Sadly Luigi is just another case of a white rich boy who went cuckoo. He was too strict on himself…..didn’t even give his life another chance😪😪😪😪 only 26 yrs old….he should’ve been at the club !!!!!
yes 💔💔
Jules of Nature
$LAYYYTER
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
styofa doing anything
Mike Driver
Not today Justin
RMH
Today's Document
i don't do bad sauce passes
wallacepolsom
will byers stan first human second
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
trying on a metaphor
AnasAbdin
Keni

Product Placement

shark vs the universe
Peter Solarz
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from Greece
seen from Saudi Arabia

seen from Ukraine

seen from France
seen from United States
seen from Netherlands

seen from Netherlands

seen from United States

seen from Greece

seen from Malaysia
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Türkiye
seen from Türkiye
seen from Brazil
@mesyeuxsouvertes
Sadly Luigi is just another case of a white rich boy who went cuckoo. He was too strict on himself…..didn’t even give his life another chance😪😪😪😪 only 26 yrs old….he should’ve been at the club !!!!!
yes 💔💔
I still wish he didnt ruin his own life. Am I the only one who thinks i’ll be crying during thr verdict? Sorry parasocial but it’s so sad ..
it’ll be incredibly sad to witness the verdict. i know everyone has said this but, he really is an intelligent person who had so much potential and a bright future ahead. i wish things could’ve gone differently for him, maybe in another life :(( i get what he wanted to do with what he did allegedly but i also think there were better ways to go at idk. it’s clear that he didn’t think the same. i hope one day we can hear from him because i believe he has so much that he wants to say but he can’t just yet.
can you tap into one of his happier memories like maybe his sister's wedding and how he felt back then? he looked so happy for her :')
Something about breathing well, i think he misses clean air, air circulation. I always envision water too when i’m given a good message. I want to say 2019-2022 he was a bit clearer mentally. Surfbreak days are weird. Not necessarily bad but everytime i try to read from that era it feels he was becoming a bit restless with himself. Also the words “bound” and “strain” come in, i think hawaii has this push and pull between holding a lot beautiful memories and the trauma from being injured.
Just like his gilman/college days held memories of pressure & being held to a high standard yet he was very social and actively enjoying his life regardless. He never hid out, he was always yin & yang.
Reading her posts, it seems she loved him and wanted to try again, but he had already made up his mind. Luigi returned to the United States to spend Christmas with his family, and when he came back to Hawaii, he did so without warning, leaving Kaitlyn's things by a door and leaving. He had planned it for a while; perhaps she insisted too much on continuing the relationship, and he didn't know how to end it.
he also loved her, but he already planned his life not to include any of his loved ones, including any girl. asia was his last stop to ease his mind then ended with zen on japan mountains before he shoot brian. the fact that he packed her items into boxes and still managed to leave it on her doorstep shows effort and care. this also meant he left it on a whim without her knowing or left her with no choice so she could've change his mind. her items still at his place says a lot. he could've just trashed it somewhere or asked rj or some landlord to pass it to her, but he still organized her items into boxes. food for thought.
Food for thought, ya'll.
He's really fragile if all it took was loneliness and a job he didn't like and feeling lost to end up having a mental breakdown and snap..
There's definitely more than that. Some people don't understand it, i always imagine it like being cornered and no where to go but one way and you don't want to go that way but it's pulls you that way... if that makes sense.
That’s sad, but I don’t think there’s any need to make everything sound so dramatic or catastrophic
Killing a man in cold blood and becoming famous for it when u came from a good family and good education with privileges is dramatic and catastrophic at 26 years old
The situation is obviously tragic — that should go without saying. A person died. And Luigi was clearly someone with a great potential and a very promising future ahead of him.
But at the end of the day, none of us actually know him. He’s not our friend or a member of our family. There are people who “waste their potential” and throw away their lives every single day.
Saying that he’ll “never see the light of day again” feels like leaning into a dramatic and sensationalized narrative. I don’t think that helps anyone, especially considering that there hasn’t even been a trial yet and none of us know how things will unfold.
And again, it’s obvious that Luigi will live with the consequences of the alleged act for the rest of his life. But we have no idea how he is personally experiencing any of this.
He’s still alive, and it’s entirely possible that he could have a meaningful and fulfilling life.
I wonder how Luigi would be as a boyfriend/partner. I know I have this idealized version of how he'd be that's probably far from reality.
Well, first of all, I think it’s only fair to say that none of us can know the answer — and we never will.
That said, just for fun, I can share my own impressions and speculations.
