[tryforce-deactivated20211211]

me, a writer, staring at one sentence for 10 minutes straight: i don’t know what’s wrong with you but i don’t like you

[bubleboobo]

@lancelesbian said something about klance and mermaids and i couldn’t help it

[jedusaur]

why you should not dismiss research unless you rly truly mean it

Internet, I am a queer researcher of queer health and I have something to say.

A few weeks back, a study went viral about the relationship between marriage equality policy and queer teen suicide rates, and a lot of people reacted thusly: “queer mental health is better when we’re not discriminated against! BREAKING: SKY IS BLUE, WATER IS WET”

This happens a lot. People see research about a thing ~Everyone Already Knows~ and they mock it. Now I want to make two things really clear:

1. Everyone does not already know.

2. This shit can lose these projects their funding.

Did you know that media coverage is a crucial factor in funding allocation? When we submit our application for grant renewal, we have to provide a list of news articles about our research so they can decide whether the public cares enough about us to let us keep doing our work. And most research doesn’t get all that much coverage, so individual reactions can really matter. If the primary reaction to our publications is eyerolling, we legitimately might not be able to continue.

I’ve seen some frustration from people who believe this research funding would be better put to use “actually helping” the affected populations instead of–I don’t know, pinning them under microscopes or whatever it is they think we do. But funding for policy initiatives is driven by research. I know you wish politicians would listen to individual voices telling them where the problems are, but that’s honestly not a smart way to direct limited resources. We need solid evidence. And a lot of the areas that need the most attention aren’t obvious–who knew bisexual people are at a much higher risk for physical and mental health disparities than gay and lesbian people? Who would have guessed that transgender folks are more likely than any other group (including straight people) to be military veterans, but overwhelmingly don’t claim their benefits? I’m sure some people noticed these patterns, but they definitely weren’t common knowledge within the queer communities I’ve grown up around, and those findings are leading to direct action as we speak.

I get that it can be frustrating to feel like your identity is being reduced to facts and figures for the benefit of red tape. But trust me, the researchers aren’t your enemy here. Most of us are queer too. All of us are just as frustrated by this crap as you are. We are doing our best, and I swear to you this work really is making a difference. Please don’t sabotage it.

[tvatemybrain]

I’m reblogging this because it only has 9 notes, and it should really, REALLY have a lot more.

[sidereanuncia-blog-deactivated2]

Also, given the current US administration’s plan to stop collecting data on LGBTQ identities as part of the census, we are in need of accurate, useful data now more than ever.

[downtroddendeity]

Plus the ability to cite peer-reviewed evidence of these sorts of things and quantify the extent of “obvious” effects can be pretty important to researchers who are working in adjacent fields that don’t produce the sorts of headline soundbites that get mocked on social media.

And often headlines and summaries are misleading and reductive- a study about wage gaps across a variety of demographics might get headlined “Women Still Make Less Than Men, New Study Shows” when the bulk of the paper is about the intersection of race and gender identity, and I’ve seen people on Tumblr mocking a study about the flavor compounds in food across the Indian subcontinent, conducted by Indian scientists at an Indian university, as “LOL white people don’t know how to cook.”

[kurtsyburtsylynn]

Author: *gives book a stressful and heart wrenching ending*

Me: *lying on floor in a puddle of nope* I don't know what I expected

[lightningstrikes-art]

[wordsnquotes]

But there’s the paradox of fiction - why do you cry when a fake character dies? It’s the basis of art. You engage with people who don’t exist and care about them as you would your friends and relatives.

Michael Gruber (via yesthatbookishnol)

[tastefullyoffensive]

How to give grandma a heart attack. (by Steec)

[nonbinarysapphic]

[butchfemmeculture]

Gender Troubles: The Butches

[sanuske-ramblings]

[kinghardy]

[insomniac-arrest]

hey, just wanna get this out there

Moana is 16…Ariel is 16…

get this: ocean sweethearts who explore places and sing duets. One is in love with humans and the other with the water, they hold hands and junk.

The Ocean clears out water so Moana can walk next to her gf on the sea floor

[saskthea-deactivated20220102]

I’M LISTENING

[area51-official]

interested in gay ocean girls

[saulla-deactivated20170410]

@harryinthemeadow

[skywalkerthrawn]

NO OFFENCE BUT THEIR SHIPNAME IS ARIANA SORRY I DONT MAKE THE RULES

[oceangirlfriends]

the post that inspired this blog!

[nohetero]

heyyo here’s a fun fact for y’all

trans women don’t experience male socialization before we come out

we experience closeted trans woman socialization which is an entirely different and extremely toxic monster

thank and have a terrible day if you disagree 

[nohetero]

hi if you’re safe to do so you should probably be reblogging this the idea that trans women are socialized as anything but women is one of the most potent arguments for stripping us of our humanity

[sonicbillymays69-deactivated202]

Twitter

[purelintrash]

[buffylives]

Raphael confirms he’s asexual

[fuckyeahasexual]

👀

[justaphobethings]

[esther-the-cosmic-princess]

Can we please take a moment to appreciate these ace socks??