ignore how ugly this looks on the "customize blog" page. this is not how it looks to the viewer just to us <3
here's a short cut to the customize page
go back to the listing 💗💗💗
i don't do bad sauce passes
One Nice Bug Per Day
Monterey Bay Aquarium
hello vonnie
🪼

⁂
sheepfilms

祝日 / Permanent Vacation

blake kathryn

if i look back, i am lost
Today's Document
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
Game of Thrones Daily
d e v o n

No title available
Peter Solarz
Xuebing Du

izzy's playlists!
occasionally subtle

★
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from Italy

seen from United States
seen from Canada

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from South Korea
seen from Türkiye

seen from United States

seen from Germany

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from Macao SAR China

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Venezuela
@mediaben
ignore how ugly this looks on the "customize blog" page. this is not how it looks to the viewer just to us <3
here's a short cut to the customize page
go back to the listing 💗💗💗
Ira Sachs and Ben Whishaw on the mundane miracle of Peter Hujar’s Day
The director and actor discuss their latest collaboration, a sumptuous adaptation of a lost conversation between Peter Hujar and Linda Rosencrantz in 1974.
January 8, 2026 By Kitty Grady
In her non-fiction essay The Journalist and the Murderer (1989), the writer Janet Malcolm famously compared the journalistic interview to the psychoanalytic relation—rather than an expected wariness, the interviewee feels an innate sense of trust, cradled, childlike in a perceived safety, free to wax lyrical about their thoughts, memories and dreams.
The simile came to my mind while watching Peter Hujar’s Day. The latest title from American indie director Ira Sachs, it is an adaptation of a 1974 text (republished in 2022) by writer Linda Rosencrantz, a part of a wider project in which she recorded artists in her New York circle to recount everything they did the day before. With Rebecca Hall as Rosencrantz and Ben Whishaw taking on the eponymous role of photographer Peter Hujar, over a luscious 76 minutes, Sachs reimagines their conversation. In Rosencrantz’s chic, sun-drenched uptown apartment, moving between the sofa and the kitchen to the bed and the balcony—from sitting and standing to supine—Peter Hujar recounts his day in crystalline detail. An editor from Elle arrives early (he then goes back to bed); he chats on the phone to Susan Sontag; he’s sent to photograph Allen Ginsberg; and spends a long evening in the darkroom. What would normally be moments to forget are drawn out by Hujar with elaborate, slightly neurotic precision (he calculates the right coat to wear downtown, determines how much he’ll be paid).
“But he’s not psychological,” clarifies Sachs, when I meet him with Whishaw in a London hotel in December. “You could say photographic, but it’s also extremely attentive.” The pair sat opposite me on a long couch, and I can’t help but notice the meta quality of our encounter. “Are you taping?” Sachs asks, as I set my devices down on the table, Rosencrantz’s tape recorder swapped for an iPhone. Peter Hujar’s Day is a mundane miracle—a document of daily life that reveals the multitudes of the photographer’s life and the world he inhabited, yet Sachs’ aim is not to transport us backwards, but into the present tense of performance, the gentle dance between interlocutors as the sun sets on Manhattan, and the film roll finishes with a fizzle.
For A Rabbit’s Foot, Sachs and Whishaw discuss finding depth in detail, Peter Hujar’s complexities as a character and the jazz of spoken words.
Rebecca Hall and Ben Whishaw in Peter Hujar’s Day (dir. Ira Sachs, 2025).
Kitty Grady: I wondered if, in preparation for making the film, either of you tried to recount your day as Peter Hujar does?
Ira Sachs: I definitely did not.
Ben Whishaw: Someone asked me to do it in an interview and I had the horrible realization that I am not a storyteller. I’m not a writer, I’m not the kind of artist that I thought, because I had just nothing to say. I was like ‘oh I think I made some chicken.’ There was nothing interesting about it. Although people sort of focus on the mundane nature of what Peter is talking about, it’s full of incidents and it’s incredibly vivid and very writerly in a way, for someone who is improvising, it’s extraordinary.
Ira Sachs: It’s really hard to pay attention to because it seems so effortless and it’s literally about daily life. But so is Proust. It’s hard to compare Peter Hujar’s Day, the text, to Proust, but he’s not psychological, except perhaps about himself, but he’s not analytical about himself. It’s actually more like Bloom than Proust, like Leopold Bloom [the protagonist of James Joyce’s Ulysses]. You could say it’s photographic, but it’s also extremely attentive.
Kitty Grady: I was interested in this idea of the invention of the everyday in the 1980s, and theorists using the everyday as a political praxis, this strategy of defiance in focusing on the minuscule.
Ira Sachs: The detail is where depth is discovered, and I think paying close attention is what I ask for in art and in novels and in memoir and cinema is the precision. There’s a wonderful film called the Hours and the Times, which someone should re-release, by Christopher Munch, made in 1991, about an imagined weekend between John Lennon and Brian Epstein that occurred in Barcelona. But there’s no evidence of what happened. And I watched it when we started making this, and actually Chris was the one who recommended a film that actually made this film possible for me: Jim McBride’s My Girlfriend’s Wedding. I had no idea how to shoot this film. That was maybe 6 weeks before we started shooting. And I thought it was a disaster waiting to happen. Seeing this one film that Jim McBride made about his girlfriend Clarissa gave me a visual language that opened the film up.
Kitty Grady: The word ‘precision’ is interesting. There’s also a kind of wandering quality to the film as well. How did you go about finding the rhythm?
Ira Sachs: I think precision can also rely on accidents. I think the two have to be encouraged. We structured the shooting of the film around light. I spent several weeks in the space with my cinematographer before we started shooting with two stand-in models and photographed them in different spaces in the apartment and on the terrace at different times of day. Looking at the sequence of those photographs gave me the visual design of the film. The schedule of the filming replicated it: we’ve got to be here at 6pm because the light is going to have this effect on the wall.
A couple scenes were quite choreographed—there’s a scene where Ben [as Peter Hujar] sits down and Rebecca gets a tape recorder and then Ben needs a cigarette and then she has to deliver him some food. That was like ballet. Now I look and there’s a bit of an Altman reference to it. And you could also say that’s what Rope, the Hitchcock film, does so well. It’s ballet. But there’s only one scene like that in the movie. In general I’d be saying ‘okay we’re gonna shoot here at 6 o’clock at night and you’re gonna be on the bed. Then there’s a lot of accidents.
Ben Whishaw in Peter Hujar’s Day (dir. Ira Sachs, 2025).
Kitty Grady: I was wondering if you looked at Peter Hujar’s photography when you were thinking about the choreography? Particularly Ben, I felt moments of his visual language in your performance.
Ben Whishaw: I definitely looked at a lot of his work and I loved his work anyway. I had seen a lot of it, but mostly because I just like looking at it. But maybe you absorb something. Lots of things weren’t conscious or deliberate. Ira and I don’t really rehearse—or we haven’t rehearsed on either of the things that we’ve done together. You’re not encouraging anyone to bring in something pre-planned. It’s very much this is the space and what comes up is what comes up and what occurs. There’s an aliveness to it.
Kitty Grady: How did the set, the interiors and physical space itself—which, as in Passages, is so painfully beautiful—affect the way you approached the performance?
Ben Whishaw: I’m so responsive to those things. I’m very responsive to space, the atmosphere, light, smell, anything. Those things are real things. And the more I act, the more I think it’s all about real things. It’s not about making things up, it’s about what’s actually going on between people and in a room. On both of our films those things were really rich. It’s a gift to work with someone like Ira who is giving you stuff to respond to and work with.
Kitty Grady: When I saw the film at the Berlinale, Ira, you spoke a bit about your relationship to psychoanalysis and how this comes through in the film. Do you mind expanding on that now?
Ira Sachs: I’ve done my time on the couch, so I feel that I’ve been trained to listen, and I consider my job as constructing images and movement. I’m not really just saying ‘go’, but creating a space where an actor feels observed, listened to, held, safe, and also free to discover the unknown. I think that would be parallel to an environment of an analyst. I think Linda [Rebecca Hall] serves for the film as a great and detailed listener.
This scenario is interesting in that respect. You’re a good journalist who is actually engaged in the conversation, but sometimes you get a bad journalist, I would use the word bad objectively—they don’t listen. I imagine it must be like that when you get a bad actor in a scene where literally they’re not listening and you’re like how can I continue? You have absolutely no connection to what I’m saying. I find it so repellent as an experience.
Rebecca Hall and Ben Whishaw in Peter Hujar’s Day (dir. Ira Sachs, 2025).
Kitty Grady: That’s interesting because Peter Hujar says that about Allen Ginsberg—they don’t have a connection so he can’t get a good shot of him.
Ira Sachs: I think it’s probably because of Allen Ginsberg’s narcissism—at least in that situation, it is grand enough that there isn’t room for two. I sense looking at that picture that his sense of self is too high.
Kitty Grady: It makes me think of the Janet Malcolm book The Journalist and the Murderer.
Ira Sachs: I wanted to make a movie about that book.
Kitty Grady: Oh my god, please make that movie. I guess it’s complicated because Linda and Peter are friends, but it’s still a kind of psychoanalytic relationship.
Ira Sachs: Have you read the Freud Archives? She’s one of those “read everything” people.
Kitty Grady: I will! I wanted to ask too about how in the film you make the tools of production plain—the end of film rolls, the sound of the recording… Why was it important to have that, rather than a more seamless texture?
Ira Sachs: If I had to overthink it, I think it would be a mistake. It was instinct. I don’t think it’s a film that plays with what is faddishly called ‘meta’. To me, there’s nothing really meta about it. It’s just a film about process: the process of taking a photograph, the process of a conversation, the process of making a film. As soon as Ben Whishaw and Rebecca Hall were cast as two Americans then you enter an area of theatricality that was new for me and I wanted to embrace that, and to some extent, say to the audience ‘I’m ahead of you’. I know this is fiction and I know we are shooting in 2024, it’s not 1974.
Kitty Grady: And for you Ben, did you listen to other recordings of Peter’s voice and try to capture it, was there much material around?
Ben Whishaw: There was one conversation which Ira found in the David Wojnarowicz archive. It’s a conversation between David and Peter. Peter doesn’t really like being interviewed, doesn’t really want to answer the questions. David does a lot of the talking to begin with, but eventually Peter sort of relaxes. It’s 20 minutes long, maybe less, but it’s wonderful. It’s such a bad recording and it’s muffled, but you still get so much information from him.
Rebecca Hall and Ben Whishaw in Peter Hujar’s Day (dir. Ira Sachs, 2025).
Kitty Grady: And how aware of his life and character were you before, you mentioned you are a fan of his photography?
Ben Whishaw: Quite a lot. But there isn’t a huge amount about him. A biography doesn’t exist at the moment although one is coming out soon. But there were things—essays and writing reflecting on Peter. Lots of people talk about his temper and his rages. But then Linda herself says she gets irritated by people focusing on that part of him because it was only a very small part. It just reminds you that everyone is complex. We are many people. It’s sort of absurd to say this person is this or this. With the performance, we weren’t trying to do imitation, I’m not good at that anyway. It was more about me and Rebecca and not him. [To Ira] Do you know what I mean?
Ira Sachs: I’m just listening to the jazz of spoken words. Because that’s something you mentioned, in undertaking the memorization of this text was that it became abstract the way language works. At one point you said ‘it’s like a grain’ but you didn’t say ‘of salt’. You skipped the end of that, but I knew what you were talking about. If you listened too much to how people speak it would drive you crazy because it’s a mess of language. But somehow Ben could evoke sense out of that mess.
Kitty Grady: In the same way, as a viewer what I liked is how you can let the conversation wash over you. It’s more about the kind of non-symbolic conversation between two bodies in a room
Ira Sachs: Well people say, does anyone know who all those people are? And nobody does, including Linda by the way. But are you familiar with the people in the Brothers Karamazov? It’s because the work evokes meaning that names become resonant. Because the actor has meaning, that they’re conveying through the symbols, which are words, it becomes a kind of universe, a cosmology that is quite complete. I think that’s Peter and Ben combined in equal measure. Because the text, as someone who has read it several times, doesn’t have that effect on me. It’s the text as realised through the performance.
Ben Whishaw: And also, surely the interesting thing is not who the person is. It’s about how Peter feels about that person or what they evoke in him or what. There’s a story. If I was talking to you about a bunch of people that I didn’t know, I would not be so interested in precisely who that person was, but in what you felt about them. I feel like when I’m listening to people, I often don’t really understand the surface of what they’re saying. I’m like, okay, sort of. But I get loads of other information. You know?
Kitty Grady: Well that’s the job of the therapist too, to read between the lines…. Was Linda involved in the making of the film?
Ira Sachs: I’ve been in conversation with Linda on a daily basis. I think this has been a delight for her, to have her work recognized, because this is her art form. The art form of using everyday language. She already did this with the book Talk, which came out in the 1960s. She said she didn’t write a book of this conversation because the others weren’t as interesting. I know maybe 10 people who are particularly interesting when they speak. This isn’t about the everyday. Exceptional doesn’t mean privileged—it just means something unusually great.
Peter Hujar’s Day is in cinemas now.
James Bond star Ben Whishaw says the next 007 ‘should be nothing like Daniel Craig’
by Asyia Iftikhar January 6, 2026
After a dazzling career spanning 25 years, acclaimed British actor Ben Whishaw has proven he can truly do it all.
The genre-leaping star has helmed gun-touting thrillers (Black Doves), messy menage a trois’ (Passages) and bleak social dramas that expose the failings of a crumbling system (This Is Going to Hurt).
He’s wooed young fans with his charming portrayal of Paddington, moved LGBTQ+ viewers with his wide array of onscreen queer characters, and lured in action-junkies as Q in the James Bond franchise.
As the upcoming era of the beloved Bond saga, directed by Dune filmmaker Denis Villeneuve, searches for the new lead star, Metro asks the Skyfall actor who he could see as the next 007.
‘I find I’m actually a terrible casting director. I don’t know who it should be,’ he jokes at first.
Then adds: ‘For me, it’s always best when they do a really big gear shift from the previous incarnation. I don’t know precisely what that means, but I think something left field, something unexpected. I think it shouldn’t try to be someone like Daniel Craig.’
As for Ben, much like his vision for the future of Bond, his own latest role may be his boldest gamble yet.
Dexterous as ever – in a sharp 180 from his blockbuster threequel, Paddington in Peru – his newest movie, Peter Hujar’s Day, is a soulful arthouse indie in which he reunites with Passages filmmaker Ira Sachs.
The unique feature lifts a real-life taped conversation between 70s New York photographer Peter Hujar and his friend, writer Linda Rosenkrantz (Rebecca Hall), where he recounts 24 hours of his life in vivid detail.
Performed as an almost singular 76-minute-long diatribe, with occasional interjections from Linda, it paints an intimate portrait of Peter’s life in which he craved more for himself and his art, to a torturous degree.
I meet the actor at The Londoner in the gloom of the December twilight. He’s sitting cross-legged on a wide sofa as I perch next to him, recorder in hand.
It’s not lost on me that we’re mimicking the very movie we were here to discuss. Life imitating art, indeed.
‘We knew that the project had very tight boundaries,’ he says while explaining how different Peter is from the characters he’s played before.
‘Everything that we were going to find was going to come from these words. There was just a lot of learning to do, and the difficulty of learning something that was not written to be learned by somebody. It’s not a script. It’s not been crafted in any way.
‘There’s not really an order to it [except] relaying the day from beginning to end. The way his mind moves is very….’ he pauses, rooting for the right word.
‘Rambling?’ I ask.
‘Yes, exactly.’
Despite the calibre of his subjects and the renowned publications he freelanced for, the late photographer went largely unrecognised in life, with his posthumous reputation far outpacing his living one.
