Negacionista de las respectability politics.
Meter Heartstopper y Love, Simon en el mismo saco que Steven Universe y The Owl House.
Ya veo, ya.

PR's Tumblrdome
macklin celebrini has autism

shark vs the universe
★
$LAYYYTER
untitled

Game Changer & Make Some Noise
EXPECTATIONS
Sade Olutola

Product Placement

pixel skylines
The Bright Sessions
Not today Justin
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
NASA
Doug Jones

tannertan36
Mike Driver
Color Me Curious

Jar Jar Binks Fan Club
seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from South Korea
seen from United States

seen from Cambodia

seen from Philippines
seen from Thailand
seen from Vietnam
seen from Indonesia
seen from Ireland
seen from Germany

seen from Bangladesh
seen from Philippines

seen from Romania

seen from Japan

seen from Malaysia

seen from Sweden
@laimagistino
Negacionista de las respectability politics.
Meter Heartstopper y Love, Simon en el mismo saco que Steven Universe y The Owl House.
Ya veo, ya.
they like everyone else more than they like me. i just know it.
"i love you" "ill never leave" "you don't annoy me" Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar
who up feeling unbelievably unlovable
mee
𝑃𝑙𝑠 𝐼 𝑎𝑐 𝑛𝑒𝑒𝑑 2 𝑒𝑛𝑑 𝑚𝑦 𝑙𝑖𝑓𝑒 :/
ND culture is being diagnosed with ocd but not autism even though im preeeeetty sure I have autism, and there's (some) autism accommodations but no ocd awareness whatsoever. Self dx pride
.
i think if heartstopper was just sending the message that you can be a boring/basic/palatable queer that would be fine. but it likes to go off on little tangents about how evil and predatory the bad queers are, which is just homophobia and respectability politics
why do you even watch Heartstopper if you’re just gonna bash on all the characters
yeah, that's the question, isn't it?
the issue is that i do, in fact, like the idea of Heartstopper. I think it's sweet and soft, and the setting/ambience makes me feel warm and cozy. I like watching teenagers be young and dumb and shyly navigate their first real relationships. The premise of Heartstopper lured me in hook, line, and sinker, and for a while, I actually enjoyed it. I watched it every day for almost 2 months straight and posted about it twice a day for the same amount of time. I got into media analysis just because I wanted to better understand my favorite characters: Nick, the hero, and Charlie, the brave but traumatized soul in particular
and then I remembered I'm not a perfect, palatable cis white gay with only The Doormat Trauma Response and had a very rude awakening.
There are a lot of problems with it that I don't get to ignore. I'm Black. I'm multiply disabled, both psychologically and physically, with a lot of stigmatized disorders. I use "contradicting" queer labels -- if you can catch me using labels at all, that is. It only took me a week to accept that I'm queer, and I don't plan to come out to everyone I know because I don't think they need to know. This means that when a show is racist, ableist (specifically against people with low empathy, which i have, and stigmatized trauma responses, which I have), and portrays a very specific queer experience I don't share as the Only Right One and demonizes or ignores the deviants in every category, I'm not going to stay quiet about it.
I do still love the show and think it has a lot of potential, but I can be pretty certain it's not going to get better at representing (or even not demonizing) me as long as the writer is the writer, and I don't feel 100% comfortable in a fandom full of privileged people praising it uncritically and participating in the demonization and dehumanization of characters like me. I've decided to carve my own niche by trying to raise awareness of these problems in the mostly white/privileged fandom and writing fanfic for myself to expand where canon falls short. I wish I could enjoy it the way everyone else does, but I won't get to do that until media gets better at representing those of us who are more than a few kissed boys away from the status quo. Part of getting that to happen is causing a fuss until people realize we exist, and this is how I choose to do that. It's not super influential, but I have managed to educate a lot of people and act as a safe space for others in this hellhole of a fandom. I'm really proud of it all and have a lot of fun running this blog most of the time <3
As someone (fem-aligned, black, genderqueer, autistic and mentally ill, gender-nonconforming on top of sapphic) who has developed a particular "fascination-like loathing" kinda thing over Heartstopper due to the fact that my former school bully (male, white, cis, allistic, gender-conforming BUT ✨achillean✨) loves it…, let me just tell you you've gotten yourself a new follower~
Well excuuuuuse me for not buying into the same narrative that my very white, very allistic, very cisgender-conforming and still very achillean school bully relates to. I am sooooo sorry I am one of the bad ones, one of those not even your omnibenevolent and omnipalatable f€llow queer$™ can resist to spit racial slurs at.
