elaine (or ven) ˖ ❀ ⋆。˚
s(he)/they, 24
co-host in @meal's system
One Nice Bug Per Day
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
Not today Justin
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda
Claire Keane
i don't do bad sauce passes
🪼
d e v o n
tumblr dot com
Cosimo Galluzzi

No title available
RMH

roma★

Origami Around
cherry valley forever

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
No title available
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
Monterey Bay Aquarium

JBB: An Artblog!

seen from Türkiye
seen from Türkiye

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye

seen from Türkiye
seen from Türkiye

seen from Russia
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Singapore

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Switzerland

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
@jourlainey
elaine (or ven) ˖ ❀ ⋆。˚
s(he)/they, 24
co-host in @meal's system
“Subverting” Catholic art? Oh, okay. I see, you think this has nothing to do with you. You log onto the internet and you post about how “Wound of Christ” from Psalter and Prayer Book of Bonne de Luxembourg, attributed to Jean le Noir, c.1349, for instance, looks like a vulva because you're trying to tell the world that you enjoy Catholic art and imagery in an alternative, queer, risqué way that challenges Christian beliefs. But what you don't know is that that stigma isn’t just a vulva. It's not just a mandorla. It's not just yonic. It's actually intentionally erotic. And you're also blithely unaware of the fact that around 1297, Saint Angela of Foligno experienced a vision of Christ himself, who called her to put her mouth to the wound in his side and lick the freshly flowing blood. And then I think it was Saint Catherine of Siena who drank blood and a clear liquid from the wound before receiving a ring made from Christ’s foreskin? And then graphically erotic encounters with the side wound of Christ quickly showed up in the writings of eight different mystics. And then the yonic interpretation of the stigmata filtered down through the illuminated manuscripts and then trickled on down into some pseudo-intellectual corner of the internet…where you, no doubt, fished it out of some Pinterest board. However, that interpretation represents hundreds of years and countless visions of religious ecstasy. And it's sort of comical how you think that you've come up with an idea that exempts you from Christian theology when, in fact…you're posting an image that was sexualized for you by the very Medieval saints you think you’re so different than…from “subverted” Catholic art.
The Adventures of Prince Achmed (1926) dir. Lotte Reiniger
lunar corona, colorful rings around the moon.
snoopy items by sissi.ceramics
we really, really should. 🚬
another piece for my noir series ;)
patreon // buy prints here
fully sober in the club googling iliad full text
reblog if you would give cheeses to these meeces
Hector at home
Sharp Objects (2018) dir. Jean-Marc Vallée
gorgeous stairs in an abandoned farmhouse
ROBIN HOOD (1973) dir. Wolfgang Reitherman
I was imagining "reverse creep radiohead" as a bit and now I can't stop thinking of "I wish you were special, I'm so fucking special" and laughing
Vintage Lace Nightgown
We make fun of steampunk and mock it but imagine if there really were marvelous devices