The 45-year-old actor was ‘struck’ by the depths of Peter’s poverty as he unpicked the layers of his life during his preparation for the role.
‘He died practically penniless. I saw some photos that I’d not seen before of him towards the end of his life, and he’s just wearing the same tatty jeans and these heartbreaking shoes that are falling apart.
‘His desire for fame was based on a real lack. There’s something very moving to me about that, because he was very devoted to his art,’ he reflects.
The way the film deals with failure, and Peter’s fraught relationship with it, deeply resonated with the Emmy-winning star.
‘What touched me was how much of [the movie] was about failure and self-doubt as an artist. The pain of having failed at what you’re trying to do, but also the value of failure to spur you on.
‘Towards the end of the film, Peter reflects on a photo that he’s taken in his day of [acclaimed poet] Allen Ginsberg, and how he doesn’t really feel like this photo is very good, and what that means to him.
‘I feel quite intimate with this feeling of reflecting and feeling like you failed to do what you wanted or what you hoped or dreamed of doing. I think there’s something in that that’s not only confined to artists or people who make things,’ he says.
This is his second collaboration with Ira, motivated by his love of the filmmaker’s ‘portraits of gay and queer life’ and the way he can even infuse a heterosexual tale with a type of ‘queerness’.
But most of all, he respects the way Ira stretches his skill to its limit, even a quarter of a century into the industry.
‘The way he challenges me, I feel a little scared in a good way.
‘He is somebody who is not frightened of telling you: “I don’t believe you”, which is a really valuable thing. I’ve been acting now for 20-odd years.
‘You crave these people who test you and push you and move you out of your comfort zone,’ he adds with a gleam in his eye.
The screen star knows the impact of his work, sees it in his everyday interactions with fans, especially those from the LGBTQ+ community, like the restaurant waiter whose perspective was changed by his gay Black Doves character Sam, a troubled contract killer.
‘[The waiter told me] he hadn’t seen a queer person portrayed quite like this, and it had made him realise something about his own sexuality.
‘He said it in such a heartfelt, intimate way that I felt really moved and honoured, actually, that he’d shared it with me. It just means a great deal to me that you could share in something like that with someone,’ Ben recalls in awe.
As for the future, he has more adventures as Paddington to look forward to, and reveals his hopes for the lovable bear’s shenanigans with a wry laugh.
‘I’ve not actually ever read any of the books, but I feel the books are full of his adventures in mundane places. I think he goes to the dentist or something, which would be a good one. Any place where a bear really shouldn’t be, [he should be],’ he shares with a grin.
And, though it might seem as though he’s traversed every genre the arts have to offer, he still has ambitions for what he would like to try his hand at next.
When I ask him which world he would love to inhabit in the future, there’s a moment’s hesitation before he replies.
‘I find I’m actually a terrible casting director. I don’t know who it should be,’ he jokes at first.
Then adds: ‘For me, it’s always best when they do a really big gear shift from the previous incarnation. I don’t know precisely what that means, but I think something left field, something unexpected. I think it shouldn’t try to be someone like Daniel Craig.’
As for Ben, much like his vision for the future of Bond, his own latest role may be his boldest gamble yet.
Dexterous as ever – in a sharp 180 from his blockbuster threequel, Paddington in Peru – his newest movie, Peter Hujar’s Day, is a soulful arthouse indie in which he reunites with Passages filmmaker Ira Sachs.
The unique feature lifts a real-life taped conversation between 70s New York photographer Peter Hujar and his friend, writer Linda Rosenkrantz (Rebecca Hall), where he recounts 24 hours of his life in vivid detail.
Performed as an almost singular 76-minute-long diatribe, with occasional interjections from Linda, it paints an intimate portrait of Peter’s life in which he craved more for himself and his art, to a torturous degree.
‘What touched me was how much of [the movie] was about failure and self-doubt as an artist. The pain of having failed at what you’re trying to do, but also the value of failure to spur you on.
‘Towards the end of the film, Peter reflects on a photo that he’s taken in his day of [acclaimed poet] Allen Ginsberg, and how he doesn’t really feel like this photo is very good, and what that means to him.
‘I feel quite intimate with this feeling of reflecting and feeling like you failed to do what you wanted or what you hoped or dreamed of doing. I think there’s something in that that’s not only confined to artists or people who make things,’ he says.
This is his second collaboration with Ira, motivated by his love of the filmmaker’s ‘portraits of gay and queer life’ and the way he can even infuse a heterosexual tale with a type of ‘queerness’.
But most of all, he respects the way Ira stretches his skill to its limit, even a quarter of a century into the industry.
‘The way he challenges me, I feel a little scared in a good way.
‘He is somebody who is not frightened of telling you: “I don’t believe you”, which is a really valuable thing. I’ve been acting now for 20-odd years.
‘You crave these people who test you and push you and move you out of your comfort zone,’ he adds with a gleam in his eye.
The screen star knows the impact of his work, sees it in his everyday interactions with fans, especially those from the LGBTQ+ community, like the restaurant waiter whose perspective was changed by his gay Black Doves character Sam, a troubled contract killer.
‘[The waiter told me] he hadn’t seen a queer person portrayed quite like this, and it had made him realise something about his own sexuality.
‘He said it in such a heartfelt, intimate way that I felt really moved and honoured, actually, that he’d shared it with me. It just means a great deal to me that you could share in something like that with someone,’ Ben recalls in awe.
As for the future, he has more adventures as Paddington to look forward to, and reveals his hopes for the lovable bear’s shenanigans with a wry laugh.
‘I’ve not actually ever read any of the books, but I feel the books are full of his adventures in mundane places. I think he goes to the dentist or something, which would be a good one. Any place where a bear really shouldn’t be, [he should be],’ he shares with a grin.
And, though it might seem as though he’s traversed every genre the arts have to offer, he still has ambitions for what he would like to try his hand at next.
When I ask him which world he would love to inhabit in the future, there’s a moment’s hesitation before he replies.
‘I’d really love to do a detective mystery, or maybe even more specifically, something in the territory of Gosford Park; lots of people in a house where a murder happens. I would really like to be in a film like that,’ he concludes with a satisfied grin.
It might not be Gosford Park, but we certainly wouldn’t say no to seeing him reunite with Daniel Craig on screen for the next Knives Out. So, Rian Johnson, if you’re reading, pick up the phone!
Peter Hujar’s Day is in UK cinemas now.
A version of this article was first published on January 2, 2026.
Ben Whishaw on the power of Peter Hujar’s photography: ‘It feels alive’
The actor reunites with director Ira Sachs on a new, experimental biopic about the iconic photographer. Here, they discuss why his work still resonates today
January 5, 2026 Text Nick Chen
Ben Whishaw is a notoriously private person. Nevertheless, I’ve started our interview by asking the 45-year-old British actor how he got out of bed the previous day. “Yesterday, I woke up at around 7:30, but I knew I wanted more sleep,” says Whishaw. “I had a sense of excitement, because I’d had a really busy few days leading up to that morning, and I was like, ‘Ah, I don’t have to be anywhere.’ I turned over and lay in the dark for another half an hour. I got up and made myself a coffee. I didn’t have any breakfast. Maybe a handful of nuts.”
It’s a Thursday afternoon, on December 4, 2025, when I meet Whishaw and the 60-year-old American director Ira Sachs at the Londoner Hotel. Their latest collaboration after 2023’s Passages is Peter Hujar’s Day, a genre-defying film that’s neither documentary nor fiction. On December 19, 1974, the celebrated queer photographer Peter Hujar described his previous day in great detail to Linda Rosenkrantz, a writer who recorded and transcribed their conversation. With Whishaw and Rebecca Hall as the leads, Sachs’ film recreates that day’s events – not the day described, but the describing itself.
The result is hypnotic and deceptively simple: for 70 minutes, it’s a dialogue that focuses on the photographer’s previous day and nothing else. The action, if you can call it that, never leaves Rosenkrantz’s New York flat, except for smoke breaks on the balcony. It’s full of tantalising contradictions: a wordy, stagey piece that’s cinematic through grainy cinematography and avant-garde cutaways; an immersive, grounded drama that’s so Brechtian it ends on an applause break.
“It’s important to state emphatically that I had no mission to introduce people to Peter Hujar,” says Sachs. “It’s really about two actors on a set who are transmitting this conversation between Peter and Linda.” But it’s a happy accident if viewers discover Hujar’s work? “I like that you’re pushing back, even though I say that wasn’t my intention. On no level would I not want people to discover his work, because his work is a gift, particularly to queer people.”
In 1974, Hujar is 40 years old and ascending in his career. His previous day involves talking to Susan Sontag on the phone, and photographing Allen Ginsberg for the New York Times; he name-drops acquaintances like Fran Lebowitz, William S. Burroughs and Ed Baynard. He frets his day is “boring”, yet his account, including the ordering of Chinese food, is engrossing. It’s ultimately Hujar’s inquisitive energy, not his photography, that’s on display.
Sachs and Whishaw are avowed fans, the latter owning a 1980 self-portrait called “Seated Self-Portrait Depressed” in his home. “His art will always be as if it was made today,” says Whishaw. “It feels alive. He managed to catch an intimacy with people – actually, not just people, but frequently animals as well – where he could get them to be so open to him. When I try to take photos, that exchange is difficult, because lots of people understandably don’t want to be photographed. It’s quite an aggressive act, photographing someone. You’re sort of taking something from them. To encourage someone to feel relaxed, open, and able to be intimate – that was his great genius. And it’s what he saw in people as well.”
It’s quite an aggressive act, photographing someone. You’re sort of taking something from them. To encourage someone to feel relaxed, open, and able to be intimate – that was Hujar’s great genius
Sachs discovered the transcript in a gay book shop in France during the shooting of Passages. By then, the ums and ahs had already been removed. “The transcript is quite musical, exact and verbatim,” says Sachs. “I’m certain when Linda typed it up 51 years ago, she removed several ums. But she did not remove the natural inflexion of how people talk in conversation.”
“I had an impulse to make it more, ‘Oh, let me just find this word or phrase,’” says Whishaw. “But Ira kept saying, ‘Just keep talking.’ It had to have a certain amount of tension in it. It couldn’t just become soggy, meandering language.”
Hujar died in 1987, aged 53, from Aids. Throughout the film, Hujar agonises about his health and mortality; Rosenkrantz pleads for him to eat more vegetables. When Hujar describes closing his eyes and going to sleep, there’s a poetic finality to the statement.
Have either of them done an interview they’d be happy for actors to re-enact? “No,” says Whishaw. “I’m not interested in my interviews. I really just like doing my acting.” Because he’s the politest actor you could imagine, Whishaw apologises out of paranoia he’s caused offence. “I’m interested in this interview, but I’m not interested in reading it back and thinking about what it means to other people.”
“Ben, Rebecca, and I did a panel at the end of Sundance Film Festival this year, after having done three days of what I thought were some of the most boring interviews I’ve ever done,” says Sachs. “I really had to rethink what was interesting about this film, because nothing I had said was interesting to me. But on this panel, I could pull away, and see the people I was talking to as people I had known for years, and learn something about them I had not known, which made me feel closer to them.”
I theorise that interviews for this film must be different from promoting Passages, an emotionally raw drama about fraught relationships. When I talked to Sachs in 2023, he somehow got me to reveal deeply personal information about myself that never made it into the article; I know of other journalists who also spilled their hearts to the director when discussing Passages.
“I would guess that’s it,” Sachs says. “We can talk about what it is to be artists, and this film would generate interesting dialogue in that realm, because it speaks about the vulnerability and insecurities that we might collectively face. But it’s a film about art-making, not about love – except perhaps the love between Peter and Linda.”
I think the role of the female friend who denies their own self in conversation with me is one that I’m familiar with. There’s a role of care. The care becomes actually their value
When I praise the intimate body language between the two actors, Sachs recalls learning during the shoot that Hall has several close, gay male friends. “I realised that my relationship to her, and Ben’s relationship to her, is not singular.”
Do women make better interviewers?
“I don’t think it’s a gendered thing,” says Whishaw.
“I think the role of the female friend who denies their own self in conversation with me is one that I’m familiar with,” says Sachs. “There’s a role of care. The care becomes actually their value.”
There’s only time for one more question, which, of course, is if either are willing to describe how they fell asleep the previous night. Again, it’s Whishaw who volunteers.
“I went to bed at about 1:25am,” says Whishaw. “I was at my partner’s house, and we had had an argument.” He laughs. “We watched some telly, and sort of semi-made up, but not quite. We were lying there in the dark. The argument was kind of lingering on, but maybe it was a little bit resolved. And then we fell asleep.”
Peter Hujar’s Day is out in UK cinemas on January 2, 2026
It’s All in a Day’s Work for Ben Whishaw
by Fehinti Balogun Jan 4 2026
As his “art project”-meets-film – Peter Hujar’s Day – hits UK cinemas, the storied British actor guides Fehinti Balogun through immortalising an ordinary 24 hours in the extraordinary New York photographer’s life.
No one eats a cupcake like Ben Whishaw. Or, more precisely, no one eats a cupcake like Charmaine, Ben Whishaw’s character in short film O Holy Ghost – Mark Bradshaw’s 2019 study of spirituality, co-led by Whishaw alongside a pre-House of the Dragon Emma D’Arcy and Down Cemetery Road’s Fehinti Balogun. Three words are all Charmaine utters in that particular scene, atop a water tower, after he leads a transcendent religious ceremony. His consumption of the iced homebake does the talking instead.
“You make the banal and the mundane quite epic,” Balogun tells Whishaw, six years on, over Zoom. “That [scene] will stick in my head for maybe the rest of my life. It was such a clue into that character’s life.” It’s just over two weeks shy of Christmas Day when the pair convene for Man About Town, and three weeks until the UK theatrical release of Whishaw’s current project – a turn as foundational New York photographer Peter Hujar in Ira Sachs’s Peter Hujar’s Day. “You can tell so much about a person by the way they eat,” Whishaw concurs. The 45-year-old has been a touchstone British actor for over two decades, but to this day, it’s the quotidien that lights him up the most. “I always find undramatic things peculiarly fascinating.”
The realm of the everyday – or, more accurately, one day – is where Whishaw finds himself as he reunites with director Sachs, following caustic 2023 love triangle Passages. In 1974, as journalist Linda Rosenkrantz set out to document a day in the life of her artistic milieu, she tasked Hujar with writing down his activities over a 24-hour period, before inviting him to her apartment to recount them, on record and in granular specificity, the following day. The book she had in mind that would collate these stories never materialised; however, in 2021, the transcript of her conversation with Hujar was published by Magic Hour Press, 34 years on from his death from AIDS-related pneumonia, aged 53. Sachs’s adaptation sees that conversation reenacted verbatim in a two-hander between Whishaw and BAFTA winner Rebecca Hall (The Town, The Prestige) that only leaves the confines of Rosenkrantz’s apartment for a roof-terrace cigarette.
While technically a duet, the feature swells with the reference to supporting characters in Hujar’s countercultural Big Apple existence. His day features a New York Times shoot with poet Allen Ginsberg, at which he discusses his next subject: author William S Burroughs. He later ponders whether Fran Lebowitz would pen an introduction to his upcoming monograph, although the greater star power – at the time – of Susan Sontag enchants him more. “I often have a feeling that, in my day, nothing much happens,” he admits to Rosenkrantz – perhaps a symptom of the fact that the magnitude of Hujar’s impact as a lensman was only fully acknowledged after his death.