I think the reason i cant get into most gay media set in modern times (heartstopper, happiest season, bros, etc etc) even when they’re like, Good Representation(tm) is because they’re all just fundamentally so assimilationist and this year i read this book about gay punk called Q()core: How to Punk a Revolution and it basically made me realize that assimilationism is the death of all social movements but ESPECIALLY the gay liberation movement anyway this is all very long winded but i feel like i watch these movies and feel like if you can take a character and can’t tell they’re gay without them saying I Am Gay or being in a gay relationship then like idk what are u doing
how to tell if it’s kin or hearted?
this is a hard one, and I've been dealing with it myself but here are some of the questions that help me the most
try looking at a photo of what your kinsidering. do you feel like you're looking at yourself or do you feel like you're looking at something you can relate to and identify with?
do you get the feeling of 'thats who I am' or "that's who I want want to be/wish I was'
this one was hard, hope I was able to help some and I wish you luck!!
!!reminder that this is all optional!!
Really what it boils down to is this: does it feel right to look at the thing in question and say "I am [x]"? If yes, it's a kintype. If no, it might be a hearttype instead, especially if it feels "like family" or similar.
Of course, that's often easier said than actually figured out, so some links that might be useful to you, anon:
This guide to questioning (and definitions of basic terms) by @/shadowfae
This otherheartedness FAQ by @/interstellarsystem, and particularly this post by @/further-fields with advice for questioning a hearttype that it links to
This post comparing one individual's fictionkinity to deir fictionheartedness by @/indornaga
My “questioning” tag, which has both posts talking about general advice and posts answering specific questions (and posts with people talking about their own questioning processes)
A list of typical experiences for various alterhuman identities (note typical, not required or universal) by @/aestherians
My "otherhearted" tag, which primarily contains experience essays and similar by otherhearted folks for you to compare notes with
Oop, showing up to infodump again '^^
I'm not sure where the idea that identifying with means "wishing or wanting to be" came from, but it's not really... true? If you long to be [that thing], feel like you should've been [that thing] - that is first and foremost a sign that you are that thing already, on some level, or that you would be happier identifying as it!
If you want to be a nonhuman species, and wish you were it: that isn't a conventional otherheart experience, but it is a pretty understandable experience for an otherkin who doesn't yet know (or accept) that they are nonhuman.
So that's... really not what the difference is between otherhearted and otherkin at all asjkdhaskjhd
It's a widespread misconception nowadays that hurts both otherkin and otherhearted. Otherkin because it can create a loop of self-invalidation ("am I really otherkin, though, or do I just want to be?" This is a nonsense concept! If you want to be then you can be!); otherhearted because it is a fundamental misunderstanding of the experience which reduces it to "otherkin lite" or "not quite kin enough".
I think the focus on the ideas of "identify as" versus "identify with" is part of the problem here, cause those are abstract and ambiguous concepts. There's no guidance given by them - most people couldn't tell you clearly what one means versus the other.
I'll give you my explanation, to the best of my ability.
Otherkin, who identify as nonhuman, perceive themselves on some level as being nonhuman in their own mind, emotions, instincts, cognition, self-perception, or self-image. Not all of these are required to be otherkin, of course - and for some folks there are physical aspects as well, but usually there's going to be a mental or emotional part of the identity too.
Non-physical identity, or identity different from that which you were raised with, can be a hard concept to grasp and certainly a hard one to recognise in yourself. Some people (like yours truly!) have a relatively straightforward time of it - able to simply untether ourselves from the ideas we were raised with, and recognise that the face we see in the mirror isn't necessarily who we are.
Aka, my systemmate, didn't have it so easy. Aka has always wanted to be a dragon. When ae was a kid, it occupied aes mind on a daily basis. Ae had phantom shifts, and played pretend all the time... scrambling around on all fours and roaring and holding aes jacket out on windy days pretending it was wings. But when ae reflected on it, ae just saw longing - not being.
And yet, when I recognised this enough to encourage aem to look deeper - and then ae discussed with some other people as well - ae found that being a dragon feels right. That it brings aem incredible joy. That when we drew up an idea of what ae's dragon might look like, it was euphoric for aem.
And in the end - excitedly - Aka realised that ae is dragonkin.
The longing was a manifestation of an identity that already existed, that Aka just hadn't been able to embrace without a bit of perspective (and encouragement) from friends.
If you see someone say they long to be nonhuman, you're doing them a disservice by pointing them to the otherheart term (which doesn't actually mean that) when otherkin is where they belong.
Now, onto what otherhearted means...
This is a term that means a great deal to me. I am arthropod-hearted. I always have been, I think. It's part of who I am.
