Net Neutrality - Week May 13 - May 21, 2013
Net Neutrality
Neelie Kroes Responds: Old Mantras and Political Uncertainty for Net Neutrality in Europe (Response [PDF]) (EDRi - May 21, 2013)
In her response dated 8 May, Neelie Kroes seems non-committal regarding the policy direction she will take in the upcoming recommendations. The extreme vagueness of the language may be an indication of heated internal discussions in the European Commission.Â
A Ruling Could Support F.C.C.âs Net Neutrality Defense (New York Times - May 20, 2013)
The Federal Communications Commissionâs high-profile attempt to defend its net neutrality rules against a court challenge got major support on Monday from the Supreme Court, which ruled in a separate case that regulatory agencies should usually be granted deference in interpreting their own jurisdictions.Â
How Net Neutrality Regulations Could Undermine the Open Internet (The Washington Post - May 20, 2013)
At the time, most network neutrality supporters described Genachowskiâs as a step in the right direction. But some warned that the FCCâs legal arguments, if accepted by the courts, could be bad for network neutrality in the long run. They could open the door to future FCC regulationsâfor example, to combat online gambling, pornography, or piracyâthat could actually undermine Internet freedom.
Telecomâs Big Players Hold Back the Future (New York Times - May 19, 2013)
 Ms. Crawford, with a smile on her face, says the outlook is grim. âWe are in this position as a country because we assumed that the magic of the marketplace would provide competition and provide world-class communications,â she said. âBut history has demonstrated that left to their own devices, companies will gouge the rich, leave out the poor, cherry-pick markets and focus solely on their profits. It isnât evil, itâs just the way things work.âÂ
Chairman Statement on T-Mobile Withdrawing Challenge to Open Internet Rules (FCC - May 17, 2013)
The ongoing litigation â now pursued by a single company â only serves to reduce that certainty and predictability. I applaud T-Mobileâs decision to withdraw from this litigation.
AT&T Continues To Mock The Concept Of Net Neutrality; This Time With Google Hangouts Block (Techdirt - May 16, 2013)
Basically, they're saying if you want to do video, you have to ask permission. That's a broken system. It goes against what makes the internet good and useful: the fact that you can innovate without permission. A mobile carrier -- one who may see video chat apps as competition, for example -- being able to act as a gatekeeper to block the usefulness of such apps is a dangerous situation for those who believe in promoting innovation. We shouldn't stand for an internet where one company gets to pick what you're allowed to do.Â
Drosselkom: Offline and Online-Protests Against ISP Plans to Slow Down Internet Connections â and for Net Neutrality (netzpolitik.org - May 16, 2013)
Until three weeks ago, activists struggled to explain the abstract concept of net neutrality to the public. With unexpected support from the major ex-state ISP, the concept is now known to more people than ever. (...)Â Although the EU commission has acknowledges its importance, it has failed to adequately regulate it. If the EU doesnât do it, it is time for individual Member States to enshrine net neutrality into law.
Consumer Groups Angered over ESPN Plan to Subsidize Cellphone Data Plans (The Hill - May 13, 2013)
Hanging over the debate about the possible ESPN deal is Verizon's legal challenge to the FCC's net neutrality rules. The company claims that the FCC overstepped its legal authority with the regulations. Many observers expect that the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals will side with Verizon and strike down at least portions of the rules. Tom Wheeler, President Obama's nominee for FCC chairman, will likely face decisions of whether to keep fighting for the regulations and how broad they should be.
Free Press Blasts Wireless Companies' Plan to Favor Some Traffic (Free Press - May 15, 2013)
AT&T CEO: A Subsidized Mobile Internet is Coming to an Operator Near You (Gigaom - May 15, 2013)
Single Market for Telecoms
The Digitisation of our Economies [SPEECH/13/414] (Vice-President N. Kroes - European Commission - May 16, 2013)
But imagine a Europe where operators can provide digital services across the whole EU, wherever they are based. Where telecoms users can enjoy those same services, wherever they live or work. Offering a boost for the whole Internet ecosystem â from operators to equipment makers to app designers. And for the whole economy besides. Because we need companies to smash barriers, think European, and compete globally: even against the American giants. We will soon be coming forward with proposals on a Single Market for telecoms. This is a major priority for the rest of my mandate. Barriers to the digital Single Market are barriers to growth. I'm determined to knock them down wherever I find them. In fact, I'm the same age as Alex Ferguson. But I have no intention of retiring until I've completed this task.Â
EU Sets Timeline for Single Telecoms Market (EUobserver - May 17, 2013)
Europe Seeks One Telecoms Regulator to Rule Them All â Replace Ofcom (ISPreview - May 21, 2013)
Telecom
Ofcom Examines Communications Services Across the UKÂ (Report [PDF]) (Ofcom - May 16, 2013)
The availability and speed of fixed broadband internet access is subject to much greater variation. This is partially because of variability in the speed provided by current generation broadband, and partially because the deployment of superfast broadband is still underway, especially in more rural areasÂ
Question for Written Answer to the Commission (EPP MEP Roberta Metsola) - EU Telecoms Framework Directive 2002/21/EC as Amended by Directive 2009/140/EC (European Parliament - May 14, 2013)
(...) does the Commission consider that a change in administration of the government of a Member State constitutes a ground for the removal of the head of a national regulatory authority under the EU Telecoms Framework Directive?