I think he could be a very normal partner, the kind of person you choose when you’re looking for a stable, peaceful relationship. Someone with whom there isn’t a lot of unnecessary drama, but rather trust, mutual care, and consideration.
I don’t see him as a bad boy, the jealous or overly protective type that I’ve seen some people describe. In fact, he strikes me as someone who could be quite shy and respectful, especially at the beginning.
That’s the impression I get based on the quotes he’s liked. Overall, I imagine a mature, adult relationship.
As for what his ex said on Reddit: it’s true that it was only one side of the story. It’s possible she still idealized him to some extent, considering the relationship had ended recently, so her account shouldn’t be treated as completely objective. At the same time, I think it’s actually quite common for people — especially shortly after a breakup and particularly when they’ve been the one who was left — to speak negatively about their ex. In this case, she seemed to have nothing but kind things to say about him. So while her perspective should certainly be taken with a grain of salt, I think there’s a good chance that he really could be a good partner.
Of course, everyone has strengths and flaws, and he’s no exception. There may be aspects of his personality that could make him difficult to be with at times — for example, he seems very stubborn and appears to like having things always under control. On top of that, relationships are challenging by nature, even when you’re with the most perfect person in the world (which, of course, doesn’t exist)
Again, these are just speculations in response to a fairly lighthearted question.
That’s what came to mind for me right now. If any of you have different thoughts or other ideas, feel free to share them — I’d love to hear what you think!
Why would we stop loving someone? Or is it simply that the initial excitement faded and now we have to work on the relationship? Questions that have nothing to do with him, sorry.
Don’t worry, questions that aren’t related to Luigi are absolutely welcome too! And this is a beautiful question!
I think the answer is partly psychological and partly philosophical.
At the beginning of a relationship, things are usually much easier because of infatuation. We tend to idealize our partner, seeing them as the most wonderful person in the world, almost without flaws. There’s often a great deal of passion, a lot of sex, and a genuine feeling that life is exciting and full of possibilities.
Over time, however, that initial “honeymoon phase” naturally begins to fade. That’s not a bad thing — it’s actually healthy and expected. As it does, we start to notice our partner’s imperfections. The first disagreements arise. We begin to see them as a real human being rather than an idealized image.
Many relationships end at this stage. Sometimes people realize they were carried away by infatuation and overlooked important differences in values, life goals, or worldviews. In other cases, some individuals are deeply attached to the feeling of being “in love” — to the excitement, intensity, and fireworks of the early stages —but struggle when the relationship settles into something calmer and more stable. There can be many different reasons!
Personally, I think this is where genuine love begins to reveal itself: when two people, having moved beyond the “honeymoon phase”, continue choosing each other day after day despite routine, imperfections, and the ordinary challenges of life.
Of course, it’s also important to be rational enough to ask whether the relationship is truly compatible in the long term. As I mentioned before, shared values, goals, and ways of seeing the world matter enormously.
One of my professors used to say that the secret to staying together for a lifetime is never fully knowing the other person. The idea was that healthy relationships leave room for discovery — that year after year, you continue uncovering new aspects of your partner and remain pleasantly surprised by the small things you didn’t know before.
What was your impression seeing him for the first time?
I think I responded to something similar before. He is very striking, his features at least. His vibe was very sad/melancholy. He put up an excellent front, though. I felt bad, like he was an animal in a zoo and I agreed without consent to be a weirdo spectator just because I wanted to go and show support and see how things were in person. No Carmella but I also tried to avoid eye contact for that reason…. not that he really even looked at supporters though.
so did anyone ever bring up the hookup in taxi story again?
it comes from one of those books written by those grifters that meet him back in Asia. He lost his phone and a taxi driver (woman) helped him and he found it, apparently she was really nice and some people were saying she only helped him because she thought he was hot and then that they probably hooked up in the back of the taxi lmao
oh that story lol. i doubt they hooked up tho that’s funny.
Subconsciously, he wants someone to save him
It’s possible!
The challenge is that, if something is unconscious, even the person themselves may not be aware of it. That makes it very difficult to determine from the outside.
But it’s true that when someone is suffering, (whether they realize it or not) they’re just looking for something to hold on to.
constantly telling someone in a vulnerable situation that they’re a hero can have significant psychological consequences. To me, that’s actually one interesting aspects of this case, and it probably deserves a separate post of its own.
