PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
Kaledo Art
sheepfilms
styofa doing anything
NASA
taylor price
Aqua Utopia｜海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
JBB: An Artblog!
KIROKAZE
art blog(derogatory)
No title available
No title available
Discoholic 🪩
$LAYYYTER
DEAR READER
Andulka
Product Placement
JVL
occasionally subtle
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
seen from United States
seen from Brazil
seen from United States
seen from Canada
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Brazil
seen from Singapore
seen from United States
seen from Italy
seen from United States
seen from Netherlands
seen from Australia
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Netherlands
seen from United States
@kitty-company
Added another panel to my mug wall. It doesn't match, but it's functional.
Total Mugs: 53
Today we welcome the newest member to the Top of the Mornin' Mug Club. May its coffee always be hot and its handle forever intact.
More Stickers Are Available.
Stickers
I started selling stickers surrounding my job at the Mart of Walls fueled by the stress. I started with these two but have three more for this collection.
COFFEE!!!!
Welcome Papa and Baby to the collection.
Dragon not included.
The Gangs All Here
I present to you:
Up Fluff
Commonly confused with Tree Floof despite there being no trees. And they are closely related to the Floor Fuzz and Bush Puff.
If a piece of fluff is hanging down, it is often safe to tuck it back onto their perch but watch out for their toe beans as they can quickly turn into danger beans.
Touching the floof snake extending from their rump roast might elicit a playful response causing a shift in the fluff and soft pats from their beans, or an aggressive response where, if blood is drawn, it's best to wash immediately.
A fine collection of mugs.
My dark roast has a little fur in it.
Not the light roast too!
My dark roast has a little fur in it.
CLICK HERE TO ENTER
A Pair of Spuds
Reblog if you genuinely support asexuals
It terrifies me that there’s so much raging passion in the lgbt+ community that insist on marginalizing asexuals and implying that asexuals don’t deserve to have safe spaces. There’s still so much acephobia so I just wanna know which blogs are genuinely supportive and a safe space for asexuals
As a writer, I'm trying to represent as many people in my stories as possible, including those on the Ace and Aro Spectrums.
Bisexual Butterfly
"Make sure you use the GAMMA FLUSH or you'll stink up the field," said my dad about the toilet in the middle of the garden.
HE HAS ARRIVED!!!!!!!
Throwback to all these Jesus comics I drew in 2012…
Good post OP
Good post, OP, and if you ever decide to do another may I please suggest “NOT IN HEBREW IT DOESN’T” as a punchline? So much of the Old Testament is HORRIFICALLY translated from the Tanakh, it drives me batty.
WAIT WAIT WHAT DOES IT SAY?????? I NEED TO LIKE,, DESTROY MI MUM FOR BEING REALLY HOMOPHOBIC
Okay, so, strictly speaking, the infamous Leviticus 18:22 does say “forbidden.” Here’s the thing:
1) The word translated as “forbidden” is “toevah.” While that translation isn’t … wrong, it’s sort of like saying “McMansion” means “really big house.” There are a lot of connotations in that word. The specific issue with toevah is that we … sort of … don’t know anymore exactly what it meant. Based on context, it seems likely that the word referred to something ritually forbidden. This part of Torah was written not only as a guide for future generations, but also to say “so, look around, see your neighbors? DON’T DO THAT.“ Thus, if we interpret “toevah” to mean something that’s forbidden to do as a ritual before G-d, then the verse says nothing whatsoever about Adam and Steve and their two kids and their dog–it’s saying you shouldn’t have sex with another man in the Temple as a sacrifice.
2) Following the same “this is ritually forbidden” logic of toevah, this verse may also be interpreted as “don’t do sex magic,” which was a thing in. Like. A lot of fucking cultures at the time.
3) Hebrew is a highly gendered language, and the grammatical gender in this verse is really really weird. One of the “men” in this verse is given female grammar. Why? Who fucking knows, man, this isn’t the only grammatical oddity in Torah. (There are also places where G-d is referred to as plural, and also as female.) One suggestion is that this is a way of creating a diminutive–that is, that the verse should be read as “a man should not lie with a boy.” Now, it’s worth noting that modern secular scholarship has concluded the written Torah was written down around the 6th century BCE, and most non-Orthodox Jewish scholars are like “yeah, all things considered, that sounds pretty legit.”
Do you know what else was happening around the 6th century BCE? What laypeople tend to mean when they say “ancient Greece” was happening.
Do you know what happened a lot in that time period in Greece? Dudes forming relationships with younger boys, like ages 10-15, and using them for sex in exchange for financial gifts, mentorship, etc. While we don’t know just how young some of these younger boys may have been, we do know some were prepubescent. In light of this, and also something I mentioned under the first point–”see your neighbors? DON’T DO THAT,” if this verse is interpreted to say “a man should not lie with a boy,” then it’s pretty clearly “my dudes, my fellows, my lads, don’t be fucking pedophiles.”
4) Because of the grammar I mentioned in #3, it’s also possible that “should not lie with a man as with a woman” is actually referring to a place, not an abstract personhood: a man shouldn’t have sex with another man in a woman’s bed. In the time period, a woman’s bed was sort of like–that was her place, her safe sanctuary. It was also a ritually holy place where babies were made. By having sex in her bed, you’re violating her safe space (and also introducing a man who may not be a male relative, thus forcing her into breaking the laws of modesty). If this verse is read this way, then it should be taken to mean “don’t sexually violate a woman’s safety and modesty.” 5) And as an offshoot of #4, this may be a second verse relating to infidelity. Which woman’s bed is any random dude in 600 BCE most likely to have access to? His wife’s. But laws were administered differently based on whether the person they pertained to was slave or free, male or female, and so on–thus, a man committing adultery with a woman would be treated differently than man committing adultery with a man (especially because the latter would carry no chance of an illegitimate pregnancy).
So you’ll note, there are a lot of ways to read this verse, and only a one-to-one translation with no cultural awareness produces “being gay is wrong, all of the time”. (You’ll also notice the word “abomination” is nowhere to be found. That’s like … a straight-up fiction created for who only knows what reason.)
Apparently tumblr mobile doesn’t want to show @prismatic-bell ’s long and in-depth essay, so here’s the screenshots, because it still shows up on mobile browsers:
Much appreciated.
I love when scholarship and history debunks bullshit
…I sadly have more bullshit to report.
“removed for violating guidelines”, EVERY screenshot.
…goddamnit
Let’s try this again
I am horrified that @prismatic-bell keeps getting censored + this info is gold.
Many thanks, @pulmonary-poultry. This isn’t the only Jewish post of mine that’s mysteriously stopped showing up in searches and/or vanished from my blog entirely, but it is the one I get the most requests to repost, so this saves me from having to rewrite the whole damned essay. @the-invisible-self, thanks for bringing it to my attention that someone was able to preserve the post!
what the FUCK??? WHICH community guidelines would an analysis of the Old Testament violate??
unless tumblr staff is just removing images that get reported a bunch of times
Never not gonna reblog
Guess ho screen shorted the hell outta this just in case? #alwaysreblog