I am not an arthropod. I don't want to be an arthropod, and I don't need to be. If anything, I find particular meaning in the connection I have with them despite not being one - that's a genuinely important part of the experience for me. They're so different from me, and yet I care so much for them!
For me, this experience is one of a profoundly deep affection which eclipses what is "normal" for a person to have towards nonhumans. Arthropods are my joy. They are my friends, my charges, and my home. They genuinely feel like one of the brightest lights in my life.
There've been times where I've been deeply depressed and miserable, and been pulled up out of it just by a small encounter with a spider or insect.
It's hard to really articulate exactly what they mean to me. Every arthropod I come across pings in my mind the same way my beloved cat does; I love them, I care about them, I want to protect them and understand them.
This is just... such a purely joyful, positive experience for me. Arthropods are the shape of what life means, for me. They are stars in my sky.
That's not the only way otherheartedness can be experienced. For example, Aka is crustacean-hearted, and aes experience of this is very different from my own!
Aka isn't all thoughtful and introspective in the way I am, and if you ask aem why ae's crustacean-hearted, you'll get a shrug. And if you ask aem what it means to aem, mostly what you'll get is excited incoherence as ae pulls up image after image of squat lobsters and rock crabs and shrimp, flailing and gesturing and saying "they're just little guys!" and "they're so shaped!"
And yet, the joy at the heart of it, I can tell you is the same energy as mine towards all arthropods. It's a kind of... boundless affection, enthusiasm, happiness at the simple fact that these creatures exist and we share the world with them!
It's a very beautiful experience. It's also a very unique and distinct experience. Some otherkin might feel a similar enthusiasm towards their kintype/s, but that comes from a perspective of "these are me" or "these are like me". Otherhearted feelings, on the other hand, are if anything defined by the fact that they aren't you - and yet you love them anyway.
And why would you need to be one, when you can exist alongside them? When you can see them from the outside, appreciate them more deeply from the vantage point of a mind that can learn, understand, and ultimately, even use that knowledge to safeguard them or to help other people see some element of the value in them that you do?
It really does break my heart to see how often, and how widely, otherheartedness is misunderstood. And especially to see it characterised as some impossible longing ("I wish I was this, and yet I'm not") - rather than something positive and joyful, which is embraced through enthusiasm and love for something other.
I'm planning to write up a proper essay on the term at some point... once I've gathered the info I need...
But I hope this can serve as some kind of resource in the meantime. I think correcting this misconception will be better for both otherkin and otherhearts. ^u^
(._. )
Well this is certainly my cue to rethink (and possibly reword) my alterhuman identity.
how to tell if it’s kin or hearted?
this is a hard one, and I've been dealing with it myself but here are some of the questions that help me the most
try looking at a photo of what your kinsidering. do you feel like you're looking at yourself or do you feel like you're looking at something you can relate to and identify with?
do you get the feeling of 'thats who I am' or "that's who I want want to be/wish I was'
this one was hard, hope I was able to help some and I wish you luck!!
!!reminder that this is all optional!!
Really what it boils down to is this: does it feel right to look at the thing in question and say "I am [x]"? If yes, it's a kintype. If no, it might be a hearttype instead, especially if it feels "like family" or similar.
Of course, that's often easier said than actually figured out, so some links that might be useful to you, anon:
This guide to questioning (and definitions of basic terms) by @/shadowfae
This otherheartedness FAQ by @/interstellarsystem, and particularly this post by @/further-fields with advice for questioning a hearttype that it links to
This post comparing one individual's fictionkinity to deir fictionheartedness by @/indornaga
My “questioning” tag, which has both posts talking about general advice and posts answering specific questions (and posts with people talking about their own questioning processes)
A list of typical experiences for various alterhuman identities (note typical, not required or universal) by @/aestherians
My "otherhearted" tag, which primarily contains experience essays and similar by otherhearted folks for you to compare notes with
Oop, showing up to infodump again '^^
I'm not sure where the idea that identifying with means "wishing or wanting to be" came from, but it's not really... true? If you long to be [that thing], feel like you should've been [that thing] - that is first and foremost a sign that you are that thing already, on some level, or that you would be happier identifying as it!
If you want to be a nonhuman species, and wish you were it: that isn't a conventional otherheart experience, but it is a pretty understandable experience for an otherkin who doesn't yet know (or accept) that they are nonhuman.
