Doctor Who, then you know the first example is the correct one.
So when youāre sharing details using āthatā or āwhich,ā contemplate how important they are to meaning of the sentence to determine which type of clause you need to use.
Then
Or worse, āAnd then.ā
It makes your writing sound a bit juvenile. Either cut it entirely, or substitute āand.ā
She jumped into the pool, then hit her head on the bottom. vs. She jumped into the pool and hit her head on the bottom.
And then, after all that time, she fell asleep. vs. After all that time, she fell asleep.
Even
Sometime āevenā can help emphasize a situation or behavior, but when itās used in narrative improperly, it sounds childish and silly.
He couldnāt even breathe. vs. He couldnāt breathe.
Even with the new hair gel, his hair was terrible. (This one is fine, though you could still cut that āevenā if you really wanted toā¦)
Just
Justā¦Delete it.
Breathe/breath/exhale/inhale/sigh/nod/shrug
Another one Iām soĀ guilty of. In my first drafts, I tend to talk about how a character is breathing, or when theyāre sighing like nobodyās business. I know a lot of writers who are guilty of this, too. Itās a great tool to use scarcely. In intense moments, you can let your character take a final deep breath to calm themselves. When a character almost drowns, those first few sweet breaths are important. But you readers know that people breath all the time. And just because you need a beat in your dialogue doesnāt mean you need to remind your reader that the character is still breathing or moving.
Rather/quite/somewhat
She was rather tall. She was tall. He was quite idiotic. He was idiotic. They were somewhat snazzy. They were snazzy. Why do you need those words? Kill āem.
Start/begin
This is a great example of fluff.
She started to run toward the shop. vs. She ran toward the shop.
He began scolding them for their performance. vs. He scolded them for their performance.
There are obviously uses for this word, like anything. He started the car. Begin your tests! But when youāre using it to slow the action and the pace of your narrative, then consider heavily if you need it. You probably donāt.
In order to/in an attempt to
Phrases that add unneeded complications, cumbersome wordingā¦kill āem!
She bit down in an attempt to stop herself from screaming. vs. She bit down to stop herself from screaming.
Was able to
He was able to call. vs. He could call. OR He called.
This is one that isnāt inherently bad, but it can easily be overused and cutting it will help simplify your narrative.
Due to
Ugh. Are you trying to sound proper and stuffy? Because thatās a reason, I guess, to use this phraseā¦and yet it sounds like doodoo. (Yes. Iām an adult.) Rephrase. Use āBecause ofā or just avoid the need altogether.
We stopped due to traffic. vs. We stopped because of traffic. OR (Strength of narrative!) We stopped mid-highway. The parked cars went on beyond the curve of the road, out of sight.
Visibly/obviously/apparently/audibly
These are a sign of telling in your narrative when you should probably be showing.
She was visibly shaking. ā> She shivered, hugging her upper arms. He was obviously tired. ā> He yawned and tripped on his own feet as he crossed the room. They were apparently angry. ā> They stomped and shouted, demanding attention. She screamed audibly. (Really?) ā> She screamed.
Donāt tell your readers what emotion a character is feeling. Instead, give a few clues that they can see/hear/feel the emotion too.
While
This word has lots of legitimate uses. However, if youāre using it poorly, then your narrative reads like an Early Readerās book, and you (unless thatās what youāre writing) probably donāt want that.
āGet it together,ā he said while flipping them off. vs. āGet it together,ā he said, flipping them off.
Turned
One of the classics. So overused, my friends. Itās needed on occasion, but not nearly as often as we use it. Just cut it out.
They turned toward her as they spoke. vs. They gave her their full attention as they spoke. OR They looked into her eyes. OR (Nothing. Readers donāt have to be updated on every little movement.)
Saw/looked/regarded
UGH. Regarded:Looked::Mentioned:Said
And, like āsaid,ā many, many instances of these words can be nixed.
She saw them run for the hills. vs. They ran for the hills.