There’s less risk of Whishaw’s career contributions flying under the radar within his lifetime, although he’s unlikely to toast himself. Thankfully, Balogun is on hand for that. “Maybe, I’ll just start with some praise,” he tells Whishaw as they settle in. From Bond, a BAFTA, Emmy and Golden Globe-winning role in Russell T Davies’s A Very English Scandal, state-of-the-NHS drama This Is Going To Hurt and Yorgos Lanthimos black-comedy The Lobster, it’s when you attempt to recall a Whishaw exploit that you’re confronted with the wealth and breadth of them across stage and screen. And who could forget the masterclass in voice acting that is his lead turn in the critic and fan-beloved Paddington?
Balogun’s love of Whishaw’s work is reciprocated, however. Whishaw’s currently in the thrall of the actor, writer and climate activist’s appearance as merciless killer Amos, opposite Emma Thompson, in Apple TV+’s Down Cemetery Road. The last episode releases that evening: “I mean this as the biggest compliment, I really need someone to kill you,” Whishaw laughs, “because you are so evil and frightening.” However, Balogun’s changemaking power offscreen inspires optimism rather than fear, not least with Green Rider, the initiative he co-founded, which is proving a lifeline in the TV and film industry’s adoption of sustainable production practices.
Today, however, Balogun’s attention is on his subject. And Whishaw could prove a tough nut to crack. His masterstroke is, after all, his ability to surprise. “I really don’t like it in life or in acting when someone goes, ‘Oh, I know what you’re all about,’” he tells Balogun. “I hate being defined.”
Ben Whishaw: Hi Fehinti. How are you?
Fehinti Balogun: I’m alright, how are you?
BW: I’m okay, my love. Are you at home?
FB: I am at home. Long time no see. We’re due a big gossip, I think.
BW: Sorry, I didn’t make your birthday. How old did you turn?
FB: 31!
BW: How does that feel?
FB: Absolutely fine. Thirties are pretty good. You’ve found your people. I think the thing I’m proud of is that everyone who meets my other friends goes, ‘God, your friends are really nice.’
BW: Yeah, that’s always a lovely feeling. Forties is really strange.
FB: Why?
BW: Sickness and encroaching death.
FB: [Laughs]
BW: Not of yourself necessarily, although who knows? But of people you love. That can really come to anyone at any time. But it becomes more prevalent. But there are lots of really wonderful things about being in your forties.
FB: I’ve got loads of questions for you. I love homework, so I’ve done it. Ben – you’re so good at acting. It’s like palpably infuriating how good your acting is.
BW: You’re pretty good yourself.
FB: I’m fucking excellent [laughs].
BW: You are incredible. We’ll get to that, too.
FB: But I think one of the things that I like, and I think it’s one of the things that we – your friends, your colleagues, we who have worked with you – find really fascinating about you is that it’s always the bit between that you fill with this life. It’s always the bit between the words or the bit behind or in front of the words. It’s a hard thing to do. With the film itself, it’s a portrait of a day in a person’s life. How hard [was it] not trying to be interesting? I know I would personally be like, ‘Okay, and here’s where I put the razzmattas in.’ ‘And I’ll do a little something here…’
BW: Basically, none of us – including Ira Sachs, our director – knew what this project was going to be. We just saw it like an art project. There was nothing defined about what it would ultimately wind up being. So that changes how you approach something, because there’s no definite audience. All that was concerning me was, ‘How do we realise as fully as possible what this peculiar thing is?’ And when I thought about that, I knew that we couldn’t do the thing that you just described, of being fearful that it was not interesting. You had to just go – ‘This may be not interesting at all. I mustn’t try and dress it up as anything.’ It was more like, ‘I just have to try to sink into this.’ I sometimes get very bored by very dramatic things. So, for me, this was kind of heaven. It’s like when you just watch someone lost in thought at a bus stop or a café, and it’s like no one is there. They’re kind of magnetic. It was an opportunity to explore something like that.
FB: I mean, every play I’ve seen you in, there are these little mundanities and clues.
BW: It’s something maybe that some directors or writers or people who run big studios don’t know so much about or aren’t so interested in. And also it can be, as you say, epic and very dramatic. I think there’s story in everything, and I really just like it when the canvas of a piece allows the eating of a sandwich to be that. Having said this, I am addicted to Down Cemetery Road, which is full of action. But I think what the central four of you do so brilliantly is grounded in character. I’m always just so interested in people and behaviour. I know it sounds like an obvious thing to say.
FB: It is the craft of the thing. You do the audition, you learn the lines, you get into the character. And then there’s what [the role] fucking feels like on your skin. What breathing the air feels like. All the stuff you learn at drama school, put away, never think you’re gonna use, then all of a sudden, you’re like, ‘Oh yeah, really? That’s how…’ With Cemetery, Amos always walks with his eyes open. He very rarely blinks. And [he] always [walks] in straight lines. And that was just like, ‘Yeah, because he’s fucking weird.’
BW: It’s true. You do magnificently the thing of being profoundly frightening without trying to be frightening. Again, I think that’s why you do the part so immaculately because, in life, that is what those people are like. It’s not because they are being threatening necessarily in some overt way, but you just get a feeling. You just go, ‘Oh, there’s something off about that person.’ I actually have wondered where that part came from in you. It’s a big thing because he’s a psychopath, probably, isn’t he?
FB: Yeah, he’s absolutely a psychopath.
BW: But [your character is] very intensely and interestingly moved about [his] brother’s death. I thought that was such another wonderful, human detail.
FB: Contradictions.
BW: Yeah.
FB: The best actors I know are very, very kind. And I think there’s something about that kindness that makes you available to that psychopathy. Because you know what it is to not have it. You play an assassin on Black Doves. Is that similar?
BW: Yeah, definitely. Well, I don’t think that they’re necessarily psychopaths… I sort of regret using that word, because I gather that not as many people are psychopaths as we might think. But perhaps the truth is that many people have elements of psychopathy. It’s to do with a lack of empathy. We all, whether we like it or not, sometimes lack empathy. And we all sometimes detach ourselves from what’s really happening in order to protect ourselves and survive. I do that all the time. And it’s only the same thing several degrees dialled up that’s true about a character like the Black Doves character, Sam. So you find a way in yourself. It’s somehow your own self you’re always using, which is why it’s interesting and why, if we’re lucky, you can keep [acting] for your whole life and get better at it.
FB: Yeah. And with [Peter], obviously, you’re playing an iconic figure in history. Did you get into photography? Have you been into photography?
BW: It’s an interest and hobby that I go in and out of doing. I discovered who Peter Hujar was because I started to take photos. I started to become interested in film photography. So [the film] just happened to cross over with an interest of mine that already existed. When I got to New York to make it, Ira sent me to a dark room to learn how to work in a darkroom, because I’d never done that. And Peter talks at some length about the darkroom and the whole process of producing a photo. So I’ve always loved images, image making, paintings and photographs. I nearly went down that route. And some part of me is still very curious about that and wants to explore it more. I think it’s a good thing for an actor because acting is so ephemeral and so ungraspable, but there’s something so wonderful about being able to make an image and capture something. You are a painter yourself, so you have the same thing. Do you find that?
FB: Yeah, I really do. A lot of the art is trying to get a very specific feeling in front of you. Almost like writing a poem and trying to convey something textural and deep. What’s that quote that’s like, ‘Those that are sensitive… their job is to feel the world and report back to everyone how it really is.’ I remember thinking about it the other day, because I was speaking to my therapist about anxiety. And she was like, ‘You know, it comes from you caring. You are affected by the world, which is why you want to affect it.’ This is maybe too much of a share for a magazine, but sometimes, especially when I was younger, I would write diary entries to be read. They were written in a way that if someone were to find them, they’d be like, ‘Oh fucking hell, this is good. And then what happened?’
BW: That’s really funny.
FB: I think there’s something [with art], where it’s like, ‘I need this to exit me so it is observed by someone else.’ I know you said earlier that you didn’t really know what the project was going to be, so you didn’t have to think about that. But, paying an homage to quite a figure in history, at a very specific time in history, was making that piece of art about it being seen and received?
BW: Well, I think it’s a strange balancing act of both things because obviously you don’t just do it for yourself – that would be some weird solipsistic thing that just looped in on itself and went nowhere. It is ultimately about wanting to communicate something with people and share something. But, in the making of it, I think you do have to sort of forget that. If I’m working in a way that feels truly exciting to me, I’m just living it for real. I’ve always felt like acting, for me, grew out of playing as a child and just being completely immersed in other worlds. And, for some reason, I decided never to stop doing that. So I think I’m always trying to get back to that feeling that I had of being completely lost in something. Of course, it’s not only that. You have craft, and you are making a living and all the mundane things. But there’s some little kernel of wanting to really live something.
FB: I used to – for longer than I will say publicly – dress up in robes. As soon as I got home from school, that would be my Roman toga and I would have my staff.
BW: Amazing.
FB: That’s where I learned my Shakespeare voice. In my living room.
BW: I think that every actor has that somewhere, going on.
FB: There’s something in the playfulness. In the world of adulting, it feels like everything is very serious, but ingenuity, creativity, solutions that solve huge problems – they come from playfulness, from joy and creativity.
BW: A hundred per cent. And also, it doesn’t have to be one thing and not another. It can be serious and playful. Children are both. At least I was. The game is only fun because it’s taken seriously. If you break the game, it doesn’t make sense.
FB: Absolutely. Peter Hujar’s Day itself is like a snapshot in history. A snapshot where it felt, maybe I’m glorifying it, but the artistic effect on society was more directly impactful and easier to access and create. It’s this time where your picture begins a conversation. The culture of queerness is changing how people are allowed to live their lives. Whereas now there are so many different barriers to making accessible work. Or the way that you can make that work is so altered by those bodies that it’s not the work that you wanted to make. With the time that we’re looking at, it’s like, ‘You had an idea, you had the people, you made the work, and the rawness of it was the art itself.’
BW: I totally agree.
FB: So I think my question to you is, how important do you think art is now in order to create change?
BW: I guess that’s such a big question, and in a way I feel a bit unqualified to really answer it. I guess what I would say I feel is that people can be changed by all sorts of things, in all sorts of ways, and they may not always be massive, but they may be massive. They may be like, ‘I’m going to support this cause.’ ‘I’m going to speak out about that.’ But it can be something internal. I think all of that’s good. Something really changed me the other day, and I’m trying to remember what it was. Something made me think about my mother, and I thought, ‘I have to be more something towards my mother after watching this.’ My point is that I think it happens continually. And as people who make things, you don’t know how it’s going to affect people.
But what do you think, Fehinti? I guess the reason I feel a bit phoney talking about it is because I know that you really do do a lot. You are an activist, so you have a public voice that’s really changing things. And I admire that very much. I don’t have the kind of personality, at least at the moment, to face the public like that. But you may not feel that way either. You may have just wound up doing it through circumstance.
FB: It’s so interesting because I think we work in such a public-facing industry that’s not just about our work. Like we do our work and then we kind of [leave] it alone, and then people intuit, infer and create narratives just around that, let alone us literally going, ‘Hi, I’m Fehinti Balogun, and this is something I believe.’ So there’s that. But Ben, I think you’re doing yourself a disjustice with how you view your validity to talk onto art and change. I think immediately about the integrity of the roles you pick. I think about the LGBT representation you bring into it. From Black Doves to this to, what’s that BBC spy series you did? London Spy. The representation of the work that you choose still, to this day, affects the culture and conversation around LGBTQIA+ things. When we talk about culture and change and choice, I think you are a huge voice in that space.
BW: Oh, that’s nice. That’s very nice feedback. Thank you.
FB: I think it’s very much true, and I think that that informs what is commissioned and what is written – what people feel inspired to write. We live in a time and age where there is this rise of very old rhetoric and philistine beliefs that are pushing back the Overton Window of what society deems we’re gonna talk about. So I think that in itself has a huge cultural impact. But being an imperfect person doing the best that you can is so much better than this idea that we have to be perfect and always well-informed.
BW: I know exactly what you’re saying. I agree.
FB: And Ben, also, you were one of the first people I talked to about Green Rider. And you were so supportive.
BW: Yeah, I mean, I’m grateful you spoke to me. And that’s really had an impact on the industry.
FB: Part of the campaign is that you get people who have been in this business for a long time to talk about this thing, and things just get done. Like Charity Wakefield and Bella Ramsey, they’ve engaged with us, and when they get signed onto a project, literally all it takes is, ‘Hi, I’m interested in sustainability.’ ‘I’m interested in this thing…’ ‘Here’s my Green Rider.’ And because we’re connected to the producers on the other side, they then call us and go, ‘Oh my God, this has changed the entire game.’ Because, before that person gave them a call and said, ‘I’m interested in this,’ it was like, ‘Oh, we might have a sustainability person, maybe.’ After the call, someone gets hired, and the whole department is there.
BW: Amazing, amazing, amazing.
FB: Number one, number two, number three on the call sheet is like, ‘This is something I’m interested in,’ the cultural impact of that engagement is fucking huge. Gangs of London reduced 80% of its emissions by changing to HVO fuel, because Sopé [Dìrísù] was interested in having those conversations.
And also, one thing I really want to ask is… your kindness is something I have really internalised. But the culture of our industry is not based on kindness. What is a cultural thing within our industry that you’d love to see changed?
BW: Well, I’m going to just go immediately with what comes to my mind because of conversations I’ve had. In a sense, I’m not the right person to talk about this, but basically, I still think we’re very far from where we need to be in terms of diversity. It’s still too one thing, which is white. The thing I feel that needs to change is who’s being cast, who’s telling stories, and who’s making the decisions about who’s cast. I mean, I don’t need to tell you all this stuff, but I feel also like I can’t be silent about it. And I just feel like aside from everything else, we’re just missing out on richness of stories and storytelling and creativity. And I find it doubly galling after 2020 and Black Lives Matter, when things seemed to be brought to the top of the pile of things that needed attention. And it’s just been relegated to something else again. And I think it’s time to bring it right back up to the top of the agenda to discuss, especially with everything that’s happening in this country at the moment.
FB: I could not agree with you more. And it’s interesting as well because so much of what is in racism and xenophobia is a lack of knowledge. It’s like, ‘Somebody somewhere told you that other means danger. And because you do not know other – you do not know someone who looks like that – then they must be a bad thing.’ And so much of The Kumars, The Real McCoy, Desmond, all of these beautiful cultural windows, change completely how people are viewed and understood. You stop labelling someone as other, and you start to see them as human.
BW: I guess it goes back to the ‘How does work change things?’ discussion and, in that sense, it’s enormously important. But it’s very hard to change people.
FB: Which people?
BW: Whoever is deciding, ‘We will tell this story, but not this one.’ ‘We will cast that person, but we’re not interested in this.’ Whoever those people are, they need to do something – or go. We’re just going through a very conservative phase right now. It will shift again, but we have to keep riding it through, and keep pushing for, as you said, more humanity and not so much othering. More kindness.
FB: It does exist. I think sometimes it’s like it isn’t there. But I’m like, ‘Those stories are there. They just need the funding.’ I think there’s something to be said about the wealth of work in this country that we could make. Life-changing, beautiful, culture-creating stories.
BW: I know, and it’s frustrating that it’s not being utilised. I haven’t figured out precisely how yet, but I really want to do more. I would like to use whatever presence I have to do more in that regard.
FB: Also, just really quickly – no rehearsal?
BW: Yes, you did ask me that. I actually love it.
FB: Really?!
BW: Yeah, I love it. But you have to be working with someone like Ira Sachs, who has chosen to do that for a very specific reason and is holding you and supporting you through it. If there’s just no rehearsal because there’s no time and no one cares, and no one’s paying any attention, that’s a very different thing. But if the reason is to capture something that’s very alive and very in the moment… I love those qualities in performance.
FB: I think sometimes – especially for people who haven’t done the job for very long – unrehearsed can be conflated with underprepared. Those two things aren’t the same. Or is it something in the underpreparedness that brings it to life?
