Tim calling Bernard "Bear" reblog if you agree
Mike Driver
No title available
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
Interview Vampire Daily

Origami Around
EXPECTATIONS
Show & Tell
No title available
ojovivo
tumblr dot com
Fai_Ryy
art blog(derogatory)

titsay
🩵 avery cochrane 🩵
almost home

ellievsbear
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
noise dept.
Game of Thrones Daily

No title available
seen from Finland

seen from T1

seen from South Korea
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from Spain
seen from Colombia

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Germany

seen from Türkiye

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from France

seen from Spain
seen from Finland

seen from Germany

seen from Sweden

seen from United States
@lordandempressdoodle
Tim calling Bernard "Bear" reblog if you agree
Indigenous lands are crucial for climate mitigation and resilience. Research shows their health is a direct result of Indigenous stewardship
While this isn't news to anyone who works in this space, it is useful to have this water-is-wet research to affirm that Indigenous knowledge and land management are extremely effective at storing carbon and protecting biodiversity.
I want to draw special attention to this part of the article:
New research shows that approach overlooks the key role that Indigenous knowledge and culture can play in mitigating climate change. It also reveals a dangerous misconception that has taken hold in global climate discussions: the idea that Indigenous lands are so rich because they are remote or sparsely populated. Nothing could be further from the truth. The health of Indigenous lands and their ability to store vast quantities of carbon stem from the stewardship of the people who inhabit them.
I'm actually bringing this back around to say another important thing.
I get a fair number of asks and comments on my posts expressing sentiments like "human beings are a plague on this Earth", "humans ruin everything, we deserve to be wiped out", "humanity is inherently selfish, evil, and irredeemable".
I don't think the folks saying these things have bad intentions, I know their words come from a place of very understandable pain, fear, and anger. But to act as though humanity's impact on nature is inherently damaging and extractive is to erase thousands of years of Indigenous stewardship of nature. These ecosystems are thriving because there are humans living there.
This is your regular reminder that you don't need to feel guilty for being a human. You are part of nature--viewing humans as inherently separate from the rest of nature is actually part of the problem. You will be so much better served redirecting that guilt into supporting the humans who are helping nature or resisting those who are hurting it.
Was that your mom I just met that was Sofia ok is Sofia your mother ?? My mother is dead. Let me put it this way. Are you hitting the same vagina you spent the first nine months of ur mortal life in?? Anatomically. There’s the womb, and there’s the cervix- Stop the car. and there’s the uterus, Are you jumping the cervix??? And there’s-🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮 STOP THE CAR —- MY SHOES!?! It’s not one thing Louis (theowing up) 🤮🤮🤮🤮 STOP THE GOD DAMN CAR. LOUIS!!!! Fuck fuck fuck my shoes. LOUIS!!!!!!!!! LOUISSSSSSS!!!!!!!! You don’t eat where you shit, and you don’t come inside the door you came out of what on GODS SAVAGE EARTH IS THERE TO TALK ABOUT ?? She was dying Louis I gave her the gift NO NO ITS BASIC ITS FUNDAMENTAL- NO ITS A COMPLICATED MULTIFACETED SET OF CIRCUMSTANCES NO NO THERES NO CIRCUMSTANCE THAT LEADS TO OH YEAH!! I COULD SEE HOW THAT WOULD HAPPEn!?!?! You’re being very judgey. Come to Montreal???? See me sing??? Hey meet my friend with incestual benefits !?! This is all- all- time Armand level deceit. OH DO NOT WALK AWAY AND - AND - AND SAY HIS NAME DO NOT COMPARE ME TO HIM HOW IS THIS ANY DIFFERENT THIS IS A CENTURIES LONG LIE YOU HUNG HER PORTRAIT OVER OUR COFFINS IN NEW ORLEANS ITS SICK ITS SICK - WE ARE UNNATURAL BEINGS AND THIS IS THE HALF HUMAN SOUL YOU CONVENIENTLY WHIP OUT WHENEVER YOU WANNA WIN AN ARGUMENT WHAT -ARGUMENT YOU GOT FOR FUCKING YOUR MOTHER ITS SICKNESS MAYBE THE SOURCE OF ALL YOUR SICKNESS BUT MY GOD - YOU!!! YOU!!! - SEEK A PROFESSIONAL - YOU CALL ME OUT OF NOWHERE TO SAY YOURE PAYING A GIRL TO PRETEND TO BE CLAUDIA AND PAYING A GIRL TO PRETEND TO BE MADELINE AND WHAT DO I SAY DO I SAY YOURE SICK LOUIS DO I SAY SICKNESS LOUIS NO I SPEND A MONTH AND A HALF TALKING YOU BACK FROM UNIMAGINABLE FRENZY IN THE MIDDLE OF MY OWN FRACTURING 😰😨😨😰😰😭😭😨😰😨😭😭😨😰I OFFER YOU ROOM UNDER MY ROOF Ok….. I OFFER YOU THE POSSIBILITY OF RECKONING WITH YOUR CRIPPLING GUILT Ok….. I OFFER 😭😭😭😭😰😰😰😰😰😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😰😰😰😰😰 I OFF 😭😭😭😭😭😰😰😰😰😰😨😨😨😭😭😭😭😭😭Ok…..It’s ok…. 😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😰😰😰😭😭😭😭🤮🤮
Disclaimer: the sign depicted in the image is there for storytelling and does not reflect my views
oh you the damnedest creature..