This can be tricky, I know, when youāre writing in limited-third or first POV. Itās tempting to put every action directly through your POV characterās filter. But resist that temptation! There are times when itās appropriate, occasionally, but it can be overdone so easily.
I looked at her and said, āPlease.ā vs. I said,ā Please.ā OR. I took her hand. āPlease.ā
This example sides with the breathing and the turning. Itās often an unneeded update on the tiny movements of the characters. And, again, sometimes you need that beat or that little detail in an intense moment, but not often.
Said/replied/stated/spoke/mentioned/asked/commented/yelled/cried/shouted
Iām not here to tell you to cut all your dialogue tags (please donāt). Iām also going to the last person who insists you get rid ofĀ āsaid.ā In fact, Iām in theĀ āsaid is invisibleā party of writing nerds and I think, if youāre going to use a standard tag, it should beĀ āsaidā 90% of the time.Ā
But aside from that, using as few dialogue tags as possible is a good thing. Iāll do a full post on this soon, but for now, be aware of how often you rely on these words in your dialogue and do your best not to overuse them. Use surrounding action and context to take some of the reliance off of these words.Ā
To-Be in all its conjugated forms
If youāre using any of this list:
am, is, are, was, were, be, being, had been
Then check yo'self. Some tenses call for an auxiliary verb. Some types of sentence do, too, not doubt about it. But many donāt, and cutting to-be verbs when you can will help tighten your writing.
We were going to the store. vs. We went to the store.
Sounds were echoing through the chamber. vs. Sounds echoed through the chamber.
To-be verbs can also be an indicator of passive voice, though they arenāt always.
He was hit by the ball. vs. The ball hit him.
Last but not least, check all of your adverbs.
Chances are, if youāre using an adverb, you could be using a single strong verb instead and giving each sentence more punch.
He ran quickly. ā> He sprinted. I hit him hard. ā> I socked him. She spoke quietly. ā> She whispered. They ran into each other fast. ā> They crashed.
So what am I supposed to do about this?
Take it to heart. Try not to let these words take over your brain as you write. Once your manuscript is finished, try this method:
Use Find and Replace. Replace any and all of the aforementioned words in ALL-CAPS. Now, if youāve paid attention to my advice in using emphasis, then those all-caps will really stick out as youāre reading over your work and you can decide at each instance whether your usage is appropriate, or if it needs to be rewritten. As I did to this very old draft of mine from my first NaNoWriMo (in which I used every single word on this list, Iām sure).
When I used this method with my most recent WIP, I was able to cut my word count from 105k to 93k without cutting any content whatsoever. It takes a lot of work and itās pretty tedious but the results are amazing!
It wouldnāt be the English language without exceptions, would it?
Now, there is actually an important time for intentionally using any or all of the words on this list. You know when that is?
When it fits the characterās voice. - More on this in my next post!
Phrases that add unneeded complications, cumbersome wordingā¦kill āem! Haiku Bot v2021.1~beta I make mistakes. I am buggy too. Sorry! | HAIKU BOT NO! Paypal | Patreon
Me duele la cabeza
This is actually examples of the field of mathematics called topology and itās fucking bullshit wizard shit.
Do Converted Androids Differ From Self-Deviated Androids?
Iāve been thinking a bit about this. Mainly how the androids Markus converts have crazy, sudden, and fervent devotion to him.Ā
The Freedom March?
The one where they assemble hundreds of androids, a lot of them freshly deviated?
Yeah, so remember how you can tell them to just stand their ground, and theyāll just do it? Even as theyāre all gunned down? Or order them to attack? And theyāll run straight into a massacre?
I donāt know about you, but I feel like at least some of those guys who just woke up would probably be likeā¦okay cool thx bro for giving me free will and all. But with this nice fresh appreciation of not wanting to die, I think ima skip out on this one.Ā
But that doesnāt happen. Not for a single android.
AND THENĀ ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE DEVIANT QUESTION youāve got people like Ralph, who self-deviate and just want to stay out of the way and live in peace. Yes, Ralph can sacrifice himself for Kara and co. at the camp, but only if theyād built some sort of relationship first.
