Lovely to see we have spaces where you can gain access to so much literature!
No title available

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣

shark vs the universe
Cosimo Galluzzi
h
Keni
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
Sade Olutola
Game of Thrones Daily
almost home
🩵 avery cochrane 🩵

PR's Tumblrdome
The Stonewall Inn
No title available
One Nice Bug Per Day
noise dept.

titsay
Monterey Bay Aquarium
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"

#extradirty

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Switzerland
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Germany

seen from United States
seen from Colombia
seen from United States

seen from China
seen from Indonesia
seen from France
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Singapore

seen from Bangladesh

seen from Brazil
@justabookwormnerd
Lovely to see we have spaces where you can gain access to so much literature!
Hanfu & Guqin Masterlist
(Updated January 8, 2026)
Hanfu Posts
-> Warring States/Qin/Han Dynasties (战国秦汉)
-> Weijin + North/South Dynasties (魏晋南北朝)
-> Sui/Tang/Five Dynasties (隋唐五代)
-> Song Dynasty (宋朝)
-> Yuan Dynasty (元朝)
✦•······················•✦•······················•✦
-> Hanfu-related videos
-> Hanfu book recommendations
Guqin (古琴) Posts
Asks
Other
to be a bookworm don't you need to know how to read and right coherently?
…You just used the word ‘right’ instead of ‘write’. I think you may have just invalidated your own insult. Also, I have a degree in English literature so I think my reading and writing skills are fine. I really wish you weren’t anon so you could see the stupidity of your ask.
the fact that im at risk of seeing a mans opinion on a female character at any point during my day is a human rights violation
I try to stay away from a lot of fandom discourse, but since I’ve been seeing this on my dash again and in tags, I feel the need to make a statement on this, particularly for any young fans who follow me that might get drawn into this mindset.
Stay away from purity culture. Warn your friends away from it too, if you see them starting to fall for it. It’s very easy to get drawn into it
Almost always, it starts with one of three roots, pedophilia, incest and/or abuse. Usually it’s pedophilia. Funnily enough, that’s also what congress usually uses to try to justify passing bills that undermine online privacy & security. Because it’s an easy, extreme target, and when people attempt to argue against it, it’s nice and easy to say “Oh so you like pedophilia” rather then actually engaging with their argument.
The logic goes like this, although there’s many forms of it.
“Pedophilia is bad.” -> Obviously, you agree with this. You’re a reasonable person, and the idea that anyone would do something like that to a child is horrible. This is a normal human reaction.
“Because pedophilia is bad, all fictional explorations of it must be equally bad.” -> Here you might hesitate, but it adds up, doesn’t it? The thought of pedophilia in any context probably gives you a bad feeling, that makes you inclined to go along with this logic.
“Anyone who creates content with a fictional exploration of pedophilia is also bad.” -> Maybe you pause here, or maybe you don’t. But still, it adds up, it’s a very easy flow. After all, we’ve decided that that is Bad, so why would anyone Good want to create something like that?
“Since people who create content with a fictional exploration of pedophilia are just as bad as people who engage in pedophilia in real life, it’s okay to harm them.” -> Here’s where you might pause again. The argument might not win you over entirely, you might not be willing to do harm yourself, but you may be a lot more willing to turn a blind eye to harm being done to someone. Or to consider it ‘justified’.
The pattern now repeats for anything else that’s considered “morally impure”, and “pedophilia” is expanded and expanded, often to ridiculous points, such as merely shipping two underage characters. “Abuse” becomes any ship that the person pushing doesn’t like, for any reason. And so on and so forth.
This is the foundation of “anti” culture, and it’s important to be aware of it so you can catch this false equivocation. Fictional explorations of something, are not the same as the thing itself. Fictional explorations are fiction. The characters are not real people. There is no actual harm being done. Equating fake harm and real harm is a dangerous, slippery slope, which leads us to fundamentally flawed ideas of moral purity. It’s a form of controlling people & making them feel guilty for their very thoughts, rather than holding people accountable for their actions.
A very handy trick for when you encounter this sort of argument, is to replace whatever the selected purity term is with murder. After all, we can all agree that murder is bad, but at the same time, we understand that a murder in a book =/= a murder in real life.
Let’s see that argument again, shall we?
“Murder is bad”
“Because murder is bad, all fictional explorations of it must be equally bad.”
“Anyone who creates content with a fictional exploration of murder is also bad.”
“Since people who create fictional explorations of murder are just as bad as the people who commit murder in real life, it’s okay to harm them.”
Hopefully, it’s now easy to see why the above argument is fundamentally flawed.
Keep your eye out for purity culture in your fandom spaces, and when you see it, refuse to engage with it. Warn your friends if you see them falling into the same traps, although try to be kind about it; this is a very easy thought pattern to fall into. I don’t recommend trying to argue/debate anti’s. The attention only feeds them. Block them instead. Don’t let people control or shame you for what you create or consume, and don’t control or shame others for what they create or consume.