So that's... really not what the difference is between otherhearted and otherkin at all asjkdhaskjhd
It's a widespread misconception nowadays that hurts both otherkin and otherhearted. Otherkin because it can create a loop of self-invalidation ("am I really otherkin, though, or do I just want to be?" This is a nonsense concept! If you want to be then you can be!); otherhearted because it is a fundamental misunderstanding of the experience which reduces it to "otherkin lite" or "not quite kin enough".
I think the focus on the ideas of "identify as" versus "identify with" is part of the problem here, cause those are abstract and ambiguous concepts. There's no guidance given by them - most people couldn't tell you clearly what one means versus the other.
I'll give you my explanation, to the best of my ability.
Otherkin, who identify as nonhuman, perceive themselves on some level as being nonhuman in their own mind, emotions, instincts, cognition, self-perception, or self-image. Not all of these are required to be otherkin, of course - and for some folks there are physical aspects as well, but usually there's going to be a mental or emotional part of the identity too.
Non-physical identity, or identity different from that which you were raised with, can be a hard concept to grasp and certainly a hard one to recognise in yourself. Some people (like yours truly!) have a relatively straightforward time of it - able to simply untether ourselves from the ideas we were raised with, and recognise that the face we see in the mirror isn't necessarily who we are.
Aka, my systemmate, didn't have it so easy. Aka has always wanted to be a dragon. When ae was a kid, it occupied aes mind on a daily basis. Ae had phantom shifts, and played pretend all the time... scrambling around on all fours and roaring and holding aes jacket out on windy days pretending it was wings. But when ae reflected on it, ae just saw longing - not being.
And yet, when I recognised this enough to encourage aem to look deeper - and then ae discussed with some other people as well - ae found that being a dragon feels right. That it brings aem incredible joy. That when we drew up an idea of what ae's dragon might look like, it was euphoric for aem.
And in the end - excitedly - Aka realised that ae is dragonkin.
The longing was a manifestation of an identity that already existed, that Aka just hadn't been able to embrace without a bit of perspective (and encouragement) from friends.
If you see someone say they long to be nonhuman, you're doing them a disservice by pointing them to the otherheart term (which doesn't actually mean that) when otherkin is where they belong.
Now, onto what otherhearted means...
This is a term that means a great deal to me. I am arthropod-hearted. I always have been, I think. It's part of who I am.
I am not an arthropod. I don't want to be an arthropod, and I don't need to be. If anything, I find particular meaning in the connection I have with them despite not being one - that's a genuinely important part of the experience for me. They're so different from me, and yet I care so much for them!
For me, this experience is one of a profoundly deep affection which eclipses what is "normal" for a person to have towards nonhumans. Arthropods are my joy. They are my friends, my charges, and my home. They genuinely feel like one of the brightest lights in my life.
There've been times where I've been deeply depressed and miserable, and been pulled up out of it just by a small encounter with a spider or insect.
It's hard to really articulate exactly what they mean to me. Every arthropod I come across pings in my mind the same way my beloved cat does; I love them, I care about them, I want to protect them and understand them.
This is just... such a purely joyful, positive experience for me. Arthropods are the shape of what life means, for me. They are stars in my sky.
That's not the only way otherheartedness can be experienced. For example, Aka is crustacean-hearted, and aes experience of this is very different from my own!
Aka isn't all thoughtful and introspective in the way I am, and if you ask aem why ae's crustacean-hearted, you'll get a shrug. And if you ask aem what it means to aem, mostly what you'll get is excited incoherence as ae pulls up image after image of squat lobsters and rock crabs and shrimp, flailing and gesturing and saying "they're just little guys!" and "they're so shaped!"
And yet, the joy at the heart of it, I can tell you is the same energy as mine towards all arthropods. It's a kind of... boundless affection, enthusiasm, happiness at the simple fact that these creatures exist and we share the world with them!
It's a very beautiful experience. It's also a very unique and distinct experience. Some otherkin might feel a similar enthusiasm towards their kintype/s, but that comes from a perspective of "these are me" or "these are like me". Otherhearted feelings, on the other hand, are if anything defined by the fact that they aren't you - and yet you love them anyway.
And why would you need to be one, when you can exist alongside them? When you can see them from the outside, appreciate them more deeply from the vantage point of a mind that can learn, understand, and ultimately, even use that knowledge to safeguard them or to help other people see some element of the value in them that you do?