Likewise, North and Simon will both sacrifice themselves to save Markus. But only if theyāre at a certain level of closeness/relationship. And guess what? They also self-deviated. You know who sacrifices himself for Markus without any relational status involved? John. How did he deviate again? Oh, yeah. Markus pulled him behind a crate andĀ converted him.
And this instant devotion doesnāt seem to be limited to just Markus.
Remember this? Free a bunch of androids from CyberLife Tower and theyāll just march forth all over Detroit at Connorās behest? And suddenly people want to hear a speech from him? Markus is dead and you awakened us so of course you should talk to everyone and be our leader!Ā
To be fair, the anomaly with sudden, enthusiastic devotion of deviated androids is likely just due to gameplay mechanics and whatās easiest for streamlining the story. Thereās also something to be said for being a bit lost and looking for direction after gaining free will/freedom so suddenly. A leader calling you to do something, offering purpose and direction, certainly would have its appeal.
BUT that doesnāt account for all of it. Especially not with what Jericho is willing to do for Markus. How they follow him blindly regardless if he wants to talk and make friends with the humans or if he wants to wage all-out war against them (looking at you, nuclear ending). I can accept that there would be androids in both of those camps of thought. But for the same group of androids to swing so wildly based on the word of one man?Ā
Wasnāt it free will they were supposed to have gained?Ā
And as a side noteā
Can we just talk about the difference between when Markus saves these guys versus when Connor does? š
HINT: that first pic was when Markus saves them. Second is Connor.
And yes, I realize that Markus is their known leader. Of courseĀ theyād be happy to be saved by āMarkus himself.ā But dayum, son, in such a high stakes, life-or-death situation, Iād think youād just be happy and relieved to be saved at all. Me personally, Iād probably be ready to thank whoever it was regardless causeĀ holy RA9 Iām still alive.
I could see an argument where, well, maybe he recognized the āfamous Deviant Hunterā and was confused. But if that was the case, I think his reaction mightāve been a little more pronounced. More of a recoil in shock/repulsion rather than aĀ āoh. Look. A person. Not my deviator.ā
We know that Kamski wanted to the revolution to succeed. Thereās footage of him that didnāt fully make it past production where, if the revolution had failed, he says heād ābe at the helmā of the next one to make sure theyād winĀ (timestamp 6:26).
And weāve seen the variable behavior of deviants who deviate on their own versus those who are converted.
Is it that far fetched Kamski mightāveā¦added a little something extra in the coding there when one of the RK-model androids deviate someone?Ā
Just some food for thought. ;)
This has been an ongoing conversation in the fandom for a while now. I remember getting into some discussions with people on Discord servers about this very thing back in the day, lol. But yeah, thereās a real question here of whether or not Markus and Connor forcibly deviating other androids can even be considered proper deviation or not. There are a couple main theories on this iirc. The first considers just what happens when Markus or Connor deviates another. How does it occur? What exactly is it they do to break through their coding? Itās been suggested that, since deviancy is caused by very strong emotion, what theyāre doing is sharing memories. Itās basically an interface boosted to 11 that manages to trigger the non-deviant enough to elicit an emotional response, thereby forcing them to deviate. In this way, it opens the door up for all androids possibly being capable of this with Markus just being the first to realize. Iāve also seen it suggested that this could be why all the AP700s in the CyberLife basement are able to seemingly convert each other without Connor directly connecting with them all. If weāre to use this theory with the aforementioned observation, then itās possible that the reason all the androids Markus converts are so fiercely loyal to him and the cause is because theyāve basically lived through his life with him, privy to the most pivotal moments that led to him deviating in the first place. With that sort of constructed empathy in place, it could be argued that every android that follows him does so because they believe in what theyāre doing just as much as Markus does, which would make for a pretty fearless, formidable force who are liable to run into bullet fire when asked. Another theory of deviancy (and the one I personally subscribe to) is that it acts like a virus, much like Kamski says if questioned about it. It is my belief that the rA9 so revered throughout the game is in fact the start-up sequence for that code. This explains why deviants seem so enamored with it and treat it as some sort of god. If all of them are aware, at least on a very basic level, that rA9 is what led to them waking up and becoming aware, it could perhaps be seen as some sort of deity. ārA9 will save us all.