Apple should make everybody’s phone follow Will Smith on IG.
Deep!
macklin celebrini has autism
RMH
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
Show & Tell
taylor price

oozey mess
Claire Keane
tumblr dot com
hello vonnie

Jimmy Eat World
Sweet Seals For You, Always

izzy's playlists!
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her

bliss lane

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
The Stonewall Inn
Keni
No title available
No title available

seen from Indonesia
seen from Canada
seen from Netherlands

seen from Türkiye

seen from Türkiye

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Morocco
seen from Ukraine
seen from United States

seen from Dominican Republic
seen from Canada
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Uzbekistan

seen from Venezuela
seen from Malaysia
@kooldreddy-blog
Apple should make everybody’s phone follow Will Smith on IG.
Deep!
Kids and parents say this Bronx teacher needs a lesson — in racism.
Hmmm!
Will The Real Bilaal ibn Rabah(RA) Stand Up?
First, I will admit that I haven't seen this movie ; however, I will eventually view this movie and I encourage others to view this movie. With one caveat, based on the imagery and plots, reviews I've read, this is an Persian/Arab's politically correct interpretation of the life of #Bilaal_ibn_Rabah, not fact.
The movie I am referring to is an acclaimed animation called "Bilal: A New Breed of Hero". Released September 2016, directed by: Ayman Jamal, Khurram Alavi. It allegedly tells the early life of one of the important figures of Islamic history. And yes, central to the story is Arab enslavement of Africans. However, to appeal to a wider target audience, the directors decided to use the imagery of slavery as told in the West, you know, Arab slavers raiding and capturing helpless, defenseless Africans and through his years of enslavement rises to become one of the most important figures in Islam. Yes, this formula is familiar, but deceptively inaccurate.
Bilaal ibn #Rabah(Remember this name) was born in al Hijaz, yes he was born on Arabian soil and that makes him an Arab by birth. His father, Rabah al-Jumah, was an Arab, his mother, Hamamah, was an Ethiopian princess who was captured during the Battle of The Elephant and sold into slavery. It is important to add that Rabah al-Jumah is of Quraysh lineage(the same as Prophet Muhammad, SAWS). Through his mother, Hamamah, Bilal is related to the #Danakil people of Ethiopia. The Danakil were/are a large clan, mostly known for their trading in salt and strict adherence to monothiestic Christianity; as well as their fierce warrior culture. This raises several questions about the Bilaal becoming a "slave" by conquest, in this movie and by many ignorant Muslims. There is no evidence to support that Bilal was enslaved by conquest, he was born and raised in Makkah, he wasn't torn from Al-Habash(Ethiopia), trodded across the desert, then Red Sea, sold in auction and brought to Makkah(Mecca). However, being that his mother was an enslaved African, his fate was sealed at birth, he became the "property" of Umayyah ibn Khalaf, the man who "owned" his mother. Note, you can not view the Arab institute of slavery through the eyes of US chattel slavery, you will get lost in trying to compare the two. The social mobility for the enslaved within the two systems were vastly different. In fact, a close scrutiny of both systems only the term "slavery" makes them the same. Bilaal was one of the few men entrusted with the keys to the #kaaba, then house to the pagan gods of the pre-Islamic Arabs, this was a very high position.
Bilaal's Appearance
All the previews and stills I've seen from this animation, depict Bilaal to be a modern-day Colin Kaepernick. Even Moustapha Akkad's 1976 acclaimed movie, The Message took great liberties in depicting, albeit incorrectly, Bilaal in a manner that is built on bias. In authentic biographies based on hadith and seerah, Bilaal was said to be tall of stature, strong African features, a deep smooth voice, bright brown skin and had a thin beard around his cheeks. He had curly bushy soft hair, a fine nose and bright white eyes...okay, I inadvertently just described Kaepernick. These are all known facts, yet in Akkad's 'The Message', we find a Bilaal that more resembles the false and spurious hadiths "head filled with raisins" nappy headed chocolate dark, brother with no facial hair...African Am Muslims full well understand the "message" with that depiction--Akkad was resorting to his typical Indo/Paki/British biases, not easily researched information. Bilaal's father being a Qurayshi Arab and his mother being a royal Habashi, it is conceivable that he may have been a shade or two darker than Kaepernick, but certainly not as depicted in either movies...more in the middle.