It really does break my heart to see how often, and how widely, otherheartedness is misunderstood. And especially to see it characterised as some impossible longing ("I wish I was this, and yet I'm not") - rather than something positive and joyful, which is embraced through enthusiasm and love for something other.
I'm planning to write up a proper essay on the term at some point... once I've gathered the info I need...
But I hope this can serve as some kind of resource in the meantime. I think correcting this misconception will be better for both otherkin and otherhearts. ^u^
Thank you for the explanation! I really appreciate it.
I comment mostly for this:
I'm not sure where the idea that identifying with means "wishing or wanting to be" came from, but it's not really... true? If you long to be [that thing], feel like you should've been [that thing] - that is first and foremost a sign that you are that thing already, on some level, or that you would be happier identifying as it! If you want to be a nonhuman species, and wish you were it: that isn't a conventional otherheart experience, but it is a pretty understandable experience for an otherkin who doesn't yet know (or accept) that they are nonhuman. So that's... really not what the difference is between otherhearted and otherkin at all asjkdhaskjhd
Because I think how widespread that idea is might partially be my doing, tbh. See, one of the first direct comparisons between 'heartedness and 'kinity I got was Daski's explanation linked above - and that is how dei described it, though I don't know if that's still how dei experiences it. It was one of the only really good resources I had for explaining the difference, so it's something I linked to people when they asked, and I've linked it a lot of times over the years. I don't know if that post is where the generally widespread idea came from, but I do know it's the earliest I saw of it.
This isn't necessarily me disagreeing with you - I do generally agree with the principle of "wanting to be a thing is a symptom of being that thing", and therefore it probably isn't The Typical 'Hearted Experience. But if I'm right, it did in fairness originally come from the direct experiences of someone who's fictionhearted, so it's not exactly wrong either - it didn't come out of nowhere.
That's fair!
(Tone clarifier for the following: passionately and enthusiastically infodumping, not aggressive or angry at all! I clarify because I know my words can come across blunter than I intend when I get into discussion mode '^^)
This is why I phrased it as "isn't a conventional otherheart experience" rather than saying it isn't an otherhearted experience at all. Some otherhearted folks do experience that, it just isn't what the term in itself means, y'know?
I'd consider it similar to, say, how species dysphoria can be an otherkin experience but it isn't always so - some otherkin have no species dysphoria, and some species dysphoric people aren't otherkin. Species dysphoria isn't what defines otherkin.
So... there is overlap, yes, but that kind of longing is not inherently linked.
Also, to be frank for a moment... it's possible that calling those "longing" experiences otherhearted could've be a misunderstanding of the concept from the start. The definitions you've linked don't really describe what otherhearted originally meant.
I'm not someone who'd cling to an old definition just because it's "the original" - I honestly and truly don't think the modern understanding of the term is useful. And it certainly doesn't do justice to the unique concept it was coined to describe.
Longing is not what I'd choose to define otherhearted, specifically because it can also be an otherkin experience (and, to me it tracks better as an otherkin experience - I think most people who long in that way are more likely to find joy in being otherkin than being otherhearted) - or it could be a plural experience, or an archetrope experience, or a furry experience, or any number of other things really!
It doesn't work as a differentiating, or defining quality. It's an ambiguous idea that doesn't do justice to the intention of the term, or unique qualities of the experience.
Whereas describing the kind of experience that is unique to otherheartedness gives more practical, usable information - and also doesn't rely on comparison to nonhuman identities, and doesn't create the impression that otherhearted "just a version of being otherkin" or "just a lesser alternative to otherkin".
"Otherkin but they're not actually the species, they just really want to be, on a level that's so moving it is a key part of who they are"... that, to me, sounds much more like a manifestation of an identify-as experience than identify-with.
Now, naturally the description I've given in the previous reply is only mine and Aka's... it's our own ways of being otherhearted, not a diagnostic. But it is our candid experience of it, which is entirely distinct from our nonhuman identities and, in truth couldn't even be mistaken for a kintype.
(One of the things I'm looking to do before I write up something proper on this is get an idea of how a variety of different otherhearted folks experience it - find the commonalities and a spread of examples of how it can feel and manifest).
