T

Vampire Enthusiast. 20. He/Him.

[themoldysausage]

If you start watching the Princess Bride at 10:33:37 PM, Inigo Montoya will kill Count Rugen at exactly midnight, ringing in the new year with vengeance for Inigo's father

[combataromantic-deactivated2026]

Guy who fights people : see idk if I could fight a girl, I know they aren’t weaker than men and I don’t want to be condescending. if you want to I could probably try, but a part of me would feel wrong about it. I guess I can give it a shot.

Dude at his funeral : he was 5’4” and we all loved him

Girl who accidentally killed him, haunted by her sudden awareness of human fragility : Everybody I touch, I fear will crumble like a house of cards.

[sizeofyoursoul]

Mid-1990's American Paperback Editions of The Vampire Chronicles

[vendetta06]

I love physical media. I love owning stuff. I love having a collection I can reference, holding it in my hand, over-analyzing it over and over

[dinosaurrainbowstarfish]

a writer who writes the most fucked up “dead dove: do not eat” problematic pairing and fully tags and warns for the content they create will always be worthy of more respect in my eyes than people who call others weirdos because of who they ship. This is because a writer who writes disturbing things but gives me plenty of warning about them has demonstrated, regardless of what happens in the fic, that they value the consent of real people, and that they value my consent to see such content and will always offer me the option to avoid or withdraw. On the other hand, a purity cultist who demands I explain my trauma and exactly why I might be drawn to dark content, regardless of whether they’re the purest fluff writer to ever write, has demonstrated a lack of respect for my boundaries and the attitude that they are entitled to whatever they want to take from me. 

There are a lot of things that bother me about purity culture, but I think the most disturbing is that it clouds the very definition of consent, and then teaches this confusing version (you must consent to deep dives into your trauma and how it affects you for the benefit of strangers who have already decided you’re a bad person, and not consenting to that automatically makes you an abuser, also no one can consent to reading or thinking about disturbing content ever because thinking about it means you want it irl) to young, vulnerable, and often traumatized individuals, thus making it harder to understand their trauma and easier for them to ignore the real warning signs of abuse (like demanding that you agree with the abuser otherwise you’re literally the worst and most harmful person ever) because it teaches that abusers only come in one type, and that all abusers are “nasty shippers”.

This is especially dangerous because real life abusers teach their victims that the abuse is happening because the victim is a bad, evil person. One of the diagnostic criteria for PTSD is literally “Places undue blame on themself or others for what happened”. Teaching traumatized people that consent is a luxury only “good” people are allowed to have is incompatible with support for abuse survivors. tl;dr a writer who tags “dead dove: do not eat” has demonstrated respect for the necessity of consent. A purity cultist who sends anon hate has demonstrated a lack of respect for consent. 

[dinosaurrainbowstarfish]

Yes, this absolutely does include people who write, read, or ship abusive pairings, explore abuse in their work, include rape or incest in their work, with or without “calling out” that content. This also includes writers who include that type of content in erotic work. Content like that that is tagged properly indicates that, regardless of what happens in the fic, the person writing it understands that their work could impact real people and that those real people deserve the chance to choose wether or not they’d like to see the fic. An author who tags their fic has demonstrated that they understand consent and the fact that everyone gets to consent or not consent to the content they’d like to consume, unlike a purity cultist who sends harassing and threatening messages with the intent to cause emotional or physical harm to the person they’ve decided is “bad”.  Furthermore, ANY ideology that allows its followers to harass and attack members of the “out-group” for the crime of “not following the rules”, where the rules are about how you speak or act rather than how you actually do or do not harm others, is dangerous and should be avoided at all costs.

[jpluvbug]

There is a line between people that express their trauma and ptsd through writing, making it acknowledged in the work that what’s being portrayed is wrong, and tag it respectively and responsibly; and people without trauma/ptsd that glorify, romanticize, and sexualize things like pedophilia, rape, abuse, etc., and portray it as something all parties enjoy.

I feel like there aren’t a lot of people in the replies here that really understand where that line is, from both sides of the argument.

If:

☑️the creator has experienced this and is using the writing to cope

☑️they know that the “dark” subject of the work is ultimately wrong and portray it as such

☑️the work is tagged correctly and has necessary warnings

This is completely fine.

If:

☑️the creator has no experience being on the receiving end of this trauma

☑️the “dark” subject of the work is glorified in any way and enjoyed by everyone involved

☑️the work isn’t correctly tagged and the creator shows no respect or interest in making it consensual

This is absolutely wrong.