Reversion to Islam
One of the greatest misconception told about about Bilaal was that he was an idol worshipper. The only evidence for this, is that Bilaal once had the keys to the house of idols for the Arabs. But we know that his mother was from the house of Ethiopian royalty, which by that time were practicing monotheistic Christianity. The War of the Elephant, which resulted in Bilaal's mother becoming enslaved, was led by a Christian monarch, Abrah. So, it is conceivable that Bilaal was brought up in a Christian home. We know without doubt, that there were many Ethiopian Christians living in and around Makkah; to the degree that Waraqa ibn Nawfal the first cousin of Khadija(RA) the Prophet's wife, was influenced by their teaching. Monotheistic Christianity was so prevalent in Makkah, that they recognized Islam's "One God" concept and easily converted. So, to say that Bilaal was an idol worshipper makes for good narrative on conversion, but is it factual? Many historians love to quote the incident of Bilaal being subjected to cruelty by Umayyah ibn Khalaf and Abu Jahl, but never clearly present a sequence of events within context. At the time Bilaal proclaimed his Islam, only the first five verses of the Quran had been revealed, so the concept of WAHDAH(One God) was based on its universal meaning, not the Quranic meaning, which would come with later revelations. He was resorting to the One God concept he was familiar with, presumably that which he learned as a child...from his mother. Even in the history of the adhan, we learn that Christians were prevalent in Makkah. Recall, when it was asked, 'how shall we notify the people that it is time to prayer?', that the ringing of the bell was rejected because that was the method Makkan Christians used. Monotheistic Christianity had a strong presence in Makkah.
Bilaal's importance
You ask a Muslim, "who was Bilaal?" and universally, they will answer "The BlackEthiopian who was the first Mu'adhan(Caller of Prayer) of Islam. The End". Partly true. Abdullah ibn Zaid was the first person to recite the adhan, he was instructed by Prophet Muhammad(SAWS) to teach Bilaal the adhan. And then its as if Bilaal fell off the Islamic history map. Ask MOST Muslims, "what became of Bilaal after the Prophet(SAWS) died" chances are you will get a "Dunno!". It's as if Bilaal disappeared from the face of the earth.
The fact is, Bilaal became the First Amir/Governor/Ruler of ash Shams or what we call Syria and Jordan. He ruled effectively and judiciously. Bilaal was so beloved by the people of Shams that it contributed to saving the life of an American Navy pilot who was shot down over Lebanon. The year was 1983, December 3rd, to be precise, U.S. Navy pilot Lt. Robert Goodman and Lt. Mark Lange's figther jet was shot down as they prepared to engage in an illegal attack ordered by Ronald Reagan. Lt. Lange died from injuries sustained in the crash and Lt. Goodman was captured by Syrian forces. Lt. Goodman who is AfricanAm and 26 years old at the time was briefly detained and turned over to the Syrian government. The media, who was "Run Jesse Run" happy, pushed Jesse Jackson to the forefront of Goodman's release, but everyone-in-the-know that it was ex champ Muhammad Ali, who appealed, as a Muslim, to Syrian president, Hafiz al-Assad. In the discussion that was printed verbatim in an American Muslim newspaper, Ali appealed for Goodman's safe return using how Bilaal treated prisoners of war. Goodman was officially released to UN negotiators in a building named after Bilaal.
It is important that we reclaim the African Diaspora narrative and challenge, even well intended sincere attempts by non Africans, to leave aside their personal biases.
