The fact that men are credited with advancing civilization, rather than condemned for critically stunting its advancement after they forbade half of humanity from contributing, is an excellent example of an androcentric analysis.

Kaledo Art
Cosmic Funnies
Peter Solarz
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
DEAR READER
$LAYYYTER
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open

shark vs the universe
No title available
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
cherry valley forever
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
No title available
occasionally subtle
Not today Justin
styofa doing anything

tannertan36
Mike Driver
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda
seen from T1

seen from Poland

seen from Belgium

seen from Norway

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Brazil
seen from Belgium

seen from South Korea
seen from Poland

seen from Morocco
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from Brazil

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
@melancholypilled
The fact that men are credited with advancing civilization, rather than condemned for critically stunting its advancement after they forbade half of humanity from contributing, is an excellent example of an androcentric analysis.
There is no moral argument for the existence of puberty blockers for the "treatment of gender dysphoria" (not for precocious puberty or other medical purposes, that's another issue entirely). From an outsider/normie's perspective this practice sounds dystopian. It's sad how if someone criticizes giving potent drugs to mentally ill or gay children they are labeled a "hateful bigot" rather than a sensible person.
Don't get me wrong, I genuinely do not care if fully mature adults inject themselves with hormones and drugs, but giving the same treatment to a prepubescent child should be illegal, not to mention the awful side effects
This isn't groundbreaking information but I think the reason someone is labeled a bigot for being against giving unnecessary drugs to children is that any critique of gender ideology is commonly associated with right-wingers like Matt Walsh and Ben Shapiro who turned any possible moral criticism of the movement into pure hatred for those who aren't gender conforming conservative heterosexuals, this is why people always group "Terfs" and right-wingers together despite them having completely different reasons for criticizing gender ideology.
There is no moral argument for the existence of puberty blockers for the "treatment of gender dysphoria" (not for precocious puberty or other medical purposes, that's another issue entirely) from an outsider/normie's perspective sounds dystopian. It's sad how if someone criticizes giving potent drugs to mentally ill or gay children they are labeled a "hateful bigot" rather than a sensible person.
Don't get me wrong, I genuinely do not care if fully mature adults inject themselves with hormones and drugs, but giving the same treatment to a prepubescent child should be illegal, not to mention the awful side effects
Seahorses are horses! 👏 Seahorses 👏 are 👏 horses! 👏 It’s right in the name, stupid!
You think a horse has to have four hooves to be a horse? What about a horse that’s born with three legs? Are you saying if I cut off a horse’s hooves, they’re not a horse anymore? God, you’re so caught up on elementary biology, bigot. At the higher levels of biology they throw all that “scientific definition” stuff out the window. Sources? Oh my god, you are such a seahorsephobe for asking!
We should start flooding stables so seahorses feel more welcomed in horse spaces!!
i am so serious when i say we need a mainstream feminist movement that promotes non religious voluntary celibacy because i see so many straight women online talk about how much they hate having casual sex but they still do it anyway, sex positive liberal feminism only hurt the women it tried to help
troons being mad all of a sudden at the terms “amab” and “afab” is so funny, you’re the dumbasses who made us use these stupid terms, and now they’re not progressive enough for you?? literally fuck off
jesus christ what do any of these words mean
Ironically, i never liked that term because i associate it with Dylan Mulvaney injecting himself with hormones and putting on makeup and women’s clothing and getting millions of views and praises from actual women validating his ego lol
I hate how criticizing degenerate and inappropriate sexual humor online is anathema to Gen Z now.
No, it’s not funny that you commented “hear me out” on a video of an animal. No, your onlyfans joke did not split my sides. Your “jokes” where you sexualize every living breathing organism you come across in pornographic and disrespectful ways are not funny.
