Why is The Future of School Lunch Important to The Rest of Us?
If you don’t have a child in school, work in school nutrition or pay much attention to the news, you may not know of the changes that affected school lunch starting last year. The Healthy Hunger Free Kids Act of 2010 (HHFKA) was a radical piece of legislation that aimed to reduce childhood obesity and instill healthy eating habits in children. Promoted by First Lady Michelle Obama, the HHFKA mandated many changes that included more fruits and veggies in the children’s lunch, fewer proteins and grains, whole grains and whole wheat pasta, rice and breads, etc.
When the program rolled out in September 2013, everyone seemed to be having a hard time: Foodservice operators were having a hard time sourcing adequate products that met the standards; food manufacturers hadn’t developed enough products that met the standards; parents and children had a hard time adjusting to these new foods being offered, etc. A lot of the food served ended up in the garbage since children didn’t really want to eat the veggies they were forced to take with their lunch. (Veggies, ewww! they’d say). Furthermore, the grain and protein portions were smaller which meant kids were getting a smaller sandwich with a smaller meat patty for instance. Due to this backlash, last year the regulation softened and lifted the cap on grains and proteins while keeping the overall calorie count of the meals. This allowed more flexibility to menu different meals.
According to the USDA’s Fact Sheet on HHFKA, the regulation has been overall successful. However, right now in Congress there is a battle going on to allow schools to opt out from the HHFKA rules if the schools are losing money in the lunch program. Regardless of political partisanship, if in fact this is the first step to roll back the changes, then we are in for a biggie. Research has shown that if young children are not encouraged to eat fruits and veggies, they will not eat them later in life. If children don’t eat healthy foods at home and are not even exposed to these foods in schools, then they will grow up with terribly unhealthy diets that will result in health problems later on. It is already a shame that being one of the wealthiest countries in the world, the US has one of the highest indexes of type 2 diabetes, obesity (more than one third of Americans is obese according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), and even worse, childhood obesity (17%). Can you imagine the situation getting worse?
The future of school lunch has very much to do with OUR future as a society not only from the public health point of view, but also from the local foods movement perspective. Did you know that a lot of schools have a Farm-to-School program? Without those purchases, the local farms might have a hard time subsisting. Furthermore, if children don’t learn to include fruits and vegetables in their diets, who will buy them in the future??? Will this be a society based on refined sugars and fried foods?
Whatever the outcome is in the Congress rink, I hope that the future of the children (and the country) is taken in consideration and not only the finances. As with anything new, there is a learning period where adjustments are made. It might not be a bad idea to hang on and brave the ride.