The #USVirginIslands needs your humanitarian support, not your politricks
I just responded to a post in a Facebook group (ruffle a few feathers) about the "attention" or lack thereof around what is taking place in the US Caribbean territories hit hard by two powerful Category 5 hurricanes.
For too many of commenting on what is taking place in the #USVI (lost in the cacophony is that within 10 days the #VI was hit by two hurricanes) and #Puerto Rico, the issues are political. Your concerns are the WHO, not the WHERE. Not the WHAT. For too many, the USVI and Puerto Rico are exotic vacation destinations, where alcohol is cheap (duty free), the historical sites, the beaches & resorts are for your pleasure and you get to enjoy these hedonisms under the cover of the US flag. Most of you reading this, probably couldn't name the capitals, muchless a city on these #AMERICAN possesions. But, for many of us, this is personal (see photo, my mother's house, totally without a roof, my brother is now without a home), this is one of my childhood homes. The house to the right resides the elderly parents of some of my longest known friends, people I've known my entire life. I can name the families in all of the homes in this photo.
The sad reality is after the hoopla surrounding the presidential antics have died down, most of you will move on to the next presidential distraction; meanwhile leaving the people of the USVI and Puerto Rico to put their lives back together under the constraints of being a colonized people.
Yes, #colonized. Yes, you may know we are US territories. But, how many know that our US citizenship hangs on a balance? Legally, these US possessions are classified as “unincorporated U.S. territories”--American Samoans are only granted American citizenship IF their parents are US citizens. Only #VirginIslanders born on and after February 25, 1927, ten years after the US purchased the territories from Denmark in 1917, are US citizens(meaning that my grandparents (all deceased) were neither citizens of the US OR Denmark. Natives born under Danish rule were classified as “stateless Inhabitants”, subjected to Danish laws, but not protected by them. On the official bill of receipts, the US paid $25 million for roughly 120 islands and “their inhabitants”. Until 1969, we lived under US military rule, then as “property of the Department of the Interior”. Our flag, not of our own design, was designed and created by white non locals who based it’s final design on the seal of the US Navy. The USVI was treated as possession, it’s people as “inhabitants”--you know, in the same fashion that when you purchase a house, you purchase all of it’s inhabitants, ie., termites, rodents and roaches. While we pay taxes, we are only permitted congressional representation and are prevented from casting a presidential vote. This nation fought a revolution to end such a relationship with Great Britain, under guise of "taxation without representation". USVIers have served in every US military engagement since 1917, #StCroix having once housed one of the most important submarine tracking station that protected the whole Eastern North and South American coasts from German attack subs.
Of late, there has been a loud social media buzz about the #JonesAct, but, again, only within the context of how it affected Puerto Rico, not the USVI. Basically the Jones Act of 1917 is an oppressive racist maritime merchant law that was created to protect the interests of wealthy white US mainland merchants, in essence to protect American hegemony of it's Caribbean territories. It says that any ship leaving an American port with goods and produce, must do so on an American registered shipping vessel, owned by an American company(the Act is more comprehensive, research more for the details). On the surface this appears harmless, but the impact on the territories were--are--heavy. For example, the #BritishVirginIslands is within site from the USVI, literally, a stone's throw. To engage in commerce with the #BVI (8 nautical miles at its closest points) products coming from the USVI must be shipped to the nearest US Customs processing center 1100 miles to Florida, clear customs, then be shipped back 1100 miles to the BVI. The process is more complex when the products originated in the BVI, as they must contract the shipping to a US owned merchant marine company. So, a product that would cost you $1.00 if you took a boat trip to Tortola, BVI, may now cost as much as $10 after shipping. This has stifled trade between US territories and their neighbors--with the whole Caribbean. So, now, what these US territories are unable to produce for themselves, they must ship in from the mainland. The same goes for trade between Puerto Rico and it’s closest western neighbor, #Hispanola (the #DominicanRepublic and #Haiti). The Jones Act insured our dependency on our relationship with the US, in essence insuring our "slave/master" relationship. Within the context of the current shituation, the Jones Act prevented necessary humanitarian goods, materials and services from other Caribbean nations from assisting their Caribbean neighbors. The Jones Act is, by far, the largest contributor to Puerto Rico's fiscal woes, that resulted in near government collapse, curtailing basic government services, like the inability to operate public schools.