BW: I think you’re quite right to say that. I think it’s being very prepared, but in a specific way. It’s absolutely being prepared. It’s like a director who I worked with when I was very young would say to me, ‘Drop the plan.’ Drop the thing that you’ve practised in front of the bedroom mirror or in your bedroom, because, particularly as a young actor, you have to plan. You have to prepare. But when it comes to the filming, you have to be wide open, or try to be. And in a way… be completely in the unknown. It’s very hard, I don’t always manage it, but it’s my aim always. So yeah, you’re right, it’s not about being lazy.
FB: What else did I write on my little pad? I think one thing that I would like to ask you, because I’m curious… you’ve got a really fucking wide portfolio of work. It could just be Bond, one, two, three, big Hollywood thing, one, two, three, four, couple series, three, four, out for a couple years, maybe come back for another Hollywood thing. But there seems to be a really deliberate choice to do things that are fucking interesting. And that are, as you said, close to those mundane but operatically normal moments in life. Why have such a varied career? And is there a risk in doing that?
BW: Everything in me is always trying to keep everything very dynamic, mobile and changing. So once you do something, you want to do something that’s very different.
You’ve got to get fresh air in or change it all up. And I’m feeling it now, actually. I’ve got to find the next thing that’s going to really terrify me, and really challenge me and push me someplace new. And so that is all I’ve really tried to do. I don’t always manage to do it as much as I would like, but it’s always on my mind. And also, it’s just more fun to be very various and unpredictable.
FB: I think I’ve asked you all of my questions. I think the last thing that I will say is a quote from Rebecca Hall. It says, ‘Ben Whishaw is touched with a kind of magic.’
BW: Oh well, so is she. She’s absolutely magical. Look, that’s a wonderful thing to hear, and I’m very touched. But as I get older, I really, truly, absolutely believe that what’s magic is what happens between actors. [The way] that we bring things out of one another. No one is acting in a vacuum, and actually, the true joy is the thing you share with each other. Really, you’re only as good as the person you’re opposite and how present everyone is willing to be.
FB: Yeah, I think it is that. It is being open. It’s exactly what you said about when you play, and you’re in your living room, with the cape. You’re not thinking about when mum’s going to get home. You’re perfectly, perfectly present.
BW: The best things are always the things that you don’t plan, really. The more I get older, the more I’m interested in how everything is an improvisation, and you’re discovering it as you go along, and trusting more.
Photography Elliott Morgan Styling Jordan Littleton Grooming Nathalie Eleni using The Skin Diary and Curl Smith Set Design Annie Alvin Stylist Assistant Giorgio Bonaddio Photography Assistant Oliver Brand Special Thanks CLD Communications
Interview with Little White Lies
How a day in the life of the New York photographer and Warhol associate Peter Hujar was channelled into a witty and nostalgic feature-length drama
Interview by CASPAR SALMON Illustration by MATHIEU PAUGET December 2025
Over the past 25 years Ben Whishaw has alternated between popular film series (Paddington, James Bond and more indie-flavoured films with directors such as Jane Campion (Bright Star), Ira Sachs (Passages) and Sarah Polley (Women Talking), while earning acclaim for TV and theatre work. His latest, Peter Hujar's Day, finds him taking on the title role, for Sachs again, in a film that painstakingly retraces a day in the photographer's life, as told to his friend, the writer Linda Rosenkrantz (Rebecca Hall).
WLies: What drew you to this project? Whishaw: When Ira and I were working together on Passages we both really enjoyed that experience. We must have started talking about Peter Hujar; And he said, there's a book out that is him talking about his day. So I read it, but I couldn't really tell if there was a film there. And then maybe a year later, Ira sent me a screenplay. And actually the screnplay made me really fall in love with it.
WLies: How did it take shape as a screenplay? Whishaw: Because the book is all dialogue anyway, isn't it? What it did was heighten small things. Because presumably Linda and Peter just sat down at the table and he spoke for an hour and a half. But Ira made it happen over the course of a whole day and described small details of their interaction, which is a beautiful thing about the film, I think.
WLies: Was there a conscious idea of exhuming Hujar and putting him back in his rightful place? Whishaw: I'm not sure that I thought about that to begin with, but as we worked and as I found out more about him, that did come into how I felt about the project. As a tribute to him and to that whole time that he lived and worked in, which is gone. And so many of the people lost.
WLies: What was the challenge for you, in terms of your performance? Whishaw: Well, one thing that was really clear to me was that - and this was difficult - I didn't ever want it to feel just like, oh, wow, he's really remembering a lot of words. I knew it couldn't be that otherwise it couldn't become interesting in the way I hoped it might, where you can just settle into this kind of quotidian ordinariness. It felt like an incredibly intimate thing to do. And the challenge was actually just having to learn the whole thing really well before starting the shoot.
WLies: The film harks back, with a great deal of nostalgia, to a very different era for artists. Do you feel a pressure to have more of a public profile as an actor? Whishaw: I don't personally feel that pressure, but I do think that's something in the ether. That's how most people are getting or promoting work. I guess I never really got on that trip, If anything I feel like I've been doing too much showing of myself. It's not my favourite thing. I don't think that people who make work are the best people to talk about it. That's why critics are important, because critics are really good at elucidating things. Whereas I think artists can be quite disappointing because they find it hard to discuss.
WLies: Like when you were talking about your relationship with Ira Sachs - that's obviously a felt thing. Whishaw: Yeah. And I think in order to do good work, you have to work in a way that's not fully conscious. In a way that's beyond your understanding, beyond your conscious mind.
Ben Whishaw on playing a half-forgotten photographer, resisting the commercial and being Paddington
The actor spoke exclusively to RadioTimes.com about his lead role in Peter Hujar's Day – the latest film from acclaimed arthouse director Ira Sachs.
A name half-forgotten who deserves to be remembered, Peter Hujar is undergoing something of an arthouse revival. The New York photographer, a staple of the Manhattan creative scene in the 1970s, is the centrepiece of Ira Sachs’ brand new two-hander, Peter Hujar’s Day, starring Ben Whishaw and Rebecca Hall. The story, such as it is, spans across a 24-hour period in December 1974, as Hujar (Whishaw) is interviewed by author Linda Rosenkrantz (Hall) for a book – ultimately unpublished – about artists’ lives.
Across the film, Hujar sits in Rosenkrantz’s apartment, chain-smoking and recalling events from his previous day, from the everyday to the out of the ordinary. “I was really intrigued because it’s not material that’s obviously going to make a good film,” says the British-born Whishaw, 45. "Which is what is interesting to me about it. I like that kind of investigation of something apparently very undramatic or just very mundane. But if you look at it closely, it contains riches. I like that and I could sense that there was some potential for that using this text."
Sachs, 60, calls Whishaw "a friend" and "a comrade", and they’re clearly kindred spirits. The Bedfordshire-born actor may be best known to audiences as the voice of Paddington in the recent trilogy of movies and as Q in the Daniel Craig-era James Bond films, but there are other facets to his artistic work. "We both have a really sustained and personal interest in creative life," says Sachs. "I think in a way we give each other strength, because we’re both resisting the commercial."
It may be more arty than commercial, but that doesn’t stop Peter Hujar’s Day being utterly mesmerising. The meandering conversation is a sublime snapshot of 1970s New York, when artists could still afford to live in the centre of the city. During his recollections, Hujar frets about his health, enjoys a Chinese meal with a friend and even plays Bach on the harpsichord. At the other end of the scale, he visits Beat poet extraordinaire Allen Ginsberg to photograph him for an assignment for the New York Times, a particularly strange but hilarious encounter.
Somehow, Sachs ensures this flowing back-and-forth between Whishaw and Hall doesn’t feel like a piece of theatre. "It was totally unlike a play," says Whishaw. "Plays require so much projection in every sentence. And this was so the opposite, it was so minimal and internal and quiet. It felt very unlike a play, actually, although I understand that, yeah, it’s lot of talking. But the talking is more like a piece of material. It’s something that washes over the viewer."
While Hujar passed away almost 40 years ago, Rosenkrantz is still alive, now aged 91. Sachs first approached her after reading her book, Peter Hujar’s Day. Published in 2019, it contains a full transcript (previously thought lost) of her conversation with the photographer, although sadly, the tape of their chat had disappeared into the mists of time. Sachs contacted her on Instagram, telling her he’d like to adapt the book for the screen.
Rosenkrantz became an enthusiastic supporter of the project. "She talked to Rebecca a lot and I think that was very helpful,” says Sachs. “And she would help Rebecca with certain words, [the] pronunciation. She’s a very generous, modest person." He also is full of praise for Hall’s take on Rosenkrantz. "Rebecca brings to the act of listening, both empathy and action. It’s a very active performance, of someone who’s listening. Maybe she made it up, but the love that she as Rebecca and as Linda feels for Peter and for Ben, I think, becomes the heart of the story."
Unlike Hall, Whishaw couldn’t meet his on-screen counterpart. There’s also almost no existing video footage of Hujar, although that didn’t stop the actor, who dived into his research with absolute commitment. "I read a lot of about Peter," he says. "There are lots of essays with people recalling him, stories about him." He also took a visit to the Morgan Library & Museum in New York, where he was shown photos, documents, and even Hujar’s wallet and camera.
Whishaw and the Sachs, who first worked together on the 2023 film Passages, did have some audio of Hujar they could listen to. One clips sees Hujar and David Wojnarowicz talk about what it means to be an artist, a conversation recorded shortly before Hujar died in 1987 of AIDS-related complications. “I also have this very rare tape, which is Peter Hujar hypnotising himself in order to stop smoking!" informs Sachs. "I got it in the Morgan library. I was like, 'What?!' So that’s pretty interesting."
Sachs first read the transcript when he was making Passages, and Whishaw was soon on board. "I was really intrigued to explore it with Ira, because I think he has such an amazing, unusual way of working with actors and drawing things out of actors," he says. "Lots of directors don’t do that. You really have a relationship with him…although he doesn’t say always that much, you really feel like your performance is a dance with him. I just was excited by the combination of all the things."
The film is also steeped in culture, especially given it was shot in New York’s Westbeth Artists Housing, a nonprofit housing and commercial complex dedicated to providing living and work spaces for artists, "It’s a building where [dancer and choreographer] Merce Cunningham had a studio for 50 years, where [photographer] Diane Arbus lived and died," explains Sachs. "It’s a building with a lot of history, and also it was a building that was given to us to make the film. I mean, not the whole building, but we were allowed access, and I think that made the film what it is, because we spent several weeks with stand-ins, body doubles, to understand how the space transformed meaning in terms of time of day and which corner you went to. And so I have a series of stills which became the movie."
Even the constant smoking in the film feels unusual by today’s health-conscious standards. "I used to be a smoker," says Whishaw. "I’m not anymore, but they’re lovely props, aren't they? They’re really elegant, interesting things. But that’s Peter…he was a chainsmoker. He talks about it. So it had to be that way. And again, none of that was planned when I would light a cigarette or when I would take a drag. Each take different, each time different. Because it was just chance." Letting fate decide was something Sachs loved. "He would put a number of elements in the scene, like some food on the table, and then it would be just what happened by chance."
Whishaw adds that Peter Hujar’s Day grew out of he and Sachs’s "conversations as friends" as much as anything. "We have lots of similar interests and we’re interested in similar artists," he says. "Sometimes films can be quite infantilising of actors, right? You don’t feel very creative actually, whereas I feel like Ira treats you like a creative adult, and a collaborator, and you’re just there, and the space is very free, and everyone is listened to and contributes."
Indeed, Passages was arguably one of Sachs’s most critically and commercially successful films, but the director refused to cash in on his new-found cachet. "I got to make a incredibly free art film," he shrugs. "People gave me money to do that film. Anything that I’m going to embark upon, I have to think has allure and attractiveness and is sexy. So to me, Peter Hujar’s Day is a pretty commercial film. I think it’s cinematically really attractive. I think there’s an erotic quality to the image and to these two bodies. I don’t know, I find it pretty commercial. If you consider commercial to be…authentic."
Like Sachs, Whishaw is a little conflicted by the more commercial choices he’s made. "Sometimes I’m regretful," he sighs. "Silly, isn’t it? I’m so grateful." But there can be no doubt he doesn’t include the Paddington trilogy in this, even if parents stop him in the street and point out who he is to their bemused kids. "It is weird because…the children find it strange because I’m obviously not Paddington, and they can’t understand that you’re the voice of Paddington. What do you mean? You’re either Paddington or you’re not. And I’m obviously not. So it’s kind of confusing for children. I can see they’re very unimpressed!"
Peter Hujar’s Day opens in UK cinemas on 2nd January 2026.
Ben Whishaw on slow cinema, Queer art and the magic of Peter Hujar
By Ben Reardon 22nd December 2025
Ben Whishaw gives a poised, poetic performance as photographer Peter Hujar in Peter Hujar’s Day, an unconventional biopic that unfolds as a meticulous, minute-by-minute account of one ordinarily extraordinary day.
Peter Hujar’s Day is an intimate two-hander set in a sun-faded New York loft in the 1970s, where Peter, played by Ben, is interviewed by Linda Rosenkrantz, portrayed with effortless elegance by Rebecca Hall. Peter regales Linda with acute details about the day before including his sleep patterns (he’s often very tired), phone calls, irritations and work worries whilst smoking endless cigarettes and chugging down drinks. They wander from room to roof and back again. From day through to night they stare at the Hudson River and the ever impressive New York skyline and languidly loll around each other, touching, resting, dancing as they share an intimacy and ease normally reserved for lovers. It is an unconventional biopic. It doesn’t tell Hujar’s life story. Instead it allows us to share a moment with him in what feels like real time, so much so you feel like you are there, breathing the same air. It’s an experience akin to watching a stage play. There are no blockbuster explosions or VFX here, the solitary moment of thrill being an impromptu dance to Tennessee Jim. Ben inhabits Hujar with delicacy. He is captivating and his words spark your imagination as he recounts photographing a curmudgeonly Allen Ginsberg or a phone call with Susan Sontag, iconic names which litter his conversation with such honesty you feel almost guilty, as though you’re eavesdropping. In 2021 Ben had wrapped filming the provocative throuple drama Passages with Ira Sachs. On completion the seed of a new project was quietly planted. “Just after we’d finished Passages, Ira gave me the book Peter Hujar’s Day and asked ‘Do you think there might be a film in this?’ I really liked it, but I didn’t quite see what it could be.” A year later and completely out of the blue, Ira sent him the finished script. “It sang to me in a way I hadn’t been able to imagine on the page. To be honest, if Ira asked me to come and read the phone book for him, I’d probably say yes. I just really, really wanted to be in his orbit and working with him again.”
The script sang to me in a way I hadn’t been able to imagine on the page. To be honest, if Ira Sachs asked me to come and read the phone book for him, I’d probably say yes. I just really, really wanted to be in his orbit and working with him again.
Ben Whishaw
He lived and worked until the day he died in the apartment once occupied by Warhol superstar Jackie Curtis. Subjects included the streets of New York and desolate landscapes to the mummified corpses of the Palermo catacombs. He modelled for Andy Warhol, dated and collaborated with artists Paul Thek and David Wojnarowicz as well as activist Jim Fouratt, photographed members from the first-ever Gay Liberation Front, and counted Susan Sontag, Vince Aletti, Nan Goldin and Fran Lebowitz among his friends. A senior, stately presence to contemporaries such as Stanley Stellar, Alvin Baltrop and Leonard Fink, Hujar shared with them an unapologetic fascination with the long-vanished Chelsea piers, which became cruising grounds and queer spaces before queer spaces officially existed. They have since become mythic: the piers were torn down, and only the photographs remain. He also captured dogs, sheep, horses and cows with the same beauty and respect he brought to his portraits of Rudolf Nureyev, Greer Lankton, Divine, John Waters, William Burroughs, Lou Reed, Cookie Mueller, The Cockettes and Quentin Crisp. Ben first encountered Hujar’s work on the cover of Antony and the Johnsons’ now-iconic album I Am a Bird Now. The startling image Candy Darling on Her Deathbed shows another Warhol superstar reclining in her hospital bed, surrounded by flowers, looking at once sensational and heartbreaking. Candy would die of lymphoma within a year of the portrait being taken. He later realised that Hujar’s work had been hiding in plain sight throughout his life. A Little Life’s now-famous cover, the 1969 photograph Orgasmic Man, with its ambiguous mix of ecstasy and agony, was Hujar’s too. And so were the postcards he once collected of men with thick, hairy chests wearing dresses which he’d held onto without yet knowing their author.“Around the pandemic, because I finally had the time, I really, really got into him,” Ben says. “And then I was like, ‘Oh, wow—this guy is just sublime.’”
