Lilian

[lillianhobbs]

Join me

[lillianhobbs]

Smells like Tension is rising in the Korean Peninsula

[lillianhobbs]

Things just Unfold 🫪🫪

[lillianhobbs]

Do you agree?

[lillianhobbs]

🚨 ROYAL ELEGANCE: King Charles III Lays Down the Law Before Congress

WITHOUT RAISING HIS VOICE. BUT THE CAPITOL FELL SILENT.

King Charles III just delivered a speech that many are calling a direct critique of Donald Trump's administration.

The message was clear. The tone was firm. And the world was watching.

What the King told Washington:

🇬🇧 On NATO and loyalty:

The King reminded lawmakers that NATO stood with the U.S. after 9/11. British troops fought alongside Americans in Afghanistan. The message? International loyalty is a two-way street. Today, that means helping Ukraine.

🇬🇧 On power and limits:

Invoking constitutional history, Charles stressed that executive power must be subject to checks and balances—a pointed reminder to any administration that overreaches.

🇬🇧 On the climate crisis:

He issued an urgent call to protect natural wonders and combat melting ice caps—a direct contrast to policies that ignore environmental science.

Why this matters for Americans:

For the #NoKingsDay movement, the King's words serve as external validation of their struggle against what they call authoritarianism.

As the U.S. faces:

· A 33% approval rating for the current administration

· Massive public pushback over $10-a-gallon gas

· Growing isolation from historic allies

The King's speech highlights a stark contrast: global cooperation versus the "Bunker Agenda."

The bigger picture:

With the probability of Trump's removal reportedly at 99.9%, the British monarch's intervention was not just protocol.

It was a reminder.

Even the most powerful republics must respect democratic values—and the alliances that keep them safe.

🏛️⚖️ Do you believe King Charles III is right to demand reciprocity in international alliances and limits on power?

Or should a foreign monarch not weigh in on U.S. internal politics?

Drop a 👑 for "He's right – allies need accountability"

Drop a 🚫 for "Stay out – monarchs shouldn't interfere

King Charles III speech Congress, Charles criticizes Trump, NATO loyalty two-way street, UK US alliance 2026, checks and balances reminder, climate change urgent call, NoKingsDay movement, Trump approval rating 33 percent

[lillianhobbs]

“World War Eleven”

Yes, that was deadly

Not knowing the difference between WW II and WW 11 speaks volume

These clowns are only out here to destroy America and nothing else. We must be vigilant before its too late

#Congress 😂😂😂😂

[lillianhobbs]

Since the start of the war in Iran, there's been a surge in numbers of US service personnel filing as conscientious objectors. Many military members are unaware of their rights.

Activists say many soldiers oppose fighting on moral grounds, especially after deadly US‑Israeli strikes on Iran, including an attack on a girls' school condemned by the UN.

Veteran and campaigner Mike Prysner explains what conscientious objection means, why more troops are applying now, and how social media exposure to civilian suffering is shaping resistance within today's armed forces.

#war #military #USMilitary #peace

[lillianhobbs]

🚨These Trump Slay memes are getting out of hand — in United States.

[lillianhobbs]

[lillianhobbs]

This is why Russia and China quietly support Iran’s rise

[lillianhobbs]

🚨 BREAKING: UK Refuses to Join Hormuz Blockade 🇬🇧⚠️

The United Kingdom has confirmed it will not participate in the proposed U.S. naval blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, creating a clear split with Donald Trump’s approach. The decision reflects a broader stance from Keir Starmer, who has emphasized that any military action must have a clear legal basis and justification before risking lives. This move highlights growing tensions not just in the Middle East, but also among Western allies, as countries weigh law, strategy, and global consequences differently. While some see the UK’s decision as responsible restraint, others argue it could weaken allied unity during a critical moment.

💬 The Big Question: Do you think the UK made the right call by staying out — or should allies stand together in situations like this? 🫢😼🫪🫩

[lillianhobbs]

🇱🇷America needed strength—and Trump delivered.

No more weak policies. No more empty promises.

Just action.

Do you support Trump?

Yes

No

Voting ended onApr 20

[lillianhobbs]

How true is this????

[lillianhobbs]

What starts as a single decision could spiral into something far bigger—something uncontrollable.

If Trump were to launch a nuclear strike on Iran, it wouldn’t stay a one-sided move. It could trigger a dangerous chain reaction: Iran retaliates, Israel becomes a target, Pakistan and North Korea get pulled in, and suddenly global powers like Russia are forced to respond. Within hours, a regional conflict could transform into a worldwide catastrophe.

This is the terrifying reality of nuclear escalation—once it begins, it doesn’t follow a script, and it rarely stops where it starts. Experts warn that modern conflicts can quickly expand across multiple countries, increasing the risk of a full-scale nuclear confrontation .

The consequences wouldn’t just be military—they would be humanitarian, environmental, and irreversible.

That’s why the message is simple, but urgent: this isn’t a situation to test limits.

It’s one to stop—before it’s too late.

[lillianhobbs]

Sergeant Benjamin N. Pennington, a 26-year-old U.S. Army soldier from Kentucky, was among the American service members who lost their lives during the 2026 Iran conflict. He died from injuries sustained in an attack on U.S. forces at Prince Sultan Air Base in Saudi Arabia, part of a series of escalating strikes following the outbreak of war.

Military officials described him as a dedicated soldier who made the ultimate sacrifice while serving his country. His death is one of several that have underscored the human cost of the ongoing conflict in the Middle East.

[lillianhobbs]

What happened

• Multiple major outlets are reporting that President Donald Trump has fired Attorney General Pam Bondi

• The move appears to have happened April 2, 2026, following internal frustration and mounting controversy

• The White House has not fully confirmed all details publicly, and some aspects remain based on sources

Facts

• Pam Bondi has served as U.S. Attorney General since February 2025

• Reports from Reuters, Fox News, CNN, and others indicate Trump removed her from the position 

• According to sources, Bondi was informed of the decision during or shortly before Trump’s recent public address related to the Iran conflict 

• Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche is expected to step in as acting Attorney General 

• Trump has reportedly considered EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin as a possible permanent replacement 

What led to this

• Reports suggest Trump had grown frustrated with Bondi’s performance over time

• Key issues mentioned across outlets include:

• Handling of the Jeffrey Epstein-related document releases and fallout 

• Internal and external criticism over investigations and prosecutions

• Pressure from allies expecting more aggressive legal action

• Bondi also faced scrutiny in Congress and criticism over communication and decision-making 

Context

• Bondi was a close Trump ally before becoming Attorney General

• Her tenure included controversial DOJ actions, including:

• Creation of a “Weaponization Working Group” to review past prosecutions

• Investigations tied to political opponents and prior Trump-related cases 

• Her time in office has been part of a broader reshaping of federal law enforcement under Trump’s second administration

Bigger picture

• This marks another major cabinet-level shakeup

• Bondi is reportedly the second high-profile official removed in recent weeks 

• The move reflects ongoing instability and rapid personnel changes inside the administration

• It also signals continued efforts by Trump to reshape the Justice Department leadership

Claims and counterclaims

• Some sources say Trump acted due to dissatisfaction and pressure from allies

• Others suggest the decision is tied specifically to Epstein-related controversies

• Trump has previously praised Bondi publicly, creating mixed signals about the decision

• Official reasoning from the White House remains limited or unclear

[lillianhobbs]

World War Looms