Used to be about various MMOs and random thoughts, but now I guess it's just about reacting to the socialists by rebloging. Seldomly, videogames reappear and nobody is upset for three seconds.
I was in Vancouver Friday November 3rd talking at an event sponsored by the very active University of British Columbia Free Speech Club (start one on your ca...
Warning: itâs like 2 hours long, but probably worth your time. Even if you donât agree with the second half of the title.
The solid science about how gender differences donât matter:
Sex differences in personality/cognition:
Lynn (1996): http://bit.ly/2vThoy8
Weisberg (2011): http://bit.ly/2gJVmEp
Del Giudice (2012): http://bit.ly/2vEKTUx
Larger/large and stable sex differences in more gender-neutral countries:
Costa (2001): http://bit.ly/2utaTT3Â
Differences in men and womenâs interest/priorities:
Rong Su (2009): http://bit.ly/2wtlbzU
Big Five trait agreeableness and (lower) income (including for men):
Spurk (2010): http://bit.ly/2vu1x6E
Judge (2012): http://bit.ly/2uxhwQh
The general importance of exposure to sex-linked steroids on fetal and then lifetime development:
Hines (2015) http://bit.ly/2uufOiv
Exposure to prenatal testosterone and interest in things or people (even when the exposure is among females):
Baron-Cohen (2014): http://bit.ly/2vn4KXq
Hines (2016): http://bit.ly/2hPYKSuÂ
Primarily biological basis of personality sex differences:
Ngun (2010): http://bit.ly/2vJ6QSh
Status and sex: males and females:
Perusse (1993): http://bit.ly/2uoIOw8
Buss (2008): http://bit.ly/2uumv4g
de Bruyn (2012): http://bit.ly/2uoWkMhÂ
Â
All links taken from the description of Jordan B. Petersonâs video interview with James Damoore: link.
Only included the ones that can be read freely without payment or without sending a request for a copy. For the full list, see the description of the video linked previously.
Adding these two about how the Left is over-represented in the humanities:
Klein (2008):Â http://bit.ly/2fwdLrS
Langbert (2016):Â http://bit.ly/2cV53Q8
Take a look at all those studes before you go around telling people they have their heads stuck in an ideological bucket.
Imposing your denial of reality is not a right you or anyone has.
Rejecting your denial of reality (specially one that depends enterely on physical observable factors), is not infringing your or anyoneâs rights.
But go ahead. Tell your friends that they can become a bird by sewing feathers on their arms and flapping them continously. And then when they jump off a ledge and fall off to their deaths, I know exactly what youâll do. Youâll make a banner of their deaths and parade their corpse all over the place while crying:
âEvil society did this! They didnât want him to be a bird and sew feathers on his arms. Because of this he couldnât fly and now heâs dead!â
Even though you are the one who pushed them off the ledge by reinforcing or even creating their pathology.
A clip from "Strengthen the Individual: Q & A Parts I & II". An audience member asked about my opinion on safe spaces and the concept of white privilege. The...
The Professor talks about the gender differences in job selection between male and females and why. *********************************************************...
Short version: According to Social Constructionism, if you eradicate enviormental variability for the genders, you eliminate the differences. Thatâs what was tried (and what they succeeded in accomplishing) in the Scandinavian countries. Despite of that differences between male and females didnât dissapear: they maximized. When you take the enviormental variables out of the ecuation, all you have left is biology. Itâs exactly the opposite of what Social Constructionism predicted would happen,
YES, of course, Jesus commanded us to love and every person deserves to be loved and respected but to twist scripture in this way is NOT loving. It truly saddens me that there are already 600 notes on this which suggests to me that people who are hurt, confused or who might feel attacked or not accepted because they struggle with homosexuality will see this and think the Bible is condoning a homosexual lifestyle. OP, youâre not giving them hope. No, you are leading them further away from freedom, further away from a life filled with love and truth.
Gonna copy and paste my friendâs reply to an earlier version of this post, one which sadly has 600,000 notes. Breaks my heart that so many are being led astray.
From @a-path-beyond84:
Itâs absolutely bizarre to see the attempts of people to twist and distort the Gospel into approving homosexual acts. Â If Colbert actually said that, as a Catholic he should be ashamed for it, because many will think there is nothing wrong with homosexual acts.