Around the pandemic, because I finally had the time, I really, really got into Peter Hujar. And then I was like, ‘Oh, wow—this guy is just sublime.’
Ben Whishaw
Is he lucky enough to own any of Hujar’s photographs? “I bought one around four years ago. It’s a self portrait. He’s naked in a chair, sitting in his loft, looking directly at the camera. And it’s so beautiful. It’s called something like Seated Self Portrait 1980 (Depressed). I think he was going through a particularly difficult time. But he’s sort of sexy in it. His tummy is sticking out and he’s looking almost challengingly at the camera.” Why did you choose this image? “I felt stopped in my tracks by it. I feel like he’s challenging me to be honest. There’s something provocative and demanding about his gaze. It’s like he’s insisting on the truth. That’s what I think when I look at it.” And where does Peter live in Ben’s day to day life? “He’s in my hallway, next to the door. So every day, in and out, there’s Peter. I feel very connected.” How does the internal pressure manifest when playing someone he reveres? “My way in is to see it only partly as truth and partly as fiction. It’s what me and Ira and Rebecca are creating so it has a basis in Peter but it’s not completely Peter. It’s fiction that we’re making, so that gives us a license.” The chemistry between Ben and Rebecca Hall is one that feels authentic, like best friends or even partners, it reads as effortless and still. “Ira would give us notes, saying ‘just very, very, very relaxed. No effort at all. Do almost nothing.’ So you end up getting into a vibe that’s very comfortable,” Ben says. “I realise how rare that is. You hardly ever get to see those kind of states depicted in films which are usually about very charged and dramatic things. I like that about this film that it’s kind of… soft.”
I think Peter Hujar was a truth-teller. They’re not idealised, cleaned-up pictures of people. There’s something raw about them, something intimate and true… So much of our world is people putting forward an idealised version of themselves, and he doesn’t do that. He shows people plain and true and, imperfect. I find that very consoling.
Ben Whishaw
Unlike Hujar, Ben flits effortlessly and elegantly between the mainstream and avant garde. How does he marry these worlds with such ease? “I like being tested and challenged. So I wouldn’t want to stay just in one territory. The older I get, the more I am interested in making things that are smaller and have a feeling of being handmade. Maybe that is where my heart really lies at the moment.” Do you feel that Peter struggled with this dichotomy? “I think that Peter Hujar’s work is absolutely beautiful. I think that it may have been more to do with homophobia, and his own inability to sell himself. I think there may have been internal obstacles. I don’t think he liked commerce, you know, selling things. I don’t think it was an easy thing for him to do. His work was so personal and so intimate. I think he could be a complicated, difficult person at times.” In his recent Criterion picks, Ben cites Derek Jarman as a hero. “When I was about 27, I discovered his house and garden in Dungeness. I started to read his diaries, and they were really transformative for me. I felt like he was saying something to me about how you could live your life as a gay man, something I had been perhaps avoiding or fearful of, and I felt like I went through a kind of liberation reading him. He taught me how you could be sexually free and creatively free and how the two are connected. He really didn’t try to win the favour of the mainstream, or heteronormativity. I mean, he really didn’t compromise at all. He just made very odd films with his friends, really. But they’re so creative, they speak so richly of that time, don’t they? And they’re still provocative. Sebastiane, in Latin, with those naked men frolicking around on a beach. Just wonderful.” A fan of directors Gregg Araki, Apichatpong Weerasethakul, Tsai Ming Liang, Andrew Haigh and Todd Haynes, Ben is excited about the current state of queer cinema. “I’m desperate to see Pillion,’ he confirms. In a world where being queer is both celebrated and, in equal measure, attacked and feared, how important is it to have this constant narrative through your work? “The world is so different from when I started acting. It wasn’t said explicitly, but it was conveyed strongly to me as a young actor that you had to appear to be straight if you wanted to keep working. It’s so important to me to make queer art.” Simply by having Ben’s name attached to this project a new audience will find its way to Peter Hujar. His reach is a meaningful one, and here he uses it with intention.
The world is so different from when I started acting. It wasn’t said explicitly, but it was conveyed strongly to me as a young actor that you had to appear to be straight if you wanted to keep working. It’s so important to me to make queer art.
Ben Whishaw
Peter Hujar’s Day feels like the start of a thread being gently pulled. The Film Independent Spirit Awards, widely regarded as an indie precursor to the Oscars, recently nominated Peter Hujar’s Day in five categories: Best Feature, Best Director, Best Cinematography, Best Supporting Performance and Best Lead Actor for Ben. In recent years, Anora, Past Lives, and Everything Everywhere All at Once have followed a similar exciting trajectory. And in New York magazine’s 2025 Year in Culture round-up, Culturati 50 honouree Lindsay Lohan named Peter Hujar’s Day the most underrated work of the year, praising its “quiet beauty.” You want to spend more time in the company of Ben as Peter, to push further into his life and open more doors into this hallowed world. The recently published Paul Thek and Peter Hujar: Stay Away From Nothing offers a tender portrait of their relationship told through photographs, handwritten postcards and letters. It is another small glimmer into a life we still know so little about. When asked whether he has seen the book, and whether he would consider revisiting the role, Ben leans over and lifts a copy from beside the sofa. “Ira gave me a copy earlier. I can’t wait to read it. There’s lots of potential there. There’s so little that remains of him in terms of footage; there’s barely any video at all, which is hard for us to believe. And, tragically, of course, so many passed away in the AIDS epidemic.” He pauses, reflective. “I feel aware that life is passing really fast. I want to do things that are really, truly meaningful to me. Things I can speak about.” He pauses, looks up then looks down before fixing his gaze. “To make films that come from a place of honesty. To tell a truth. Something I can give my heart to. Films I feel passionate about. That’s what I want to do.”
Can the film 'Peter Hujar's Day' capture the essence of the elusive artist?
Filmmaker Ira Sachs and actor Ben Whishaw bring Peter Hujar back to the front of the cultural consciousness
By Miriam Balanescu 20th December 2025
Ira Sachs’ latest feature makes its artifice clear from the start. A clapperboard shuts as Ben Whishaw steps into the persona of Peter Hujar, the queer, black-and-white photographer who frequented, and captured, an exuberant 1970s New York cultural set. Peter Hujar’s Day – adapted from author Linda Rosenkrantz’s book of the same name – reenacts verbatim a conversation from morning to sunset between the two friends, at once a precious window into their world and a self-aware spinning of fiction.
Besides the transcript, the resources Sachs and Whishaw had to draw on to summon Hujar were scant, with only a single interview with David Wojnarowicz (then his friend and mentee) to listen to. ‘I think that was probably a good thing,’ reflects the Passages director, when we meet in The Londoner Hotel. He took some liberties with biographical details; ‘the good idea of having a Scotch in the middle of the afternoon’ despite Hujar not drinking, for example. What the duo could glean about his life suffused the atmosphere onset, including, says Whishaw, ‘a kind of spaciousness, a sort of time, actually, in the way [Hujar and Wojnarowicz] talked.’
Though he only published one book during his lifetime and all but vanished from the cultural consciousness after his death in 1984, Hujar’s work has been enjoying a resurgence of popularity thanks to recent major retrospectives in London and Venice. The film, in which Hujar name-drops Susan Sontag, Allen Ginsberg, Fran Lebowitz but also dozens of forgotten creatives, raises the question of ‘when someone appears, why does everyone else disappear?’, says Sachs. Hujar helped to document a transient artistic scene, but that doesn’t alter the fact that it was fading.
‘I didn't know him, and I don't feel like I know him any better now,’ insists Sachs. ‘I know parts of him, but I don't feel close to him in any way – and so maybe I still want to. I drive by his apartment almost every other day, driving my kids to school, I see the windows that he lived in, and that's a very nice, funny, weird connection.’
Alex Ashe’s sunlight-permeated cinematography brings another artistic dimension to the film, though Sachs and Ashe were ‘consciously not looking at [Hujar’s] work’ for inspiration, but directors like Rainer Werner Fassbinder, Jean-Luc Godard and Chantal Ackerman ‘who create their own forms of portraiture’. It was important to Sachs that Whishaw and Rebecca Hall, who plays Rosenkrantz (and is also a painter), were primarily interested in leading creative lives, so they would commit to the filmmaking ‘process’ over the product with ‘complete abandon’.
If there’s a theme running through Hujar’s day, it’s self-doubt. ‘We don't often see that in artists, except in very melodramatic ways,’ says Sachs. ‘He is continually coming back to the question of whether or not on that day he made a good photograph.’ Whishaw adds that, though essential, insecurity is ‘torture’, precipitating a ‘change of perspective’: ‘You have to have this kind of questioning, reflection and striving to reach something that feels unrealisable.’
The film has a note of nostalgia for Hujar’s heyday, pre-global art market. ‘I had a sense that the parameters of value were more local,’ explains Sachs. ‘There is a depth that comes from that where there is a community of people who are actually going through a lot of similar things, politically and socially. That's where movements come out: a group of people in one location coming into conversation with each other. That's very hard to do now.’
Death was a constant theme in the photographer’s oeuvre – his book, interspersed with catacombs, titled Portraits in Life and Death. Sontag observed that his subjects ‘appear to meditate on their own mortality’. This is something which rises to the surface during the film’s melancholy final sequence, amid ‘the waning light, the gathering darkness,’ says Whishaw. ‘It was lamplight and candles and the conversation turns to Peter's health. There was just a shift in atmosphere.’
Sachs looked to Elizabeth Taylor’s final scene in the Tennessee Williams adaptation Suddenly, Last Summer, her tone ‘purely theatrical’, with a touch of melodrama – creating a heightened interiority. ‘I knew that the whole film spoke to the impact of Aids and the loss without saying anything [directly], and that somehow Peter's soon-disappearance was an element in what we were making.’
Peter Hujar's Day is released on 2 January 2026
Peter Hujar’s Day: Ben Whishaw, Ira Sachs on LGBTQ history and the art of documenting queerness (EXCLUSIVE)
Attitude catches up with film star Ben about the irrepressible pull of reality TV and "the day that changed my life," as he sits down with his latest director to discuss photography, memory and the process of being interviewed
By Jamie Tabberer 18th December 2025
In his new film Peter Hujar’s Day, actor Ben Whishaw plays legendary photographer Peter Hujar, known for capturing the queer intelligentsia of 1970s New York City, from the late Beat icon Allen Ginsberg to author and public speaker Fran Lebowitz, now 75. (Peter died of AIDS-related complications in 1987 at the age of 53.)
But, as Ben tells Attitude in an interview alongside director Ira Sachs in a London hotel, the artist’s focus extended far beyond human beings – even if the lovers, friends, frenemies and collaborators of his day get a lot of the retrospective attention.
“There’s a book that came out after his death called Night: pictures of New York at night,” the 45-year-old tells us. “I find that particularly beautiful. One picture I love is of broken crockery on a shitty table in some ruined place! I just love that his eye was a spectator to so many different things. Interestingly, he didn’t just photograph gay men, or men, at all, did he? He loved everything. He was open to broken dishes, pregnant women, and a dog. I love that so much about him.”
Ira, 60, says he doesn’t have a favourite photo of Peter’s. “When I love an artist, I love everything about them. I love their failures and successes. I love the good photographs and the bad photographs. I think this is true of his art, but I’ve often thought about it with [Rainer Werner] Fassbinder. There’s only one Fassbinder film, and it’s all of them!”
“I agree,” says Ben. “If I love someone’s work, I love absolutely all of it. I get very annoyed when people are like: ‘But that period wasn’t so good!’ No! I love them! I’m there with them the whole way through the journey with their art.”
In the film, Rebecca Hall plays writer Linda Rosenkrantz, who, on 18 December 1974, asked Peter to write everything down that he did that day. The next day, she invited him over to her apartment to be interviewed about it. Rosenkrantz released the verbatim transcript of the interview in 2021,and the film recreates that exact conversation with a warmth and intimacy that feels staggeringly real.
While Attitude fears the interview you’re reading now may never be made into a film, for what it’s worth, here’s our Q&A with Passages and Love Is Strange director Ira and James Bond and Paddington star Ben, with unfettered meanderings (ours) and epic artistic insights (theirs) left in for good measure.
Attitude: I love that Peter was a queer photographer shooting a lot of queer subjects, and that, if my research is correct, you [Ira] came across this conversation in a queer bookstore in Paris while filming another film with queer sub-texts, Passages…
Ira: Sub-texts? Text!
Yeah, sure, yeah, yeah, yeah. Do you feel, as I do, that there is beauty in this sort of queerness upon queerness? Like a queerness squared? And I say this having just written a retrospective of Brokeback Mountain, which I love, and was written and directed by straight people!
Ira: Right, right, right! Well, yes. For me, I think Hujar’s photographs, when I initially saw them, seemed like a door opening to a queer, artistic world that I wanted to be a part of. And I guess I’m still searching and seeking that community in a lot of the things that I do and make in my life. And I think finding a queer, artistic brother in Ben, who had shared interests, including homosexuality… [Everyone laughs] Fact and fiction! Literally!
I’m interested in homosexuality too!
Ira: Yeah! I think being interested in men in a sexual basis is really a connector to people. Maybe for Peter as well.
Attitude: I know Peter covered a lot of the LGBTQ movement in his work from the ’60s to the ’80s. Is there anything new that you learnt about queer history as a result of researching and making this film?
Ben: I stumble a bit. Someone asked me what I thought about that time. I love his work and obviously one gets a sense through his work of that period. But I feel it’s too big for me to really grasp, in a way. I’m not very good with history. Do you know what I mean, Ira?
The picture of his that you own, Ben, is that an original or a print, and do you mind if I ask how you display it?
Ben: It’s not an original, but it is a print by Gary Schneider, the only person allowed to print Peter; a great photographer and a pupil of Peter’s, kind of. He’s a wonderful printer. It’s a more recent print. It’s a photo of Peter, a self-portrait, and he’s sat naked in a chair and it’s very beautiful and quite stark. It has a kind of weight about it. He was very depressed and took this photo of himself. It hangs in my hallway. I really get a lot from sharing my flat with him.
I love any art that captures friendship between gay men and women. Did you know Rebecca Hall before this, and if not, how did you build chemistry?
Ben: We think we met each other a long time ago, 20 years ago, when we were starting out. I can’t precisely remember where that was or what happened! I guess we didn’t see each other for a long, long, long time, until 2024. It was basically like meeting for the first time. Ira did the thing that he likes to do – we didn’t know one and other, and he said, go meet each other in this diner and get to know each other. Just see what happens, actually. So, we did, and we spoke for hours and ate tuna sandwiches!
Ira: The diner has gone! Hector’s [Cafe and Diner]!
