The stupid cookie law is dead at last (via The stupid cookie law is dead at last | Silktide blog)
No title available

Product Placement

Kaledo Art
we're not kids anymore.

tannertan36
Today's Document
NASA

roma★
Three Goblin Art
Sweet Seals For You, Always

#extradirty
Stranger Things
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ

★
KIROKAZE
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
No title available

pixel skylines
todays bird
TVSTRANGERTHINGS

seen from Türkiye
seen from Malaysia
seen from Venezuela
seen from Brazil
seen from Bulgaria
seen from Brazil
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Ireland
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Slovakia
seen from South Korea
@member-comms
The stupid cookie law is dead at last (via The stupid cookie law is dead at last | Silktide blog)
Vi Hart's Guide to Comments (by Vihart)
Not entirely sure that all the associations and membership organisations out there have received this memo yet:
But instead of saying, we need to hire a professional class of librarians to organize these photos once they're uploaded, Flickr simply turned over to the users the ability to characterize the photos. So, I was able to go in and draw down photos that had been tagged "Mermaid Parade." There were 3,100 photos taken by 118 photographers, all aggregated and then put under this nice, neat name, shown in reverse chronological order. And I was then able to go and retrieve them to give you that little slideshow.
Now, what hard problem is being solved here? And it's -- in the most schematic possible view, it's a coordination problem, right? There are a large number of people on the Internet, a very small fraction of them have photos of the Mermaid Parade. How do we get those people together to contribute that work? The classic answer is to form an institution, right? To draw those people into some prearranged structure that has explicit goals. And I want to call your attention to some of the side effects of going the institutional route.
First of all, when you form an institution, you take on a management problem, right? No good just hiring employees, you also have to hire other employees to manage those employees and to enforce the goals of the institution and so forth.
Secondly, you have to bring structure into place. Right? You have to have economic structure. You have to have legal structure. You have to have physical structure. And that creates additional costs.
Third, forming an institution is inherently exclusionary. You notice we haven't got everybody who has a photo. You can't hire everyone in a company, right? You can't recruit everyone into a governmental organization. You have to exclude some people.
And fourth, as a result of that exclusion, you end up with a professional class. Look at the change here. We've gone from people with photos to photographers. Right? We've created a professional class of photographers whose goal is to go out and photograph the Mermaid Parade, or whatever else they're sent out to photograph. When you build cooperation into the infrastructure, which is the Flickr answer, you can leave the people where they are and you take the problem to the individuals, rather than moving the individuals to the problem.
(via Clay Shirky: Institutions vs. collaboration | Video on TED.com)
(via Social Media Implications for Gen X and Gen Y Marketing [Research] | Heidi Cohen) Hmmm, not sure I buy this at all. 40% of people are interacting with brands 'all the time'? Harumph.
How To Win At Pooh Sticks
Yesterday I gave a talk at the Content Marketing Show called “How To Win At Pooh Sticks”.* If you don’t like the rather sterile word “content” as applied to “things on the internet”, there is a lot of it in this post. Sorry about that.
Kelvin Newman, who put the show together, got in touch with me after reading this Pitchfork essay about “the stream” – the stream, that is, of stuff coming at social media users, into which brands and marketers hurl their content like, yes, pooh sticks.
Hopefully I’ll get the nod to put the slides up online, but here is the main line of argument.
Read More
Editorial briefs - a content trend you haven't heard of?
> Editorial briefs are just as important as creative briefs. Editorial briefs are gaining in use and popularity, both in content marketing and social media marketing. Sure, it's important for everyone to understand what the goals, tent poles, and KPIs there are, but it's equally important for everyone to be on the same page when it comes to the editorial strategy across platforms - the idea, voice, cadence, and themes - so that the authors have enough information to go back and create content that will resonate with their audience while serving the needs of the program/site/brand's goals.
Forming bonds around the publishing service