Jesus did say that the foundation of marriage was that God created them male and female.
Jesus connects marriage to reproduction, stating that in heaven people are neither married nor given in marriage for they can no longer die.
Jesus condemns both sexual immorality and sensuality, and no where in scripture makes any clarification that sexual immorality is anything different than what it had always been.
The apostle Paul, called personally by Jesus, and who wrote much of the New Testament, condemns homosexual *acts* both male with male and female with female, connecting them with rejecting truth and worshipping creating things rather than God.
Paul explicitly says men who have sex with men along with adulterers, called out specifically from the sexual immoral already listed, will not inherit the kingdom of God, stating in strong terms not to be deceived on this point.
Paul condemns homosexual acts yet again, in the context of opposing false teachers.
If Paulâs authority isnât enough, Jude speaks of ungodly people perverting the grace of the Lord into a license for sexual immorality and then connects this to the citizens of Sodom and Gomorrah, whose punishment serves as an example for those who will suffer the punishment of eternal fire.
From the succeeding centuries, we have the witness of not only countless Christians, but Saints, Doctors of the Church and Popes to the same effect.
For a Christian, for someone who believes scripture to be inspired by God, to see all this and not a single sentence fragment even hinting at homosexual actions not being sexually immoral, it simply isnât possible to take any view other than the orthodox view. Â Look, Iâm a sinner myself, and I hate it, but the cure isnât to pretend sin isnât sin. Â It does me no good for others to say that my sin isnât really sin, for that only helps keeps me enslaved to it. Â We need to come to Christ, in repentance, and pray that he grants us the grace to follow him, to become Saints. Â This is what I pray for myself, and for everyone. Â
Can you imagine how much homosexual activists would hang their hat on even one pro-homosexuality quote with the strength of any of the examples above if it existed? Â I would invite them to imagine how ridiculous it would look if they could pull seven pro-homosexuality quotes from the New Testament, along with Old Testament support and the authority of twenty centuries of Saints, only to see orthodox writers trying to imply that homosexual acts were sins after all, but Iâm afraid their heads might explode.
[See the Read-First Introduction before proceeding]
CENSORED BY TRANSPOLITICS: A MASTERPOST
                            TIER 1
MURDER OF PEOPLE WHO QUESTION TRANSGENDER PEOPLE/IDEOLOGY
Psychotherapist Rita Powers murdered by her patient, a transwoman, because Powers didnât think he was an appropriate candidate for sex reassignment surgery
Note, in the link, that the transgender community blamed Powers for being murdered, saying that if she had just given her patient what he wanted, she would still be alive. In other words, âshe asked for it.â Sound familiar?
                                                 TIER 2
ASSAULT OF PEOPLE WHO QUESTION TRANSGENDER PEOPLE/IDEOLOGY
Cheryl Partsch punched in teeth for questioning cross-dressing man in womenâs restroom.
His punch cost her $60K in medical bills. Note that Patrick doesnât identify as a woman, but still punched Cheryl in the teeth for being concerned about his presence in the womenâs restroom, and called her questioning a âhate crime.â
Feminists assaulted in Transgender Attack at Portland conference for Social Change
Violent Zoey Tur grabs panelist by the neck and threatens to send him âhome in an ambulanceâ live on the air
The panelistâs crime? Mentioning biology.
UK trans athlete Lauren Jeska, attempts to murder an official and attacks two other officials from British Athletics for reviewing the medals won while competing as a woman. Â Lauren Jeska is male.
                          TIER 3
ECONOMIC PUNISHMENTS
(SUCH AS UNEMPLOYMENT OR LEGAL FINES)
OF PEOPLE WHO QUESTION TRANSGENDER PEOPLE/IDEOLOGY
Rochester Radio Hosts Fired After making transgender jokes
General fired from academic post over transgender bathroom joke
Gavin McInnes fired for thought catalog post, âTransphobia is Perfectly Naturalâ
Daycare workers fired for âmisgenderingâ confused student
ESPN fires Curt Schilling for sharing a âtransphobicâ meme
Transactivists attempt to fire Meghan Murphy for writing about Laverne Cox
Transwoman & business owner Janelle Bahan threatens to fire any woman who might be a feminist
Womanâs Planet Fitness Membership cancelled for concern over transwoman in locker room
Transactivist attempts to fire âtransphobeâ Elizabeth Hungerford for her Open Letter to Smith College
Worthy of note: The same transactivist is now trans-critical, has since apologized, and now experiences abuse from the trans community.