I’m all about the minutiae of one’s day, because if you can get pleasure out of making a cup of tea or [organising] your socks, I really feel that’s a key to happiness. I love that this film captures that so well. I know this is a misconception, but I just can’t seem to let it go: I always assume accomplished [people]; actors and directors, must be like Jon M. Chu, the director of Wicked who I saw in a Q&A recently, who said he has to make a thousand decisions a day. I assume people in those worlds are really effective all the time. Do you guys procrastinate though, as we do, as your subject does?!
Ben: I definitely relate to a lot of what Peter talks about. I love to nap! Peter loves to nap. Definitely, the life of an actor, you can have many days where nothing much seems to happen. I very much relate to that. In fact, mostly it’s how life is!
Ira: Occasionally, there are periods in your life as a director where you have constructed some sort of necessity of being productive, which you can’t resist! That asks for you to show up in a very active way. But then, you can go down a hill and there’s a long period of wanting to be there again! I think there’s also a big difference between a director like Jon M. Chu, who makes people money, and a director like me, who does it because I have to… I mean, I’m sure it [Jon’s career] is incredibly challenging in ways I couldn’t possibly imagine, but there’s also an industry that demands his presence because he becomes part of a capitalistic circle that I, for better or worse, am not a part of. I guess in some ways, I was making this movie, we were in one location, equipment in a certain room, cafeteria in another room down the hall, and we were all together and it felt a little like a mini studio. I was jealous of the time there was this apparatus and structure that encouraged constant creativity. The answer is yes and no and yes!
I’ve never asked anyone this before, but the film has gotten me thinking about interviewing in a new way – what is it actually like to be interviewed, in your position?
Ben: It really depends on what is the interview is in aid of. If it can feel like a real exchange – this feels like we’re actually having a conversation – then that’s really nice. But if, essentially, you’re just being asked to give some soundbites that have been preordained and you can’t deviate from them, and you have to just sell something, I find that excruciating. I’m not very good at it. [But] when it feels like there’s some listening going on from both sides…
If you could choose any notable, or not notable, day from your careers to recount for a project such as this, what would it be?
Ira: For me, it would always be today. Particularly when I’m in an interview, I’m trying to be as present as possible. Pay attention to things in the immediate. So, what would interest me would be the things close at hand.
Ben: What sprang to mind, into my memory, was the day that changed my life. It was a day I had a very important audition for a theatre job. I didn’t realise when I went in for this audition, it turned out it was to play Hamlet. [Ben played the lead in Trevor Nunn’s 2004 production of Hamlet at the Old Vic.] I thought it was to play Rosencrantz or something, a smaller role. I remember so vividly this day. Although I hadn’t thought about it until you just asked the question and it just came back. It was snowy, the jacket my boyfriend had given me at the time, a sheepskin coat, smelled musty. I remember so many things!
Ira: When you say that, and include your boyfriend, what role did the closet have on you or for you at that moment?
Ben: That’s a whole other thing. It was really very big, when I look back. It was frightening to feel, particularly once I became someone people had heard of, and seemed to be interested in. I felt like I was guarding almost a dirty secret. It was very horrible. I would never have talked about my boyfriend at that time.
Ira: Did you have two closets? You came out of one then came out of another? You were out in your social world, had boyfriends?
Ben: Yes. But then, my parents didn’t know, and lots of other family. Once they knew, it was another coming out to the world.
In the spirit of the film, did you do any record-keeping of making it, or have you in the past – diaries, photos?
Ira: I have a diary of the making of Keep the Light On. It’s actually still online.
Ben: Wow!
Ira: Occasionally I go back to it, to remember certain things. It’s useful to me. Since then, I have not. I wish I did, because I would like to be in closer contact with my own feelings.
I love that the making of this film must have involved a lot of long conversations, because that’s what it’s about. Whereas media is so fast paced – we don’t have five minutes to rub together to talk about anything. Was that what it was like?
Ira: For me it was.Ultimately, my artform is a series of conversations that generate images. There’s always collaboration at the centre. Definitely many more conversations with Alex Ashe, the cinematographer, than with Ben or Rebecca. With the actors, I try to keep unspoken a lot of things, in order to discover together. But with the cinematographer, there has to be a deep, circular conversation around the images we’re making. Hours and hours and hours of conversation.
I was reading an interview with Linda Rosenkrantz in the New York Times earlier. She said she watches Keeping Up with the Kardashians and Project Runway! I was thinking, with all these amazing names I heard in the film – Allen Ginsberg, for example – I want those people to live on in future generations of queer people. But for me, I had to seek them out; no one taught me about them. Sometimes I worry [that a barrier is] people think they can’t be into low culture and high culture, or low culture and alternaculture. But you can. Are there any examples of low or mid-culture that you guys like?
Ira: I think once you develop a curiosity in something, you follow paths. I read an article in the late ‘80s about David Wojnarowicz, which included a mention of his lover and mentor Peter Hujar. Then I see there’s a show at Matthew Marks Gallery of Peter Hujar, so I seek that out. I walk in the door, and I see photographs of Charles Ludlam, Susan Sontag, Fran Lebowitz, Allen Ginsberg. I began to follow certain entryways that this world led me to. Also, I seek out queer and gay writers because I find it so intimate to read versions of stories that seem so familiar to me. You do that over 40, 50, 60 years, you end up with a breadth. A limited breadth. And then, I only watch one thing on television, which is Housewives! Every night, my husband and I, he gives me 20 minutes of Housewives before I fall asleep.
Ben: Which one though?!
Ira: Beverley Hills. Salt Lake City. Atlanta. Miami. And that’s it. I don’t recommend it! It just happens to be, for me, mainlining something. But I think what Housewives and reality [TV] do is something like Hujar does: it gives you a connection to the minutiae of everyday life, even if it is constructed. It is quite real. The dramas are there, waiting for you to turn them up.
Ben: I don’t watch Housewives. I find it too much. I don’t find it relaxing company in any way. But my partner really loves them all. I like Traitors. I think that show is fantastic! I am devoted to it!
Peter Hujar’s Day is out on 2 January 2026.
‘To be really successful, you have to be sexy in a straight way’: Ben Whishaw on libidinous New York and playing Peter Hujar
by Alex Needham 16th December 2025
On 19 December 1974, the writer Linda Rosenkrantz went round to her friend Peter Hujar’s apartment in New York, and asked the photographer to describe exactly what he had done the day before. He talked in great detail about taking Allen Ginsberg’s portrait for the New York Times (it didn’t go well – Ginsberg was too performative for the kind of intimacy Hujar craved). He also described the Chinese takeaway he ate and how his pal Vince Aletti came round to have a shower. And he fretted about not being paid by Elle magazine.
So what did Ben Whishaw, who plays him in the new film Peter Hujar’s Day, do himself the day before? The actor, on a video call from his home in London, rubbing his hands through his hair in a worried manner, says he could probably describe it in “about five sentences”, but after some persuasion attempts to give a flavour. “I got home from filming and I got the chicken that I’d cooked the previous day and eaten half of and I finished it. Well, not finished it but continued eating it and then had a glass of wine and fell asleep at half past nine. Boring. But, um, maybe there’s no such thing as boring.”
Hujar was also acutely attuned to details, from light on the Hudson River to the hair on a drag queen’s shins
This is a thesis the film tests to the limit. Directed by Ira Sachs, Peter Hujar’s Day consists entirely of 70 minutes of chat between Hujar and Rosenkrantz, played by Rebecca Hall. The script is taken from Rosenkrantz’s transcript, which was rediscovered in 2019, when Hujar’s papers were donated to New York’s Morgan Library (Rosenkrantz is now 91, while the photographer died of Aids in 1987, aged 53). Hujar and Rosenkrantz talk in his flat, lounging on the sofa and reclining on the bed, her reel-to-reel tape machine clanking and whirring as the sun goes down in what feels like real time.
As you’d expect from actors of Hall and Whishaw’s calibre, the accents are impeccable and the intimacy of Hujar and Rosenkrantz is conveyed through the tiniest details: a look, a touch, a comfortable silence. Whishaw describes it as “a portrait of a friendship, almost a love story”. Some critics have acclaimed the film as a masterpiece. Lindsay Lohan recently praised its “quiet beauty”. Others, however, may find it challenging to view in its entirety – although Whishaw says it can be watched like a video work in an art exhibition, with the viewer dropping in and out. “That would feel equally valid.”
Peter Hujar’s Day was filmed at Westbeth, an artists’ community on the western edge of Manhattan where Hujar took pictures. Whishaw loves being in New York. “You feel like there’s a lot of libido,” he says. “There’s an energy that feels sexual – it’s something to do with the climate, that island, the people and the way it’s all laid out.” When he’s in the city, he likes to go to concerts, or to Julius, the city’s oldest gay bar. “You can always get a chair at Julius,” he says. “If that existed in London, it would just be rammed the whole time, wouldn’t it?”
Sachs told Whishaw not to divulge exactly how long Peter Hujar’s Day took to film, as it was so brief – somewhere between a week and a month. Nonetheless, Whishaw certainly put a shift in. He had 55 pages of painstakingly recreated mundane chat to memorise, while Hall had a mere three. “I really enjoy that in art,” Whishaw says of this focus on the small stuff. “I’m reading these diaries by this brilliant Australian writer called Helen Garner” – recent winner of the Baillie Gifford prize – “and they’re all tiny observations. But it changes your perception of life, because they point you to how life is really made up of tiny moments, even when enormous events are going on.”
Whishaw loves Hujar’s work for the way it captures a long-lost queer New York bohemia destroyed by Aids (“like a portal into a time that might not have been remembered”); for his mastery of monochrome (“he talks about that in the film – the blacks and the greys, and the sorrow in them is beautiful”); and for the psychological insight in his portraits. Earlier this year, Whishaw went to a comprehensive show of Hujar’s work at Raven Row in London. “You could really feel how extraordinarily intimate he was able to be with his subjects,” he says. “I think that’s very moving.”
Whishaw was working on Sachs’s previous film Passages, about a man who cheats on his husband with a woman, when the director asked him to play Hujar. He agreed immediately. “I wanted to work with Ira again. I wanted just to be with Ira again,” he says. “He’s someone whose company I enjoy. We share interests and we like talking to each other. So it just came about that way. And yeah, to work with a gay person is really nice.”
Is it different from working with a straight director? “It definitely feels different if you’re making a project that’s about gayness or queerness,” Whishaw says. “And there are lots of beautiful gay directors – but not that many. I think it’s hard for them to make films. So it’s precious when you get to be involved with one.”
There aren’t that many out gay actors either, especially ones at Whishaw’s level of success. “No, not very many,” he says. “It’s complicated and probably different for every individual, but I think it’s still something to do with the fact that if you want to be really successful, you have to conform to what is deemed to be heterosexual taste, or something. Or be sexy in a heterosexual way. I’m always amazed by how much sex is underneath everything, actually. Or desire. There’s still a lot of homophobia and hatred. I mean, it’s better, but it’s still true. Also, who knows what journey people are on with these things? I don’t blame people for being private.”
Whishaw is 45. Like a lot of queer people his age, he is somewhat haunted by the absence of the generation of gay men above him, many of whom died of Aids when they still had so much to contribute as mentors, teachers or father figures, and through work they never got to make. “I feel the lack of elders,” Whishaw says. “It’s like this massive gap, which is still so sad and shocking.” Hujar never took a picture again after finding out he had Aids. “He literally stopped the minute he got the diagnosis. Everything in the darkroom was left exactly as it was. It gives me chills to think about what would be behind that.”
It’s especially sad, Whishaw says, because most artists keep working for as long as they can. The actor is certainly no exception. Next he’s doing a TV series, then a film, then perhaps some theatre, before possibly making something himself. “A dancer can’t keep going, can they? I mean, some people do and that’s extraordinary. But actors and photographers can keep going. And I think you can get better because you have more to offer about what it is to be human.”
Peter Hujar’s Day is out in the US. It is released in the UK on 2 January
Ben Whishaw interviews Ruth Wilson
Ruth Wilson does her homework
The thriller series maven saw an unsettling amount of herself in her latest character. Here, she sits down with fellow actor Ben Whishaw to go Down Cemetery Road.
by Ben Whishaw December 10, 2025
Over our slightly blurry video call, Ruth Wilson wears a deep blue knitted jumper and traces of sun-kissed hair flicked away from her face. Warm, attentive and witty, Wilson laughs readily and greets every question with careful consideration. It’s exactly the balance of humility and confidence that one might expect from an Olivier-Award- winning actor who grew up in a quiet village in Surrey — a village where she worked her way towards LAMDA, before landing her first role as Jane Eyre in the eponymous 2006 BBC adaptation. Since, Wilson has starred in Luther, The Affair, His Dark Materials, as well as both on stage and the silver screen. Her latest project, Down Cemetery Road, is a new adaptation by Morwenna Banks based on Slow Horses writer Mick Herron’s 2003 book series. In it, Wilson plays Sarah Tucker, an art conservationist looking for a missing girl after an explosion shakes her suburban Oxford life. With the help of private investigator Zoë Boehm (Emma Thompson), the pair unravel a thrilling world of betrayal, violence and government secrets.
Despite having both been in Saving Mr. Banks, Down Cemetery Road marks the first time Thompson and Wilson have actually acted together. In that sense, Ben Whishaw, today’s interviewer, has one up on Thompson. He and Wilson played opposite each other in The Second Woman, a marathon of a play in which the Surrey actor performed the same scene on a loop with a different partner over the course of twenty-four hours. Wearing a loose bun and an artsy graphic tee, Whishaw joins our Zoom call after a night shoot. Surprisingly, he is somewhat anxious. “I never think that the interviewer might be as nervous as I am being interviewed,” he jokes, holding out his hand-written questions. However, his nerves quickly give way to an easy but engaged conversation in which he and Wilson regularly break to compliment each other’s projects. Whether they’re talking about previous roles or shared memories, one thing is clear: they would love to work together again.
Ben Whishaw: First of all, Down Cemetery Road is completely brilliant. I’ve only watched the first two [episodes], but I was totally hooked. How different is the show from the books?
Ruth Wilson: It’s quite weird, because the books were written in 2003, and they needed to be modernised slightly. My character certainly needed a lot of adaptation, because [in the books] she was a bored housewife: she didn’t have a job, she didn’t have any children and was wandering around the streets, bored. I don’t know many people like that anymore. But also the books were much darker. Sarah’s husband in the books is drugging her, and she is someone that has lost her sense of self and confidence.
BW: Had that work already been done or were you involved in those changes?
RW: I got offered the pilot and Morwenna had already made those changes. I definitely questioned the changes, because, to me, [the book] makes Sarah’s motivations a bit more obvious. She’s a person like you or me that suddenly finds themself in a conspiracy thriller. I found the character as I went, which is the first time I’d done that, actually.
BW: What do you mean you found it as you went?
RW: Usually I’m quite clear going into a job. I’ve done my homework and I decide what my arc is. I did go to a woman at Somerset house and she taught me all about art restoration. I practiced cleaning the dirt off an old painting. In this, I felt a little bit unsure because things happen to her, so it was something that was revealing itself to me. Ultimately I thought, Make it as close to me as possible, and it will come out.
“I take the prep and the world very seriously. I obsess over it.”
BW: It’s interesting that you say that you struggled to find her, because I didn’t get that sense at all.
RW: My mum actually said that, too. It wasn’t a voice I had to create. I knew it already. And that left me feeling a little bit untethered.
BW: As a character, Sarah is kicked while she’s down. Her boss dismisses her, her husband diminishes her, law enforcement tries to silence her. How much did anger fuel your performance?
RW: I think injustice definitely did. In Sarah, there’s definitely a feeling that if someone’s being wronged, she’ll say it out loud. I used to be perhaps more like that, but definitely as a kid, [I felt] the idea of injustice and unfairness. In terms of anger, I think it’s more anger at, a bit Hedda-like, the prison she’s put herself in. This is her way to get out.