Mobistar Pulls Plug on Fixed Line Consumer Services (Reuters - May 15, 2013)
Belgian mobile phone operator Mobistar said on Wednesday that it would stop offering fixed line services until the regulator puts into place a more favourable environment for accessing competitors' networks.
BEREC
Draft Agenda BEREC 2013 2st Contact Network Meeting16-17 May 2013, Paris (France) [PDF] (BEREC - May 14, 2013)
Agenda:
11. Net Neutrality â Oral update
13. Stakeholder dialogue â Oral updateÂ
FICORA will make an oral update on the status of the preparation of the stakeholder dialogue in September.
14. BEREC Medium Term Strategy
15. Amended Decision on the BEREC EWGâs for 2013
20. Information by the Commission
Oral up-date on Commission initiatives not mentioned previously.
21.2. Information by BNetzA on the NGA workshop (5 June 2013, Athens)
Internet Governance - WTPF / WSIS
5th World Telecom Policy Forum â Stepping Stone to Changes in the Internet Governance Arena? (Internet Policy Review - May 16, 2013)
Opinions one to four were endorsed without any changes, five and six with almost no changes. A seventh opinion proposed by Brazil on the role of governments in internet governance was discussed but not agreed upon consensually.
ITU World Telecommunication Policy Forum Closes Focused on Continuing Open Dialogue  (The Wall Street Journal - May 16, 2013)
Throughout the meeting, the Internet Society participated in dialogue that focused on several key areas, including the significant role of Internet exchange points as a means of enhancing Internet connectivity, the need for timely deployment of IPv6, and the importance of the multi-stakeholder model of Internet governance.Â
WTPF-13 Opinions 5 and 6 (Lingua Synaptica - May 16, 2013)
Brazilâs revised draft Opinion didnât reach anywhere near consensus during the discussions, although there was broad agreement that the issues were important. Instead, a summary of the discussion will be included in the Report of Working Group 3 Chair. The Chair has suggested that a summary on where Brazilâs draft stands, including the feedback of the WG3 participants, be sent to the ITU Council Working Group on international Internet-related public policy issues (CWG-Internet). CWG-Internet may then forward it to the ITU Council, which in turn may decide how to proceed with it within the ITU framework.
The First Day and a Half of WTPF-13Â (Lingua Synaptica - May 15, 2013)
There was a slightly surreal discussion whether it was necessary to exclude stakeholder participation in irrelevant forums by specifically adding mention of their attendance at relevant forums. This was prompted by Turkeyâs proposal to include the word ârelevantâ in Opinion 2:Â Fostering an enabling environment for the greater growth and development of broadband connectivity
Too Many Stakeholders Spoil the Soup (Foreign Policy - May 15, 2013)
If multi-stakeholderism is to survive as a concept that is useful in guiding our thinking about Internet governance, then it needs to be understood as a legitimizing principle that is strictly at odds with state sovereignty-based conceptions of legitimacy. Under a true multi-stakeholder system, states can have roles in Internet governance insofar as other stakeholders welcome those roles. But they cannot unilaterally declare authority, or collectively assert it without the consent of the rest of the Internet. Unfortunately, the meaning of multi-stakeholders in Internet governance is likely to remain a point of contention beyond this week's talks in Geneva.Â
House Unanimously Votes for Government-Free Internet (The Hill - May 14, 2013)
In a 413-0 vote, members passed H.R. 1580, which once again signals the support of Congress for the continued development of the Internet without guidance from any single government or a collection of governments.
World Telecom Policy Forum: Healing The Split Or Fueling A Telecom Policy âCold Warâ? (IP Watch - May 14, 2013)
The nature of the âmulti-stakeholderâ model and the future role of the ITU are the most controversial issues for WTPF, especially as the Russian Federation â which will bring another of the larger delegations to Geneva â has decided to revive its call for a stronger grip of national governments on internet governance. (For ITU member statesâ written contributions, see here)
Other
German Lawmakers Calling for More Consumer Rights on the Mobile Apps Market (Deutsche Welle - May 17, 2013)
German state-level lawmakers agree that consumers should have the right to return mobile apps. But changing the law may do little to help consumers if companies don't do their bit.Â