Vassar College transactivist students attempt to fire Professor
New York City enacts $$$ 6-figure fine for âmisgenderingâ*
Canada Prime Minister Justin Trudeau introduces bill that punishes âmisgenderingâ with up to two years in prison*
* Challenge for transactivists: can you find any comparable punishments for people who call women bitches, sluts, cunts or whores? Hell, most rapists donât even face consequences this severe for raping people.
YMCA fires rape victim for expressing fear of being raped in gender neutral bathrooms
Georgia ACLU leader Maya Dillard Smith pressured to resign after asking too many questions about transgender bathroom bill
Transactivists violently harass, deplatform and attempt to fire Ruth Barrett
Because she signed a petition and had an opinion about MichFest. How dare she!
Macyâs fires Catholic employee for disagreeing with transgender bathroom policy
The policy was never made known to him, and he promised to uphold the policy, but they still fired him.
Renee Gerlich is banned from a community book market and subsequently lost her job and was the target of a bullying pact launched against her by a trans spokesperson from the New Zealand Prostitutesâ Collective.
                         TIER 4
THE NO-PLATFORMING, DISINVITATION, EVENT CANCELLATION, UNPUBLISHING AND CENSORSHIP
OF PEOPLE WHO QUESTION TRANSGENDER PEOPLE/IDEOLOGY
BOLD links = this person has been deplatformed repeatedly
(Meaning, this list is longer than it looks.)
Derrick Jensen disinvited from Oregon State University over âtransphobiaâ (Response)
Lawrence University invokes last minute BAN on Earth Day Keynote Speaker Lierre Keith due to her Feminist views on Gender
Rachel Ivey of Deep Green Resistance âEnd of Genderâ presentation cancelled at Bluestockings⊠ âŠand at Unitarian Church of Philadelphia
Julie Bindel repeatedly deplatformed for her gender-critical views
Lesbian activist stripped of Grand Marshall honors over âtransphobicâ Facebook posts
Cindy Sheehan talks about being targeted by âtrans bulliesâ
Glosswitch commissiond, then un-commissioned, to write for feminist site
even though she was initially told she could write âANYTHINGâ
Janet Mock and followers target GenderTrender blog, shut it down & suspend blogger
Campus âVagina Monologuesâ cancelled for being about vaginas (which is âexclusiveâ to transwomen)
Lesbian Outsmart review of Julia Seranoâs âExcludedâ removed from website for âinsensitiveâ trans-critical remarks
New York Times transgender/gay rights debate features 2 transwomen, 4 gay males, but NO women or lesbians
Christine Benvenuto essay removed, AND bookshop event cancelled, after petition & harassment by her transwoman ex-spouse
Bev Jo disinvited from Butch Voices by transwoman
Iconic Michigan Womenâs Music Festival ends after long fight over trans-inclusivity
Organizers were threatened for years by transacitivists for having a female-only vision of the festival
Vulva Cupcake event called âviolentâ â transactivists attempt to cancel it
Womanâs Bruce Jenner rant deleted by YouTube
Iconic feminist Carol Adams targeted by âtransphobiaâ misinformation/deplatforming campaign
No evidence of her alleged transphobia was ever provided by her accusers.
PantheaCon female-only spiritual rites infiltrated by transactivists
Sex-specific events are no longer allowed at PantheaCon â not even traditional rites based on exclusively female experiences such as menstruation, which have always been deeply revered in many Pagan traditions
Kate Smurthwaiteâs comedy show cancelled for âtransphobiaâ
even though sheâs demonstrably supportive of trans people
Female Erasure Book faces pre-emptive attacks
Royal College of Psychiatrists Transgender Conference cancelled after trans complaints
Cardiff University cancels Germaine Greer lecture after trans-critical remarks
Sheila Jeffreys targeted by âtransphobiaâ de-platforming campaign
Jeremy Clarkson Amazon Show cancelled for trans-critical remarks
Potentially $568 million in economic damages, countless event cancellations, and corporate withdrawals and in North Carolina following HB2 decision
Everyday Feminism pulls article by Alice Dreger about sex ed; cites disagreement about âtrans issuesâ
For Booksâ Sake takes down, apologizes for, sharing FeministCurrent articleâŠcalls it transphobic but does not explain how itâs transphobic
Ruth Greenberg denied venue for lesbian-focused, trans-inclusive event based on year-old âtransphobicâ tweet
Thistle Pettersen banned from the community radio station, WORT 89.9 FM, AND she was also prevented from organizing a yearly women-focused music & arts festival in Madison, WI due to accusations of âtransphobiaâ.