Also, as a note, let me be clear about something. If you are uncomfortable with any of the above discussed things, or anything in general in fiction (ie, underage ships, murder, incest, abuse, penguins, needles, etc), that’s perfectly fine (it’s also called a squick, for those that haven’t heard that term before). Absolutely control your fandom experience by blocking people, filtering tags, unfollowing, etc. However, just because you are uncomfortable with something, does not give you the right to control other people. Other people have no right to control what content you create or consume, and you have no right to do that to them either.
Okay?
Cracker
Is this supposed to be insulting?
Die 💜
Aw, another member of the most ‘vulnerable minority group ever’ sending threats to women who don’t want males in places where we are naked. So harmless.
Trans women are real women you fucking asshole 🖕
Trans “women” are male. Women are adult human females, so no, trans “women” cannot be women. You’re a coward who commented anonymously so you won’t see this, but repeating a mantra religiously doesn’t make it true. It doesn’t make me an asshole to say that males can’t suddenly become female. Cope harder!
If anon believed what they were saying themselves, they wouldn't even have bothered interacting with you.
True. Unlike them, we don’t have to convince ourselves because what we’re saying is just factual 😂
Skip Google for Research
As Google has worked to overtake the internet, its search algorithm has not just gotten worse. It has been designed to prioritize advertisers and popular pages often times excluding pages and content that better matches your search terms
As a writer in need of information for my stories, I find this unacceptable. As a proponent of availability of information so the populace can actually educate itself, it is unforgivable.
Below is a concise list of useful research sites compiled by Edward Clark over on Facebook. I was familiar with some, but not all of these.
⁂
Google is so powerful that it “hides” other search systems from us. We just don’t know the existence of most of them. Meanwhile, there are still a huge number of excellent searchers in the world who specialize in books, science, other smart information. Keep a list of sites you never heard of.
www.refseek.com - Academic Resource Search. More than a billion sources: encyclopedia, monographies, magazines.
www.worldcat.org - a search for the contents of 20 thousand worldwide libraries. Find out where lies the nearest rare book you need.
https://link.springer.com - access to more than 10 million scientific documents: books, articles, research protocols.
www.bioline.org.br is a library of scientific bioscience journals published in developing countries.
http://repec.org - volunteers from 102 countries have collected almost 4 million publications on economics and related science.
www.science.gov is an American state search engine on 2200+ scientific sites. More than 200 million articles are indexed.
www.pdfdrive.com is the largest website for free download of books in PDF format. Claiming over 225 million names.
www.base-search.net is one of the most powerful researches on academic studies texts. More than 100 million scientific documents, 70% of them are free
Reminder that libraries are literally foe this purpose. If you go to a public library with a research question you will make their day.
You’re have the same beliefs as incels
Because radical feminists are totally the same as incels (men who think they’re entitled to raping women). You’re clearly not very smart. 😂😂
You're still a fucking asshole. Your discrimination against people who don't transition specifically to harass you in the bathroom, who are beaten and killed for being trans, isn't going to stop the discrimination against women. Fuck your bio essentialist bullshit, science has proven that sex transition exist in various animal species. Repeating a mantra religiously doesn't make it true ✌️
Sex transition exists in various species, true, but we are human. Did you forget? Humans can’t change sex. That’s what the actual science says. It’s not bio-essentialist to acknowledge that sex exists. You clearly don’t know the definition of the word. I’m not discriminating against anyone—trans “women” are males (men) and men don’t belong in women’s spaces. That’s the whole point of spaces separated by sex, sorry! Tell me, are gynaecologists not allowing men as patients also discriminating against trans women? And repeating what I said makes you even funnier since you’re the only one repeating a mantra (that trans women are women, which is biologically false). Anyway, you’re so cowardly that you went on anon so…have fun being a rape apologist I guess?
Hello, I am just here to try and hold a civil case as to why you say that trans women are male. Generally speaking almost no one refers to humans with “male” or “female” out of purely scientific contexts, but in contexts like this it is always brought up. Being trans itself is something that happens while you’re developing in the womb, and your biological sex (female, male or intersex) does not align with the one that your mind develops to be (best way I can explain this). And what about those who have had bottom surgery? Do still think they are male?
Hello, and thank you for engaging respectfully.