An interesting thought - the nature of our campfires are changing and anybody can start a 'publication' these days (whether it's any good or not is another matter entirely): > Professional societies began their publishing ventures as a means for members to share their work with other like-minded individuals. Typically, members of a society paid a fee or dues, and among the benefits of membership was free or discounted access to the society’s publication. Non-members, including institutions, paid a subscription fee for the journal, which ultimately gave rise to the situation we have today, where academic libraries’ subscriptions vastly outstrip membership dues as a source of revenue for societies. When journals became digital and libraries granted remote access to authorized users, many society members stopped paying their membership dues because the journal was now available to them at no cost to them. While societies provide other benefits to members (discounted conference fees, policy work with government officials, public education), many societies today are facing a difficult problem of coming up with benefits that their members are willing to pay for. > That’s the old face of the professional society — assemble a group of like-minded individuals and then develop a publishing program to cement their affiliation. The new face of the professional society may work in the opposite direction, beginning with publication and then forming bonds around the publishing service.
The research on international CR reports from Leeds University is both interesting and quite shocking! The findings certainly do nothing to promote CSR to sceptics within the business environment.
The report reinforces CAF’s belief that corporate responsibility(CR) reports...
>WTOP reporter Neal Augenstein is donating this iPhone and a custom microphone stand he designed to hold it at press conferences. (via WTOP ‘mojo’ pioneer donates iPhone to the Newseum | Poynter.)
You should work more like GitHub?
>The processes and basic rules for communication on github.com projects are roughly the same as those of an open source project. Mainly, that development and operations follows these constraints where sensible: >Electronic: Discussion, planning, and operations process should use a high fidelity form of electronic communication like email, github.com, or chat with transcripts wherever possible. Avoid meatspace discussion and meetings. >Asynchronous: Almost no part of the product development process requires that one person interrupt another's immediate attention or that people be in the same place at the same time<. >Lock free: Avoid synchronization / lock points when designing process. . . approval/rejection to the review stage or automate it, but surface work early to get feedback. The general point here is to make your workflows more like an Open Source project. Not sure the average person would agree if they delved into the issue queues of some of the bigger examples of this... However, you could argue that the general hurly-burly of the issue queues and the snark-and-bile of the comment threads are at least _visible_. Maybe work really is like that - messy and fractious? And any organisation that attempts to 'manage' this is kidding itself.
A 2012 UK government report estimated that, “moving services from offline to digital channels will save between £1.7 and £1.8 billion a year.” However, it went on to state that, “The vast majority (82%) of the UK population is online but most people rarely use online government services.” Why is that? Because for years we have been focusing tactically on technology and content. We need genuine management engagement. Real strategy that is focused on the customer. With the Web, we are sitting on a goldmine but we are managing it like a coalmine.
Management practice lags behind technology innovation | Gerry McGovern
One piece of data makes a dinner party anecdote. Two data sources combined can make a story.
“Data Other data People = Readable story” - Himanshu Ojha at Hacks/Hackers London
More than two-thirds of authorities claim to use social media for both one-way and two-way communications while a quarter admit to using it for just one-way communication. Worryingly, just 9% of councils said they used social media solely for two-way communications – room for improvement if we truly want to engage with our residents rather than simply inform.
An opportunity or a threat? How local government uses social media today | Local Government Network | Guardian Professional
>Potholes make for good content. No.Really! Click through for an interesting story and a brilliant piece of #contentstrategy creativity. (via Potholes make for good content. No.Really! | andydickinson.net)
A surprising fact about who owns (and uses) the most tablet devices?
Growth in tablets is outstripping our ability to measure it
Christmas has come up with the goods for the UK tablet market, with Christmas sales bumping up total tablet ownership to 12.2 million adults. That's almost 30 percent of the UK’s adult online population, and almost one in five of every man woman and child in the country. It was only in September that YouGov estimated there were fewer than 6 million tablet owners in the UK - so growth is outstripping the pollsters' ability to measure it.
>Most strikingly, the name of the company itself was dropped from the home page, replaced by a single stylized F. In other words, Graph Search was important enough to bump the word Facebook from Facebook. “When I first joined the team, I was a little skeptical: Is search really going to be the quintessential part of Facebook in the future?” says Keith Peiris, a product manager on the search team. “But we quickly realized that this was inevitable and would make Facebook stronger.” (via Facebook's Bold, Compelling and Scary Engine of Discovery: The Inside Story of Graph Search | Wired Business | Wired.com)