Please take the time to read this one, if you can: PART 1, PART 2, PART 3, PART 4.
Professor tells student she is not allowed to share trans-critical views during class discussions
Twitter bot corrects tweets that âmisgenderâ Caitlyn Jenner
Vancouver Womenâs Library harassed and threatened for having âTERFâ and âSWERFâ literature in their catalogue.
This is despite the fact that the library is trans-inclusive. According to this Guerrilla Feminist Collective post, transactivists have also assaulted a library visitor and stolen the libraryâs sign.
Support the VWL by donating and signing this petition!
Thistle Pettersen has again been silenced and pressured to not perform at an event she started organizing.
Meghan Murphy has a post she wrote for rabble arguing against Planned Parenthoodâs dehumanizing use of the word âmenstruatorsâ to describe women censored without notice or explanation. When pressed, she finally got a response claiming the post includes âtransphobic language.â To date no one has explained exactly what that âtransphobic languageâ was. She quit in protest.
                         TIER 5
SOCIAL EXCLUSION, DOXXING, HARASSMENT, GENERAL INTIMIDATION
OF PEOPLE WHO QUESTION TRANSGENDER PEOPLE/IDEOLOGY
Laci Green doxxed for saying âtrannyâ years ago, even though she apologized
Yes, THE Laci Green that liberal feminists love so much.
Cathy Brennan was stalked and harassed by a group of transactivists in Olympia for refusing to say that a homosexual male could also identify as a lesbian.
There are so many open threats of violence made against trans-critical people, particularly against lesbians and/or radical feminists, that I cannot list them all. So Iâll summarize instead:
WITHDRAWAL OF SUPPORT
Transactivists are known to threaten to withdraw support for feminist causes/organizations if they fail to openly pledge allegiance to transgender ideology. Many such organizations are in desperate need of social support and funding, so they donât have much of a choice except to go along with what transactivists tell them to say.
The message is clear: âYour rights are important, but validating my beliefs is more important.â
One example:
SOCIAL MEDIA PHASE-OUTS
Ask ANY radical /gender critical/trans critical feminist, and they will tell you: we get deleted, harassed, banned and blocked more than anyone. Many of us have lost real-life friends over trans-critical Facebook posts or even for asking questions. It seems that transactivists patrol Facebook for the slightest hint of âtransphobiaâ so they can pile-on and virtue-signal what a Good Trans Ally they are.
Again, there are too many examples to post here, so here are just a few examples: (x)(x)(x)
TERF BLACKLISTS
Transactivists on Tumblr often make lists of alleged âTERFsâ and command their followers not to engage with, or reblog anything from, people on the lists. Some examples:
The âTERF hiveâ commands trans allies to censor, harass, report, block and otherwise shut down trans-critical sites:
DIE CIS SCUM
This is a popular slogan in transactivists circles. Transactivists argue that their use of this slogan is okay because âtheyâre more oppressed than cis people.â As you can see in the picture below, itâs a very threatening slogan, especially when tattooed on the body of a male holding a baseball bat.
#KILLALLTERFS
A favorite hashtag of transactivists. Many examples of these open threats of violence can be found on the following websites:
TERF is a Slur | Violent Receipts | Violent Trans Male Witness
Here is a small sampling of the kinds of threats made against us by transactivists, taken from the 3 links above ^
VIDEOS:
TRANSACTIVISTS IN ACTION See it for yourself.
Anti-feminist protesters at the Vancouver Womenâs Library Launch from GFC on Vimeo.