Next time, reach for a fruit that isn’t already on the floor and long rotten. There is humor beyond coom. It’s okay.
reblog if the type of villain you are is extreme misandrist :)
MASSIVE TW: TRANSPHOBIA, V*GINA, W*MAN.
Now that I've put the triggers warnings, i wanted to talk about a really serious issue... Am i the only one who thinks that the painting The Origin Of the World by Courbet is... Extremely transmisoginy and transphobic??????
I mean... Look at it. The model used for it was a woman, and calling it "the origin of the world", meaning that the artist thought that only women could give birth, It's bioessentialist. What about the trans men??? Huh??? Also, as i said before, the model was a woman, a CIS theyfab. Why not use a transwoman for indicating the origin of the world uh?? Bioessentialism again. Calcel Courbet 2024.
“having a genital preference is bigoted and transphobic”
they are really telling on themselves
Let’s do a thought experiment:
if a man doesn’t want to date or have sex with a brunette woman because she’s not his type, he isn’t denying her femaleness or value as a person
so how come if a man doesn’t want to date a “woman” with a penis he’s all of a sudden invalidating “her” “female” identity?
it’s almost like the only proof that “she” is a “woman” is dependent on policing other people’s behaviors to accommodate “her” delusion
the ultimate blackpill is when you realize that most men view rape as desecration of property rather than an act of violence against another human
I really believe there’s some sort of “emperor’s new clothes” phenomenon happening with Gen Z discoursers where they’re too afraid to question the logic of some of the discourse being thrown at them for fear of appearing to be unwoke so they just blindly parrot it not to be excluded by their peers
nothing makes me laugh more than when tras claim the 'terf' movement is somehow government funded or benefiting some sort of upper class like bro ur entire movement is based off of lining the pockets of plastic surgeons❗️❗️❗️❗️🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😭😭😭😭
Every major terf movement is backed by conservative super pacs in the western world from the US to the Nordic nations if you look at their funding it’s millionaires giving money to politicians to push an agenda.
Meanwhile trans activists can’t even afford to help abuse victims or fund protests and have to beg on sites like go fund me.
I’d also like to point out that there are no socialist or communist TERFs (cause we understand that oppression is fundamentally an evil thing unlike terfs and Karens) making the entire terf movement a capitalist movement filled with capitalists that reinforce the patriarchal norms and dehumanize women by defining womanhood as “a womb” (real feminists are rolling in their graves at that one)
No, there absolutely are not conservatives backing any radfem causes. The problem is that you think terf and radfem means any woman who just hates trans people and that is not what radical feminism is. The far-right actually does hate trans people and it’s because they think any form of gender non-conformity is destroying society. It’s illogical and in no way do they represent feminism even if claim that they do. Right-wingers are not radfems are their goals are fundamentally opposed to radical feminist beliefs. They are forced birthers, pro-child marriage, homophobic, pro-war, and many other things that do not align with radical feminism and never have.
It’s a shame that trans activists don’t have the money to help abuse victims and I wish we didn’t live in a capitalist hellhole that requires crowdfunding for things that shouldn’t cost money, but in no way does that make OP’s point invalid when she correctly stated that plastic surgeons and pharmaceutical companies are making bank off of your movement.
There also absolutely are socialist and communist radfems. Idk who told you that we don’t exist. It is nearly impossible to defend capitalism as a radfem considering the fact that it’s turned women into products to be consumed and puts women in positions where they are forced to rely on their abusers.
You have been made to believe that we are evil alt-righters who would ally with people like Matt Walsh, Donald Trump and Ron DeSantis to round up LGBT people and put them in camps. Anyone who supports that and anyone who spreads “all gays and gender non-conforming people are groomers” propaganda is not a radical feminist and if they claim to be one then they clearly haven’t ever read any radical feminist theory (or anything about radical feminism in general). Hope that clears things up a bit.
what he says: "there's a male loneliness epidemic"
what I hear: "there's a 'increasing numbers of women and girls setting boundaries and making it harder for me to find a victim companion' epidemic"