For a bit of context, my understanding of the term comes from around when it first started to be used in the therian and otherkin communities, which was... ehh, maybe a decade ago?
But it seems to have landed in a very confused, ambiguous place in the time between then and now. Most people don't seem to really understand what it means - most definitions just give the "identifying with instead of as" definition, with no explanation of how that actually feels (if anything, the "identify as" contrast is usually explained more, and "identify with" is treated as anything which isn't included in "identify as", rather than its own experience).
And most often the only other idea given is this one of "longing", which... isn't definitionally an otherheart experience, because that can (as said before) be related to many kinds of identity.
Plus... I've also seen it used to "quietly" invalidate fluid, ambiguous, non-shifting, or subtle nonhuman identity experiences. And that really sucks. That's one of the reasons I think the misunderstanding is harmful to both "sides".
And overall, the way that the heart of this beautiful, unique experience has been lost is... genuinely tragic for the community imo.
I don't have much sway over anything - I'm not a well-known and respected member of the community, just someone who shows up to infodump every now and then! But I hope things can change, I really do.
I get where you’re coming from and don’t necessarily disagree with your core point - that is, that that shouldn’t be presented as The Core Otherhearted Experience, especially when contrasting ‘heartedness with ‘kinity, because you’re right, that’s not going to be very useful in a lot of cases and there’s probably more global otherhearted experiences that can be cited - but I do want to gently point out that you are kind of being rude in saying this:
Also, to be frank for a moment… it’s possible that calling those “longing” experiences otherhearted could’ve be a misunderstanding of the concept from the start. The definitions you’ve linked don’t really describe what otherhearted originally meant.
And thereby basically saying that Daski and others like deim are wrong about their own experiences. You say that you acknowledge that some otherhearted people do experience their ‘heartedness that way, which is appreciated, but then you immediately followed up by saying “but actually I think they’re wrong and misunderstood it”. For some people that distinction between “should be” and “is” is important and meaningful, and while granted I’m not exactly otherhearted myself, I don’t think it’s fair to say it goes against the meaning of otherheartedness to include that either. You’re edging into throwing out the baby with the bathwater a bit here, and I don’t necessarily think you mean to do that, but that is what you’re doing when you’re faced with someone who is both otherkin and otherhearted and tells you that this is the distinction between them for deim, and your response is “but that’s not really what otherheartedness is typically, that sounds more like ‘kinity in denial”.
'heartedness survey
Granted, this is a survey that could have been better run, but the amount of people who agree their 'hearted experience includes Daski's description of (paraphrasing) "I should have been this, but I'm not" aren't insignificant. Neither are those who would want to be their hearttype or see it as their ideal self. I'll admit this is a point that isn't great for an introduction to 'heartedness as it requires a fine degree of Nuance and it does make differentiating it from a 'kin identity confusing, but I don't believe it should be regarded as a mislabeled experience.
I can't speak for "I should have been this," but I do go through cycles of longing to be my hearttype. What's so strange about longing to be something we have a deep connection with? How is that incompatible with an otherhearted experience?
it really feels like modern audiences - even gay people! - who are used to gay media being assimilationist and bordering on edutainment have no idea how to handle torchwood. oh no owen proposed an orgy in Sleeper without reminding the audience that not all bisexuals have orgies! this is not very heartstopper young royals love simon!!!
No safety. No food. No aid. No water. No healthcare. No education. Is this what it means to live? Is this what world accept as life?
If a group of animals were trapped, starved, and cut off from the world like this, people would be outraged. But because it's us—human beings—somehow, the world looks away.
These are unbearable days. Everything feels heavy. Each hour presses on my chest like I’m being suffocated.
My family needs urgent help.
Basic survival has become nearly impossible. Bread—just bread—now costs over $25 a day to make.
We are not asking for luxury. We are begging for life.
Please, if you’re reading this: help. Reblog this post. Talk about us. Donate if you can. Even a small act can mean everything right now.
#crisis #humanrights #emergency #donate #pleasehelp #tumblrcommunity #survivestories #reblogtohelp #signalboost
Replace the flock of blackbirds with a pack of wolves.
Add said woman's daughter.
Voilà.
To all of the above, add:
A goth-scene human tween girl.
Her Morticia Addams mantis-sona of a mother.
Her thespian, wannabe vampire, male mosquito of a father.
Her gnat and roly poly older brothers.
Her whole entire huge extended family of creepy-crawlies.