Also worth considering:
These major âfeministâ/womenâs websites will publish pro-transgender pieces but wonât publish âtransphobicâ (trans-critical, gender-critical or radical feminist) pieces:
Feministing, EverydayFeminism, Jezebel, xoJane, The Frisky, Bitch Media, The Establishment, Refinery29, Bustle, Black Girl DangerousâŠ
Autostraddle even blatantly admits to being inclined to give trans*people more money for their writing (source)
Many trans-critical writers have had to resort to publishing on Right-wing websites just to have a platform, even though they do not sympathize, or want to associate, with the Right. (This is part of where the âradfems are conservativeâ stereotype comes from.)
Jordan B. Peterson of University of Toronto is another one to add to this list. Heâs become a prime target for SJWs in Canada. The latest attempt to shut down his right to free speech occurred yesterday at McMaster. Heâs a professor of psychology but has gained much attention for his political activism and common sense when it comes to the growing insanity of political correctness.
my guy you said leftists are the true nazis as implied in the poster. but anyways, even then, leftists arenât nazis.
whatâs your point? that people who disagree with you will bring it up? yea lad thatâs how human nature works, thanks for uhhh discovering that shit.
I stand by what I said.  Nazis, national socialists, were most indeed hard leftists, despite what you think you know or were told in school.  Perhaps you and @lets-stay-o-k should do some more in-depth reading on the subject (Pro tip: things found on Google are not always accurate).  Hopefully soon Iâll get to my post on gaslight.tv on the leftwing origins of fascism and Nazism and you can read that, but until then Iâve posted/written about this subject several times: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15].  Iâm not just making this stuff up, I just obviously know more than you on the subject.
And my point is that for people that claim they hate my political views, you and others seem to be inexplicably drawn to my blog posts quite often. Itâs just a humorous observation for me because I know nothing about your political views or really who you are.
listen buddy if you want to argue that you know more about the economy than people whoâs lives work is to research the economy than go ahead but I just want to let you know youâre wrong and youâre wasting your time. You donât âobviously know more than usâ you just really donât want to admit that the Nazis were right wing. step off your high horse and stop being such a child. Also, you tagged me. You want to fight me but then never actually reply to my responses. Just âcause the name âsocialistâ is in nazi doesnât actually mean they were socialist, as, repeated for the 100th time, said in Mein Kampf. The ânationalâ part kind of stabs at the âsocialistâ part. you obviously donât understand politics. again, research the difference between left and right wing.Â
Letâs try something different.  Why do you believe Nazis are right-wing?  What is âright-wingâ in your opinion compared to âleft-wingâ? Name specific attributes of political policy and weâll see how narrow that gap is between communism and Nazism. Â
Just in case there was any doubt about the inherent similarities of Marxism/socialism and Nazism/fascism, hereâs a spot on synopsis by Ayn Rand of the comparison between these two totalitarian ideologies. They are two sides of the same evil coin. There is no left and right, there is only liberty or tyranny.
@lets-stay-o-kâ and @mary-queen-of-thotsâ just spew non-arguments that are perfect examples of the kind of intellectual laziness that state-run education produces. Talk about â alternative factsââŠ
@redbloodedamericaâ, as always, owned the argument from start to finish.
Father, why did the Church support fascist regimes like Franco's and Mussolini's? Now, I know the Church did eventually start working against Mussolini, but why did they initially support the two dictators?
Hello Nathaniel:
The support extended to these Fascist regimes was never in the form of moral approval of what they were doing, but in the form of some kind of cooperation that would lessen the damage done to the rights of the Church.
In the case of General Francisco Franco, the Church was dealing with a man who had overthrown an atheistic, savage, and brutal government whose hatred of religion was seen in the way they conducted the Civil War in Spain.Â
The Socialists who fought Franco claimed to be legitimately elected, which they were, but upon assuming power, they did not control violence but promoted it as a way of pushing Communism into the country. This is why they were allied with Soviet Russia, and pillaged the treasury of Spain, shipping much gold off to Moscow.
As Franco moved from victory to victory, the Socialists carried out numerous war crimes and acts of retribution against all people seen as sympathetic with Franco. Villages were burned and people massacred in whole as Francoâs army approached.