I was also very interested on how this has effected him and his ego... Especially, as you say how in prison, information is filtered, mediated through other people, limited or skewed. Can you go into detail about this topic?
Disclaimer: the discussion that follows assumes the possibility that Luigi is guilty
This is a complex and somewhat technical topic, and I’ll do my best to explain it as clearly as possible.
Premise: when a person kills another human being — regardless of who that person is or how morally reprehensible they may be — it profoundly alters their relationship with themselves, with other people, and with their own moral framework. This means that if Luigi is guilty, he will never be the same person he was before 2024.
When the entire world tells someone, “You’re a hero,” several psychological dynamics can emerge:
1. Identity:
Luigi risks no longer being recognized by others — and, more importantly, by himself — as a multifaceted human being. Instead, he risks being reduced solely to the act he allegedly committed.
This is particularly dangerous because the psychological work he would eventually need to do is the exact opposite: understanding that he is a person, and that the act is only one part of his story. He would need to integrate aspects of himself that often feel impossible to reconcile (I realize that sounds paradoxical).
Otherwise, there is a risk that he could spend the rest of his life identifying himself exclusively as “the man who killed someone,” or, conversely, completely dissociate himself from the act and view it as something unrelated to who he is.
2. Ambivalence:
Even if someone were to kill Hitler, it would still be normal to experience conflicting emotions: relief, guilt, anger, pride, disgust, and many others.
But if the world keeps telling you, “You did the right thing,” it becomes much harder to acknowledge the negative emotions that may also be present, because the message you receive is that you are not supposed to feel them.
One of the most helpful things for a person in that position would be understanding that it is entirely acceptable to experience mixed and contradictory feelings about what happened.
3. Guilt:
It is important that guilt remains possible, because guilt reflects the continued recognition of the other person’s humanity.
I discussed this in one of my earliest posts: in order to kill someone, a certain degree of dehumanization is often necessary. It is a psychological state that allows the act to become possible, even if only temporarily. Over time, however, it becomes important to reconnect with the reality that, regardless of how objectionable that person may have been, they were still a human being.
If the world constantly tells you that you were unquestionably right and should never question yourself, you may stop allowing yourself to feel guilt. The problem is that guilt cannot be avoided indefinitely. When it is chronically suppressed, it often resurfaces in other forms: nightmares, depression, intrusive thoughts, and so on.
4. Narcissistic risk:
This is a somewhat delicate point.
The risk is that Luigi could begin to believe that his value— and his importance to other people — exists only because of that act, rather than because of his qualities as a person.
Over time, this can create a dependence on the heroic image itself.
5. Grief:
Even if the person was harmful, even if the person were Hitler, a death still represents a loss.
Heroization can make it difficult to recognize realities such as the fact that someone suffered because of BT’s death, or that death is irreversible, etc
Instead, one may become trapped in the belief that “only good came from what I did.”
In this post, I am not interested in debating whether the act was right or wrong, whether it was justified, whether it was worth it, or whether violence is ever necessary. Those are separate issues that we can discuss in other posts.
What interests me here is explaining the potential psychological consequences and, to a very limited extent, understand how to protect Luigi and his mind.
Personally, I think the healthiest approach for supporters is to view the act as “symbolic” , as a starting point for a broader social change. BUT that should be separated from Luigi as a person. Not turning him into a martyr. Not idolizing him. And, if one wishes to support him, doing so by treating him as a human being rather than a symbol.
(We should also remember that even the idea that his alleged actions were motivated by a “revolutionary” purpose remains speculation. We do not actually know his intentions unless and until he chooses to express them himself)
Paul is foine I'm sorry lucia
Can you please do reading if September trial is going to get a verdict or hung jury?
Hung Jury: A hung jury is a jury that is unable to reach a verdict by the required voting margin. A hung jury will often lead to a retrial of the case. In some cases, the judge may instruct the jury to continue their deliberation, but this is not a common practice.
Mistrial: A trial rendered invalid through an error in the proceedings.
Why did I get Colombia twice? Definitely a theme with different South American countries with him. Wouldn't be surprised if he travelled more countries than we think in 2024.
The jury will feel like information blends different narratives/ mixing together/overlapping interpretations. Deliberation will take days. Competing interpretations of evidence not everything separating cleanly.