So, while you have the US #Caribbean territories on your lips, keep in mind that the natural disasters they just suffered only drew back the veil, exposing American political hypocrisy. We must demand of DC politicians to repeal the Jones Act, to address the legal status of all people born under the flag and sovereignty of the Republic of the United States of America and classify them as US citizens--regardless of their parents citizen status with all the rights enjoyed by all citizens of this nation. Grant the right to full participation in the spectrum of political expression--to include the election of the #POTUS. Imagine only if, the peoples of the USVI and Puerto Rico had the opportunity to decide WHO was elected POTUS, if there would have been a bureaucratic delay in the relief efforts. It has been over two weeks since the hurricane Harry crippled the USVI and still no official visit from the leader of whose flag we are under, just childish #HappyTwittaFinger pontifications and name callings.
My people, both in the USVI and Puerto Rico, don't need politics, we had no part in--save it. We need assistance. We need basic life anemities, like clean water and food. We want compassion.
#VirginIslandsStrong
Why Rachel Dolezal Is An Important Discussion Within The Black Community
Rachel Dolezal a name that seemingly won’t vanish from social media and the African-Am lexicon. Ms Dolezal, now known by her African names, Nkechi Amare Diallo, has hit a collective nerve with many in the Black Community. Why? Why would a woman, born into the dominant ethnic group in the United States, voluntarily choose to identify with an ethnic group that even many within spend a lifetime trying to deny/escape? Therein lies the dichotomy. Is this about a woman suffering from deep seeded psychological issues, grandiose delusional feelings of self denial? Or perhaps, it’s a sick game of neurotic attention seeking? To understand how this woman became the subject of ridicule, interest and a few jokes, we must first look back, transcending Ms. Dolezal. We must look critically at America’s history, it’s racial politics. Historically, Ms Dolezal isn’t the US’s first #TransRacial, there have been many profiled and others who flew under the radar. It must be emphasized, most Americans do not seem to take issue with TransRacial “whites”(those of other ethnicity who “pass” for white), unless they violate social norms. For example, for all of his life, FBI Director J Edgar Hoover lived his life as a “White American”. Many are oblivious that President Barak Obama (44th) was NOT the first confirmed elected US President of the US of African descent, this distinction goes to our 34th president, Dwight D. Eisenhower. There are many entertainers, past and present, of African descent, who for all of their adult lives, transported themselves racially as white—without question, we’ve almost wholeheartedly accepted them for who they present themselves to be. The most “recent” transracial scandal in recent memory was in 1996 when “Iron Eyes Cody”(born Espera Oscar de Corti) publicly denied that he was Italian. Iron Eyes aka “The Crying Indian”from the 1971 “Keep America Beautiful” commercial vehemently denied that he was European. Cody claimed his father was #Cherokee and his mother was #Cree(his birth parents were Antonio de Corti and Francesca Salpietra, both Italian immigrants). Cody lived his life as a Cherokee, identified as a Cherokee and submersed himself in the culture. And for the most part he was widely accepted by Native Americans as a genuine member of their people. Even when it was disclosed that he was “White”, members of the several Native Nations came forward and embraced him, crediting him for doing more for the cause than even some Native Americans. By all standards, Iron Eyes Cody was culturally a Cherokee, not only in name, but by cultural ideation. Did we level the boom of social mockery on Cody? No, for the most part, Native Americans embraced him based on his contributions. So, why has Nkechi Amare Diallo nee Dolezal received a somewhat different reception within the African-American community? Some of the same social critics who are quick to call out discrimination when the acknowledgment of #transgenders are denied, have become some of Ms Diallo’s biggest critics. Why? Ms Diallo didn’t walk out the “racial closet” during the 2015 interview on #TheReal, when she first publicly disclosed her racial identification. In her recent quasi-autobiography, “In Full Color: Finding My Place in a Black and White World”, Ms Diallo stated that her etnnic ideation began while she was still a child and before turning 30 years old, she was openly transracial. There are many who question the fabric of deception woven by Ms. Diallo, seemingly, to cover up her manufactured identity. This is understandable, her actions loans to the “shadiness” of the situation. But, in the same light, some understand why she took that avenue—she understood there would be consequences for a private and personal matter….or maybe didn’t. But none of the above addresses why the vitriol response by so many in the African-American community. And certainly, her discrimination lawsuit against #HowardUniversity, an “elite” #HBCU does not help her win Black Love(she sued because she felt she was being denied scholarships and a tenured teaching position due to her being a “white woman”. Yes, the “cafeteria skin game” does in fact leave a sour taste in the mouth of folks like me who give her a pass. This was “white people” behavior, playing the white card when it was in her favor. Still, while a violation of the “Color Game”, it’s not enough for an ejection. So, why do many in the African-Am community want Ms Diallo to “go away”? If you are easily triggered, here is where you should click “next”, my opinion will not be easy to digest, some may find it a violation; but my shoulders are wide. I opine, #RachelDolezal is being mocked by many in the African-Am community because she is a reflection in the mirror. *Final Chance to leave, the ride gets real bumpy from here on* There can be no denying that many within the African-Am community have a poor image of self. To deny this, makes understanding our collective visceral response to Ms. Diallo, impossible. When we are criticizing, mocking, laughing at Ms Dolezal(Diallo from here on), we are laughing and adversely critiquing ourselves. See, many of us have long internalized that nothing good comes from the African-Am community. Again, we can deny it, there have been too many scholarly works done on this topic by brilliant African-Am experts in the field, not only qualified, but they LOVE their people. Denial is why many of us treat Ms Diallo as an apparition. In Ms. Diallo, we find a person going against social norms to become something, many of us either reject or are running from. Ms. Diallo placed a huge amount of effort trying to become “Black”, where so many of us work so hard denying it. Start with her hair. Ms Diallo, worked to put the “kink in her hair”, when Black women and a growing number of men, have funded a hair industry that is not only Non African phenotypical, but grossly misrepresenting nature. Worse, however, is that in doing so, we give license to the notion that “white beauty” is the universal standard…we grant it legitimacy. Ms. Diallo is adopting her “transraciality” is saying, “I see something beautiful” in being Black…in identifying as “of African descent”. Admit it—or not—this is troubling for many African-Ams…we have internalized a poor negative self image, that we do not expect anyone to want to be “like” us”. Our disgust is at the subconscious level, with makes it even harder to hold a serious conversation, with depth and exploring the real reasons for our uncomforting reactions to Ms. Diallo. I am no sociologist nor do I hold a doctorate in social psychology, but does one need to be? The easy way out is to accuse Ms. Diallo of cultural appropriation. But, aside from her 2002 lawsuit against, Howard U, we can not point to much that would support that charge. Ms. Diallo spent much of her adult working for—in her understanding—for the “Cause”. Albeit, the #NAACP has long lost it’s “hood pass”(if it ever had one), but it retains a “historical” membership. In 2014, Ms Diallo became the branch President of it’s Spokane chapter, receiving credit for revitalizing it during her brief tenure. Here is the slap in your face, most African-Americans criticizing Ms. Diallo do not belong to ANY organization that works towards “the Cause”, grassroots or nationally? She ran a chapter of one of the oldest organization in the nation, most of her critics are #keyboardwarriors—at best. Then the name change. If you’re still with me, it [this journey] gets no smoother. How ironic it is to find African-Ams taking issue with a non-African adopting an African name? A name the individual chose for themselves, a name with meaning and significance? We don’t have to discuss how most African-Ams received