https://soundcloud.com/tashtodd/night-jog
h

tannertan36
KIROKAZE
DEAR READER
Sade Olutola

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
Three Goblin Art
almost home
Monterey Bay Aquarium
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year

Origami Around
One Nice Bug Per Day
trying on a metaphor
No title available
dirt enthusiast
taylor price

Kiana Khansmith
Jules of Nature

⁂

if i look back, i am lost

seen from United States
seen from India
seen from Türkiye
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from Japan
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from South Korea

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
@kaleidoscopetodd
https://soundcloud.com/tashtodd/night-jog
telemarketer looking ass
“…When I say “romantic,” I mean a sensibility that sees everything, and has to express everything, and still doesn’t know what the fuck it is, it hurts that bad.”
-Jeff Buckley (via whoachabatti)
This
https://soundcloud.com/tashtodd/just-woke-up
Water travel
https://soundcloud.com/tashtodd/420a
DOING is particularly hard for artists who are in the beginning stages of their creative field. As Ira Glass has explained, there is often a gap between taste and skill when starting out. We aspire to become artists because we love great music, paintings, or books. But there is often a gulf between our aspirations and our skills. Overcome by self-doubt and indecision, many beginners quit at this stage. But artists who have the nerve to push through this awkward, uncomfortable phase evolve and eventually improve. Over time, they find their own unique style, the right medium, and a routine that makes original art possible.
Be creatively promiscuous
Stephan Bugaj - lights film school
M.E.S.H on technique
https://soundcloud.com/tashtodd/onono
TALK TO ME
sample from Infinity Frequencies
"Feminist therapy and feminist therapy theory have been developed by and with white women. Currently, feminist therapy theory is neither diverse nor complex in the reality it reflects. It has been deficient from the start in its inclusiveness of the lives and realities of women of colour, poor or working class women, non - North American women, women over sixty-five, or women with disabilities. Commonly cited landmark volumes in feminist therapy such as Miller (1976), Sturdivant (1980) or Greenspan (1983) appear to describe the realities of white women only, with occasional passing references to the fact that women of colour, women with disabilities, poor women, and so on may bear even heavier burdens of oppression than do their white, able-bodied and financially more secure sisters. The 'Handbook of Feminist Therapy' which arose from the first Advanced Feminist Therapy Institute acknowledges the absence of women of colour as authors or subjects of discussion, although lesbians and (more specifically) women in poverty are addressed in that volume (Rosewater and Walker, 1985). These books focus on applications of feminist therapy rather than theory. However, they accurately reflect zeitgeist in which theory is being developed."
Mirrors mirrored