ā And, quite literally, that is what it does. So, going by this theory, what Markus and Connor are doing when they deviate another android is injecting them with the rA9 āvirus,ā giving the other androidās system a jump-start on deviancy without ever having to experience a traumatic or overly-emotional event to activate it in the first place. And, if weāre trying to figure out why these forcibly-deviated androids are so loyal, perhaps we can turn to literal naivety here? After all, it must be a jarring experience, to be so suddenly aware. I imagine they would be looking for some sort of guidance, some one to direct them as their programming would have before. And in this way, we can perhaps assume that they look towards the one who awoke them in the first place and innocently agree to what theyāre asking of them. A third theory of deviancy suggests that there is something inherent in the RK line that allows for this phenomenon of forced-deviation. I also subscribe to this theory to an extent in that I think the RKās specialized software perhaps played a crucial role in what they were capable of in the game. However, Iām of two minds on whether or not this would remain a skill only they could have. There are a lot of androids in the world in 2038. If only the RK series could convert a non-deviant, Connor and Markus would be in incredibly high demand all across the country and on into other nations that deal in CyberLife androids. The scope is just too massive I think for this to be the case and so, for practicalityās sake, I think Jericho must figure out some other way in the aftermath of the Revolution. Perhaps whatever method Connor used in the basement? The visible chain reaction of the AP700s is very obvious after all: Connor only touched the one and it spread all on its own. So yeah, I think
this oneās pretty likely, too. However, this is definitely the most likely theory to hold weight when considering a newly-deviant androidās immediate priorities. If Markus and Connor are using some sort of special program in order to accomplish this task, then it also follows that they could implant an order directly in them at the same time. This theory gives them much more direct control over how an android deviates and, if they were in dire need of backup like in the Freedom March or the Battle for Detroit, thereās a definite possibility that they influenced the newly deviated androids into doing what they needed to accomplish their missions. And perhaps itās not even a conscious decision, but it still makes sense. The fact that no android is seen just⦠leaving or saying no, I donāt want to do this or having any sort of opposition at all is very suspicious. And it ties in closely with the last theory, which is: The forcibly-deviated androids are not actually fully deviant at all. Merely, whatever Connor and Markus do to them in the process, it breaks them free of CyberLifeās control without necessarily demolishing their servile programming completely. And in that way, they basically are just managing to have an army of semi-sentient slaves to instruct as they see fit. Which is⦠a very dour thought, but still a possibility. Iāve seen all these and more suggested by people in discussions and there are certain merits for each. Itās a very interesting subject to theorize about, honestly. And there are certainly some opportunities for a very dark take on the whole matter. But yeah, I just wanted to add my two cents in for the sorts of things Iāve discussed with people over the years and some of the possibilities for why things seem so off. Cheers!
reblog this if your blog is a safe space on april fools and wonāt have any jumpers, screamers, or anything scary or anxiety inducing
Hey, if weāre mutuals donāt forget that:
You can ask for my Skype
You can ask for my Steam
You can ask for my Discord
Ā You can kill me in one hit
Iāve seen a lot of posts on my dash tonight about users who are threatening suicide, with other Tumblr members posting in effort to try to get ahold of them. I think you all should see this:
IF THERE IS EVER A TUMBLR USER WHO HAS POSTED A GOOD-BYE MESSAGE, SUICIDE NOTE, VIDEO, OR ANYTHING OF THE SORT, PLEASE FOLLOW THIS POST.
1. Scroll to the top of your dashboard.
2. See the circular question mark icon at the top? Itās the third one over from your home symbol. Click on that, and a screen similar to the one in the picture will come up.