their names? How many African-Ams place their name on the line? We laugh at and mock names we give ourselves, referring to them as #ghetto or hood. We even write intelligent sounding prose discouraging naming our children with “ethnic sounding names”—the fall back is “it may impact their future”(we still can nt accept that thinking as “slave mentality). I come from a place where your surname means much, surnames given to my ancestors, after having to give up their culture, language, religious practices, and yes, their name. Yet, generationally, we bless our progeny with names that are rooted in our oppressive history—and find pride in doing so. It was our fear that told you naming your children with “ethnic sounding names” will hold them back”((All my children have “ethnic sounding names, as does my grandson…my legal name is “ethnic sounding’ and has been since I left the military. Any job that I might have missed due to some bigoted job recruiter, is a job that I didn’t need to be at ANYWAY. Not only did I have an “ethnic sounding name” I’ve had locs long before it became a “fashion trend”. My freshman year in college, you know who teased me about my “dirty looking” locs? Perhaps some of the same people who are wearing them now. I was teased and ridiculed for having locs…by people who looked like me, not white folks—albeit, I went to an HBCU. And again, after leaving the military, I put locs in, who laughed and teased? Who told me that I was denying myself employment opportunities? I heard it when I legally changed my name, as well. I share all this to illustrate that I can relate from experience. Ms Diallo is touching raw nerves. She is forcing many in Black America to come to grips with their own self image issues. As stated earlier, the “triggered” souls reading this will respond in one of several ways, denial, dismissive or the usual ad hominem fallacy. Very few have the ability to look within and see the damage caused by white supremacy; and seeing how it impacts our day to day lives. And the irony to it all is that it is a self identifying “transracial” woman forcing us to fight this inner battle.
Hamza Yusuf and the Dangers of Black Pathology
Ya know, I’m not very familiar with Sheikh Hamza Yusuf. When I say “not very familiar,” I mean I used to think he was the guy who formerly went by the name Cat Stevens. (Embarrassing, I know.) So when it comes to his reputation and character, I think it better to suspend my initial impressions and rely on the Muslims I know (mostly black) who are acquainted with him. What I’ve gathered seems to boil down to three basic viewpoints:
Those who have followed him/known him for years and believe him to be good, kind and absolutely not racist.
Those who have followed him/known him for years and think he’s a decent Islamic teacher but have always felt uncomfortable about his commentary on race and politics.
Those who could never bring themselves to follow him because his commentary on race and politics always seemed racist and out of touch.
So what do I do with that? How do I reconcile the divergence? Well, it seems he’s probably not an avowed racist, but clearly his thinking is misguided and very much affected and infected by the mythology of black pathology. (Shout out to activist, scholar, artist Su’ad Abdul Khabeer for putting this on my mind.) White supremacy, which results in the othering/devaluing of blackness, is so pervasive that even the most well-intentioned people can suffer from it without even knowing. We can probably all think of racist things that have flown out of the mouths of people we generally love and agree with. In fact, we (black people) can probably think of some of our own statements that have been either tinged or deeply stained with this implanted self-hatred. I’m tryna tell you, it’s deep, son.
Sheikh Hamza Yusuf, speaker at RIS2016
As a cousin of mine so eloquently put it, our brainwashing has been complete. There is no part of our thinking or experience that has not been affected, influenced and tailored. So when a well-respected, well-loved scholar like Hamza Yusuf gets on a grand stage and tries to counter and discount black justice movements (BLM and the like) by citing the myth of black on black crime and then tops it off with a statement like, “It actually makes me a little sick to my stomach to see all these people rising up about… white privilege,” we see exactly what we’re dealing with and how no one, no matter how popular, is exempt from inheriting diseased thinking.