The Church itself took the brunt of the Socialistsâ wrath, with numerous churches being burned, and thousands of bishops, priests, and devout Catholics being shot without trial or jury. Franco imposed a severe and lethal martial law when Spain fell to his armies, but the country at least had a chance to enjoy peace and the end of lawlessness. Franco was especially generous and kind to the Church, which rallied the people to support his efforts, not because he was a dictator, but because he represented law, order and tranquility after so much violence and death perpetrated upon innocent civilians.
The Catholic Church in Spain was given a privileged place in law under Francoâs regime, with all other religions publicly banned and even blasphemy against Jesus and Mary carrying a jail sentence. Those caught, tried, and found guilty of murder, rape, and other capital crimes were executed within 72 hours. Was justice too severe under Franco in Spain? Perhaps so. Was the Church too enthusiastic to collaborate with his dictatorial regime? Perhaps.
But take into account that the Church has always favored law and order, and the protection of the innocent. Crime in Spain under Franco was almost non-existent. Women and children could walk the streets of large cities at 2 in the morning and fear no mugging, rape, and death, so extensive was the police force, and the watchful eye of the secret police. Believe it or not, some people did not mind the repression of the regime in exchange for the almost total peace of mind and security it provided. Now, Spain is âfreeâ and you can be mugged and raped at any hour and the criminals are hardly caught, much less sent to prison.
In the case of Benito Mussolini, you have to remember the context that the Church was practically without any rights, or voice, or vote, after the fall of the Papal States to the armies of Garibaldi. When Mussolini came to power, he wanted to make peace with the Church and grant it an official status in Italy.
The rights conferred by the Mussolini regime allowed Catholic schools and colleges to operate freely, allowed religious orders to once again manage their funds and properties without governmental interference, and allowed for an active participation of Catholics in the political process, limited as that was under the dictatorship.
Under both regimes, the Church was completely at the mercy of the fascist regimes that had seized power. The Church could be hostile to these regimes and cause further loss of the rights of the faithful, or cooperate with them and assure at least some rights on paper. The Church chose to cooperate with them, in order to assure that Catholics would not be shut out and deprived of the opportunities to work within these nations and be a voice for change insofar as that was possible. I hope this context makes the Churchâs collaboration somewhat understandable, even if it is not the ideal mode of operating under fascism. God bless and take care! Fr. Angel
Does the federal law prohibiting âsex discriminationâ forbid us to countenance the category of âsexââand thus of âsex discriminationâ? Can the rule of law survive a yes answer to question one?
The solid science about how gender differences donât matter:
Sex differences in personality/cognition:
Lynn (1996): http://bit.ly/2vThoy8
Weisberg (2011): http://bit.ly/2gJVmEp
Del Giudice (2012): http://bit.ly/2vEKTUx
Larger/large and stable sex differences in more gender-neutral countries:
Costa (2001): http://bit.ly/2utaTT3Â
Differences in men and women's interest/priorities:
Rong Su (2009): http://bit.ly/2wtlbzU
Big Five trait agreeableness and (lower) income (including for men):
Spurk (2010): http://bit.ly/2vu1x6E
Judge (2012): http://bit.ly/2uxhwQh
The general importance of exposure to sex-linked steroids on fetal and then lifetime development:
Hines (2015) http://bit.ly/2uufOiv
Exposure to prenatal testosterone and interest in things or people (even when the exposure is among females):
Baron-Cohen (2014): http://bit.ly/2vn4KXq
Hines (2016): http://bit.ly/2hPYKSuÂ
Primarily biological basis of personality sex differences:
Ngun (2010): http://bit.ly/2vJ6QSh
Status and sex: males and females:
Perusse (1993): http://bit.ly/2uoIOw8
Buss (2008): http://bit.ly/2uumv4g
de Bruyn (2012): http://bit.ly/2uoWkMhÂ
Â
All links taken from the description of Jordan B. Petersonâs video interview with James Damoore: link.
Only included the ones that can be read freely without payment or without sending a request for a copy. For the full list, see the description of the video linked previously.
A summary of the obvious: Bathrooms are not specified in terms of mental states; thereâs no reason for respective bathroom access to depend on oneâs mental state; and thereâs no viable way to regulate admission to separate bathrooms on the grounds of mental states.
2087
dailybridgerton
gracieabrams
pixelskylines
areudirty
germansingergirl