Long processing time. Misunderstanding or mishearing about something? Exhaustion (From Luigi and the jury). This again points to strain in reaching clarity and that could also possibly mean that the story or alibi will feel confusing.
Smoothing iron imagery. Things reaching completion/precision. This strongly leans towards eventual resolution or alignment.
It emphasizes again that there is confusion during the process, especially emotionally or narratively, not necessarily structurally in law. These people won't disagree about what is there, but about what it means in combination
I got something about his father. That he could possibly see his son differently after this trial. That his mother would feel abandoned. No comfort or closure.
At the last state hearing, did you notice anything interesting in his quirks/behaviours? (from the video)
What follows are only my personal impressions. None can know exactly what he was thinking or feeling, so take everything I say with a grain of salt.
That said, he struck me as very serious and somewhat melancholic, but also highly aware of what was happening around him. I got the impression that he knew he was being filmed and, as a result, knew that every movement would be scrutinized and analyzed. Because of that, it seemed as though he was trying to appear as “normal” as possible, which may have come across at times as slightly “mechanical” (an anon actually sent me a question saying that Luigi’s involvement seemed fake— I personally don’t think it was).
I also think being filmed bothers him to some extent. He knows that his image can be used to support all kinds of narratives by the media, so he seemed a little irritated or fed up by the whole thing.
I think he was also understandably somewhat anxious. With the latest hearing, the “first phase” has essentially come to an end. The defense now has all the relevant information and can begin shaping the broader narrative and strategy they intend to bring to trial. So it was a genuinely important day.
I also noticed that he seemed quite restless in his chair. That could have been due to anxiety, discomfort from the handcuffs, or both. One anon pointed out that it could also have been related to his back — which is certainly possible.
If anyone else has impressions or observations, I’d be happy to hear them!
I answered a similar question here (I might have added a few more details), so feel free to take a look:
💬 2 🔁 1 ❤️ 11 · Do you think he's depressed or something like that right now? I'm worried after the last hearing. I’ve seen a lot of spec
I'm surprised no one notices his arrogance in these hearings and his letters. People are so blinded by his good looks.
As for the hearings, personally I found him much more arrogant in December 2024 and February 2025, and then gradually less so as time went on. I’ve also heard people say that he behaves very differently when cameras are present compared to when they aren’t.
It’s difficult to interpret because, in my opinion, during those first hearings he was somewhat intoxicated by the sudden fame and media attention. Everything was brand new for him: hundreds of letters, constant public attention, the adrenaline still probably running high. At the end of 2024 and the beginning of 2025, everyone was talking about him — he had almost become a kind of American media phenomenon.
At the same time, arrogance can absolutely function as a defense mechanism. Some people unconsciously adopt that kind of attitude when placed in extremely stressful situations.
As for the letters, I don’t have a definitive opinion. It could very well just be part of his personality and the way he naturally presents himself. My impression is that, throughout most of his life, he strongly identified with being “the intelligent one,” so that is probably the first trait he tends to put forward when introducing himself to the world, something like “look how smart I’m!”.
I’ll add this: I think he’s very aware of his own intelligence, but he doesn’t strike me as someone who makes other people feel inferior because of it.
Honestly, I wish I could give you a more precise answer on this. I just feel like I would need more information and context. I don’t find it fair to judge based solely on picture and briefly videos. As far as I’m concerned, he could either be genuinely arrogant or simply masking his discomfort that way.
I do agree that many people tend to see him through rose-colored glasses because of his appearance. Nobody in this world is perfect, including him. I’m sure that even before the alleged events, he had many strengths but also many flaws, just like the rest of us. I think it’s important to recalibrate our perspective a little, because idealizing someone is ultimately unhealthy for everyone involved — especially for him.
It’s a really interesting point, anon. If you want, give me some specific examples, and maybe I can analyze the different aspects of them more carefully.
He is gonna have a hard time sitting through trial… as a PT and see him so shifty in his seat with that bad back of his. He loves to appears nonchalant until he doesn't understand what is occurring. He has moments of shifting focus, but his involvement with his team at first feels performative.
This tracks with the account of Germans saying after he drove the car, he has difficulty getting out of the seat or something to this extend!
You're right! I imagine that a surgical procedure like his requires physical therapy and perhaps follow-up medical care.
I hope he's able to access some of that