For those who Stan for Yusuf and cannot and will not accept these comments as anything more than the result of his intense fatigue, I (kinda) understand your pain. I say this because I know how hard it can be to swallow the idea that a person you have revered for years—a person whose teachings brought you deeper into the fold of Islam—can have racist views. I get that you experience it as a loss, and I get that there is a bit of grieving involved for the image you once held. But after the shock subsides, recognize and acknowledge the danger of black pathology and how it was wound all up and through Yusuf’s RIS 2016 rhetoric.
Black pathology is the idea that black people are—perhaps simply by virtue of being born black—steeped in pathology, unable to think and behave normally, healthily, sanely. Black pathology states that we are inherently flawed, not in a “all of mankind is flawed” sort of way, but in a “something is specifically wrong with those people” sort of way. So the many problems that have befallen black people have nothing to do with concerted efforts of concentrated racism and everything to do with our messed up wiring, which prevents us from pulling ourselves up by our bootstraps like so many others. Yes, I know Yusuf never made such bold and direct claims, but there was definite danger in his words.
Why? Because he had an opportunity to educate a mass of mostly non-black Muslims on the oppression of their black brothers and sisters but instead spoke on black on black crime and how America’s anti-discrimination laws are top notch. Translation: “The problem is them.” To borrow a tweet from Su’ad Abdul Khabeer,
Black pathology is used to explain away structural racism by claims of “bad” behavior, culture, morals, etc #RIS2016
— Su'ad Abdul Khabeer (@DrSuad)
December 25, 2016
And then to add insult to injury, Yusuf brought up the racism “in our own communities” but only addressed anti-Jewish sentiment and Arab vs. non-Arab (i.e., South Asian) racism. He made no mention, not even in passing, of the very real and visible issue of anti-blackness in Muslim communities. Please tell me you see something wrong with that.
But that was late Friday night. He was tired and wasn’t exactly thinking clearly. He had Saturday to clarify. However, what came Saturday night wasn’t much better. Though he apologized explicitly about his comments directed toward Sheikh Yasir Qadhi and the Muslim Brotherhood, he did not directly apologize about his comments on black people. Instead, he explained how he couldn’t possibly be racist because of his proximity to non-white people. Really, bro?
What’s crazy is that most people didn’t even expect him to come out and say, “I apologize for being a racist.” Brother, only you and Allah (SWT) know your heart. If you say with sincerity that you love all of humanity and are not racist, I’ll accept that you believe that, but know that having a Mexican wife and a mother in the Civil Rights Movement doesn’t excuse you from being held accountable when you say racist things. We all must accept correction.
All that was required was a sincere apology, an admission of insensitivity, an acknowledgment of the fact that you don’t have the understanding or cultural sensibilities to speak to such issues.
But that’s not what happened. Instead, you crawled deeper into the cave of black pathology by saying the breakdown of the black family is the greatest issue facing black Americans, not racism. I must ask, how on earth can any person with any bit of black history under their belt discuss the tearing apart of black families, which is a real thing, WITHOUT centering the structural racism that was put in place specifically to do just that? There is no clear picture of one without the other.
Otherwise, you end up sending the message that black men and women are being incarcerated at alarming rates just because. That’s black pathology. You end up sending the message that black people are killed and mistreated (by others and themselves) just because. More black pathology. You end up sending the message that black people tend to be less financially stable just because. Another statement powered by black pathology. This type of thinking attaches itself to existing ideologies of racism and supports them as they grow, further blotting out black humanity. Ergo, it is a very big deal.
So if you are going to discuss such complex topics, be willing to make space at the table for all relevant aspects, including those that make you uncomfortable. And humble yourself enough to admit where you lack knowledge. If you cannot do that, silence is better.
You can only depend on you...embrace your doubters.
Dear Self...a reminder
Oh, this journey isn't for the meek. Have faith in yourself and dreams, even when others may lose faith in you.
Cliché-ish
A smile or kind word to a troubled soul is an act of charity.
...as I look in the mirror...I see my reflection.
Fear is an unreal obstacle...stay focused on the real
I always have to keep this in focus