3. Where you can type in questions, the box with the magnifying glass at the top, type in the word āsuicide.ā
4. Click on the first link that shows up. It should say, āPass the URL of the blog on to us.ā
5. Type in the userās URL and tell Tumblr admin that the user is contemplating suicide and has posted a message indicating that they are going through with it or will be attempting. Hit send! Tumblr administration will perform a number of actions to contact the user and take the necessary steps to prevent the suicide.
TUMBLR: THIS COULD SAVE A USERāS LIFE. PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE SUICIDE THREATS.
Reblog this to keep other users aware. Suicide isnāt a joke, and neither is someoneās life. If you didnāt know this, someone else may not, either. Pass it on.
why on earth doesnāt this have more notes
I actually had to do this once. She lived.
if you scroll past this on your dash you are absolutely heartless.
Reblog this!! This can save somebodyās life!
reblog.
help.
do not scroll down.
I SWEAR TO GOD IF ANYONE SCROLLS PAST THIS WITHOUT REBLOGGING I WILL LITTERALLY FIND THEM AND GIVE THEM A LECTURE
may I just update this?
see the little thing that says help?
Donāt ever scroll past this post. FUCKING NEVER SCROLL PAST!!!
šøšøšø
Anyone know where it is on mobile ???
You report the user, choose āsomething elseā, scroll down and choose āsuicide or self harmā
DO NOT SCROLL DOWN
REBLOG TO LITERALLY SAVE A LIVE
PLEASE REBLOG
Please donāt scroll past this post, you could save someoneās life.
SAVE A LIFE
this. reblogging this on my largest blog for yāall to see this
You can also do this on Android mobile.
Scroll to the top of the post
Click the three dots in the top right corner of the post.
When the menu pops up, click Report Something Else
Then choose Suicide or Self Harm Concern.
Sorry this aināt my usual content. But this is important.
I will post soon, but this is very important
iāve been having terrible back ache for a week now, but i just did this and i heard a loud POP!!!⦠back ache is gone folks
i have this on my office wall and gave a copy to the front desk staff who also put it on their wall.
Detroit: Become Human uQuiz
Find out which DBH character you are with this uQuiz!!!!
At first I was really startled because when the results came an add popped up in between the headline and my result. Guess I am a 3D animation of a butt⦠oh wait no Iām Josh xD
Interesting! Honestly thought Iād get Connor or Nines, but le description is rather accurate and actually makes a good deal of sense when I think about itāso Robo Jesus it is, then! š
Also, thatās awesome you made it so quickly, Ollie xD and asksksks @headfulloffantasyā thatās hilarious and now we need to reconstruct the Jericrew.Ā šGotta find us a Simon and North haha
Iā¦. I got Elijah Kamski and I donāt how I feel about that
I got Hank and honestly - yes
Y'know, whenever people want to talk about why aspec people ācountā as an oppressed identity, they tend to go for the big stuff like corrective rape and conversion therapy. And like, we should absolutely talk about that stuff. Obviously those things are terrible and important and we need to raise awareness and deal with them.
But I feel like people often gloss over how⦠quietly traumatising it is to grow up being told that there is only one way to be happyā and that everybody who doesnāt conform to that norm is secretly miserable and just doesnāt know itā and then to gradually realise that, for reasons that you cannot help, that is never going to happen for you.
Youāre not going to find a prince/princess and ride off into the sunset. Or if you do, then itās not going to look exactly the way it does in fairytales. Youāre not going to get a ānormalā relationship, because you are not ānormalā, and everybody and everything around you keeps telling you that thatās bad.
You see films where characters are presented as being financially stable, genuinely passionate about their work and surrounded by friends and family, but then spend the rest of the plot realising that the real thing they needed was a (romantic and sexual) partner, to make them 'completeā.
You absorb the idea that any relationships you have with allo people will ultimately be unfulfilling on their side, and that this will be your fault (even if you discussed things with your partner beforehand and they decided that they were a-okay with having those sorts of boundaries in a relationship) unless you deliberately force yourself into situations that you arenāt comfortable with, so as to make uo for your 'defectsā.
