I think we've touched a nerve
I live in Rogers Park, I'm also:
Infrequent user on Nextdoor, pending the topic
Member of a Participatory Budget committee, second year now
Interested in sunshine on politics and government
Recently, somewhat regrettably, a commenting user on Chevanston
This has certainly turned into quite a mix of knowledge, situations and outcomes. But recently we've encountered the problem of a blog allowing Anonymous posting. While Nextdoor subjects users to a, more stringent than usual, security protocol, another site does not, Chevanston. These sites have different purposes.
The administrator appears to have meant well, I believe their objective was to allow a free flow of discussion by not hindering readers with registration. I respect that approach, though I disagree with it. I was, along with my wife, an unsuspecting victim of this problem, I let my guard down and another Rogers Park resident had used the Anonymous option and posted using my name. My wife had never even visited this site!
No, the name is not linked, there's no IP to track down, but it did state my name and others clearly accepted that it was me. I do not post anonymously. Let's make that clear.
The foundation of all this? Some Rogers Park residents disagree with me, though I know I'm not alone in what I would like to see change. That's all it amounts to. I don't have quantified results of who agrees with me, neither do those who oppose my suggestions. I don't hate the individuals who disagree with me, it feels as though some are approaching that level of dislike for me.
The topics at hand others dislike me for?
Safety improvements for bikers and pedestrians
Inquiring with the alderman through social media channels
Expectation of Chicago Police to enforce traffic law
Welcome to the world of local politics is all I can muster for this situation. An individual, maybe a handful, has evidently figured out the Internet and lost any level of integrity and respect for a community and it's members. Meanwhile, some of those who disagree with me enable that individual because they're more opposed to me, than upholding integrity.