Photos leaked this weekend of Gotham socialite Tim Drake-Wayne kissing an unknown blond in Penguin's Iceberg Lounge. Now, Bruce Wayne has asked press to stop investigating. What could they want to hide? Read more here
Sex and intimacy in TVL
@armandsbitchboy and I were discussing the lack of sex between the main "ships" this season, and how we both actually prefer non sexual intimacy - for me this was a huge draw of the books when I was first reading them as a teenager, as well as the way the characters can have sex without actually having it, via biting and blood drinking.
This made me start thinking about the way sex is shown in TVL as opposed to series 1 and 2.
For those first two seasons sex is generally shown on screen as a pleasant experience for all concerned. Unpleasant sexual encounters such as Claudia's repeated assaults by Bruce take place offscreen.
In TVL this dynamic is reversed. Every sexual encounter we are shown is rape (Magnus), abusive (Gabriella) or indifferent (the constant groupie sex that Lestat has). The only true intimate encounter we see, between Nicky and Lestat, has a cut away before anything really happens.
I would surmise that this is deliberate and speaks to the attitude of the respective narrators towards sexual intimacy. For Louis sex is associated with love, hence why he's hurt when Lestat wants other sexual partners. Even when he does have his own encounter with someone else immediately following this conversation, it's with someone he loved.
For Lestat sex is either traumatic, or it is utilised like a drug to numb his feelings of emptiness and loneliness, as he tells us in the song of the same name. BTW, it is not uncommon at all for people with a traumatic sexual history to become hypersexual as a coping mechanism, so these two things are not incongruent.
This leads me to the idea that perhaps for Lestat non-sexual intimacy with partners he actually loves may be more important to him. One of the reasons episode 6 was by far and away my favourite episode this season was because of how closely Lestat and Louis' relationship mirrored the dynamic of the books, and how intimate they were onscreen without even a kiss.
Another point I'd like to make regarding this: I've seen many in the fandom bemoaning the lack of sex scenes between intimate partners this season (Devils Minion, Lestat and Louis, Lestat and Nicky etc).
I would say that due to the way all the other sexual encounters are shown (violent, abusive or meaningless) it would be extremely difficult to frame an intimate sexual encounter as tender and emotional. Can you imagine showing Lestat and Nicky together in the same episode Lestat is raped by Magnus? Or Lestat and Louis getting back together in this way in the same episode that Gabriella's incestuous abuse is exposed? It would leave a really foul taste to the whole thing, and during episode 6 in particular I was really hoping nothing physical happened between Lestat and Louis for precisely that reason.
The performance of Brutal Love, the (unscripted!) hug in the street, their interaction at the bar, the conversation on the bench, did more to establish closeness than any "love scene" could have.
best character of all time
the duality of man
Textile art featuring a school of koi fish, by artist Lin Xia.
Paul tvl ep7
i don't know where I land on whether Paul was real or part of Lestat's imagination. I dont think the show is making that firm a statement on the reality of heaven at this point in the show. I think it is meant to be ambiguous.
But I tend to side with it being part of Lestat's psyche, the part that also wants to listen to birdsong and get things from nature -- a quiet calm part of him that can see through the obfuscation of life.
I think what Paul is there to deliver is not some sort of absolution that Lestat is the best husband ever. I think he is there to tell Lestat to have some empathy and theory of mind. Just like you are a product of your makers, so was he. He cannot express love the way you need him to, right now Lestat, because he was a product of his upbringing. Just like Lestat was and would fail.
But Lestat kept Louis from meeting the same fate as Paul, because of his love. He was closest to death when he was farthest from Lestat in terms of alienation. At least that is what Lestat believes.
Anyway, I think that is what Paul represents. I don't think he is a voice from heaven. The light at the end is not heaven approaching, but Lestat being removed from the bag and sewn back up with silver threads.
And the alarm can be stopped before it beeps. yes ma'am.
the same expressions: hesitation, disgust, and regret
A splinter of coldness in you, is that what makes you fascinating?
Tim Drake says Fuck ICE
Not your first kill, but perhaps the bloodiest ...
Was chatting with @dailyezrabridger (@prettydykeboy ) a while back about the aftermath of the great purgilling and felt compelled to make this.
"huh... now what are you doing all the way out here?"
Skybridger weekend day 1: First Meeting
I love his new look so much, baby boys done grown up!