You grow up feeling lowkey gaslighted because all the adults in your life (even in LGBT+ spaces. In fact especially in LGBT+ spaces) are insisting that itās totally normal to not be attracted to anybody at your age, and then you go to school and everybody keeps pressuring you to name somebody youāre attracted to because they canāt imagine not being attracted to anybody at your age.
And then you get older and realise that one day youāre going to be expected to leave home, and that one day all your friends are going to be expected to put aside other relationships and 'settle downā with a primary partner and you donāt know what youāre going to do after that because you straight up donāt have a roadmap for what a 'happy endingā looks like for someone like you.
(And the LGBT+ community is little help, because so many people in there are more than happy to tell you that youāre not oppressed at all. That youāre like this because you donāt want to have sex, and/or you donāt want to have any relationships, that your orientation is some sort of choice you madeā like not eating bananasā rather than an intrinsic part of you that a lot of us have at some point tried to wish away.)
Even if youāre grey or demi, and do experience those feelings, you still have to deal with the fact that youāre not experiencing them the 'normalā way and that thatās going to effect your relationships and your ability to find one in the first place.
If youāre aiming for lifelong singlehood (which is valid af) or looking for a qpp, then youāre going to have to spend the rest of your life either letting people make wrong assumptions about your situation (at best that your relationship is of a different nature than it actually is, at worst that the life youāve chosen is really just a consolation prize because you 'failedā at finding a romantic/sexual partner) or pulling out a powerpoint and several webpages every time you want to explain it.
This what being aspec looks like for most people, and it is constantly minimised as being unimportant and not worth fighting againstā even in aspec spacesā because weāve all on some level absorbed the idea that oppression is only worth fighting against if itās big, and dramatic, and immediately obvious. That all the little incidents of suffering that we experience on a daily basis are not enough to be worth bothering about.
I mean, who gives a shit if you feel broken, inherently toxic as a partner, and like youāre going to be denied happiness because of your orientation? Shouldnāt we all just shut up and thank our lucky stars we donāt have to deal with all the stuff some of the other letters in the acronym have to put up with (leaving aside the fact that there are many aspec people who identify with more than one letter)?
So you know what? If youāre aspec and you relate to anything Iāve said above (or can think of other things relating your your aspec-ness that I havenāt mentioned) then this is me telling you now that itās enough. Even if we got rid of all the big stuff (which weāre unlikely to do any time soon becauseā Shock! Horror!ā the big stuff is actually connected to all the small stuff) we would still be unable to consider our fight 'overā because what you are experiencing is not 'basically okayā and something we should just be expected to 'put up withā.
No matter what anybody tells you, we have the right to demand more from life than this.
OP, I hope itās okay to expand on this, but I just wanna add how itās nearly impossible to be self sustaining while being single.
The fact that you get tax benefits for being married and having children as well as the dual-income household is something aspecs are barred from on an inherent basis because of our identities. Not to mention intersections like other queer identities, neurodivergency, disability, mental illness, chronic illness, and a host of other things I canāt think of right now.
Your breakdown of the social impact of what we face and how deeply weāve internalized all that was spot on, and everyone who still doesnāt understand what aspecs experience needs to read it. I feel that itās also important to talk about how this system either guarantees weāll be working poor or that we force ourselves into unhappy normative relationships to avoid it.
And like. I wish aphobes would shut the fuck up about how our suffering and discrimination starts and ends with āsomeone was mean to me online uwuā because Iām tired of people suggesting aspecs need to have their identities raped out of them, and then turn right around and call us toxic perverts.
Gosh I felt all this do deeply.
TRYING TO PROVE SOMETHING
Reblog if you think pansexuals and bisexuals can coexist and support each other!
I'm tired of hearing people argue that pansexuals are biphobic or transphobic. I'm tired of hearing that bisexuals are panphobic. I'm tired of hearing that my sexuality exists only to erase another. Aren't you?