macklin celebrini has autism
Phantogram Three

izzy's playlists!
Show & Tell
Sweet Seals For You, Always
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
almost home
Keni
The Bright Sessions
The Bowery Presents
art blog(derogatory)
noise dept.
The Stonewall Inn
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

ellievsbear
No title available
Today's Document
Fai_Ryy

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Poland

seen from Germany

seen from Germany
seen from Türkiye

seen from Poland
seen from Uzbekistan

seen from Germany
seen from France

seen from Poland
seen from Netherlands

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Poland

seen from Malaysia

seen from Türkiye
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Malaysia
@literalbest
lol You Know Who academic is out there arguing that “distrust of trans women” is bad, as if that Same Academic didn’t use trans women as a punching bag in an uninformed rant about TWs
Academics are bad 2K-always
lol You Know Who academic is out there arguing that "distrust of trans women" is bad, as if that Same Academic didn't use trans women as a punching bag in an uninformed rant about TWs
why are the pseudo-inclusive gender questions on surveys inevitably worse than just the standard male/female
How do you tell! If someone likes you! How do you indicate that you like someone! Life is a fucking mystery and I am too traums to do this!!!
Broken bathroom stall doors are transphobic
TBH
sometimes i just can’t get over the fact that Hamilton is literally a great white man bildungsroman and yet i still like it
A little heads-up can help students engage with uncomfortable and complex topics, and a little sensitivity to others, at the most basic level, isn’t coddling. Civic discourse in this country has become pretty ugly, so maybe it’s not surprising that students are trying to create ways to have compassionate, civil dialogue.
Trigger Warnings, Safe Spaces and Free Speech, Too - The New York Times
Students, y’all. Student activists. What a great response to that ugly U of Chicago statement. The author really nails the institutional interest in construing trigger warnings as an intellectual threat: a tidy way of ignoring students’ specific concerns about access and transparency.
The administration wants to appear as an intellectual force beating back destabilizing waves of political correctness that have rocked college campuses. But the focus of student protests hasn’t been the lack of trigger warnings and safe spaces. Instead, many protesters want the university to evaluate how it invests its money, improve access for students with mental illnesses and disabilities, support low-income and first-generation students, and pay its employees fair wages. They have been pushing for more transparency in the school’s private police force, which has resisted making most of its policies public in the face of complaints. The university is also under federal investigation over its handling of sexual assault cases.
Yet, the administration has refused to meet with student groups who have asked to discuss these issues, and it has threatened to discipline students who staged a sit-in protest. The university even hired a provost who specializes in corporate crisis management and dealing with “activist pressure.” While the university accuses students of silencing opposing voices, it continues to insulate itself against difficult questions.
(via grrdis)
i thought i was going to like applying to jobs because i like talking about myself and making up new fake ideas BUTTTTT it turns out i hate it and it makes me sad and scared and i CANNOT FIGURE OUT how to be a professional academic, and i think i confuse them and/or make it seem like i’m coming for them when i’m not (or, like, am, but only like lowkey am) and then i talk about trigger warnings too much at dinner and i think i’ll never be able to behave correctly, like, there are social cues about not to be loud and weird and infodump-y that i am totally missing in these spaces, ugh, my poor fragile brain :/
can someone give me a job because i am interested in stuff? is that job just “go be a journalist?”
also i think like a lawyer more than an activist these days which i can tell because listening to this older trans lady attorney tell me things i already know about sex determination is still more interesting than this other dude-appearing person talk about why things are bad
ugh i guess i’m a grown up now :( / :)
can someone point me to literature about whether / why the invocation of native peoples and land at academic conferences is good? this seems like a very canadian practice / i have literally only seen trans canadians do it most of whom identify as settlers so like idk if it’s a thing that is important or if it’s just a style of signaling alliance within a specific national framework
anyway this post brought to you by academic conferences being weird
?
also lol i was gone for a few months and suddenly this site has as many ads as instagram, that’s so stupid, i hope yahoo is losing buckets of money on all their properties forever
lol
I finally went through the trouble to request the password to the fake email address that I use for this tumblr in order to request the password that I’d forgotten to this tumblr, aka I am the literal worst, aka I’m kind of back now i guess
@bootybreakfast
omg this dog is wonderfuls dog is wonderful
mark’s words, as always, provide solace. but i’m still so mad that she is gone too, and i don’t know that the people reposting them even know she is dead.
Worship the Borzoi - Obey the Borzoi by Vladimir Borzoi
this is a great borzoi
It is in this context that we need to think about invitations addressed to trans activists to have a dialogue with trans-exclusionary feminists. Invitations can function as part of a rebuttal system. A dialogue is not possible when some people exercise arguments as weapons by treating others as evidence to be rebutted. When you are asked to provide evidence for your existence, or when you are treated as evidence, your existence is negated. Transphobia and antitrans statements should not be treated as just another viewpoint that we should be free to express at the happy table of diversity. There cannot be a dialogue when some at the table are in effect (or intent on) arguing for the elimination of others at the table. When you have “dialogue or debate” with those who wish to eliminate you from the conversation (because they do not recognize what is necessary for your survival, or because they don’t even think your existence is possible), then “dialogue and debate” becomes a technique of elimination. A refusal to have some dialogues and some debates is thus a key tactic for survival.
Sara Ahmed, “An Affinity of Hammers”
@ghoulchantsister this makes me think of what you have been posting recently
(via transarterrified)