BW: One of the things I love about watching you is that sense of you being completely in the moment and loving it.
RW: I take the prep and the world very seriously, and I think deeply about everything. I obsess over it. When I’m doing it, there’s a part of me that just goes, Oh, fuck it and embrace the fun.
BW: When you’re watching something like Down Cemetery Road, are you good at piecing together these stories?
RW: I mean I’m in a lot of them. I’ve grown up on it — [shows] like Prime Suspect, Cracker, and Morse or Miss Marple.
BW: They’re delicious, aren’t they?
RW: They’re great. When I do watch, I really indulge in the mystery of it and annoy people next to me who want to keep quiet.
BW: This is a question that I got asked about two weeks ago, and I didn’t really know how to answer — but I don’t really curate a career. Where do you sit on something like that?
RW: I’m a bit the same. People always ask me what play would you love to do. I don’t have a play I’d love to do. You don’t have control over what comes your way, really. Right now I feel like I really need to go back on stage. It’s a coincidence. Sometimes you see something and think, This is interesting.
BW: Are you likely to do more of Down Cemetery Road, Ruth?
RW: If people watch it I’ll have no choice.
Whishaw laughs.
RW: I would love to revisit those characters. I think Emma and I don’t get quite enough time on screen together. We do in the last three episodes, but it’s more of a hint of what’s to come.
BW: Is the idea that, going ahead, you would become a duo that solves things?
RW: I hope that [Sarah] is still a normal pleb. I hope they don’t make her another private investigator. Her recklessness and slight naivety is what I like.
BW: Do you have things you’re working on that you’re looking forward to?
RW: I’ve got three little projects: a play that I’m developing with Kit Williams, a film with Tessa Ross and a TV show that I’m developing. And hopefully something with you, Ben.
BW: Yes, I know, we do really need to work together.
Do you miss the queer figureheads, Ben Whishaw?
The openly gay Briton Ben Whishaw was on display alongside Franz Rogowski in "Passages." Ira Sachs now also has "Peter Hujar's Day," where he performs as a gay photographer. We met the actor for an interview.
Ben Whishaw (45) starred in "The Perfume," in "Cloud Atlas" or the queer love story "Lilting" 2. The gay actor also has a same-sex partner as tinkerer Q in the James Bond films 3. Most recently, the Briton gave the queer contract killer for Netflix in "Black Doves" with a very big fondness for champagne. After "Passages" , Whishaw is once again in front of the camera for Ira Sachs: The new feature film "Peter Hujar's Day," which took place on 6. November 2025 in German cinemas, tells the story of the American photographer Peter Hujar and his girlfriend Linda. We talk to the actor about the film.
Mr. Whishaw, I was expecting you to drink a glass of champagne during this conversation. Just like my character in "Black Doves"? In contrast to the assassin Sam, I personally do not like champagne! If you look at "Wake Up Dead Man: A Knives Out Mystery" with Daniel Craig as a gay master thief, you quickly come up with the idea that you would have given up an even more perfect pair with your Ex-007 partner than Josh O'Connor? Well, maybe there's another sequel to "Knives Out." And maybe there are still opportunities. (laughs) In "Peter Hujar's Day," you sit on a couch and have to read monologists for a very long time. Is that more exhausting than the sex scenes with Frank Rogowski in "Passages"? It's not the same. However, there are quite similarities. In both films, director Ira Sachs is interested in what it means to build closeness to someone. It's about the question of how easy or difficult it can be to get intimate with a person. Ira really wants to know the truth about how people treat each other when they get closer. This theme is typical of all Ira's films. As an actor, of course, there are very special challenges. Are these particular challenges in the fact that it is more intellectual than emotional? Peter is asked by Linda to just tell him what he did on this one day. And Peter tries to remember what happened. That's pretty intellectual. I was surprised at how many emotions are associated with it. There is tenderness, pain, frustration, fear and love. So there are a lot of feelings beneath the surface. Are those queer icons of the 1960s and 1970s like Allen Ginsberg, William Seward Burroughs or Susan Sontag not long past and have lost their importance? It was actually completely different times than it is today. What these people have created, nobody does anymore. It really feels distant, all the flavor has been lost in a way. In this respect, this film is the portrait of a lost time, a culture that has disappeared.
Do you think it's sad that there are no more queer gurus and thought leaders? What's a Ginsberg in TikTok times?
That's where I agree. There are no such queer people who are gigantic figures. Of course, there are wonderful queer artists. But everyone is a product of the time they live in. The giants have lived in a very specific moment in history, queer life was completely different than it is today. That's why they had to be incredibly strong and brave. They didn't get anything delivered on a silver platter, but had to fight their own way.
Do you want your film to inspire you to rediscover Ginsberg and Co.?
I hope so. But that was not the reason we made this movie. Our goal was a tribute to Peter Hujar, this extraordinary artist who was unfortunately never properly appreciated in his time. At the same time, I found it a fascinating challenge to turn a conversation into a whole movie. Last but not least, Ira and I wanted to work together again on a project.
Your public coming-out was twelve years ago. What is the balance sheet? Did you have negative experiences like Rupert Everett, who laments a career kink?
No, I have not had a bad experience, although I am a bit younger than Rupert. In my coming-out in 2014, the world had changed a lot. Although this has never been a secret for my friends and family anyway, I lived with a partner after all. It was then clear only to the public and there were no negative reactions whatsoever.
In "Black Doves," you play the cool, gay serial killer. That probably would hardly have been possible ten years ago?
I am incredibly happy about this development. Ten years ago, as a queer figure, you were the best friend of someone or the fig leaf gay. A lot of things remained quite stereotypical. Today, on the other hand, we have reached a stage where queer people are depicted in film and television in the full spectrum of the rainbow. Up to gay assassins who like to drink champagne! (laughs)
In Germany, four years ago, there was the #ActOut campaign , the collective coming-out of 185 people from film, television and theatre. Wouldn't that have been an issue for Britain?
I didn't know anything about this action. That sounds very nice. I don't know why we didn't do anything similar in the UK. I don’t know what that says about our different countries. (laughs)
The old question: Should queer roles only be played by queer people? Or is this demand outdated?
I don't think queer roles should be reserved for queer people only. There are many examples where people who are not queer have embodied such roles quite wonderfully and perfectly believably. However, it should be an equivalent playing field on which queer people can also take on every role. But we're not that far yet. In this respect, there are cases in which at least it should be tried that a role that is queer or transgender is also played by such a person. This should not be neglected, because we are simply not far enough. I hope at some point we reach the point that everyone can just play everything. That's the goal!
Do you agree that "Lilting" is one of the most underrated gay love movies?
I'm glad you liked it. "Lilting" is a wonderful movie. It was made with very little money, but with a lot of heart. I love the movie very much!
The next season of "Black Doves" is being created. Is there the champagne torture for you again?
Yes, there is champagne again. But in truth it's apple juice, sometimes grapefruit. (laughs)
Ben Whishaw: ‘Coming out? Part of me still thinks it’s nobody’s business’
From Paddington to Bond, Ben Whishaw has starred in some of Hollywood’s biggest blockbusters – but off screen he’d rather blend into the crowd
by Jonathan Dean September 28th, 2025
Ben Whishaw is having a crisis — well, as much of a crisis as somebody as calm, gentle and softly spoken as him can have. It is a quiet crisis — the man speaks at a volume so low it could be coming from a different room — but, behind that exterior, that hedge of black hair and bushy beard, lies a bustling, fretting brain.
“I’m not a model, you know,” he says, frowning, as we settle back in an east London photo studio for a day of modelling. “And I’m not particularly interested in fashion, which is probably not what you want to hear, but it’s a strange expectation of actors — that they should also look really brilliant in fashionable clothes. So you just need to find a way to not feel like an idiot.”
No wonder they picked him to play Paddington — a friendly bear who has come to represent the very British virtues of reserve and decency. If they did Paddington without fur, just with Whishaw, it would be basically the same film. When we meet, on a stifling day, he is dressed in a vintage T-shirt and jeans, with trainers that could have had a few owners. The actor has had an acclaimed past year: on stage in London for Waiting for Godot; on TV in the hit Netflix spy thriller Black Doves; on the big screen in Paddington in Peru. Next is the tender arthouse biopic Peter Hujar’s Day, about the 1970s snapper — more on which later — but first, back to what’s bothering Whishaw.
“I’ve been thinking, what is the way to dress as a man in his forties?” He is 44, 45 next month. “I went through a phase of wearing black, but that is just heavy, isn’t it? Should I wear suits? I went through a dungaree phase. But now I just dress like a teenager.” Does he ever take outfits from film sets? “I’ve definitely got socks that belonged to Q,” he says of his techie role in Daniel Craig’s James Bond films. What about Paddington? “There’s nothing tangible to take from Paddington, apart from the memo- ries.” He does add that he owns a little red hat.
His doubts about fashion are because of the attention it can bring. “I have a conflict in my head,” he admits. “Sometimes at events I’d rather blend in. For me, clothing and fashion is armour, a camouflage, and so I’ve never worn anything extravagant because I don’t feel comfortable with people looking at me.”
Isn’t that a professional hazard when it comes to acting? “Well, they do look at you,” Whishaw admits, smiling. “But you’re repre- senting a character, so most of the time you almost think it is not yourself.” So, psycho- logically, he does not feel like he is Ben? “Yes. You’re in disguise. You don’t feel it’s you being exposed.”
He pauses. He likes being at home and to keep home separate — Whishaw was married to the Australian composer Mark Bradshaw for a decade, before splitting up in 2022, and is now reportedly dating the Slow Horses actor Kadiff Kirwan. “You have to protect yourself somehow or other,” he says of life away from the cameras. “I need lots of privacy, and then to do my work, but it gets complicated because things need to be publicised.” He pauses. He pauses a lot, at lengths so great you could brew a cup of tea. “I mean, capitalism is obviouslyapartofwhatIdo,Iamaproduct that needs to be sold. But, most of the time, I pretend that’s not the case.”
He was born and raised in Bedfordshire — son to Linda, who worked in retail, and Jose, a one-time non-league footballer who still works in sport. He has a twin brother, James, whose Instagram shows them together at Wimbledon and premieres. Whishaw upped and left for London aged 19 to study at Rada, graduating in 2003. Acclaimed theatre work came early with Hamlet at the Old Vic, while his big screen breakthrough was in 2006 for the adaptation of Patrick Süskind’s cult serial killer novel, Perfume: The Story of a Murderer. Soon he was everywhere and it was all striking work: playing the poet John Keats in the film Bright Star and one of the versions of Bob Dylan in I’m Not There.
And then there is Paddington. The first film came in 2014, a superior sequel three years later, with the disappointing blur of a third movie last year. It started as a cute, well-meaning jaunt through a British classic, but ended as something of a cult, the centrist dad of family entertainment that came to represent, for many, a country that disap- peared via the division of Brexit. Or it’s just about a semi-naked bear. Either way it has become the biggest movie of his career.
“I have a weird relationship to it,” he admits. “Because I am very aware that I just contributeonetinyparttoit,Ialmostfeellike it has nothing to do with me. But the films are lovely and it’s gratifying to hear how much children love it. I bumped into somebody who told me about their very autistic grandson and how he finds lots of life quite difficult, but he is absolutely obsessed and, apparently, calmed by Paddington 2. He watches it over and over and goes into some other place.” Whishaw beams.“That’s wonderful.”
Voice acting, though, which is what he largely does in Paddington, is one of the sections of the industry most threatened by AI. As in, software exists to mimic voices. Does he think Paddington would work without his unique tone, which quivers and shakes along with a certain high-pitched assertiveness? “A human voice is an extraor- dinary thing,” he argues, incredulously. “Like if you lost someone...” He shakes his head somewhat, mind wandering somewhere. “When one loses someone, not hearing their voice again is one of the things that you are so pained about. Someone is completely present in their voice — I don’t think it’s a small thing at all. It’s an amazing thing, someone’s voice.”
Someone once called Whishaw “a Judi Dench in the making”. A couple of years ago I asked Dench to name some modern greats of acting she had worked with and she replied: “Keeley Hawes, Benedict Cumber- batch, Ben Whishaw.” This makes him squirm.“Oh,that’s super-nice.”
I feel like he would have been happier in Dench’s day. Back then there were interviews, yes, but the job was less 24/7 — there was no social media. You could pretty much just act and go to the pub.“But it’s a different world now,” he says, a rare fortysomething who does not like to pretend they are younger than they are. “God, this sounds so stupid and ancient, but I remember when social media started and I thought, why would anybody do this? Back then it sounded to me like a text message you made public. But now we take it for granted that everything is in the public domain.” He takes a beat. “It’s so bizarre. But every now and then I do feel very much like, come on, Ben, get with the times.”
Peter Hujar’s Day is set in 1974. Directed by Ira Sachs — who also worked with Whishaw on 2023’s superb romantic entanglement drama Passages — the film is, essentially, a conversation between Hujar, an acclaimed photographer best known for his black-and- white portraits, and a friend, played by Rebecca Hall. It is a beautiful piece of passion that came out of a conversation Whishaw had with Sachs about Hujar’s rather forgotten work.
“Lots of people don’t know about Peter,” Whishaw says. “Yet he was extraordinary. He didn’t like things to look self-consciously arty. He had this enormous sensitivity and way about him that enabled people to feel really intimate, because his photos have this amazing nakedness. I mean, sometimes they are literally naked. But even when they’re not, you feel almost painfully close to the people in the images.”
Hujar was diagnosed with Aids in 1987 and died ten months later. Is it a period Whishaw researched or talked to people from? “I mean, as a gay man who grew up in the Nineties, having reached the age I am? That period is very fascinating to me,” he says. “Great art was made by queer people in that time, and what is sad about Peter is his images document that transition from the Seventies through to the Eighties. You see the fear and absolute tragedy of losses of that period.”
Much has changed in the gay community since the Eighties — but then much has changed too since Whishaw started acting. Back then a role like the one he played in Black Doves barely existed, if at all — his Sam, an assassin, is gay, but very little is made of that fact. Instead, he just lives with a man, in the way that thou- sands of heterosexual characters have had partners over the past decades. The hit show, which co-stars Keira Knightley and is set for a second series next year, feels subtly revolu- tionary — something Whishaw agrees with, suitably quietly.
“Maybe it is quite new?” he says, thought- fully. “And I like that, but I was less inter- ested in the fact that him being gay wasn’t a remarkable thing or the focus of the story, and more interested in this man being a killer. It’s not a psychologically probing series, but I’m taken by gay characters not having to be noble, flawless or setting a good example — instead behaving in ways that are ambiguous, morally dubious, ambivalent. Messy. That’s intriguing.”
Yet I suppose this is a natural conse- quence to there being more queer roles — quantity leads to different qualities being explored, rather than gay parts being used to represent various stereotypes or be the
entire point of a character? “Yes, I agree,” Whishaw says. “I suppose that, for a long time, there were so few stories about those characters that they were a bit overloaded. As in, ‘This is the one gay story!’ That pressure is a bit too much to bear, it had to say too much for a group.” He looks off to one side, his mind clearly running through what he might say. “There has been a change ...” He takes yet another pause. “What do I think?” And another. “I think ... Well, there were very few gay actors who were out when I started and so being out didn’t seem like a sustainable position to be in.” Whishaw came out in 2014. “But now it kind of is sustainable, but, actually, it opens up so many questions I have for myself. Because, again, part of me still thinks that it is nobody’s business.”
He asks if I have any children — we are the same age. I say yes, two. “That must be hard work — but also extraordinary,” he says, somewhat wistfully. “I can really imagine the anxiety piling up. How do you know what the right thing to do is or the right thing to say? I guess one perhaps shouldn’t overthink it.”