[dragonsarrow]

2021 predictions

january: footage of trump being removed from the white house

february: valentines day commercials of people wearing masks during sex

march: popular hazbin hotel artist starts a gofundme for surgery,  ppl debate if they deserve money or not

april: new meme called “boinkers”

may: right wing tries to make “confederate memorial day” a national holiday

june: new nintendo mobile game and everyone obsesses with it for two weeks before it gets forgotten

july: popular tumblr user gets called out for visiting family/friends on 4th of july, following week they’re outed as an “osomatsu-san” incest shipper

august:  ~T̞̰̫̪͒́h̭̭͍̝͟e̋ ̛̰̏͋ ̯̯͈̳̦Kͭin̺̥̺ͬ́͡ͅ ̗̤̋̋ͩ̈͢ ͊̄Wa̍ͣͧ̒̏͏̪ȓ̌̒͆ͬ͏̲̩s͙̞̼̘̤͐͆́~

september: elon musk retweets the “boinkers” meme, effectively killing it. right wing turns it into a hate symbol

october: halloween comes back full force and companies go all out with advertising, but there’s a big covid spike and it gets cancelled again

november: meme about putting your dick in canned cranberry sauce, complete with discussion on whether it could help cure UTIs

december: my chemical romance releases a new album and it hits #1 on most charts

[silly-slacker-person]

Please don’t speak this into existence, I don’t think I could handle it

[lil-pillow]

I had to add some to fill all the slots but I hope y’all have fun!!

[jpluvbug]

Reblog to manifest

[jpluvbug]

I haven’t watched supernatural yet but seeing everyone I follow posting about all the shit going on is still fucking hilarious

[jpluvbug]

Sometimes I just want to,,,,

U̵̞̎͛͘͠͝G̴̨̗͓̟̿̆͑͆̕͠H̸̻͕̙͍̆H̶̫̭͇͖͈̞͝Ĕ̵̢̞͚̪̏̑Ř̶̤̰̺̫̻͕̈D̴̨̻͈̩́͒͛̋̕͝I̷͖͒͋̿ͅĖ̵̱̔̇͊͠H̴̬̰̳͊Ë̷̯̗̙̑͌̎̒͝ͅȞ̸̨͆̅̾͊U̶̠̒̊̄E̷͈̤̎͆̂Ṙ̸̋ͅŰ̶͚̺̂͂U̷̙̍̓̚E̵̢̻̹͆̇Ĥ̵͖Ć̶̨̪Ḩ̸͉̯͋̉̚E̶͓̓̕͝G̵̟̥͕̈̆͘E̶̻̘͐R̸̢̤̗̃

[hyperthrust]

alright, why would you be a good killjoy?

[jpluvbug]

Easy. I’m queer, I hate the government, and am completely prepared to work as a part of a closely knit group of people who are also gay and hate the government. Also I have a lot of anger I should probably get out.

[no-chill-at-all]

[wildlyannoyingdoofus]

These kinds of responses are my FAVORITE. Some examples to answers to this question I have heard:

1.

“Okay, and who’s the president?”

“Obama, no wait, shit *vehemently* fuck, I hate him… what’s his name…”

“It’s okay, you know who he is.”

2.

“Who’s the president?”

“*drunkenly angry and confused* ..uhhhhhhh…Orange… damn it what’s the fuck’s name….

“Yup, good enough.”

3.

“And who’s the president,”

“Not fuckin’ Obama!”

“I feel ya.”

4.

“Who’s the president- wait, nevermind you’re from Korea you said, right? So who’s-“

“Everybody knows that Trump-bitch.”

“Oh, well, alright then.”

5. (My personal favorite)

“Who’s the president?”

“Ew.”

“Good enough.”

[epaulettes]

My roommate is a neurologist and has to do this check all the time. Her all-time favorite so far has been “ay dios mio” during which the woman was vigorously crossing herself.

[moodyehudi-deactivated20180519]

lol me too , lady

[emi--rose]

One time I got “that orange fuck” from a very cute little old lady with urosepsis

[nezumipi]

I have - quite unintentionally - contributed to this phenomenon.

I was waking up from surgery in the post-op observation room, where they kept people before sending them off to the ICU. The nurse was talking to me as I was semi-awake, telling me that as soon as it was ready, I would be sent to room 2008.

I did not hear the word “room”.

I started trying to sit up and get out of bed (entirely unsuccessfully), shouting (mumbling forcefully), “He’s not president yet! I have to warn everyone!”

[magimerlyn]

That’s awesome. Thank you for trying to warn us

[andtheyfellintodarkness]

don’t know if it still happens, but a few years ago they had to get rid of the ‘who’s the prime minister’ question in Australia cause it changed too often

[transkingoryx]

reblogging for the person who thought they were time travelling back to 2008