From a radical feminist perspective, we say that trans women are male because biological sex is an objective, material reality—not a feeling or identity, but a classification based on biology. “Male” and “female” are not just scientific terms; they are political ones too, especially when we’re discussing women’s oppression. Female people are oppressed on the basis of our sexed bodies—our capacity to be impregnated, our vulnerability to male violence, and our socialization as girls and women. That doesn’t change if someone identifies differently.
You’re right that most people don’t walk around saying “I’m male” or “I’m female” in everyday life—but that’s because it’s usually assumed. Yet in feminist and political discourse, sex is essential to name clearly, because it underpins the material basis of women’s oppression. This is especially important in situations like rape shelters, sports, prisons, or female-only spaces, where biology does matter—because male bodies pose risks and advantages that can’t be neutralized by identity or surgery.
As for the claim that “being trans happens in the womb”—this is a hypothesis, not a settled fact. The idea that there is a “female brain in a male body” is rooted in outdated, sexist stereotypes. There is no conclusive scientific evidence that male and female brains are innately different in a way that would justify a trans identity. Moreover, radical feminists challenge the whole idea of “gender identity” as something innate. Instead, we understand gender as a social system—a hierarchy imposed on people based on their sex. That hierarchy harms all of us, but it especially subjugates females.
Regarding bottom surgery: yes, even trans “women” who have undergone surgery are still biologically male. Surgery can alter appearance but it cannot change chromosomes, gametes, or reproductive class. A surgically created “neovagina” is not a functional female reproductive organ—it does not menstruate, gestate, or self-lubricate naturally. It is entirely different to actual vulvas aside from aesthetics. It is a fact that humans can not change sex. Gametes and chromosomes cannot change. Again, this is not a belief but a fact. Radical feminists just choose not to ignore it, unlike some.
This position isn’t about cruelty—it’s about clarity. We can respect people’s choices and autonomy without redefining the category of woman in ways that erase or override the needs and realities of females. When we center gender identity over biological sex, we risk dismantling the very basis of sex-based protections, language, and rights that women fought hard to win. Does this help?
Trans women are real women you fucking asshole 🖕
Trans “women” are male. Women are adult human females, so no, trans “women” cannot be women. You’re a coward who commented anonymously so you won’t see this, but repeating a mantra religiously doesn’t make it true. It doesn’t make me an asshole to say that males can’t suddenly become female. Cope harder!
You should focus on books instead of frothing and raving over the existence of 1% (if that) of the population… you’d probably be happier yk
Men are are half the population but okay. Trans women might be a small population, but the problem is that they’re male. As I said, half of humans are male. You’d be happier if you used your brain, I expect.
23 Emotions people feel, but can’t explain
Sonder: The realization that each passerby has a life as vivid and complex as your own.
Opia: The ambiguous intensity of Looking someone in the eye, which can feel simultaneously invasive and vulnerable.
Monachopsis: The subtle but persistent feeling of being out of place.
Énouement: The bittersweetness of having arrived in the future, seeing how things turn out, but not being able to tell your past self.
Vellichor: The strange wistfulness of used bookshops.
Rubatosis: The unsettling awareness of your own heartbeat.
Kenopsia: The eerie, forlorn atmosphere of a place that is usually bustling with people but is now abandoned and quiet.
Mauerbauertraurigkeit: The inexplicable urge to push people away, even close friends who you really like.
Jouska: A hypothetical conversation that you compulsively play out in your head.
Chrysalism: The amniotic tranquility of being indoors during a thunderstorm.
Vemödalen: The frustration of photographic something amazing when thousands of identical photos already exist.
Anecdoche: A conversation in which everyone is talking, but nobody is listening
Ellipsism: A sadness that you’ll never be able to know how history will turn out.
Kuebiko: A state of exhaustion inspired by acts of senseless violence.
Lachesism: The desire to be struck by disaster – to survive a plane crash, or to lose everything in a fire.
Exulansis: The tendency to give up trying to talk about an experience because people are unable to relate to it.
Adronitis: Frustration with how long it takes to get to know someone.
Rückkehrunruhe: The feeling of returning home after an immersive trip only to find it fading rapidly from your awareness.
Nodus Tollens: The realization that the plot of your life doesn’t make sense to you anymore.
Onism: The frustration of being stuck in just one body, that inhabits only one place at a time.
Liberosis: The desire to care less about things.
Altschmerz: Weariness with the same old issues that you’ve always had – the same boring flaws and anxieties that you’ve been gnawing on for years.
Occhiolism: The awareness of the smallness of your perspective.
Source article. Where words came from.
I hope you cry yourself to sleep knowing that most of this website and the world hate you.
Lmaooooo, is this supposed to be an insult? I don’t care what y’all think!