How has Whishaw himself changed since he was a boy? “I’ve changed an awful lot,” he says. “I mean, I was really shy, quiet and still am in some ways, but I do something very public. But, also, the events of life change you, don’t they? I would like to get back to what I was like as a child.” In what way? “A bit lighter, a bit less encumbered by certain things. I think you become more aware that ‘oh no — this is really it’. This is the one go at life and a whole chunk is already gone and you’ve made certain decisions that put things in motion, that are irreversible...
“I’d like to ...” he continues, after his lengthiest pause yet, a man forever having an internal conversation, “I’d like to get back to a certain lightness.”■
Peter Hujar’s Day screens at the BFI London Film Festival on October 10-11, and nationwide from January 2, 2026.
Ben Whishaw at the Berlinale : “I enjoyed stuffing so much text into my head”
In Ira Sachs' film “Peter Hujar’s Day”, Ben Whishaw plays the legendary New York photographer. A conversation about his work, gay film roles and Tom Tykwer.
By Nadine Lange 15th February 2025
Ben Whishaw, what did you know about the photographer Peter Hujar before director Ira Sachs asked you if you want to participate in the film adaptation of a conversation between him and his girlfriend Linda Rosenkrantz from 1974? In fact, I already knew a lot because I loved his work for a long time.
What fascinates you about it? When he photographs people, you have the feeling that he has access to their interior. This is really astounding. In addition, the pictures are simply beautiful. When you see the prints in the original, you can see what a tremendous quality they have. I also like his motifs very much: the drag queens, cabaret performers, artists, authors, people on the street. Then again horses, cows and geese – he was simply open to everything. That's what I love about him.
The film is based on the transcript of an interview in which he reports the day before. Usually you approach Hujar through his pictures, here it is alone text. What was your impression of him when you read it? I was amazed at the fullness of detail with which he remembered things. It sounds a bit ridiculous because he was a photographer, but he saw photographically. His thinking has a great clarity. He speaks in whole sentences and with great security. When I watched the film, it touched me very much when it talked about having the feeling of failing, for example with Allen Ginsberg, with whom he simply couldn't build a connection.
In the 75 minutes of the film talk almost only you. How did you handle the incredible set of text? I enjoyed the challenge of stuffing it all into my head. Someone once told me that actors use part of their brains, which dates back to times when people had no writing and used an oral tradition to pass on experience. Most people no longer use this memory ability, but actors are allowed to do so.
The film, which is shot at 16 millimetres, transports us back to a pre-digital era, in which time is much slower. Did this make you nostalgic? Yes! Sometimes I want to get rid of this thing ). What I really get attracted to the film is watching people really spend time together. They are actually lying together all day – I don't do anything like that anymore. Everything happens at a hyperspeed, all can reach one constantly and want to get an immediate answer to any mail. That drives me crazy.
Peter says in the film that he really needs time for his work. He has to stand in front of the picture and look at it. He cannot be hurried.
Peter Hujar was openly gay, just like you. However, you once said that it took quite a long time to understand that. Were there films or other art forms that helped you with your coming out? I don't know whether this was a help, but there were things that helped me notice it. For example, the British TV series “Queer as Folk” by Russell T. Davies, who blew me away as a teenager. She was sexually explicit and really hot. It was extremely rare at the time that queer characters were portrayed in such an honest way.
I agree that interesting Tagesspiegel offers will be submitted to me by e-mail. I can withdraw my consent at any time.
They have played very different gay characters – from the grieving widower to the contract killer, recently in the Netflix series “Black Doves”. Would you have dreamed of such a bandwidth when you started? No. But I remember discussions saying that you might not play a gay role. Which seems quite absurd, because it implies that there is a limitation. Of course, gay life is as rich and diverse as any other.
When I started acting, you had to be able to go through as hetero to get work at all. There was only occasional a gay character in a supporting role. This is now over because everything has become fluid and there are queer characters as central characters in series and movies. But that all happened only recently.
In the James Bond films with Daniel Craig you played the weapons master Q. Once there was a little hint that he has a date with a man. If you play Q again, what do you want for him? I don't really know, they will probably replace the cast. I won't play Q again, so I didn't think much about the role. But I found it nice that there was a gay character at Bond – even though he wasn't the first.
They have shot several times with the Berlin director Tom Tykwer, among others in their first major film, “Das Parfum”. Have you seen his film “The Light” with which the festival was opened? Yes, I was there at a cast-and-crew screening and it was fantastic. I love the film, which I find very moving, complex and unpredictable. Tom has come an exciting look at the present and I am very proud of him. Unfortunately, I hardly saw him because he was so busy because of the opening.
What did you learn in working with him? Many things. But above all, I got an apprenticeship with him to play for a camera. I came from the theatre and had filmed a bit, but not a big leading role like “Das Parfum”. Tom showed me less to do less, to create space that the spectators can fill. This allows the audience to really get involved in a figure. Tom always said: You have to be someone as an actor who can project something onto people and he has always encouraged me to do that.
“Just take the damn glass”
Ben Whishaw is probably the most likeable film star of the present day. An encounter at the Berlinale to clarify the question of how to drink as an actor correctly.
By David Steinitz 17. February 2025
Ben Whishaw does not like marmalade. This report at least caused amazement in his homeland of England, if not at all. Because the actor is the voice of Paddington Bear, at least in the original version of the movies. Paddington Bear loves marmalade – and the English love Paddington bear and marmalade. Only Ben Whishaw is not a sweet breakfast. However, he has enjoyed the reaction to his spread-length inclination.
A cold February day on the third floor of the Berlinale Palace on Potsdamer Platz. Outside, the snow rages, the festival visitors scus inside and never messed up. However, Ben Whishaw has more than relaxed on his armchair in the small lounge, deeply immersed in his oversized sweater. The 44-year-old, who most viewers know as Q from the last James Bond films and from the cinema adaptation of "The Perfume", has to confess even more terrible confessions beyond the jam. For example, he likes Berlin very much in February. Seriously? Wouldn't a meeting in Cannes have been more beautiful? “No, no, no! The cold, the snow, I feel very comfortable.”
Interviewing movie stars, becomes more and more complicated, Ben Whishaw is a pleasant exception
Until a few years ago, it was a matter of course that you could interview film stars at the big festivals in Berlin, Cannes and Venice. Today, a so-called 1:1, as the insane American publicity managers call one-on-one conversations with their protégés, has almost become a rarity. They prefer to stuff eight, nine or ten journalists in roundtable calls to get the maximum coverage per time slot. Some also simply do no more interviews at all, beyond the constantly overcrowded press conferences. Timothée Chalamet briefly marched over the red carpet in Berlin in the pink tank top to present his Bob Dylan film, and was then already gone.
And if there is an offer for a rare one-on-one meeting, you will be happy to get a list of topics that you should not address in advance. For Adrien Brody (for "The Brutalist" just nominated as the best lead actor in the Oscars), for example, this is the case. He does not want to talk about the fact that AI was used by “The Brutalist” to make Hungarian his role sound authentic. With such specifications, you can then leave it the same.
In this sense, Ben Whishaw is an absolutely rare specimen of the genus Hollywood star. No list of taboos in advance, single interview no problem, and as pmeaningful as some other colleagues – Hugh Grant, for example – he is not somewhat. And this even though he claims to be miserable in the small talk. Glatt adequate.
Most recently, Whishaw was seen in the award-winning Netflix series "Black Doves", which became a streaming hit in the run-up to Christmas. However, Whishaw is an actor who has to make at least one small arthouse film after every mainstream production, for artistic soul healing. He is therefore presenting his experiment “Peter Hujar’s Day” at the Berlinale. Hujar was a well-known New York photographer. In 1974, the writer Linda Rosenkrantz recorded a conversation with him in her apartment in Manhattan. He was supposed to tell her every detail from the last 24 hours he had experienced, even if it was so small.
The book project, which other such one-day narratives of artists were to be incorporated, did not finally come about. For “Peter Hujar’s Day”, director Ira Sachs packed the records of that time, five decades later, completely into a film. Ben Whishaw plays Hujar, Rebecca Hall plays Linda Rosenkrantz. It is a small low-budget production that was filmed in just three weeks.
The result has an impressive meditative effect. Hujar tells of encounters with famous people such as Allen Ginsberg and Susan Sontag, about sexual offers and flirces. At the same time, however, he also reports in detail how he always poured his flowers with the coffee pot, which he in turn generally fills in the bathtub, because there the water pressure is greater than at the sink. And it is precisely these small details that make the figure grow to your heart. The film does without everything that movies usually try to heed, a strict three-act structure, a purification of the hero on his journey. The whole script council conclusion does not play a role here at all. This feels damn good.
Because Hujar really talks continuously, this project sounds like quite a bit of text to memorize. “Well,” says Whishaw, who started his career at the theater: “Once you have played the Hamlet, then you will never worry more afterwards.”
It is perfectly clear that a film like “Peter Hujar’s Day” will never come to such a large number of viewers as a Bond movie or a Netflix series. But he wanted to do it for a reason: “As an actor, you often speak great sentences of the best authors, no matter whether they come from Shakespeare or from the stars of the guild from Hollywood. But these are all sentences where infinitely long things have been filed and polished. A text like that of Peter Hujar, which he simply flattened without thinking big in Rosenkrantz’ recording device, you otherwise never get to speak. It felt very much alive.”
Whishaw describes itself as "theatre nut", as theatrical maniac. He grew up in the small town of Clifton, the family had no connection to the show business. As a teenager, he travelled from the province to London almost every weekend by train and looked at everything that the stages had to offer the city. Especially the pieces of the young and then died early playwright Sarah Kane had done it to him. He has seen some of them in the premiere, and he is proud of which until today. He also began to imitate the way the actors speaking in order to get rid of his light provincial dialect and sound just as “posh” as the celebrated Shakespeare actors on the Old Vic. Finally, he was recorded at the legendary Royal Acadamy Of Dramatic Art and, after a somewhat frustrating auditory marathon, he first became a theatre star and then a movie star.
What can you learn about the university and what only in practice? “Actually, you can only learn the job in practice. But I had a teacher at acting school who was very important to me because he taught me never artificially intellectuizing things, but simply resorting to my experience. He said that if a scene demands that you take a sip of water from a glass, then please do not try to play someone who drinks a sip of water from a glass. Just take the damn glass and drink a sip and put it back!”
Speaks, drink a large sip of still water from its glass and disappears towards the hotel to put on his suit for the premiere in the evening.
Ben Whishaw, as Paddington Once More, Is Here to Make You Feel Better
With “Paddington in Peru,” the British actor voices the beloved bear for the third time. His calming charm remains the franchise’s calling card.
By Brooks Barnes Feb. 14, 2025
Paddington was not part of my childhood. I was a Muppet kid, and Fozzie was my comfort bear of choice.
Instead, Paddington came to me as an adult. In 2015, an exceedingly polite, marmalade-slurping fellow in a floppy felt hat and blue duffel coat arrived in theaters and offered an uplifting story about tolerance and pluck. Three years later, the euphorically reviewed “Paddington 2” delivered a reassuring — calming — message about the ugly chaos of modern life: Keep believing in goodness. It’s still out there.
So when I recently had the opportunity to talk to Paddington himself, I couldn’t help but turn the interview into a therapy session.
It wasn’t actually Paddington, of course. I was on a video call with the British actor Ben Whishaw. He voices Paddington in the PG-rated franchise, the third installment in which, “Paddington in Peru,” arrives in theaters in the United States and Canada on Friday. Our chat was supposed to be about an imaginary world where optimistic bears carry umbrellas and tuck sandwiches under their hats. On the day we spoke, however, my mind was consumed by the real world — the Los Angeles fires, the turmoil of a changing presidential administration, my mother needing heart surgery.
Paddington! Say it’s all going to be OK!
“I understand,” Whishaw said gently, sounding identical to Paddington in every syllable. “You feel like nothing is stable anymore.”
My eyes started to well up. “But here is the truth,” he continued. “Treating people well, looking at the world kindly, that still exists.”
In the first movie, Paddington turns up in London as an illegal immigrant from “darkest Peru” and encounters prejudice. A maniacal taxidermist played by Nicole Kidman wants to stuff him. “Let one bear in and soon the street will be full of them,” she sneers. Paddington carries on, helped by the kindhearted Brown family.
In the second film, Paddington faces a new challenge: Can he hold on to his decency when sent into a wider world? After encountering a series of obstacles, including wrongful imprisonment, we learn that (spoiler alert) he can. This is one resilient bear, even in the face of a villainous Hugh Grant, who plays a narcissistic, has-been actor.
“Paddington in Peru” has the same emotional arc. This time, however, the fish-out-of-water theme is reversed. Paddington is back on home turf, and the Browns — traveling with him — are caught in an unfamiliar world. “Paddington in Peru” also obscures the villain until late in the action. Is it Olivia Colman’s joyful nun? She seems to have a sinister secret. Or is it Antonio Banderas’s brooding steamboat captain?
The third movie, which cost StudioCanal an estimated $90 million to make, has already taken in $104 million overseas. (It was released in the United Kingdom in November.) By the end of its global run, “Paddington in Peru” should have ticket sales exceeding $200 million, according to box office analysts. (“Paddington 2” collected $290 million.)
In other words, the franchise is relatively healthy. No obvious reason to expect the Paddington films to go away anytime soon.
But should fans (meaning: me) worry that Paddington could lose his voice? Already, one important member of the original cast, Sally Hawkins, has decamped. After playing the sensitive Mrs. Brown in the first two films, Hawkins decided not to return for “Paddington in Peru.”
“We did everything we could to try and persuade her, but she felt she’d already brought everything she could to it,” Rosie Alison, who produced the trilogy, told me. Hawkins was replaced by Emily Mortimer, whose credits include “Mary Poppins Returns.” (It takes some getting used to.) Paul King, who directed the first two movies, also departed and was replaced by Dougal Wilson, a first-time filmmaker.
Whishaw, 44, could be next. Franchises do not seem especially important to him, although he also played the tech genius Q in three James Bond blockbusters. Based on his résumé, he clearly likes new challenges, especially in gritty TV dramas (“Black Doves,” “This is Going to Hurt”) and art films (“Women Talking,” the coming “Peter Hujar’s Day”).
“I don’t know if there will be any more Paddingtons,” he said. “I’m always of the opinion that it’s best to leave people wanting more. I don’t think it should go on and on.”
This was almost more reality than I could take. I gave Whishaw a hard stare.
“We’ll see,” he offered, returning to therapist mode.
The Paddington films are a hybrid of animation and live action, a style that can be tricky to pull off, especially tonally. Whishaw’s soft, soothing, somewhat otherworldly voice is the secret ingredient. But he was not the first choice for the role. Colin Firth, an Oscar winner for “The King’s Speech,” left the first Paddington film after production had already started because his voice (deep, booming) turned out to be an awkward fit.
“I have to work quite hard at it,” Whishaw said. “He should be funny. But he also needs to be tender. He can’t be too knowing, not ever. If it becomes too much wink wink then he just dies as a character. Sometimes he must be a little melancholy, other times quizzical. He always has to be very optimistic.”
“You do every single line 100 times or something,” Whishaw added, noting that each recording session lasts four hours. “Four hours of growling. It sounds easy, but it’s quite difficult.” While recording, Whishaw wears a helmet fitted with a camera that captures his facial expressions; Pablo Grillo, an animation whiz, uses the imagery to create Paddington.
Alison, the producer, said she hoped Paddington could help soothe the nerves of those who need it.
“He’s a very composed Englishman who takes everything in his stride, and nothing really fazes him,” she said. “Somehow, everything turns out all right for him, and he sees the best of all possibilities in the world. There’s a lovely light touch about him — that inner child is very much still there. He’s courteous and respectful. He has manners.”
Wait a second: Was she talking about Paddington or Whishaw?
“One and the same,” she said.